Bin Li, Xiao Liu, Kwok-Fai Chung. Tensile Properties of Q690-QT High Strength Steel Welded Sections with Different Heat Input Energy During Welding[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2024, 39(5): 34-40. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS24050105
Citation: Bin Li, Xiao Liu, Kwok-Fai Chung. Tensile Properties of Q690-QT High Strength Steel Welded Sections with Different Heat Input Energy During Welding[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2024, 39(5): 34-40. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS24050105

Tensile Properties of Q690-QT High Strength Steel Welded Sections with Different Heat Input Energy During Welding

doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS24050105
  • Received Date: 2024-05-01
    Available Online: 2024-06-22
  • Publish Date: 2024-05-22
  • High strength steel with yield strengths at 690 MPa has been widely used in primary structural members of steel structures because of their strength-to-self-weight ratios. Over the past two decades, there were a number of experimental investigations into mechanical properties as well as structural behaviour of high strength Q690-QT steel welded sections. It is evident now that, these welded sections will suffer from a significant reduction in their mechanical properties, i. e. both yield and tensile strengths as well as ductility, due to change in microstructures if welding is not properly controlled. These experimental investigations focus on describing the structural behaviour of welded sections, and the mechanism of the influence of different welding process parameters on the mechanical properties of high-strength steel welded connections has not been studied. Moreover, the improved welding technology that could avoid the strength reduction of welded high-strength steel could not be proposed. These studied are difficult to provide theoretical evidence for the practical engineering of high-strength steel materials in buildings and bridges. Therefore, a series of carefully planned and executed standard tensile tests were carried out to investigate and quantify effects of various line heat input energy onto the mechanical properties of the Q690-QT steel welded sections. A total of 12 standard tensile tests on cylindrical coupons of welded sections, 3 standard tensile tests on cylindrical coupons of base plate, 3 standard tensile tests on cylindrical coupons of welded metal were conducted, and full range deformation characteristics of these coupons were obtained through use of strain gauges and measurements on high resolution digital images. Both welding methods, namely, GMAW and SAW, were employed to prepare full penetration butt-welded section with various line heat input energy (1. 0, 1. 5, 2. 0, 5. 0 kJ/ mm). It should be noted that GMAW was performed with a robotic welding system while SAW was performed with an automated welding machine to attain high quality welding consistently. After comparison the tested data, the design suggestions for controlling the welded Q690-QT high-strength steel material strength in practical engineering will be proposed. The results show that almost all coupons of the welded sections tested in the present study, fracture occurred within the heat affected zones (HAZ) of the welded sections without any failure in neither the weld metal nor the base plates. For welded sections prepared with a line heat input energy equal to 1.0 or 1.5 kJ/ mm, there were almost no reduction in the mechanical properties of the welded sections. However, for these welded sections prepared with a line heat input energy equal to 2.0 kJ/ mm, only 90% of the yield and the tensile strengths of the base plates was attained. As for these welded sections prepared with a line heat input energy equal to 5.0 kJ/ mm, only 70% of the yield strength of the base plates was attained. Compared with the elongation tested data of base plates and welded sections, the ductility reduction of welded sections is more significant with the increase of heat input energy. Consequently, the effects of welding onto mechanical properties of the Q690 - QT steel welded sections have been successfully quantified, and the information is readily adopted in assessing their mechanical behavior according to various line heat input energy employed during welding. In practical engineering, the equal strength connection of high-strength steel materials could be achieved by setting the heat input energy as 1.0 or 1.5 kJ/mm.
  • [1]
    李国强. 高强结构钢连接研究进展[J]. 钢结构(中英文), 2020,35(6):1-40.
    [2]
    Liu X, Chung K F, Ho H C, et al. Mechanical behavior of high strength S690-QT steel welded sections with various heat input energy[J]. Engineering Structures, 2018, 175:245-256.
    [3]
    Chung K F, Ho H C, Hu Y F, et al. Experimental evidence on structural adequacy of high strength S690 steel welded joints with different heat input energy[J/OL]. Engineering Structures, 2020, 204[2020-02-01]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.110051.
    [4]
    冯祥利,王磊,刘杨. Q460 钢焊接接头组织及动态断裂行为的 研究[J]. 金属学报,2016,52(7):787-796.
    [5]
    邢淑清,陆恒昌,麻永林,等. 800 MPa 级高强钢焊接粗晶区再 热循环的组织转变规律[J]. 材料工程,2015,43(7):93-99.
    [6]
    李少峰,马成勇,宋志刚,等. 800 MPa 级高强钢焊接接头组织 及力学性能[J]. 焊接学报, 2020, 41(5):91-96

