Volume 37 Issue 12
Dec.  2022
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
AN Luming, ZHAO Jian, REN Yanlong, SHI Linze, CHENG Bin. 3D Laser Scanning Technology Research for Erection Line-Shape Monitoring of Long-Span Steel Truss Arch Bridge[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2022, 37(12): 18-23. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS22051001
Citation: AN Luming, ZHAO Jian, REN Yanlong, SHI Linze, CHENG Bin. 3D Laser Scanning Technology Research for Erection Line-Shape Monitoring of Long-Span Steel Truss Arch Bridge[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2022, 37(12): 18-23. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS22051001

3D Laser Scanning Technology Research for Erection Line-Shape Monitoring of Long-Span Steel Truss Arch Bridge

doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS22051001
  • Received Date: 2022-05-10
    Available Online: 2023-04-20
  • The rapid development of bridge construction level leads to the increasing demand for bridge construction volume and construction risk dynamic assessment. Line-shape monitoring is crucial in the erection process of large steel truss arch bridge, which can ensure that bridge line-shapes accurately extend. Guangzhou Mingzhuwan Bridge is a six-span continuous steel truss structure with full cantilever construction method in the erection process. The erection working conditions account for a large proportion when the cantilever length is more than 200 m, and most of the rods are splice with high-strength bolts outside the joints in terms of the freedom of adjustment of the rods is large, so that the erection alignment is difficult to control under the influence of wind, temperature and other natural factors. The 3D laser scanning technology can obtain the coordinate information of massive structure surface through fast scanning, realizing the rapid real-time monitoring of multiple key points in the structure. The research has monitored the erection line-shapes of the main arch and girder of Mingzhuwan Bridge by using 3D laser scanning technology. Three key erection conditions of main arch girder erection, main arch closure and main girder closure were monitored through reasonable arrangement of scanner monitoring positions, and several structural scans were carried out mainly around the cantilever of main girder and around the tower crane. In the monitoring process, the rear intersection method was used to obtain the coordinates of scanner erection position and then calculated the coordinate information of the point cloud of the monitoring target. Moreover, the point cloud processing software Cyclone was used to realize the overall model splicing of the main bridge point cloud through noise elimination and point cloud association, and then multiple linear monitoring indicators were extracted for analysis by combining the point cloud data processing technology. At the same time, the same point coordinates were obtained by the total station for verification. The results show that the average difference of the relative distance between the cantilevers of the main arch and girder is 19 mm for the 3D laser scanning and total station measurement methods, which is within the relative point position measurement error between adjacent points allowed by Technical Specifications for Construction of Highway Bridge and Culverts(JTG/T F50—2011), indicating that the linear monitoring method based on 3D laser scanning can meet the engineering application requirements. The verticality index between the tower crane joints is generally within ±3‰, thus the bottom of the tower crane does not reach the ultimate bending moment without structural failure. However, when the main arch or girder is large cantilever, the upper structure of the tower crane has a large vertical deviation, and it is still necessary to strengthen monitoring during the erection of the main bridge. The monitoring line-shapes of the main arch and girder are basically consistent with the theoretical line-shapes, and the mean values of transverse and elevation deviation indexes are 2.9 mm and 16.6 mm, which are in line with the deviation threshold of the longitudinal axis and height difference of steel arch bridges in JTG/T F50—2011. Moreover, the cantilever rods on both sides of the main arch and girder constantly approach the theoretical value during the erection process, indicating that the erection alignment of the main bridge well control and meeting closure needs.
  • loading
  • [1]
    施洲,纪锋,余万庆,等.大型桥梁施工风险动态评估[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版),2021,49(5):634-642.
    [2]
    刘子阳.刚架拱钢箱连续梁组合桥施工关键技术研究[D].广州:华南理工大学,2020:39-55.
    [3]
    张俊仁.大型桥梁线形控制监测技术应用与研究[J].北京测绘,2021,35(2):172-177.
    [4]
    郭爱平,姜阿娟,张伟山.恩来高速公路忠建河特大桥施工监控[J].桥梁建设,2018,48(6):110-115.
    [5]
    杨培兵,易岳林,房涛,等.望东长江公路大桥关键测量技术[J].世界桥梁,2016,44(4):40-43.
    [6]
    杨国静,陈列,王珣,等.铁路大跨桥梁桥面线形监测预警系统的设计与应用[J].铁道勘察,2017,43(6):13-17.
    [7]
    王锋.一种新的桥梁线形监测系统及其在刚架拱桥中的应用[J].公路工程,2018,43(2):177-181.
    [8]
    梁栋,赵恺,马印怀,等.基于3D激光扫描的钢桥塔节段虚拟装配方法[J].桥梁建设,2021,51(3):62-71.
    [9]
    徐进军,廖骅,韩达光,等.大跨度桥梁桥面线形测量新方法[J].测绘通报,2016(1):91-94.
    [10]
    Kitratporn N,Takeuchi W,Matsumoto K,et al.Structure deformation measurement with terrestrial laser scanner at Pathein Bridge in Myanmar[J].Journal of Disaster Research,2018,13(1):40-49.
    [11]
    交通运输部.公路桥涵施工技术规范:JTG/T F50—2011[S].北京:人民交通出版社,2011.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (228) PDF downloads(15) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return