Volume 39 Issue 12
Dec.  2024
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Ziqin Jiang, Tongkuan Wang, Wenying Zhang, Wei Han, Zuosong Zhuang. Research on Seismic Performance of a Novel Prefabricated Self-Centering Steel Frame-Support Structural System[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2024, 39(12): 29-37. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS24031902
Citation: Ziqin Jiang, Tongkuan Wang, Wenying Zhang, Wei Han, Zuosong Zhuang. Research on Seismic Performance of a Novel Prefabricated Self-Centering Steel Frame-Support Structural System[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2024, 39(12): 29-37. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS24031902

Research on Seismic Performance of a Novel Prefabricated Self-Centering Steel Frame-Support Structural System

doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS24031902
  • Received Date: 2024-03-19
    Available Online: 2025-01-25
  • To investigate the seismic performance of self-centering structural systems and the simplified modeling methods for energy-dissipating components, the paper proposed a novel prefabricated self-centering steel frame-support system based on traditional rigid-frame steel structures. This system incorporates replaceable components, including double-yield-point prefabricated buckling-restrained braces and self-centering prestressed steel frame beam-column joints with dog-bone weakened cover plates, into the traditional rigid-frame structure. A simplified calculation model for the replaceable components was developed by using the finite element software OpenSEES, and its accuracy was verified through a comparison with existing data. Based on the proposed seismic performance-based design objectives, the novel system was designed and its seismic performance was studied through elastic-plastic time-history analysis (NLTHA). The study indicated that the proposed simplified calculation model had high accuracy and could be applied to the elastic-plastic time history analysis of the system. The novel prefabricated system, designed based on the proposed seismic performance indicators, exhibited superior seismic performance compared to traditional systems. The maximum top-floor displacement and maximum inter-story drift of the novel prefabricated system were smaller than those of both the traditional rigid-frame steel structure and the traditional rigid-frame steel bracing structure. Specifically, the maximum top-floor displacements and maximum inter-story drifts in the x-and y-directions were, on average, reduced by 28.35%, 10.13%, and 26.86%, 10.42%, respectively, compared to the traditional rigid-frame steel structure. The double-yield-point prefabricated buckling-restrained braces could control the inter-story drift of the structure, while the inclusion of self-centering prestressed steel frame beam-column joints with dog-bone weakened cover plates could further enhance its energy dissipation capacity.
  • loading
  • [1]
    张爱林,张艳霞. 工业化装配式高层钢结构新体系关键问题研究和展望[J]. 北京建筑大学学报,2016, 32(3): 21-28.
    [2]
    姜子钦,杨晓峰,张爱林,等. 带可更换抗侧耗能装置的装配式钢框架结构静力性能研究[J]. 北京工业大学学报,2021, 47(4): 365-373.
    [3]
    Bruneau M, Chang S E, Eguchi R T, et al. A framework to quantitatively assess and enhance the seismic resilience of communities[J]. Earthquake Spectra,2003,19(4):733-752.
    [4]
    Oh S H, Kim Y J, Ryu H S. Seismic performance of steel structures with slit dampers[J]. Engineering Structures,2009, 31(9): 1997-2008.
    [5]
    周云,钱洪涛,褚洪民,等. 新型防屈曲耗能支撑设计原理与性能研究[J]. 土木工程学报,2009, 42(4): 64-71.
    [6]
    郭彦林,江磊鑫. 型钢组合装配式防屈曲支撑性能及设计方法研究[J]. 建筑结构,2010, 40(1): 30-37.
    [7]
    潘振华,潘鹏,叶列平,等. 自复位钢框架节点有限元模拟及参数分析[J]. 建筑结构学报,2011, 32(3): 35-42.
    [8]
    Rofooei F R, Farhidzadeh A. Investigation on the seismic behavior of steel MRF with shape memory alloy equipped connections[J]. Procedia Engineering,2011, 14: 3325-3330.
    [9]
    周颖,吕西林. 摇摆结构及自复位结构研究综述[J]. 建筑结构学报,2011, 32(9): 1-10.
    [10]
    Sun J B, Pan P, Wang H S. Development and experimental validation of an assembled steel double-stage yield buckling restrained brace[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research,2018, 145: 330-340.
    [11]
    吕西林,武大洋,周颖. 可恢复功能防震结构研究进展[J]. 建筑结构学报,2019, 40(2): 1-15.
    [12]
    Jiang Z Q, Chen M L, Yang Z S, et al. Cyclic loading tests of self-centering prestressed prefabricated steel beam-column joint with weakened FCP[J]. Engineering Structures,2022, 252,113578.
    [13]
    Zhang A L, Wang H W, Jiang Z Q, et al. Numerical simulation analysis of double yield points assembled buckling-restrained brace with replaceable inner core[J]. Structures,2022, 35: 1278-1294.
    [14]
    Hao J P, Wu X H, Tian W F, et al. Experiment and numerical analysis of multi-story coupled steel plate shear wall with weak-axis connections[J]. Journal of Building Engineering,2023, 73,106699.
    [15]
    邱灿星,吴诚静,杜修力. 设置间隙式SMA隔震支座的钢筋混凝土框架结构抗震性能分析[J]. 北京工业大学学报,2022, 48(12): 1226-1237.
    [16]
    张谨,王立军,杨律磊,等. 基于性能的钢结构抗震设计方法探讨及其改进研究[J]. 钢结构(中英文),2023, 38(1): 37-65.
    [17]
    邹俊,邵冰,邢遵胜,等. 一种扁钢管柱-X型支撑钢框架结构的抗震性能研究[J]. 钢结构(中英文),2024,39(6):14-21.
    [18]
    中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 建筑与市政工程抗震通用规范: GB 55002—2021[S]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2021.
    [19]
    许云龙,丁发兴,吕飞,等. 多维地震下钢管混凝土柱-组合梁框架结构体系抗震性能分析[J]. 钢结构(中英文),2023, 38(12): 27-38.
    [20]
    中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 建筑结构荷载规范: GB 50009—2012[S]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2012.
    [21]
    张爱林,刘杰,姜子钦,等. 内嵌双阶段装配式防屈曲支撑的钢框架-支撑结构抗震性能评估[J]. 工业建筑,2023, 53(9): 54-61.
    [22]
    Federal Emergency Management Agency. Recommended seismic design criteria for new steel moment-frame buildings:FEMA 350[S]. Washington, DC:FEMA,2000.
    [23]
    Federal Emergency Management Agency. Prestandard and commentary for seismic rehabilitation of buildings:FEMA 356[S]. Washington, DC: FEMA,2000.
    [24]
    中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 钢结构设计标准: GB 50017—2017[S]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2018.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (40) PDF downloads(4) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return