    ,102.
    [7]
    Azhari F, Heidarpour H, Zhao X L, et al. Mechanical properties of ultra-high strength (Grade 1200) steel tubes under cooling phase of a fire:an experimental investigation[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2015, 93:841-850.
    [8]
    Azhari F, Al-Amin Hossain A, Heidarpour A, et al. Mechanical response of ultra-high strength (Grade 1200) steel under extreme cooling conditions[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2018, 175:790-803.
    [9]
    Amraei M, Skriko T, Björk T, et al. Plastic strain characteristics of butt-welded ultra-high strength steel (UHSS)[J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 2016, 109:227-241.
    [10]
    Lan L, Qiu C, Zhao D, et al. Analysis of microstructural variation and mechanical behaviors in submerged arc welded joint of high strength low carbon bainitic steel[J]. Materials Science and Engineering:A, 2012, 558:592-601.
    [11]
    Jiao H, Zhao X L, Lau A. Hardness and compressive capacity of longitudinally welded very high strength steel tubes[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2015, 114:405-416.
    [12]
    Jiao H, Zhao X L. Tension capacity of Very High Strength (VHS) circular steel tubes after welding[J]. Advances in Structural Engineering, 2004, 7(4):285-296.
    [13]
    班慧勇,施刚,石永久. 960 MPa 高强钢焊接箱形截面残余应 力试验及统一分布模型研究[J]. 土木工程学报,2013,46 (11):63-69.
    [14]
    班慧勇,施刚,石永久. 高强钢焊接构件工字形横截面残余应力试验及统一分布模型研究[J]. 工程力学,2014,31(8):83-91.
    [15]
    班慧勇,施刚,石永久. 高强钢焊接箱形轴压构件整体稳定设 计方法研究[J]. 建筑结构学报,2014, 35(5):57-64.
    [16]
    高磊,王靖文,白林越,等. 焊接残余应力对BS700 槽形对焊箱 形截面构件稳定性的影响研究[J]. 钢结构(中英文),2022,37 (11):24-30.
    [17]
    高磊,白林越,江克斌. BS700 对焊槽钢焊接残余应力分布及 影响因素研究[J]. 钢结构,2017,32(3):47-51

    ,65.
    [18]
    杨帆,王燕,倪延顺,等. 对接焊缝构造形式对Q460 高强钢梁 柱节点断裂性能的影响研究[J]. 钢结构,2018,33 (5):11- 16

