均匀流场作用下ETFE气枕的流固耦合分析

王晓峰; 张玉清; 杨庆山

doi:10.13206/j.gjgSE20041902

均匀流场作用下ETFE气枕的流固耦合分析

doi: 10.13206/j.gjgSE20041902

1. 北京交通大学土木建筑工程学院, 北京 100044;
2. 重庆大学土木工程学院, 重庆 400044

基金项目:

This research is sponsored by the general project (51778041) from National Natural Science Foundation of China.

详细信息

作者简介:
王晓峰,Email:wangxiaof@bjtu.edu.cn

计量
- 文章访问数: 259
- HTML全文浏览量: 63
- PDF下载量: 12
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2019-08-27

Study on the Fluid-Structure Interaction of ETFE Cushions Under Uniform Flow Field

1. School of Civil Engineering, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China;
2. School of Civil Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China

Funds:

This research is sponsored by the general project (51778041) from National Natural Science Foundation of China.

摘要

摘要: ETFE（Ethylene-Tetra-Fluoro-Ethylene）气枕由于自重轻、造型丰富等优点，广泛应用于土木工程领域的大跨空间钢结构如水立方等以及航空航天领域的空间可展结构。ETFE气枕属于风敏感结构，在风荷载作用下，易产生较大的变形和振动，进而使得周围风场发生变化，引起显著的流固耦合效应。这种耦合效应可以通过结构形状改变、附加质量、气动阻尼和气承刚度的变化来表征。目前相关研究主要对张拉膜结构在均匀流情况下的流固耦合作用进行了研究，尚未发现有关ETFE气枕等充气膜结构方面的研究报道。
以方形ETFE气枕为研究对象，借助商用有限元软件ADINA，通过将CFD（Computational Fluid Dynamics）/CSD（Computational Structure Dynamics）分析结果与FSI（Fluid Structure Interaction）分析结果进行对比，探究其在均匀流场情况下的流固耦合作用的特点以及对动力响应的影响规律。数值计算中忽略能量的耗散，因此没有考虑气动阻尼的影响，通过有势流体考虑气承刚度的影响，着重研究了流固耦合作用中气枕形状改变和附加质量的影响作用。主要研究内容与结论如下：
假定外部流场为均匀层流场，采用8结点层流单元进行离散；ETFE气枕外围薄膜为线弹性材料且其变形满足大转动、小应变条件，采用3D-4结点膜单元进行离散；ETFE气枕的内充气体为小扰动、无旋的理想流体，采用8结点线性势流体单元进行离散。
在CFD模块，通过瞬态分析求得ETFE气枕刚性模型表面的风压分布和风荷载时程，然后将风压时程施加在CSD模块中ETFE气枕的膜面上，借助隐式时间积分进行时程分析，求得在不考虑流固耦合作用时气枕的风致响应。
通过分别在CFD和CSD模块中设置流固耦合界面，并在CFD模块中引入ALE（Arbitary Lagrangian-Euler）网格离散计算域以考虑流固耦合边界的运动问题，对均匀流场中的ETFE气枕进行双向耦合分析，计算其在考虑流固耦合作用情况下的表面风压和风致响应。
通过将CFD/CSD分析结果与FSI分析结果进行对比，研究流固耦合作用对ETFE气枕动力响应的影响规律。结果表明：两种情形下得到的风压分布和数值大致相同，说明在外部均匀流场情况下，气枕形状改变对流场的影响很小；而两种情形下的内压、位移、速度、加速度和应力响应时程结果差异较大，说明在外部均匀流场情况下，附加质量对ETFE气枕动力响应具有显著影响。可见，均匀流场与ETFE气枕的流固耦合作用，在不考虑气动阻尼的情况下，主要体现为附加质量的影响。
- ETFE气枕 /
- 流固耦合作用 /
- 均匀流场 /
- 附加质量 /
- 形状改变
Abstract: ETFE (Ethylene-Tetra-Fluoro-Ethylene) cushions are popularly used in large-span steel structures such as National Swimming Center, etc. Due to flexibility and wind-sensitivity, ETFE cushions under wind often suffer large deformation and vibration, which, however, further changes the surrounding wind field and therefore its action on the enveloping membrane, causing a significant fluid-structure interaction. The fluid-structure interaction can be characterized by the effects of change in the structural shape, added mass, aerodynamic damping and pneumatic stiffness. So far, the literature only focused on the fluid-structure interaction of tensioned membrane structures under uniform flow and the research on inflated membranes such as ETFE cushions still remains untouched. In view of this, this paper aims to numerically explore the fluid-structure interaction of ETFE cushions under uniform flow and its effect on the dynamic responses by comparing the results from the CFD/CSD (computational fluid dynamics/computational structure dynamics) analysis and the FSI (fluid-structure interaction) analysis. Since aerodynamic damping is not included in the analysis and pneumatic stiffness can be considered with the potential flow element in the CSD module of ADINA, attention is only paid in the paper to the influences of the change in the structural shape and added mass. The results indicate that the effect of FSI has a slight effect on the wind pressure but plays a significant role in the dynamic responses of ETFE cushions.
- ETFE cushions /
- fluid-structure interaction /
- uniform flow field /
- added mass /
- change in the structural shape

