Volume 39 Issue 2
Feb.  2024
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Yue Wu, Shiwei Zhang, Junbin Zhao. Research on Mean Wind Load and Wind Response Characteristics of Air-Supported Membrane Structures with Rectangular Plane[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2024, 39(2): 50-57. doi: 10.3724/j.gjgS23051802
Citation: Yue Wu, Shiwei Zhang, Junbin Zhao. Research on Mean Wind Load and Wind Response Characteristics of Air-Supported Membrane Structures with Rectangular Plane[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2024, 39(2): 50-57. doi: 10.3724/j.gjgS23051802

Research on Mean Wind Load and Wind Response Characteristics of Air-Supported Membrane Structures with Rectangular Plane

doi: 10.3724/j.gjgS23051802
  • Received Date: 2023-05-18
    Available Online: 2024-03-29
  • Publish Date: 2024-02-25
  • Inflatable membrane structures are typical wind sensitive structures, and the membrane surface will undergo significant deformation under wind load. Wind resistance is an important factor restricting the development of membrane structures. In order to study the wind load characteristics of inflatable membrane structures with rectangular plane, six different rigid models were designed and manufactured. Three types of landforms, A, B, and C, were simulated using wedges, rough elements, and serrated baffles. The pressure tests of the rigid models with rectangular plane were carried out in the atmospheric boundary layer wind tunnel, and the effects of wind direction, rise-span ratio, length-width ratio and ground roughness on the mean wind pressure distribution were analyzed, and the wind coefficient of the structure was calculated at different wind directions. Based on wind load data obtained from wind tunnel tests, wind vibration response analysis was conducted on a prototype sized inflatable membrane structure with rectangular plane by the finite element software ABAQUS. The membrane surface was modeled using M3D4R elements, and the cable was modeled using T3D2 elements. The mean wind response characteristics of the structure under different wind directions were studied, and the displacement and stress distribution patterns of the membrane surface under wind load were summarized. The locations where the displacement and stress extremes occurred were determined. Finally, a partition scheme for wind load shape coefficient applicable to inflatable membrane structures with rectangular plane was proposed, and suggested values for different partitions were given. The results show that the mean wind pressure coefficient distribution of inflatable membrane structures with rectangular plane is greatly affected by the wind direction and the length-width ratio of the structure, but less affected by the ground roughness. As the length-width ratio decreases, the wind pressure in the upper suction area decreases. As the rise-span ratio increases, the positive wind pressure coefficient in the windward region increases, and the negative wind pressure in the upper suction region decreases. The wind force coefficient of inflatable membrane structures with rectangular plane is the highest at 0° wind attack angle. The inflatable membrane structure with rectangular plane has significant deformation on the windward surface and top at 0° and 45° wind attack angle, while the deformation on the windward surface is significant at 90° wind attack angle and the deformation on the top is relatively small. At 0° and 90° wind attack angle, the stress in the protruding parts connecting the two sides and the middle of the structure is relatively high. At 45° wind attack angle, there are obvious folds and stress concentration at the corner of the windward surface. The maximum displacement and stress are observed at 0° wind attack angle, while the minimum displacement and stress are observed at 90° wind attack angle. It is recommended to use 5 zones for the wind load shape coefficient of inflatable membrane structures with rectangular plane at 0° and 90° wind attack angle, and 7 zones at 45° wind attack angle. The zoning wind load shape coefficient at 0° and 90° wind attack angle is significantly affected by the rise-span ratio, while at 45° wind attack angle it is significantly affected by the length-width ratio.
  • loading
  • [1]
    薛素铎. 充气膜结构设计与施工[M]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 2019.
    [2]
    Newman B G, Ganguli U, Shrivastava S C. Flow over spherical inflated buildings[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 1984, 17(3):305-327.
    [3]
    Kawamura S, Kiuchi T, Mochizuki T. Characteristics of wind pressure acting on spatial large dome[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics,1992, 42(1/2/3):1511-1512.
    [4]
    Toy N, Tahouri B. Pressure distributions on semi-cylindrical structures of different geometrical cross-sections[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 1988, 29(1/2/3):263- 272.
    [5]
    Turkkan N, Srivastava N K. Prediction of wind load distribution for air-supported structures using neural networks[J]. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 1995, 22(3):453-461.
    [6]
    Li Y Q, Tamura Y. Wind loading and its effects on single-layer reticulated cylindrical shells[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2006, 94(12):949-973
    [7]
    Uematsu Y, Tsuruishi R. Wind load evaluation system for the design of roof cladding of spherical domes[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2008, 96(10):2054-2066.
    [8]
    Cheng C M, Fu C L. Characteristic of wind loads on a hemispherical dome in smooth flow and turbulent boundary layer flow[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2010, 98(6):328-344.
    [9]
    Sun Y, Qiu Y, Wu Y. Modeling of wind pressure spectra on spherical domes[J]. International Journal of Space Structures, 2013, 28(2):87-99.
    [10]
    Qiu Y, Sun Y, Wu Y, et al. Modeling the mean wind loads on cylindrical roofs with consideration of the Reynolds number effect in uniform flow with low turbulence[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2014, 129:11-21.
    [11]
    Natalini B,Natalini M B. Wind loads on buildings with vaulted roofs and side wallsA review[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2017, 161:9-16.
    [12]
    Centro de Investigación de los Reglamentos Nacionales de Seguridad para las Obras Civiles. Reglamento Argentino de acción del viento sobre las construcciones:CIRSOC 102[S]. Buenos Aires:Centro de Investigación de los Reglamentos Nacionales de Seguridad para las Obras Civiles, 2005.
    [13]
    于艳, 罗晓群, 张其林, 等. 大跨度膜结构表面平均风压的数值模拟[J]. 建筑结构, 2018, 48(增刊2):1007-1011.
    [14]
    冉无忌, 姜国义, 王峰. 应用LK k-ε模型的气承式充气膜结构风荷载和风环境研究[J]. 建筑结构, 2018, 48(增刊2):1012-1017.
    [15]
    张虎跃, 王秀丽. 流线型单脊膜结构表面风压特性数值模拟分析[J]. 工业建筑, 2021, 51(7):90-97.
    [16]
    申跃奎, 赵德顺, 王秦. 考虑流固耦合作用的充气膜结构风压分布研究[J]. 计算力学学报, 2017, 34(5):665-671.
    [17]
    Nayer G D, Apostolatos A, Wood J N, et al. Numerical studies on the instantaneous fluid-structure interaction of an air-inflated flexible membrane in turbulent flow[J]. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 2018, 82:577-609.
    [18]
    中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 建筑结构荷载规范:GB 50009-2012[S]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 2012.
    [19]
    中国工程建设标准化协会. 膜结构技术规程:CECS 158:2015[S]. 北京:中国计划出版社, 2015.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (72) PDF downloads(5) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return