Volume 39 Issue 12
Dec.  2024
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Jingfu Lu, Leiyu Xu, Chunyu Tian, Jiani Shen. Research on Seismic Performance and Rotational Stiffness of Dry Connections Between Prefabricated RC Columns and Steel Beams[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2024, 39(12): 74-85. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS24011802
Citation: Jingfu Lu, Leiyu Xu, Chunyu Tian, Jiani Shen. Research on Seismic Performance and Rotational Stiffness of Dry Connections Between Prefabricated RC Columns and Steel Beams[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2024, 39(12): 74-85. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS24011802

Research on Seismic Performance and Rotational Stiffness of Dry Connections Between Prefabricated RC Columns and Steel Beams

doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS24011802
  • Received Date: 2024-01-18
    Available Online: 2025-01-25
  • The prefabricated steel-concrete composite structure is a type of prefabricated structure with broad application prospect, there is a kind of semi-rigid joint among the joints of prefabricated concrete columns and steel beams, and the rotational stiffness and seismic performance of the semi-rigid joint are closely related to the structure of the joint. In order to study the seismic performance and rotational stiffness of the dry connection joint between the precast concrete column and the steel beam, a full-scale component with a semi-rigid connection joint beween the precast concrete column and steel beam was designed and subjected to quasi-static loading tests. The yield characteristics of the steel joint module, the joint core area reinforcing steel, and the longitudinal rebars of the precast column were analyzed in the connection joint, as well as the bearing capacity, hysteretic behavior, and failure mechanism of the connection joint’s seismic performance indicators and rotational stiffness. The key components in the connection joint were simulated by using the ABAQUS finite element software, and the concrete damage plastic model was used to simulate the concrete failure process. The uniaxial compression and tension constitutive models of concrete were adopted from the model provided in the Code for Design of Concrete Structures (GB/T 50010—2010), and the constitutive model of steel rebars was adopted from the ABAQUS user-defined material subroutine package PQ-Fiber developed by Tsinghua University, which used the uniaxial elastic-plastic hysteretic constitutive model of steel rebars (USteel02). The key components include the thickness of the side plates of steel joints module, the diameter of the tie rods, the thickness of the stiffeners on the corbels, the thickness of the vertical plate on the corbels, the thickness of the horizontal plate on the corbels, and the diameter of the high-strength bolts for connection. The research showed that the failure modes of the connection joint were beam hinge mechanism failure, concrete crushing of the slab, and yielding of the steel joint module side plates and internal tie rods. The existence of the steel joint module ensured the stiffness and bearing capacity of the beam-column node zone, which could meet the requirements of "strong joints" in seismic design. The displacement angle between adjacent storeys exceeded 2% when the connection joint showed obvious damage, and the bearing capacity had not yet decreased. When the displacement angle exceeded 2.75%, the steel joint module side plates experienced tensile outward bulging at the corresponding location, and the tie rods yielded, but no obvious damage was found in the steel corbels or the welds. The hysteretic curve of the specimen was in the shape of a spindle, the skeleton curve experienced a long strengthening section, and the bearing capacity decreased slowly. The bending moment-angle curve of the beam ends indicated that the joint had the characteristics of a semi-rigid joint, and the positive and negative rotation stiffnesses were not consistent, with the negative rotation stiffness being six times greater than the positive rotation stiffness. The components that had a significant impact on the rotational stiffness of the connected joints were the thickness of the steel module side plates, the diameter of the tension rods, and the thickness of the vertical plate on the corbels. The thickness of the side plates and the diameter of the tension rods had a significant impact on the positive rotational stiffness, while the thickness of the vertical plate and the stiffeners could effectively improve the negative rotational stiffness, but their thickness had little effect on the positive rotational stiffness.
  • loading
  • [1]
    陈幼潘,张超.探索发展我国装配式建筑之路[J].建筑,2021,24:70-71.
    [2]
    芦静夫,樊则森,孙占琦,等.装配式钢-混凝土组合框架结构在学校建筑中的研究与应用[J].施工技术,2020,49(8): 13-18.
    [3]
    中国工程建设标准化协会.高层建筑钢-混凝土混合结构设计规程:CECS 230∶2008[S].北京:中国计划出版社,2008.
    [4]
    高立人.钢梁-混凝土柱组合框架结构在国外的发展[J].建筑结构,2002(5): 34-37.
    [5]
    Shiekh T M, Deierlein G G. Beam-column moment monnection for composite frames[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 1989,115(11):2858-2875.
    [6]
    Iverson J K, Neil H. Performance of precast prestressed concrete building structure during northridge earthquak[J]. PCI Journal, 1994(2): 38-55.
    [7]
    Park S K.Experimental test for the seismic performance of PCS structural system[J].Journal of the Korea Concrete Institute,2007,19(3): 313-322.
    [8]
    Park S K,Kimm K.Initial stiffness of beam column joints of PCS structural systems[J]. Journal of the Korea Concrete Institute,2008,20(3): 271-282.
    [9]
    Khaloo A,Doost R B.Seismic performance of precast RC column to steel beam connections with variable joint configurations[J].Engineering Structures,2018,160(3): 408-418.
    [10]
    杨建江,郝志军.钢梁-钢筋混凝土柱节点在低周反复荷载作用下受力性能的试验研究[J].建筑结构,2001,31(7):35-38

    ,42.
    [11]
    李贤,肖岩,毛炜烽,等.钢筋混凝土柱-钢梁节点的抗震性能研究[J].湖南大学学报(自然科学版),2007,34(2):1-5.
    [12]
    陆铁坚,贺子瑛,余志武,等.钢混凝土组合梁与混凝土柱节点的抗震性能试验研究[J].建筑结构学报,2008,29(1):70-74.
    [13]
    李升才,颜军,王会丽.混凝土柱蜂窝钢梁组合节点拟静力试验研究[J].建筑结构学报,2009,20(2):20-38.
    [14]
    郭子雄,朱奇云,刘阳,等.装配式钢筋混凝土柱-钢梁框架节点抗震性能试验研究[J].建筑结构学报,2012,33(7): 98-105.
    [15]
    刘阳,郭子雄,戴镜洲,等.不同破坏机制的装配式RCS框架节点抗震性能试验研究[J].土木工程学报,2013,46(3): 18-28.
    [16]
    章少华,张锡治,张天鹤,等.预制混凝土管组合柱-钢梁连接节点抗震性能试验研究[J].建筑结构学报,2022,43(7): 143-155.
    [17]
    中华人民共和国建设部.普通混凝土力学性能试验方法标准:GB/T 50081—2002[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2003.
    [18]
    全国钢标准化技术委员会.金属材料拉伸试验第1部分:室温试验方法:GB/T 228.1—2021[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2021.
    [19]
    中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.建筑抗震试验规程:JGJ/T 101—2015[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2015.
    [20]
    方自虎,周海俊﹐赖少颖,等.ABAQUS混凝土损伤参数计算方法[J].建筑结构,2014,44(增刊1):719-721.
    [21]
    中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.混凝土结构设计标准:GB/T 50010—2010[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2024.
    [22]
    陆新征,叶列平,缪志伟.建筑抗震弹塑性分析[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2009.
    [23]
    British Standards Institution. Eurocode 3: design of steel structures part 1-8: design of joints:EN 1993-1-8[S]. London:British Standards Institution,2005.
    [24]
    韩林海. 钢管混凝土结构:理论与实践[M]. 2版. 北京: 科学出版社,2007.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (45) PDF downloads(3) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return