Volume 36 Issue 10
Jan.  2022
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Bida Pei, Lianhua Wang, Lifeng Li. Fatigue Assessment and Fatigue Test of the Full-Scale Model of Tensile Anchor Plate of Cable-Stayed Bridges[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2021, 36(10): 50-59. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgs20112801
Citation: Bida Pei, Lianhua Wang, Lifeng Li. Fatigue Assessment and Fatigue Test of the Full-Scale Model of Tensile Anchor Plate of Cable-Stayed Bridges[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2021, 36(10): 50-59. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgs20112801

Fatigue Assessment and Fatigue Test of the Full-Scale Model of Tensile Anchor Plate of Cable-Stayed Bridges

doi: 10.13206/j.gjgs20112801
  • Received Date: 2020-11-28
    Available Online: 2022-01-11
  • In order to study the fatigue performance and fatigue assessment method of the key fatigue categories of the gusset plate anchorage device of cable-stayed bridges, with the Wujiang Bridge as the engineering background, according the cable force amplitude under the traffic load of the Midas full bridge model, the last cable anchor plate of mid-span of this bridge was selected as the research object. This paper establishes a three-dimensional finite element analysis model of the gusset plate anchorage device for fatigue assessment. The nominal stress method and the hot spot stress method was used to assessment the key fatigue details of the gusset plate anchorage device with JTG D64-2015, ASSHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications and Eurocode 3. The assessment methods of each code were compared and analyzed. At the same time, the fatigue test of the full-scale model of the gusset plate anchorage device was carried out.
    The theoretical analysis results showed that:the most unfavorable position of tensile anchor plate structure formed by the butt welding of was tensile anchor plate and the side web was the excessive arc of the upper welding seam of the tensile anchor plate and the anchor cylinder(detail A), which required special attention; the key fatigue details of the tensile anchor plate structure met the infinite life design requirements by nominal stress methods with those specifications, and the results were more secure when used Eurocode 3. From the perspective of structural safety, it was recommended to adopt Eurocode 3 to infinite life fatigue design of anchor plates by nominal stress.
    The analysis results of the hot-spot stress method showed that the tensile anchor plate of the Wujiang Bridge met the requirements of the specification. The results of the hot-spot stress method were more objective than the nominal stress method, and its fatigue strength-life(S-N) curve was relatively uniform and was less affected by subjective factors. Therefore, it was recommended to use the hot-spot stress method to evaluate the fatigue of the weld toe of the tensile anchor plate.
    The full-scale fatigue test results showed that the structure was still in the elastic stage after the fatigue loading 2 million times, the stiffness had not been significantly reduced, and no visible cracks were found on the surface of the structure. The fatigue load amplitude increased to 640 kN and the fatigue load was continued to 3 million times. It was equivalent to loading approximately 5 million times according to the initial fatigue load amplitude, the structure was still not cracked, and the gusset plate anchorage devices met infinite life design. Both theoretical analysis and full-scale model fatigue test showed that the design of the tensile anchor plate of the Wujiang Bridge had reasonable design, and its fatigue properties met requriement of actual engineering.
  • loading
  • [1]
    姚建军, 李军. 厦漳跨海大桥北汊主桥锚拉板锚下区域受力分析[J]. 桥梁建设, 2013, 43(4):39-43.
    [2]
    朱劲松, 肖汝诚, 曹一山. 杭州湾跨海大桥索梁锚固节点模型试验研究[J]. 土木工程学报, 2007, 40(1):49-53.
    [3]
    刘庆宽, 王新敏, 强士中. 南京长江二桥南汊桥索梁锚固足尺模型试验研究[J]. 土木工程学报, 2001,34(2):50-54.
    [4]
    任伟平, 强士中, 李小珍, 等. 斜拉桥锚拉板式索梁锚固结构传力机理及疲劳可靠性研究[J]. 土木工程学报, 2006, 39(10):68-73.
    [5]
    骆炜然. 斜拉桥索梁锚固区疲劳性能试验与研究[D]. 成都:西南交通大学, 2013.
    [6]
    孟云. 斜拉桥锚拉板式的锚固结构模型试验与研究[D]. 重庆:重庆交通大学, 2009.
    [7]
    曹珊珊, 雷俊卿, 黄祖慰. 大跨多线公铁两用斜拉桥索锚结构疲劳荷载效应[J]. 中南大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 48(12):3301-3308.
    [8]
    王会利, 张岩,秦泗凤. 基于TCD的锚拉板疲劳性能分析与试验研究[J]. 大连理工大学学报, 2018, 58(6):600-606.
    [9]
    杨阳. 基于残余应力的钢-混结合梁斜拉桥锚拉板疲劳特征研究[D]. 武汉:武汉理工大学, 2018.
    [10]
    董雨洁. 大跨度铁路斜拉桥锚拉板式索梁锚固结构焊接残余应力研究[D]. 成都:西南交通大学, 2019.
    [11]
    中华人民共和国交通运输部. 公路钢结构桥梁设计规范:JTG D64-2015[S]. 北京:人民交通出版社,2015.
    [12]
    European Committee for Standardization. Eurocode 3:design of steel structures[S]. European Committee for Standardization, 2006.
    [13]
    American Association of State Highway and Transportion Officials. AASHTO LRFD bridge design specifications[S]. 8th ed. Washington D C:American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, 2017.
    [14]
    陈传尧. 疲劳与断裂[M]. 武汉:华中科技大学出版社, 2001:1-14.
    [15]
    张彦华. 焊接结构疲劳分析[M]. 北京:化学工业出版社, 2013:48-56.
    [16]
    Schijve J. Fatigue of structures and materials[M]. Amsterdam Springer Science & Business Media, 2009:535-559.
    [17]
    袁毅, 王碧波, 易伦雄. 丰都长江二桥斜拉桥索梁锚固结构设计[J]. 钢结构, 2017, 32(2):80-83.
    [18]
    Wei X, Xiao L, Wang Z J. Full-scale specimen testing and parametric studies on tensile-plate cable-girder anchorages in cablestayed bridges with steel girders[J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2018, 23(4). DOI:10. 1061/(ASCE) BE. 1943-5592. 0001193.
    [19]
    Wang Y L, Wang Z J, Wei X, et al. Test and finite element analysis of gusset plate anchorage for cable-stayed bridges[J]. Stahlbau, 2013, 82(4):313-321.
    [20]
    中华人民共和国交通运输部. 公路桥涵设计通用规范:JTG D60-2015[S]. 北京:人民交通出版社,2015.
    [21]
    Hobbacher A. Recommendations for fatigue design of welded joints and components[M]. 2nd ed. Springer Science & Business Media, 2016:18-62.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (352) PDF downloads(13) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return