Volume 40 Issue 1
Jan.  2025
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Yijun Xie, Hua Xia, Zhengfeng Shen, Linlang Tong, Wei Li, Hongyu Pan. Numerical Research on Shape Coefficients of Wind Loads of Industrial Buildings with Overhanging Awnings[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2025, 40(1): 52-57. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS23090801
Citation: Yijun Xie, Hua Xia, Zhengfeng Shen, Linlang Tong, Wei Li, Hongyu Pan. Numerical Research on Shape Coefficients of Wind Loads of Industrial Buildings with Overhanging Awnings[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2025, 40(1): 52-57. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS23090801

Numerical Research on Shape Coefficients of Wind Loads of Industrial Buildings with Overhanging Awnings

doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS23090801
  • Received Date: 2023-09-08
  • Long-span light-gauge steel industrial buildings are typical wind-induced sensitive structures, which are prone to wind-induced disasters. The wind load is closely related to the shape of the building. Due to functional requirements,long cantilevered awnings are usually set in industrial buildings. There is no corresponding shape coefficients of wind loads of the cantilevered awning structure on both sides in the current code Load Code for the Design of Building Structures (GB 50009—2012) and Technical Code for Steel Structure of Light-Weight Building with Gabled Frames (GB 51022—2015). Therefore, selecting a reasonable shape coefficient of wind loads becomes the key to wind resistance design. Taking the industrial building with through-length awnings on both sides as the research background, the influence of different overhang lengths and inclination angles of the awnings on the shape coefficients of wind loads at typical positions of the building based on the software Fluent. It was compared with the current code GB 50009—2012 and GB 51022—2015, and provided the wind resistance design suggestions of structure with overhanging awnings. The results indicated that: the length of awning had a significant effect on the upper wall of the awning and the shape coefficient of the awning. The shape coefficient of wind loads on the upper wall of the windward awning changed from positive to negative with the increase of awning length at positive inclination angle, and was positive at negative inclination angle. The shape coefficients of the whole roof and the leeward side were negative, and the length of awning had little effect. The angle of the awning had great influence on the shape coefficient of the awning and the upper wall of the awning on the windward side, but had little influence on the other positions. When the awning angle was positive, the upper wall shape coefficient of the awning was negative and decreased with the increase in the awning angle, and the wind suction of the awning increased with the increase in the awning angle. When the angle of the awning was negative, the shape coefficient of the upper wall of the awning was positive and increased with the increase in the angle, and the wind suction of the awning decreased with the increase in the angle. By comparing with the current codes, GB 50009—2012 and GB 51022—2015, the shape coefficient of the windward awning was -1.37 when the awning length was 8 m and the angle was 0°. The shape coefficient of eaves on the windward side was close to -1.4 in item 16 of table 8.3.1 of Load Code for the Design of Building Structures, but the shape coefficients of wind load at other positions were different. And for other awning lengths and angles corresponding to the structure of the shape coefficients of wind loads were different from the current codes, enough attention should be paid to the design.
  • loading
  • [1]
    Jang S,Lu L,Sadek F, et al.Database-assisted wind load capacity estimates for low-rise steel frames[J].Journal of Structural Engineering,2002,128(12):1594-1603.
    [2]
    Coffman F B,Main A J,Duthinh D, et al.Wind effects on low-rise metal buildings:database-assisted design versus ASCE 7-05 standard estimates[J].Journal of Structural Engineering,2010,136(6):744-748.
    [3]
    Fu J Y, Wu J R, Dong C C, et al.Optimization design of large span portal-rigid steel frame with tapered sections under wind-induced drift constraint[J]. Engineering Structures, 2018, 194:396-405.
    [4]
    方钊.矩形高层钢结构风致疲劳分析中体型系数的讨论[J].钢结构(中英文),2022,37(11):39-45.
    [5]
    王世方,王孟鸿,白泽升.开敞空间网架结构的风场数值模拟[J].建筑结构,2021, 51(增刊2):427-431.
    [6]
    王艳萍,黄友钦,吴玖荣,等.基于多目标等效风荷载的变截面门式刚架抗风优化[J].郑州大学学报(工学版),2014,35(5):59-63.
    [7]
    白娜,陈水福.门式刚架轻钢结构抗风性能研究[J].钢结构, 2015, 30(7):12-14.
    [8]
    夏俞超,陈水福.轻钢结构抗风极限承载力的三维精细分析[J].钢结构, 2017, 32(7):54-59.
    [9]
    周瑞.中美房屋建筑风荷载计算对比分析[J].建筑结构,2023,53(增刊1):258-262.
    [10]
    Richards P, Hoxey R. Appropriate boundary conditions for computational wind engineering models using the k-ε turbulence model[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 1993, 46:145-153.
    [11]
    Blocken B,Carmeliet J,Stathopoulos T. CFD evaluation of wind speed conditions in passages between parallel buildings:effect of wall-function roughness modifications for the atmospheric boundary layer flow[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2007, 95(9):941-962.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (16) PDF downloads(1) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return