Login Register
Volume 35 Issue 3
Mar.  2020
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Article Navigation >  STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English)  > 2020  >  35(3): 26-36
Weiyi Zhao, Lin Wang, Quanquan Guo, Zepeng Gao. RESEARCH ADVANCES OF IMPACT RESISTANCE OF STEEL-CONCRETE COMPOSITE STRUCTURES[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2020, 35(3): 26-36. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgSE19121501
Citation: Weiyi Zhao, Lin Wang, Quanquan Guo, Zepeng Gao. RESEARCH ADVANCES OF IMPACT RESISTANCE OF STEEL-CONCRETE COMPOSITE STRUCTURES[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2020, 35(3): 26-36. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgSE19121501
shu

RESEARCH ADVANCES OF IMPACT RESISTANCE OF STEEL-CONCRETE COMPOSITE STRUCTURES

doi: 10.13206/j.gjgSE19121501

  • 1. School of Civil Engineering, Qingdao University of Technology, Qingdao 266033, China;

  • 2. Beihang School, Beihang University, Beijing 100083, China;

  • 3. School of Transportation Science and Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100083, China

  • Received Date: 2019-12-10
    Abstract
  • A steel-concrete composite (SC) structure consists of two steel faceplates and a core concrete. It has a wide application in engineering practice such as nuclear facilities, high-rise buildings, and protective structures, etc. With the structures exposed to unexpected impact loadings during its service life, it demonstrates a great necessity to investigate the impact resistance of SC structures and components. Based on the review of the development and application of SC structures and the investigations on its impact resistance at home and abroad, the performance of SC structures under impact loadings and the calculation methods for local damage and global response are summarized. Some suggestions on the key problems in the research and practical application of the structures are discussed.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References(61)
  • Liew J Y R, Yan J B, Huang Z Y. Steel-concrete-steel sandwich composite structures-recent innovations[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2017, 130:202-221.
    JEAC. Technical code for seismic design of steel plate reinforced concrete structures:buildings and structures:JEAC 4618-2009[S]. Tokyo:Japanese Electric Association Nuclear Standards Committee, 2009.
    KEPIC-SNG. Specification for safety-related steel plate concrete structures for nuclear facilities[S]. Korea:Board of KEPIC Policy, Structural Committee, Korea Electric Association, 2010.
    AISC. Specification for safety-related steel structures for nuclear facilities:ANSI/AISC N690s1-15[S]. Chicago, Illinois:American Institute of Steel Construction, 2015.
    中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 核电站钢板混凝土结构技术标准:GB/T 51340-2018[S]. 北京:中国计划出版社, 2018.
    Solomon S, Smith D, Cusens A. Flexural tests of steel-concretesteel sandwiches[J]. Magazine of Concrete Research, 1976, 28(94):13-20.
    Ichikawa K, Isobata O, Kawamata S. Design and analysis of reactor containment of steel-concrete composite laminated shell[C]//Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology (SMiRT 4). San Francisco:USA, 1977.
    Bowerman H, Coyle N, Chapman J C. An innovative steel/concrete construction system[J]. Structural Engineer, 2002, 80(20):33-38.
    Johnson R P. Composite structures of steel and concrete:beams, slabs, columns, and frames for buildings[M]. Australia:Blackwell Publishing, 3rd ed, 2008.
    加藤勉. コンクリ-ト充填鋼板壁のせん断強度[C]//東京大学工学部総合試験所年報. 東京:1979.
    加藤勉, 佐藤邦昭, 江守克彦,等. コンクリート充填鋼板耐力壁の実験的研究:その1:研究概要[C]//日本建築学会学術講演梗概集. 東京:1985.
    Kaneuji A, Okuda Y. Feasibility study of concrete filled steel (SC) structure for reactor building[C]//Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology (SMiRT 10). Anaheim, CA:USA, 1989.
