Volume 39 Issue 12
Dec.  2024
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Jinzhi Wu, Yang Li, Mingliang Liu, Guojun Sun, Yijun Hou, Chunjuan Zhou. Seismic Performance and Strong Earthquake Collapse Analysis of Long-Span Space Suspended-Dome Spoke-Type Truss Structures[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2024, 39(12): 61-73. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS23110303
Citation: Jinzhi Wu, Yang Li, Mingliang Liu, Guojun Sun, Yijun Hou, Chunjuan Zhou. Seismic Performance and Strong Earthquake Collapse Analysis of Long-Span Space Suspended-Dome Spoke-Type Truss Structures[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2024, 39(12): 61-73. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS23110303

Seismic Performance and Strong Earthquake Collapse Analysis of Long-Span Space Suspended-Dome Spoke-Type Truss Structures

doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS23110303
  • Received Date: 2023-11-03
    Available Online: 2025-01-25
  • In order to analyze the collapse of long-span space structures subjected to strong earthquakes, SAP 2000 software was used to model and analyze the seismic performance of a gymnasium in Xi’an University. Firstly, the natural vibration characteristics of the structure were analyzed, and the low-order mode and natural vibration period of the structure were understood. Subsequently, the seismic performance of the structure was investigated through the response spectrum analysis of mode decomposition. On this basis, the elastoplastic time-history analysis of the structure was focused on, and the plastic development process of the structure under different peak seismic waves was deeply discussed. According to the maximum deformation of the structure, combined with the number and state of plastic hinge, whether the structure could meet the expected capability target of the structure under the specified seismic load was determined, and the response laws of the structure were summarized. The method of determining whether the structure collapsed was obtained. The results showed that the structure had good seismic performance under the action of 8 degree earthquake and rarey occurred earthquakes. Under the action of three-way input RSN55_SFERN seismic wave, the structure did not collapse when the peak value of seismic wave was 1 000 cm/s2. Under the action of artificial fitted seismic wave of unidirectional rarely occurred earthquakes, when the peak value of Y-direction input seismic wave was 1 400 cm/s2, more than half of the lattice columns completely failed at 7.3 s, and the overall maximum displacement of the structure was 2.2 m, which indicated the collapse of the structure. Under the action of artificial fitting seismic waves of a three-way major earthquake, when the peak value of local seismic waves was 600 cm/s2, almost all the lattice columns of the main library failed at 20.8 s, nearly half of the auxiliary columns failed, and the overall deformation of the main library exceeded 2.72 m. Based on the hinge and deformation conditions, the structure collapse was determined at this time. The plastic hinge distribution of the structure occurred on the lattice column and the chord member of the central main truss. It is necessary to investigate the multi-directional seismic wave action when investigating the seismic and collapse resistance performance of long-span structures.
  • loading
  • [1]
    尚守平, 周福霖. 结构抗震设计[M]. 3版. 北京:高等教育出版社, 2015: 2-4.
    [2]
    聂桂波, 戴君武, 张辰啸, 等. 芦山地震中大跨空间结构主要破坏模式及数值分析[J]. 土木工程学报, 2015, 48(4): 1-6.
    [3]
    薛素铎, 张毅刚, 曹资, 等. 中国空间结构三十年抗震研究的发展和展望[J]. 工业建筑, 2013, 43(6): 105-116.
    [4]
    傅学怡, 黄俊海. 结构抗连续倒塌设计分析方法探讨[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2009, 30(增刊1): 195-199.
    [5]
    陆新征, 廖文杰, 林楷奇,等. 我国工程结构防连续倒塌研究: 回顾与展望[J]. 建筑结构, 2019, 49(19): 102-112

    ,135.
    [6]
    姜健, 吕大刚, 陆新征, 等.建筑结构抗连续性倒塌研究进展与发展趋势[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2022, 43(1): 1-28.
    [7]
    张爱林, 刘学春, 牟俊霖,等. 北京大兴国际机场航站楼大跨度钢结构C1区抗震性能模型试验研究[J]. 钢结构(中英文), 2020, 35(2): 1-12.
    [8]
    丁阳, 郭峰, 李忠献. 地震作用下空间网架结构考虑损伤累积效应的弹塑性分析[J]. 工程力学, 2005, 22(1): 54-58.
    [9]
    支旭东, 范峰, 沈世钊. 材料损伤累积在网壳强震失效研究中的应用[J]. 哈尔滨工业大学学报, 2008. 40(2): 169-173.
    [10]
    朱忠义, 王哲, 束伟农,等. 北京新机场航站楼屋顶钢结构抗连续倒塌分析[J]. 建筑结构, 2017, 47(18): 10-14.
    [11]
    梁姗妮, 王孟鸿, 赵要祥. 筒壳结构的关键杆件加固与结构抗倒塌性能研究[J]. 建筑结构, 2020, 50(增刊1): 880-886.
    [12]
    中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.建筑结构荷载规范:GB 50009—2012[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2012.
    [13]
    中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.建筑抗震设计标准:GB/T 50011—2010[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2024.
    [14]
    Federal Emergency Management Agency(FEMA). Pre-standard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings:FEMA 356[S]. Washington, D.C.: FEMA, 2000: 13-54.
    [15]
    北京筑信达工程咨询有限公司. SAP 2000技术指南及工程应用[M].北京:人民交通出版社, 2018.
    [16]
    中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.建筑抗震试验规程:JGJ/T 101—2015[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2015.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (32) PDF downloads(2) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return