Volume 35 Issue 11
Feb.  2021
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Xiang Zhou, Tianxiang Xu, Xuanding Wang, Jiepeng Liu. Analysis on the Mechanical Behavior of RC Column to Truss Joint in Staggered Truss System[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2020, 35(11): 40-54. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgSE20042001
Citation: Xiang Zhou, Tianxiang Xu, Xuanding Wang, Jiepeng Liu. Analysis on the Mechanical Behavior of RC Column to Truss Joint in Staggered Truss System[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2020, 35(11): 40-54. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgSE20042001

Analysis on the Mechanical Behavior of RC Column to Truss Joint in Staggered Truss System

doi: 10.13206/j.gjgSE20042001
  • Received Date: 2020-04-20
  • The staggered truss structural system originated from America in the 1960s, which has been widely used. Typical staggered truss structural system consists of columns, floors, plane trusses, etc. The H-shaped steel, steel pipe, and concrete-filled steel tube (CFT) can be used as structural columns. The slabs can be designed to be hollow slab, composite slab, cast-in-place reinforced concrete slab, etc. In addition, there are three typical types of trusses, i. e. open-web truss, parker truss, and hybrid truss. This structural system has advantages of large space, light structural weight, convenient construction process, economic benefits, high efficiency, and environmentally friendly. In addition, the structure has light weight and good integrity, resulting in a small internal force of the column. When steel columns are used, the slenderness ratio is usually considered as the design control condition, resulting in a waste of materials. The precast reinforced concrete (RC) column is characterized by solid section and convenient construction process. Application of precast RC column into the staggered truss structural system can make better use of the mechanical properties of the column and improve economic benefits of this type of structural system. However, a robust column to truss joint is necessary for the application of RC columns. China Construction Science & Technology Co., Ltd., designed and developed a prefabricated staggered truss structural system consisting of RC columns, steel trusses and pre-stressed concrete floor. The inelastic static analysis of this structural system was conducted by Chongqing University to evaluate its seismic performance. A host of experimental and theoretical studies have been conducted to investigate the seismic performance of the truss and staggered truss structural system. For the column to truss joint of staggered truss structural system, preliminary investigations are still limited, and previous studies mainly focused on the mechanical performance of steel or CFT column to truss joint.
    In this study, a finite element model (FEM) is established to investigate the mechanical behavior of the proposed RC column to truss joint used in a practical project. The stress distribution, internal force and loaddisplacement curves of the joint under five kinds of most unfavorable working conditions in the structural analysis are analyzed. The investigated parameters include the axial load ratio of RC column, with/without restriction of chord horizontal displacement, and load condition of web members. The results are as follows:1) The internal force of the member can be transferred to the corbel or embedded steel plate through the gusset plate and then transferred to the column through the anchor bars, demonstrating that the joint is designed reasonably with a clear force transfer path. 2) All kinds of members yield before of reinforcement within the joint region, meeting the design requirement of "strong joint and weak member". 3) The material strength of the chord and web is better used in the case where the horizontal displacement of the chord is restricted despite of a lower degree of reinforcement stress development in the RC column. 