    ,97.
    [19]
    European Committee for Standardization. Metallic materials-tensile testing, part 1:method of test at ambient temperature:BS EB ISO 6892-1[S]. Brussels:European Committee for Standardization, 2009.
    [20]
    Ho H C, Liu X, Elghazouli A Y, et al. Hysteretic behavior of high strength S690 steel materials under low cycle high strain tests[J]. Engineering Structures, 2018, 165:222-236.
    [21]
    中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 高强钢结构设计标准:JGJ/T 483-2020[S]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 2020.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]Zhenghao Qian, Weiyong Wang. Research on Mechanical Properties of Circular Tubed Steel-Reinforced Concrete Stub Columns with High-Strength Steel Under Axial Compression[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2025, 40(2): 29-36. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS24091402
    [2]Shuxin Liu, Yongqian Zhang, Yuan Liu, Hongpeng Sun. Status and Prospect of Boiler Steel Structure Technology Development[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2024, 39(11): 56-62. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS24101036
    [3]Hao Jin, Mengfei Zhu, Kwok-Fai Chung, Yanhua Wang, Hailong Liu. Mechanical Properties of Thick Plates After Welding of Q690 High Strength Steel[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2024, 39(5): 17-26. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS24050103
    [4]Mengfei Zhu, Ho-Cheung Ho, Hao Jin, Kwok-Fai Chung. Experimental Investigation into the Axial Compression of Welded Stocky Columns of Q690 and Q960 High Strength Steel[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2024, 39(5): 49-56. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS24050107
    [5]Wei Chen, Kwok-Fai Chung. Fatigue Performance Study on Q690 High Strength Steels and Their Welded Sections[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2024, 39(5): 27-33. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS24050104
    [6]Jianyu Yao, Ruiting Deng, Baofeng Zheng, Ganping Shu. Study on Mechanical Properties of Weld Joints of Stainless Steel and Carbon Steel[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2023, 38(10): 25-31. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS23102401
    [7]WANG Wei-yong, WANG Zi-qi, TAN Xing-kui, PANG Shi-yun, HUANG Dan, HUANG Yong-dong. Load Bearing Capacity and Economic Analysis of Cold-Formed Stiffened High-Strength Steel Beams[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2022, 37(10): 32-42. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS22033101
    [8]Liu Zhiguo, Li Junping, Che Ping, Zhang Haifeng. Discussion on the Detailed Design of the Composite Beam Bridge Structure in China[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2021, 36(11): 28-33. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS20062702
    [10]Le Gao, Tengfei Li, Jiangran Guo, Mingzhou Su, Yan Sui, Peipei Jiao. Remote Collaborative Test on Seismic Behavior of High Strength Steel Composite Eccentrically Braced Frames[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2020, 35(12): 8-15. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS20120501
    [11]Fei Yin, Lu Yang, Gang Shi, Xiaolin Li. OVERVIEW OF RESEARCH PROGRESS FOR SEISMIC BEHAVIOR OF HIGH STRENGTH STEEL STRUCTURES[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2020, 35(3): 1-25. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgSE20010805
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(1)

    1. 赵凯. 飞机高强钢拼焊板高温拉伸试验及高温本构模型研究. 模具技术. 2024(06): 73-79 .

    Other cited types(0)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-040102030
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 16.7 %FULLTEXT: 16.7 %META: 79.2 %META: 79.2 %PDF: 4.2 %PDF: 4.2 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 33.3 %其他: 33.3 %上海: 0.5 %上海: 0.5 %北京: 8.3 %北京: 8.3 %十堰: 0.5 %十堰: 0.5 %南昌: 0.5 %南昌: 0.5 %嘉兴: 0.5 %嘉兴: 0.5 %天津: 2.6 %天津: 2.6 %太原: 0.5 %太原: 0.5 %官坑: 0.5 %官坑: 0.5 %宣城: 1.0 %宣城: 1.0 %常州: 0.5 %常州: 0.5 %常德: 0.5 %常德: 0.5 %广州: 1.6 %广州: 1.6 %廊坊: 1.0 %廊坊: 1.0 %张家口: 14.6 %张家口: 14.6 %扬州: 0.5 %扬州: 0.5 %晋城: 0.5 %晋城: 0.5 %杭州: 1.6 %杭州: 1.6 %武汉: 0.5 %武汉: 0.5 %池州: 0.5 %池州: 0.5 %洛阳: 0.5 %洛阳: 0.5 %济南: 0.5 %济南: 0.5 %漯河: 1.0 %漯河: 1.0 %濮阳: 0.5 %濮阳: 0.5 %福州: 1.0 %福州: 1.0 %芒廷维尤: 19.8 %芒廷维尤: 19.8 %芝加哥: 1.0 %芝加哥: 1.0 %苏州: 1.0 %苏州: 1.0 %西宁: 2.1 %西宁: 2.1 %贵阳: 0.5 %贵阳: 0.5 %运城: 1.0 %运城: 1.0 %长沙: 0.5 %长沙: 0.5 %其他上海北京十堰南昌嘉兴天津太原官坑宣城常州常德广州廊坊张家口扬州晋城杭州武汉池州洛阳济南漯河濮阳福州芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州西宁贵阳运城长沙

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (151) PDF downloads(8) Cited by(1)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return