装配式可恢复功能预应力钢框架研究进展

张艳霞; 陈丰; 张爱林; 吴延辉; 盛一凡

doi:10.13206/j.gjgS26090245

装配式可恢复功能预应力钢框架研究进展

doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS26090245

1. 北京建筑大学土木与交通工程学院, 北京 100044;
2. 北京建筑大学工程结构与新材料北京市高校工程研究中心, 北京 100044;
3. 北京工业大学北京市高层和大跨度预应力钢结构工程技术中心, 北京 100124

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目（52578155）。

详细信息

作者简介:
张艳霞，博士，教授，主要从事装配式、自复位及大跨度钢结构方面的研究。Email：zhangyanxia@bucea.edu.cn

计量
- 文章访问数: 4
- HTML全文浏览量: 1
- PDF下载量: 0
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2026-09-02

Research Progress on Prefabricated Prestressed Steel Frames with Recoverable Functionality

1. School of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Beijing 100044, China;
2. Beijing Higher Institution Engineering Research Center of Structural Engineering and New Materials, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Beijing 100044, China;
3. Beijing Engineering Research Center of High-rise and Large-span Prestressed Steel Structures, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China

摘要

摘要: 针对传统可恢复功能预应力钢框架需高空张拉、施工质量难控及楼盖损伤等技术瓶颈，在梳理国内外研究现状的基础上，系统综述了团队提出的装配式可恢复功能预应力钢框架体系的关键创新及其性能研究成果。该体系采用带腹板摩擦耗能装置的装配式预应力梁柱节点，实现了预应力钢绞线的地面张拉，并通过设置刚柔复合楼盖释放楼板约束。研究团队针对该体系在节点、平面框架、空间框架及楼盖层面开展了系列拟静力、拟动力和振动台试验，结合数值模拟与理论分析，验证了体系的协同工作机制与良好的抗震性能。结果表明：装配式可恢复功能预应力钢框架体系避免了高空张拉预应力钢绞线，提升了张拉施工质量和作业效率，改善了节点的受力性能，可以实现震后功能快速恢复和抵御“大震”或多次余震的目标，其中钢框架减震体系对于整体结构耗散地震能量贡献显著，适合应用于较大跨度的高层可恢复功能钢框架结构中。带刚柔复合楼盖的可恢复功能钢框架体系能够适应结构的“膨胀效应”，同时实现高效耗能减震的目标，新体系实现了“多遇地震节点无开口、无损伤，设防地震和罕遇地震节点开口耗能但主体结构无损伤，超罕遇地震下结构损伤较小且能正常使用”的性能化设计目标，满足“多遇地震、设防地震、罕遇地震后无需修理，超罕遇地震时保护生命与财产安全，超罕遇地震后可修且快修”的设防要求。该体系丰富了新一代抗震韧性钢结构的理论和实践内容。
- 装配式 /
- 可恢复功能 /
- 预应力钢框架 /
- 刚柔复合楼盖 /
- 抗震韧性
Abstract: To address critical limitations of conventional prestressed steel frames with recoverable functionality， such as high-altitude tensioning of prestressing stands， difficulties in construction quality control， and floor-slab damage， this paper systematically reviews the key innovations and research on the performance of a novel prefabricated prestressed steel frame system with recoverable functionality developed by the authors' team. The proposed system features prefabricated beam-column joints incorporating web friction energy-dissipation devices， enables tensioning of prestressing stands at ground level， and mitigates the floor restraint effect through the integration of a rigid-flexible composite floor system. Comprehensive experimental tests， including quasi-static， quasi-dynamic， and shaking-table tests， were conducted at multiple structural levels （joint， planar frame， spatial frame， and floor subsystem）. Combined with numerical simulations and theoretical analyses， these tests confirmed the cooperative working mechanism and good seismic performance of the system. The results show that the prefabricated prestressed steel frame system with recoverable functionality avoids high-altitude tensioning of prestressing stands， improves construction quality and efficiency， as well as joint mechanical properties， and can achieve post-earthquake functional recovery and resist strong earthquakes or multiple aftershocks. In particular， the energy-dissipating steel frame subsystem contributes significantly to the seismic energy dissipation of the overall structure， and the proposed system is applicable to large-span high-rise steel frame structures with recoverable functionality. Furthermore， steel frame structures with recoverable functionality and a rigid-flexible composite floor system can accommodate the “expansion effect” of the structure and achieve a high energy-dissipation capacity. The system meets the following performance-based seismic design objectives： no gap opening and no damage under frequent earthquakes； energy dissipation dominated by gap opening with the main structure undamaged under design-basis and rare earthquakes； and slight damage with maintained serviceability under extremely rare earthquakes. It also satisfies the seismic fortification requirements： repair-free after frequent， design-basis， and rare earthquakes； life safety and property protection under extremely rare earthquakes； and reparability and rapid repair after extremely rare earthquakes. This research advances the theory and engineering practice of next-generation seismic-resilient steel structures.
- prefabricated /
- recoverable function /
- prestressed steel frame /
- rigid-flexible composite floor /
- seismic resilience

