Volume 41 Issue 3
Mar.  2026
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Kui Li. Finite Element Analysis of Casing-Encased Double-Steel-Tube Buckling-Restrained Braces[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2026, 41(3): 29-35. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS24120401
Citation: Kui Li. Finite Element Analysis of Casing-Encased Double-Steel-Tube Buckling-Restrained Braces[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2026, 41(3): 29-35. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS24120401

Finite Element Analysis of Casing-Encased Double-Steel-Tube Buckling-Restrained Braces

doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS24120401
  • Received Date: 2024-12-04
    Available Online: 2026-04-13
  • Publish Date: 2026-02-22
  • Based on thin steel plate shear walls, domestic scholars have proposed a lateral force-resisting structural system composed of buckling-restrained braces at the four corners and a central shear steel plate. This system can concentrate the structure’s inelastic deformation within the central energy-dissipating element area, facilitating replacement and reducing post-earthquake repair costs. However, under horizontal loads, the shear steel plates in this system experience significant out-of-plane displacement, which hinders their capacity to fully and stably dissipate seismic energy. To address this issue, improvements have been made to the aforementioned buckling-restrained braces, proposing a casing-encased double-steel-tube buckling-restrained brace. Using the finite element analysis software, seven models of this brace design were subjected to unidirectional and cyclic loading simulations. This study compared the effects of varying parameters, such as inner tube length, outer sleeve length, and the stiffness ratio between the outer sleeve and the inner steel tube, on the numerical simulation results. The results showed that under tensile loading, the outer sleeve and the inner steel tube of the casing-encased double-steel-tube buckling-restrained brace cooperated in bearing the load, while under compressive loading, the outer sleeve separated from the inner steel tube, with only the inner tube providing compressive stiffness. Consequently, the brace’s tensile stiffness and tensile bearing capacity were greater than its compressive stiffness and compressive bearing capacity. This difference became more pronounced with a higher stiffness ratio between the outer sleeve and the inner steel tube. Furthermore, the proposed brace exhibited good ductility and energy dissipation capacity. This casing-encased double-steel-tube buckling-restrained brace can be arranged in a series of composite structural systems similar to cross bracing, which can fully utilize the capacity of the structural system to stably dissipate seismic energy through the lateral displacement of the plane of the self-restrained structure with different tensile and compressive stiffnesses.
  • loading
  • [1]
    苏幼坡,刘英利,王绍杰. 薄钢板剪力墙抗震性能试验研究[J]. 地震工程与工程振动,2002(4):81- 84.
    [2]
    陈国栋,郭彦林. 十字加劲钢板剪力墙的抗剪极限承载力[J]. 建筑结构学报,2004,25(1):71- 78.
    [3]
    黄育琪,郝际平,崔阳阳,等. 低屈服点钢板剪力墙抗震性能研究[J]. 钢结构,2012,27(10):1- 5.
    [4]
    王伟,李志安,高博青,等. 考虑竖向荷载的波形钢板剪力墙力学性能研究[J]. 钢结构(中英文),2019,34(7):1- 6.
    [5]
    陈国栋,郭彦林,范珍,等. 钢板剪力墙低周反复荷载试验研究[J]. 建筑结构学报,2004,25(2):19- 26.
    [6]
    魏德敏,温沛纲,卞宗舒. 新型带缝钢板剪力墙的试验研究及其数值模拟[J]. 地震工程与工程振动,2006(1):129- 133.
    [7]
    王萌,杨维国. 薄钢板剪力墙结构滞回行为研究[J]. 建筑结构学报,2015,36(1):68- 77.
    [8]
    郭兰慧,李然,张素梅. 薄钢板剪力墙简化分析模型[J]. 工程力学,2013,30(增刊1):149- 153.
    [9]
    方东健,窦立军. 可更换屈曲约束支撑的有限元分析[J]. 工程抗震与加固改造,2024,46(1):35- 41.
    [10]
    胡锡勇. 屈曲约束支撑装配式钢结构减震设计[J]. 建筑结构,2021,51(增刊1):844- 848.
    [11]
    石文龙,杨梦霞,吴凯琪,等. 端部不同连接构造的屈曲约束支撑性能试验研究[J]. 结构工程师,2023,39(4):129- 137.
    [12]
    殷占忠,陈伟,陈生林,等. 改进型双钢管约束屈曲支撑试验研究[J]. 建筑结构学报,2014,35(9):90- 97.
    [13]
    宗玉强. 带延性剪切耗能钢板的防屈曲组合支撑抗震性能研究[D]. 兰州:兰州理工大学,2021.
    [14]
    刘军. 配置耗能组合支撑钢框架结构抗震性能研究[D]. 兰州:兰州理工大学,2022.
    [15]
    胡大柱,陶林杰,杨振桥. 基于刚度比设计的屈曲约束支撑-混凝土框架抗震性能研究[J]. 结构工程师,2022,38(6):44- 54.
    [16]
    陈凌秀,祁皑,蔡储旺,等. 考虑节点板刚度的屈曲约束支撑核心段应变的理论及试验研究[J]. 湖南大学学报(自然科学版),2019,46(11):43- 49.
    [17]
    庄茁,张帆,岑松,等. ABAQUS非线性有限元分析与实例[M]. 北京:科学出版社,2005.
    [18]
    石亦平,周玉蓉. ABAQUS有限元分析实例详解[M]. 北京:机械工业出版社,2006.
    [19]
    公茂盛,霍逸文,赵一男. 考虑地震动持时效应的结构拟静力试验加载制度研究[J]. 地震工程与工程振动,2023,43(2):81- 92.
    [20]
    刘盼盼,张海风,贺海洋. 梁腹板削弱型节点滞回性能研究[J]. 结构工程师,2020,36(6):17- 25.
    [21]
    中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 建筑抗震试验规程:JGJ/T 101—2015[S]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2015.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (21) PDF downloads(0) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return