    阿部琢志, 古和田明, 山下利夫, 等. 鋼板コンクリート構造に関する実験的研究:その1全体計画概要[C]//日本建築学会学術講演梗概集. 東京:1996.
    成川匡文, 秋山宏, 菅原良次, 等. 原子力発電所建屋の鋼板コンクリート構造化の研究:その1. 研究全体計画[C]//日本建築学会学術講演梗概集. 東京:1995.
    JEANSC. Technical guidelines for aseismic design of steel plate reinforced concrete structures-buildings and structures:JEAG 4618-2005[S]. Tokyo:Japanese Electric Association Nuclear Standards Committee, 2005.
    高宁. 钢板混凝土结构在AP1000核电站中的应用[C]//2010年核电站新技术交流研讨会论文集. 深圳:2010.
    俞逸舟, 宋晓冰, 李林家. 钢板混凝土组合结构试验与理论研究现状[J]. 混凝土, 2019(10):54-61.
    Tomlinson M, Tomlinson A, Chapman M L, et al. Shell composite construction for shallow draft immersed tube tunnels[C]//ICE International Conference on Immersed Tunnel Techniques. Thomas Telford Publishing, 1989.
    Wright H D, Oduyemi T O S, Evans H R. The experimental behaviour of double skin composite elements[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 1991, 19(2):97-110.
    Wright H D, Oduyemi T O S, Evans H R. The design of double skin composite elements[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 1991, 19(2):111-132.
    Wright H D, Gallocher S C. The behavior of composite walling under construction and service loading[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 1995, 35(3):257-277.
    Hossain K M A, Wright H D. Experimental and theoretical behaviour of composite walling under in-plane shear[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2004, 60(1):59-83.
    Liew J Y R, Sohel K M A. Lightweight steel-concrete-steel sandwich system with J-hook connectors[J]. Engineering Structures, 2009, 31(5):1166-1178.
    丁朝辉, 江欢成, 曾菁等. 双钢板-混凝土组合墙的大胆尝试:盐城电视塔结构设计[J]. 建筑结构, 2012, 41(12):87-91.
    赵治泉. 钻井用的钢板混凝土复合井壁[J]. 煤炭科学技术, 1986(1):22-25, 39.
    葛家良, 孙文若. 谢桥矿西风井双层钢板混凝土钻井井壁设计研究[J]. 江苏煤炭, 1994(1):15-18.
    Abrate S. Impact on composite structures[M]. USA:Cambridge University Press, 1998.
    Barr P, Carter P G, Howe W D, et al. Experimental studies of the impact resistance of steel faced concrete composites[C]//Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology (SMiRT 7). Chicago:USA, 1983.
    Walter T A, Wolde-Tinsae A M. Turbine missile perforation of reinforced concrete[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 1984, 110(10):2439-2455.
    Tsubota H, Kasai Y, Koshika N, et al. Quantitative studies on impact resistance of reinforced concrete panels with steel liners under impact loading. Part 1:Scaled model impact tests[C]//Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology (SMiRT 12). Stuttgart:Germany, 1993.
    Mizuno J, Koshika N, Sawamoto Y, et al. Investigation on impact resistance of steel plate reinforced concrete barriers against aircraft impact part 1:test program and results[C]//Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology (SMiRT 18). Beijing:China, 2005.
    Hashimoto J, Takiguchi K, Nishimura K, et al. Experimental study on behavior of RC panels covered with steel plates subjected to missile impact[C]//Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology (SMiRT 18). Beijing:China, 2005.
    Remennikov A M, Kong S Y, Uy B. The response of axially restrained non-composite steel-concrete-steel sandwich panels due to large impact loading[J]. Engineering Structures, 2013, 49:806-818.
    Remennikov A M, Kong S Y. Numerical simulation and validation of impact response of axially-restrained steel-concrete-steel sandwich panels[J]. Composite Structures, 2012, 94(12):3546-3555.
    Sohel K M A, Liew J Y R. Behavior of steel-concrete-steel sandwich slabs subject to impact load[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2014, 100:163-175.
    Liew J Y R, Sohel K M A, Koh C G. Impact tests on steel-concrete-steel sandwich beams with lightweight concrete core[J]. Engineering Structures, 2009, 31(9):2045-2059.