HTML全文

参考文献(56)

[1]	Erochko J,Christopoulos C,Tremblay R,et al. Residual drift response of SMRFs and BRB frames in steel buildings designed according to ASCE 7-05[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering,2011,137（5）:589-599.
[2]	Richards P W,Mccall A J,Marshall J D. Functional recovery of steel special moment frames[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering,2023,149（3）:04022261.
[3]	Ricles J M,Sause R,Garlock M M,et al. Posttensioned seismic-resistant connections for steel frames[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering,2001,127（2）:113-121.
[4]	Garlock M M,Ricles J M,Sause R. Experimental studies of full-scale posttensioned steel connections[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering,2005,131（3）:438-448.
[5]	Christopoulos C,Filiatrault A,Uang C M,et al. Posttensioned energy dissipating connections for moment-resisting steel frames[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering,2002,128（9）:1111-1120.
[6]	Rojas P,Ricles J M,Sause R. Seismic performance of post-tensioned steel moment resisting frames with friction devices[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering,2005,131（4）:529-540.
[7]	Kim H J,Christopoulos C. Friction damped post-tensioned self-centering steel moment-resisting frames[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering,2008,134（11）:1768-1779.
[8]	Wolski M,Ricles J M,Sause R. Experimental study of a self-centering beam-column connection with bottom flange friction device[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering,2009,135（5）:479-488.
[9]	Chou C C,Lai Y J. Post-tensioned self-centering moment connections with beam bottom flange energy dissipators[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research,2009,65（10/11）:1931-1941.
[10]	Vasdravellis G,Karavasilis T L,Uy B. Large-scale experimental validation of steel posttensioned connections with web hourglass pins[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering,2012,139（6）:1033-1042.
[11]	Tsai K C,Chou C C,Lin C L,et al. Seismic self‐centering steel beam-to-column moment connections using bolted friction devices[J]. Earthquake Engineering& Structural Dynamics,2008,37（4）:627-645.
[12]	Lin Y C,Sause R,Ricles J M. Seismic performance of steel self-centering,moment-resisting frame:hybrid simulations under design basis earthquake[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering,2013,139（11）:1823-1832.
[13]	Lin Y C,Sause R,Ricles J M. Seismic performance of a large-scale steel self-centering moment resisting frame:MCE hybrid simulations and quasi-static pushover tests[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering,2013,139（7）:1227-1236.
[14]	Deng K,Pan P,Lam A,et al. Test and simulation of full-scale self-centering beam-to-column connection[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration,2013,12（4）:599-607.