4)The load bearing capacity and displacement are greater in the cases where the horizontal displacement of the chord is not released, which is benefit from a better use of material strength of the chord and web member. In the case whose axial load ratio is 0, the load of the web member increases approximately linearly with increasing the displacement of the web member at the initial loading stage. The plastic deformation within the joint region gradually increases once the displacement of the web member exceeds 5 mm, resulting in a slower increase of the load of the web member. 5) The bending moment and shear force of the chord are generally small in all working conditions except for the shear force in the case whose axial load ratio is 0. The axial force of the chord is significantly larger in the cases where the horizontal displacement is restricted and the axial force of the chord increases by approximately 10%. 6) It is suggested to appropriately increase the longitudinal reinforcement ratio of the RC column to alleviate the eccentric effect of the column caused by the corbel, further improve its safety reserve.
  • loading
  • 曹子旭. 近场地震作用下钢交错桁架结构体系的抗震性能评估[D]. 苏州:苏州科技大学,2016.
    朱玉祥. 交错桁架结构的抗震性能研究[D]. 合肥:安徽建筑大学,2017.
    颜於滕. 装配式交错桁架钢结构体系的设计与应用[J]. 上海建设科技,2019(4):16-18.
    甘丹,周绪红,周期石. 交错桁架钢框架结构抗震性能研究现状[J]. 建筑钢结构进展,2019,21(4):1-10.
    Basha H S, Goel S C. Special truss moment frames with vierendeel middle panel[J]. Engineering Structures, 1995, 17(5):352-358.
    Parra-montesinos G J, Goel S C, Kim K Y. Behavior of steel double-channel built-up chords of special truss moment frames under reversed cyclic bending[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2006, 132(9):1343-1351.
    Simasathien S, Jiansinlapadamrong C, Chao S H. Seismic behavior of special truss moment frame with double hollow structural sections as chord members[J]. Engineering Structures, 2017, 131(15):14-27.
    冉红东,赵道程,梁文龙,等. 交错桁架延性段双槽钢组合截面弦杆往复弯曲性能试验研究[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2017, 38(7):34-41.
    赵宝成,周德昊,顾强,等. 偏心腹杆式交错桁架结构滞回性能试验研究[J]. 工程力学,2013,30(12):71-77.
    赵宝成,计明明,顾强,等. 被动消能交错桁架滞回性能试验[J]. 沈阳建筑大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 29(1):7-15.
    Gupta R P, Goel S C. Dynamic analysis of staggered truss framing system[J]. Journal of the Structural Division, 1972, 98(7):1475-1492.
    Hanson R D, Berg G V. Aseismic design of staggered truss buildings[J]. Journal of the Structural Division,1974, 100(1):175-193.
    Ger J F, Cheng F Y, Lu L W. Collapse behavior of Pino Suarez Building during 1985 Mexico City earthquake[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 1993, 119(3):852-870.
    郭兵,张帅,刘川川,等. 空腹式延性桁框结构探讨[J]. 建筑钢结构进展,2013,15(1):1-7.
    Goel S C, Itani A M. Seismic-resistant special truss-moment frames[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 1994, 120(6):1781-1797.
    潘英,周绪红. 交错桁架体系的抗震性能动力分析[J]. 土木工程学报,2002,35(4):12-16.
    周期石,周绪红,刘永健. 交错桁架结构动力特性的简化分析方法[J]. 建筑科学与工程学报,2006,23(4):28-33.
    许红胜,周绪红,刘永健. 影响交错桁架整体延性的结构因素[J]. 建筑科学与工程学报,2006,23(2):52-56.
    张勇,张崇厚,刘彦生. 多层与高层错列桁架钢结构体系抗侧力性能对比[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版),2007,47(12):2100-2104.
    张崇厚,张勇,刘彦生. 高烈度地震区的错列双桁架钢结构住宅体系[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2008, 48(6):926-930.
    郭庆生,杨庆山. 错列式钢桁架结构受填充墙影响的抗震研究[J]. 北京交通大学学报,2012,36(1):68-72.
    陈向荣,宗智芳,冉红东. 基于能量平衡的延性交错桁架塑性设计方法[J]. 地震工程与工程振动,2015,35(4):236-243.
    苏明周,金峰华,王喆,等. 竖向荷载下套管节点装配式交错桁架受力性能研究[J]. 西安建筑科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2015,47(6):781-787.
    卢林枫,顾强,苏明周,等. 钢结构错列桁架节点构造与设计要点[J]. 工业建筑,2005,35(7):83-85

    ,79.
    李启才,何若全,顾强,等. 交错桁架体系中桁架与柱的连接节点设计方法研究[J]. 建筑钢结构进展,2008,10(4):39-42.
    宋小武. 装配式交错桁架体系桁架与柱连接节点滞回性能试验研究[D]. 西安:西安建筑科技大学,2015.
    中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 混凝土结构设计规范:GB 50010-2010[S]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2010.
    钟善桐. 钢管混凝土结构[M]. 3版. 北京:清华大学出版社,2003.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (256) PDF downloads(17) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return