Volume 41 Issue 10
Oct.  2026
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Huang Zhenfeng, Cheng Qiuyu, Zhang Sumei, Gong Chao, Hou Zhaoxin, Huang Zhixing. Design and Structural Behavior of Nested Long-Span Double Beam-String Steel Bracing System[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2026, 41(10): 95-106. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS26081145
Citation: Huang Zhenfeng, Cheng Qiuyu, Zhang Sumei, Gong Chao, Hou Zhaoxin, Huang Zhixing. Design and Structural Behavior of Nested Long-Span Double Beam-String Steel Bracing System[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2026, 41(10): 95-106. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS26081145

Design and Structural Behavior of Nested Long-Span Double Beam-String Steel Bracing System

doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS26081145
  • Received Date: 2026-08-11
  • To address the increased in-plane depth of excavation-side bracing, restricted working space along the pit perimeter, and limited interchangeability of structural members resulting from increased bracing spans in large-scale foundation pits, a long-span nested double beam-string steel bracing system is proposed. The bracing system consists of inner and outer beam-string units, with the crown beam or waler serving as their common upper-chord beam-column member. The beam-string units provide zoned support, with the bracing span adjusted by varying the horizontal tension-rod lengths while keeping the strut lengths and in-plane installation heights unchanged, thereby facilitating modular and standardized member design. Compared with the ZXL36 single beam-string bracing system with the same span of 36 m, the proposed system reduces the maximum in-plane depth from 9.113 m to 8.000 m, a reduction of 12.2%, while reducing the numbers of both struts and active displacement-control devices from five to four. A three-dimensional finite element model of a 40 m-span nested double beam-string steel bracing system was developed to investigate its structural response to prestressing and equivalent earth pressure. The effects of solar radiation and uniform temperature variation on the structural behavior of the bracing system were examined. For the 40 m-span system subjected to a resultant equivalent earth-pressure force of 25000 kN, prestressing established an initial tension-compression state, with the steel tension rods in tension and the struts in compression. Prestressing also produced an active in-plane pre-deformation of 63.6 mm toward the outside of the foundation pit at the midspan of the common upper-chord member. As the earth pressure was applied, the in-plane displacement increment toward the inside of the foundation pit at the midspan of this member reached 67.1 mm. The outward pre-deformation induced by prestressing offset most of the earth-pressure-induced displacement, resulting in a final inward in-plane displacement of only 3.5 mm. The axial forces in the inclined tension rods, horizontal tension rods, and compression struts of the outer beam-string unit were 14125 kN, 9987 kN, and -11066 kN, respectively, whereas the corresponding values in the inner unit were 7467 kN, 5618 kN, and -4947 kN. The axial-force levels in the outer unit were higher than those in the inner unit. The maximum cross-sectional von Mises stresses of the members ranged from 157 to 409 MPa. The outer inclined tension rod exhibited the highest stress of 409 MPa and was therefore the strength-governing member under this loading condition. Under solar radiation, the absolute axial forces in the main members of the inner and outer beam-string units decreased by 10.2%-10.3% and approximately 25.9%, respectively, relative to those under the equivalent earth-pressure condition at ambient temperature; the maximum cross-sectional Mises stresses of these members decreased by 2.5%-10.1% and 18.5%-27.1%, respectively.Nonuniform heating produced a pronounced stress gradient across the strut sections, while the thermal elongation of the steel tension rods caused a loss of effective prestress. Consequently, the inward in-plane displacement at the midspan of the common upper-chord member increased from 3.5 mm to 76.5 mm, exceeding the allowable limit of 30 mm. In engineering applications, the in-plane displacement of the bracing system and the prestress levels in its members should therefore be monitored, and the prestress should be adjusted promptly based on the monitoring results to satisfy the displacement-control requirements. Following a uniform temperature decrease of 15 ℃, the midspan displacement of the common upper-chord member changed from an inward displacement of 3.5 mm to an outward displacement of 1.8 mm. The absolute axial forces in the main members of the inner and outer beam-string units increased by 1.2%-1.3% and 1.5%-1.6%, respectively, while the maximum cross-sectional Mises stresses increased by 2.1%-3.7%. These results indicated that the uniform temperature decrease had only a limited effect on the internal forces and stresses of the structural members.
  • loading
  • [1]
    Li L,Li Z,Lei L,et al. Case study on response characteristic of surroundings induced by a covered semi-top-down excavation with synchronous construction of the superstructure and substructure[J]. Applied Sciences,2025,15(5):2739.