[15]	Jiang H J,Bu H,He L. Study of a new type of self-centering beam-column joint in steel frame structures[J]. The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings,2020,29（14）:e1779.
[16]	Qin Y,Shu G P,Wang W. Seismic behavior of self-centering steel connections with friction T-stubs[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research,2020,173:106263.
[17]	Lou T,Wang W,Li J. Post-earthquake fire behaviour of a self-centring connection with buckling-restrained plates and pre-stressed bars:an experimental investigation[J]. Journal of Building Engineering,2022,56:104733.
[18]	Lou T,Wang W,Li J. Seismic behaviour of a self-centring steel connection with replaceable energy-dissipation components[J]. Engineering Structures,2023,274:115204.
[19]	吕西林,陈云,毛苑君. 结构抗震设计的新概念:可恢复功能结构[J]. 同济大学学报（自然科学版）,2011,39（7）:941-948.
[20]	吕西林,武大洋,周颖. 可恢复功能防震结构研究进展[J]. 建筑结构学报,2019,40（2）:1-15.
[21]	邱灿星,杜修力. 自复位结构的研究进展和应用现状[J]. 土木工程学报,2021,54（11）:11-26.
[22]	方有珍,赵凯,陈赟,等. 新型PEC柱钢梁中节点摩擦耗能型部分自复位连接抗震性能研究[J]. 土木工程学报,2016,49（1）:22-30.
[23]	王先铁,谢川东,李进,等. 带耗能钢板的自复位方钢管混凝土框架抗震性能研究[J]. 建筑结构学报,2020,41（9）:1-12.
[24]	王先铁,谢川东,罗遥,等. 带楔形装置的自复位方钢管混凝土柱-钢梁节点抗震性能试验研究[J]. 建筑结构学报,2021,42（9）:52-61.
[25]	潘振华,潘鹏,叶列平,等. 自复位钢框架节点有限元模拟及参数分析[J]. 建筑结构学报,2011,32（3）:35-42.
[26]	王一帆,李启才,方有珍. 承载力比值对摩擦型自复位节点抗震性能的影响[J]. 钢结构,2013,28（12）:26-30.
[27]	Chi H,Liu J. Seismic behavior of post-tensioned column base for steel self-centering moment resisting frame[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research,2012,78:117-130.
[28]	Christopoulos C,Tremblay R,Kim H J,et al. Self-centering energy dissipative bracing system for the seismic resistance of structure:development and validation[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering,2008,134（1）:96-107.
[29]	方成,黄琳婷,王伟,等. 基于混合控制的自复位支撑钢框架抗震性能研究[J]. 建筑结构学报,2020,41（增刊2）:180-191.
[30]	楚功崚,王伟. 基于新型可更换阻尼器的自复位模块钢框架抗震性能研究[J]. 建筑钢结构进展,2021,23（11）:1-8.
[31]	刘璐,吴斌. 自复位防屈曲支撑钢框架减振效果分析[J]. 建筑结构学报,2016,37（4）:93-101.
[32]	应琪,陈云,欧阳素娟. 自复位钢框架结构研究进展Ⅰ:基于预应力拉杆/拉索[J]. 结构工程师,2018,34（5）:170-177.
[33]	Zhang A L,Zhang Y X,Li R,et al. Cyclic behavior of a prefabricated self-centering beam-column connection with a bolted web friction device[J]. Engineering Structures,2016,111:185-198.
[34]	Zhang Y X,Li Q G,Huang Z W,et al. Behavior of prefabricated beam-column connection with short strands in self-centering steel frame[J]. Advanced Steel Construction,2019,15（2）:203-214.
[35]	张艳霞,黄威振,郑明召,等. 考虑楼板效应的装配式自复位钢框架节点弯矩-转角理论研究[J]. 钢结构,2019,34（3）:1-8.
[36]	张艳霞,刘安然,张贺昕,等. 装配式自复位钢框架梁柱节点低周往复试验的数值模拟[J]. 钢结构,2017,32（8）:7-14.
[37]	Zhang A L,Shangguan G H,Zhang Y X,et al. Experimental study of resilient prefabricated steel frame with all-bolted beam-to-column connections[J]. Advanced Steel Construction,2020,16（3）:255-271.
[38]	张爱林,张艳霞,赵微,等. 可恢复功能的装配式预应力钢框架拟动力试验研究[J]. 振动与冲击,2016,35（5）:207-215.