    Zhao W Y, Guo Q. Experimental study on impact and post-impact behavior of steel-concrete composite panels[J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 2018, 130:405-413.
    Zhao W Y, Guo Q, Dou X, et al. Impact response of steel-concrete composite panels:Experiments and FE analyses[J]. Steel and Composite Structures, 2018, 26(3):255-263.
    Guo Q, Zhao W Y. Design of steel-concrete composite walls subjected to low-velocity impact[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2019, 154:190-196.
    赵唯以, 郭全全. 低速冲击下双钢板混凝土组合墙的力学性能研究[J]. 土木工程学报, 2018, 51(11):88-94.
    Riera J D. On the stress analysis of structures subjected to aircraft impact forces[J]. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 1968, 8(4):415-426.
    U. S. Department of Energy. Accident analysis for aircraft crash into hazardous facilities:DOE-STD-3014-2006[S]. Washington D C:U. S. Department of Energy, 2006.
    Methodology for performing aircraft impact assessments for new plant designs:NEI 07-13 Rev 8P[S]. Walnut Creek, CA, USA:ERIN Engineering & Research, 2011.
    Jiang H, Chorzepa M G. Aircraft impact analysis of nuclear safetyrelated concrete structures:a review[J]. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2014, 46:118-133.
    Bruhl J C, Varma A H, Johnson W H. Design of composite SC walls to prevent perforation from missile impact[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2015, 75(1):75-87.
    Mizuno J, Koshika N, Morikawa H, et al. Investigation on impact resistance of steel plate reinforced concrete barriers against aircraft impact part 2:simulation analyses of scale model impact tests[C]//Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology (SMiRT 18). Beijing:2005.
    陈仰光, 周羽. 飞机撞击混凝土平板的动力学分析[C]//第15届全国结构工程学术会议论文集. 2006.
    徐征宇, 李忠诚. 钢板混凝土与普通混凝土结构抵抗飞机撞击的比较分析[C]//第十七届全国反应堆结构力学会议论文集. 上海:2012.
    朱秀云, 潘蓉, 林皋, 等. 基于ANSYS/LS-DYNA的钢板混凝土墙冲击实验的有限元分析[J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2015, 35(2):222-228.
    朱秀云, 林皋, 潘蓉, 等. 基于荷载时程分析法的钢板混凝土结构墙的抗冲击性能敏感性分析[J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2016, 36(5):670-679.
    Sohel K M A. Impact performance of steel-concrete-steel sandwich structures[D]. Singapore:National University of Singapore, 2008.
    郑全平, 周早生, 钱七虎, 等. 防护结构中的震塌问题[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2003, 22(8):1393-1398.
    高世桥. 混凝土侵彻力学[M]. 北京:中国科学技术出版社, 2013.
    ACI. Code requirements for nuclear safety-related concrete structures and commentary:ACI 349-06[S]. Farmington Hills, MI, USA:American Concrete Institute, 2006.
    Barr P. Guidelines for the design and assessment of concrete structures subjected to impact[R]. London:UK, UK Atomic Energy Authority, Safety and Reliability Directorate, 1990.
    Grisaro H, Dancygier A N. Assessment of the perforation limit of a composite RC barrier with a rear steel liner to impact of a non-deforming projectile[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2014, 64(2):122-136.
    Guo Q, Zhao W Y. Displacement response analysis of steel-concrete composite panels subjected to impact loadings[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2019, 131:272-281.
    Grisaro H, Dancygier A N. Assessment of residual deformation of rear steel plate in RC barriers subjected to impact of non-deforming projectiles[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2015, 77:42-58.
    Bruhl J C, Varma A H, Kim J M. Static resistance function for steel-plate composite (SC) walls subject to impactive loading[J]. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 2015, 295:843-859.
    Bruhl J C, Johnson W H, Reigles D G, et al. Impact assessment of SC walls using idealized SDOF and TDOF models[C]//ASCE Structures Congress. Portland, Oregon:USA, 2015.
    赵唯以. 低速冲击下双钢板混凝土组合结构的力学性能研究[D]. 北京:北京航空航天大学, 2018.
    • Relative Articles