    [2]
    中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 建筑基坑支护技术规程:JGJ 120—2012[S]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2012.
    [3]
    王涛,闫振环. 边桁架内支撑体系在深基坑工程中的分析[J]. 岩土工程技术,2014,28(2):96-99.
    [4]
    顾宽海,陈梦,陈明阳,等. 南京IC研创园超大型深基坑平面支撑体系布置设计分析[J]. 建筑结构,2022,52(增刊1):2618-2625.
    [5]
    庄诗潮,张建霖,张灿辉,等. 装配式预应力鱼腹式钢支撑系统的刚度研究[J]. 土木工程学报,2021,54(4):18-25.
    [6]
    王震,黄炜,刘建鹏,等. 张弦梁在基坑工程中的应用研究[J]. 广东土木与建筑,2026,33(1):52-56.
    [7]
    郭亮,胡卸文,钱德良,等. 基于位移控制的装配式预应力鱼腹梁深基坑应用研究[J]. 工程地质学报,2016,24(5):1016-1021.
    [8]
    潘平,方章聪. IPS预应力鱼腹梁结构在深基坑支护中的综合应用[J]. 建筑施工,2011,33(4):268-269.
    [9]
    杨钦聪. 超大跨度预应力张弦梁钢支撑结构受力性能研究[D]. 厦门:华侨大学,2023.
    [10]
    刘建鹏. 装配式张弦梁钢支撑基坑支护主动控制原理分析[J]. 工程与建设,2023,37(6):1727-1731.
    [11]
    闵康. 深基坑工程中预应力张弦梁支护技术的应用与力学分析[D]. 南昌:南昌大学,2024.
    [12]
    林雨浓,孙德畅,张朝慧,等. 装配式张弦梁钢支撑结构力学性能分析[J]. 华侨大学学报(自然科学版),2023,44(3):309-318.
    [13]
    郑金伙,严丰佐,方四宝,等. 预应力张弦梁钢支撑系统力学性能分析[J]. 华侨大学学报(自然科学版),2024,45(2):175-185.
    [14]
    杨静,罗庆良. 张弦梁钢桁架支撑在某基坑工程中的应用[J]. 广东土木与建筑,2025,32(4):49-53.
    [15]
    陈春汉. 预应力张弦梁组合钢支撑系统在深基坑中的应用研究[D]. 南昌:东华理工大学,2023.
    [16]
    尹晨波. 装配式张弦梁钢支撑体系在基坑支护中的应用研究[D]. 广州:广州大学,2023.
    [17]
    徐忠根,尹晨波,秦效启. 装配式张弦梁钢支撑体系设计及工程应用[C]// 第二十三届全国现代结构工程学术研讨会论文集. 兰州:2023:214-218.
    [18]
    占文想. 预应力张弦梁-钢桁架内支撑基坑空间整体计算方法研究[D]. 南昌:南昌大学,2025.
    [19]
    曾毅,易阳,卞跃威,等. 明挖隧道基坑张弦梁主动位移控制理论模型及应用[J]. 现代隧道技术,2026,63(3):84-92.
    [20]
    罗川疆. 太阳辐射作用下基坑围护结构非均匀温度效应与力学行为研究[D]. 成都:西南交通大学,2019.
    [21]
    American Society of Heating,Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers. 2021 ASHRAE handbook—fundamentals[M]. SI ed. Peachtree Corners,GA:American Society of Heating,Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers,2021.
    [22]
    吕炜煜,朱文越,苑克娥,等. 内陆地区近地面大气消光系数统计特征及气象要素影响分析[J]. 光子学报,2009,38(9):2376-2380.
    [23]
    Mcquiston F C,Parker J D,Spitler J D,et al. Heating,ventilating,and air conditioning:analysis and design[M]. 7th ed. Hoboken:John Wiley & Sons,2023.
    [24]
    深圳市气象局台. 深圳市气候概况及四季特征[EB/OL].[ 2026-08-03]. https://weather.sz.gov.cn/qixiangfuwu/qihoufuwu/qihouguanceyupinggu/qihougaikuang/mindex.html.
    [25]
    深圳市住房和建设局. 基坑支护技术标准:SJG 05—2020[S]. 深圳:深圳市住房和建设局,2020.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (3) PDF downloads(0) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return