[39]	Zhang Y X,Wang Z Y,Zhao W,et al. A pseudo-dynamic test study on a self-centering prefabricated steel frame with a column base connected by semi-rigid joints[J]. Advanced Steel Construction,2016,12（3）:296-315.
[40]	Zhang A L,Zhang Y X,Liu A R,et al. Performance study of self-centering steel frame with intermediate columns containing friction dampers[J]. Engineering Structures,2019,186:382-398.
[41]	Cheng M Y,Zhang Y X,Li Z X,et al. Experimental study of hysteretic behavior of resilient prefabricated steel frames with and without intermediate columns[J]. Advanced Steel Construction,2022,18（3）:715-727.
[42]	张艳霞,庞占洋,武丙龙,等. 装配式自复位钢框架-开缝钢板剪力墙结构试验研究[J]. 工程力学,2020,37（10）:168-178.
[43]	Zhang Y X,Li Q G,Zhuge Y,et al. Experimental study on spatial prefabricated self-centering steel frame with beam-column connections containing bolted web friction devices[J]. Engineering Structures,2019,195:1-21.
[44]	Garlock M E M,Li J. Steel self-centering moment frames with collector beam floor diaphragms[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research,2008,64（5）:526-538.
[45]	Kim H J,Christopoulos C. Seismic design procedure and seismic response of post-tensioned self-centering steel frames[J]. Earthquake Engineering& Structural Dynamics,2010,38（3）:355-376.
[46]	Chou C C,Chen J H. Seismic design and shake table tests of a steel post‐tensioned self‐centering moment frame with a slab accommodating frame expansion[J]. Earthquake Engineering& Structural Dynamics,2011,40（11）:1241-1261.
[47]	Chou C C,Chen J H. Seismic tests of post-tensioned self-centering building frames with column and slab restraints[J]. Frontiers of Architecture and Civil Engineering in China,2011,5:323-334.
[48]	King A. Design of collector elements for steel self-centering moment resisting frames[D]. West Lafayette:Purdue University,2007.
[49]	Chou C C,Chen J H. Development of floor slab for steel post-tensioned self-centering moment frames[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research,2011,67（10）:1621-1635.
[50]	Darling S C,Eatherton M R,Maurya A. Self-centering beams for seismically resilient moment frames[C]// Structures Congress 2013:Bridging Your Passion with Your Profession. Pittsburgh,Pennsylvania:2013:1701-1712.
[51]	Zhang Y X,Wu B L,Li Y L,et al. One-way shaking table test study of resilient steel frame with seismic isolated floor system[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research,2024,215:108545.
[52]	张艳霞,武丙龙,张爱林,等. 双向地震作用下设置隔震楼盖的可恢复功能钢框架振动台试验研究及结构动力分析[J]. 建筑结构学报,2025,46（1）:30-50.
[53]	Wu B L,Zhang Y X,Zhang A L,et al. RSF-SIFS limit state study and quantitative parametric analysis of miniature rubber bearings[J]. Structures,2025,76:108955.
[54]	Zhang Y X,Wu Y H,Zhang A L,et al. Numerical study of resilient steel frame with SIFS under bi-directional earthquake[J]. Structures,2025,77:109132.
[55]	张艳霞,郑明召,黄威振,等. 自复位钢框架性能化设计方法[C]// 中国钢结构协会结构稳定与疲劳分会第16届（ISSF-2018）学术交流会暨教学研讨会论文集. 青岛:2018:289-297.
[56]	武丙龙. 带隔震楼盖系统的可恢复功能钢框架抗震性能研究[D]. 北京:北京建筑大学,2024.