HTML全文

参考文献(23)

Chu H Y. Analysis of dynamic properties and wind induced response of tensioned flat membranes with wrinkling deformation[D]. Beijing:Beijing Jiaotong University, 2018. (in Chinese)

Mao G D, Sun B N, Lou W J. The added air-mass of membrane structures[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2004, 21(1):153-158. (in Chinese)

Irwin H P A H, Wardlaw R L. A wind tunnel investigation of a retractable fabric roof for the Montreal Olympic Stadium[C]//Proceeding of 5th International Conference on Wind Engineering. Colorado:1979.

Kassem M, Novak M. Wind-induced response of hemispherical air-supported structures[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamic, 1992, 41(3):177-178.

Choi H G, Joseph D D. Fluidization by lift of 300 circular particles in plane Poiseuille flow by direct numerical simulation[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2001, 438:101-128.

Glück M, Breuer M, Durst F, et al. Computation of wind-induced vibrations of flexible shells and membranous structures[J]. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 2003, 17(5):739-765.

Henn M I, Yang Q S, Lu M. Simulation study on the structure of the added air mass layer around a vibrating membrane[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering & Industrial Aerodynamics, 2019,184:289-295.

Li Q X. Study on dynamic analysis and wind-induced aerodynamic instability for membrane structures[D]. Hangzhou:Zhejiang University, 2006. (in Chinese)

Wu Y. Study on wind-induced dynamic response of cable-membrane structures with fluid-structure interaction[D]. Harbin:Harbin Institute of Technology, 2003. (in Chinese)

Yang Q S, Wang J S, Zhu W L. Experimental study on the static interaction between membrane structures and air[J]. Journal of Civil Engineering, 2008, 41(5):19-25. (in Chinese)

Kim J Y, Yu E, Kim D Y, et al. Long-term monitoring of wind-induced response of a large-span roof structure[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2011, 99(9):955-963.

Han Z H, Gu M, Zhou X Y. Aerodynamic parameters of tensioned membrane structure based on aeroelastic wind tunnel test[J]. Journal of Tongji University (Natural Science), 2015, 43(6):830-837. (in Chinese)

Minami H. Added mass of a membrane vibrating at a finite amplitude[J]. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 1998(12):919-932.

Sun X Y. Study on wind-structure interaction in wind-induced vibration of membrane structure[D]. Harbin:Harbin Institute of Technology, 2007. (in Chinese)

Niemi J, Pramila A. FEM-analysis of transverse vibration of an axially moving membrane immersed in ideal fluid[J]. International Journal of Numerical Methods in Engineering, 1987, 24(3):2301-2313.

Sygulski R. Vibrations of pneumatic structures interacting with air[J]. Computers and Structures, 1993, 49(5):867-876.

Kukathasan S, Pellegrino S. Vibration of prestressed membrane structures in air[C]//Proceeding of the 43rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference and Exhibit. Denver:American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc, 2002.

Chen Z Q. Investigation of aeroelastic instability mechanism of tensioned membrane structures[D]. Harbin:Harbin Institute of Technology, 2015. (in Chinese)

Wu Y, Shen S Z. Study on wind induced vibration of membrane cable structure with the consideration of aeroelastic effect[J]. Progress in Steel Building Structures, 2006, 8(2):30-36. (in Chinese)

Wu Y, Yang Q S, Shen S Z. Wind tunnel tests on aeroelastic effect of wind-induced vibration of tension structures[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2008, 25(1):8-15. (in Chinese)

Li Y Q, Wang L, Shen Z Y, et al. Added-mass estimation of flat membranes vibrating in still air[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2011, 99:815-824.

Li P. Research on the mechanical performance and wind-induced response of ETFE cushions considering interaction between the enclosed air and the external membrane[D]. Beijing:Beijing Jiaotong University, 2015. (in Chinese)

Song Y X. The Research on property of air-inflated membrane structure based on the fluid-structure method[D]. Beijing:Beijing Jiaotong University, 2009. (in Chinese)

施引文献

资源附件(0)

访问统计