  • Relative Articles

    [1]Zhenming Chen, Ka Bian, Fei Gao, Junbo Chen, Meng Xiao. Anti-Slip Experimental Research on Aluminum-Based Metalized Faying Surfaces of Q690 High Strength Steel with Different Bolt Hole Types[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2024, 39(5): 8-16. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS24050102
    [2]Zhaoxin Hou, Chao Gong, Zihao Liang, Gang Wang, Zhidong Yao. Experimental Investigation on the Effects of Temperature on the Bearing Capacity of High Strength Bolt Connections[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2021, 36(1): 50-59. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS20081803
    [3]Zhaoxin Hou, Chao Gong, Yanxia Zhang, Zihao Liang, Weiqiao Liang, Wujun Fang. New Development of High Strength Bolt Connections in Steel Structures[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2021, 36(1): 1-12. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS20081901
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(1)

    1. 刘仲洋，汤青松，董新元，翁维素，赵佳兴，张晋梅. 冷弯方钢管柱-H型钢梁外伸端板单向螺栓连接节点性能试验研究. 建筑结构. 2021(02): 57-63 .

    Other cited types(6)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-04050100150200250300
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 21.9 %FULLTEXT: 21.9 %META: 74.4 %META: 74.4 %PDF: 3.7 %PDF: 3.7 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 30.0 %其他: 30.0 %其他: 2.5 %其他: 2.5 %Baden: 0.2 %Baden: 0.2 %Ballwin: 0.1 %Ballwin: 0.1 %Baltimore: 0.1 %Baltimore: 0.1 %Boiling Springs: 0.1 %Boiling Springs: 0.1 %Bruderheim: 0.1 %Bruderheim: 0.1 %Carrboro: 0.1 %Carrboro: 0.1 %Central District: 1.2 %Central District: 1.2 %China: 0.6 %China: 0.6 %Edinburg: 0.0 %Edinburg: 0.0 %Halethorpe: 0.1 %Halethorpe: 0.1 %Hamilton: 0.1 %Hamilton: 0.1 %Indianapolis: 0.3 %Indianapolis: 0.3 %Japan: 0.1 %Japan: 0.1 %Kao-sung: 0.1 %Kao-sung: 0.1 %Kennedy Town: 0.1 %Kennedy Town: 0.1 %Malvern: 0.2 %Malvern: 0.2 %Matawan: 0.0 %Matawan: 0.0 %Mercer Island: 0.1 %Mercer Island: 0.1 %Nahant: 0.1 %Nahant: 0.1 %Norman: 0.2 %Norman: 0.2 %Reserved: 0.0 %Reserved: 0.0 %Rochester: 0.1 %Rochester: 0.1 %San Jose: 0.1 %San Jose: 0.1 %Seattle: 0.3 %Seattle: 0.3 %Sitka: 0.1 %Sitka: 0.1 %Sterling: 0.1 %Sterling: 0.1 %Sugar Land: 0.0 %Sugar Land: 0.0 %Taoyuan District: 0.0 %Taoyuan District: 0.0 %Tiruchi: 0.1 %Tiruchi: 0.1 %Twinsburg: 0.1 %Twinsburg: 0.1 %United States: 0.1 %United States: 0.1 %Valencia: 0.1 %Valencia: 0.1 %[]: 0.3 %[]: 0.3 %上海: 3.0 %上海: 3.0 %东京: 0.1 %东京: 0.1 %东莞: 0.3 %东莞: 0.3 %中山: 0.2 %中山: 0.2 %丹佛: 0.1 %丹佛: 0.1 %丽水: 0.0 %丽水: 0.0 %九龙: 0.0 %九龙: 0.0 %亚兹德: 0.1 %亚兹德: 0.1 %伊斯坦布尔: 0.1 %伊斯坦布尔: 0.1 %伊萨卡: 0.1 %伊萨卡: 0.1 %休斯敦: 0.2 %休斯敦: 0.2 %休斯顿: 0.5 %休斯顿: 0.5 %伦敦: 0.1 %伦敦: 0.1 %伯灵顿: 0.1 %伯灵顿: 0.1 %佛山: 0.0 %佛山: 0.0 %保定: 0.1 %保定: 0.1 %元朗新墟: 0.1 %元朗新墟: 0.1 %克雷塔罗: 0.1 %克雷塔罗: 0.1 %六安: 0.1 %六安: 0.1 %兰州: 0.1 %兰州: 0.1 %加利福尼亚州: 0.7 %加利福尼亚州: 0.7 %北京: 3.3 %北京: 3.3 %匹兹堡: 0.1 %匹兹堡: 0.1 %十堰: 0.2 %十堰: 0.2 %华盛顿: 0.0 %华盛顿: 0.0 %南京: 0.9 %南京: 0.9 %南京市江宁区: 0.1 %南京市江宁区: 0.1 %南宁: 0.0 %南宁: 0.0 %南昌: 0.1 %南昌: 0.1 %南甘马粦省: 0.1 %南甘马粦省: 0.1 %南通: 0.3 %南通: 0.3 %占碑: 0.1 %占碑: 0.1 %卡尔加里: 0.1 %卡尔加里: 0.1 %卡拉奇: 0.2 %卡拉奇: 0.2 %卡纳塔克: 0.1 %卡纳塔克: 0.1 %厦门: 0.2 %厦门: 0.2 %台北: 0.1 %台北: 0.1 %合肥: 0.2 %合肥: 0.2 %哈密: 0.1 %哈密: 0.1 %哈尔滨: 0.1 %哈尔滨: 0.1 %唐山: 0.0 %唐山: 0.0 %商丘: 0.1 %商丘: 0.1 %喀什: 0.0 %喀什: 0.0 %嘉兴: 0.3 %嘉兴: 0.3 %圣保罗: 0.1 %圣保罗: 0.1 %圣克拉拉: 0.4 %圣克拉拉: 0.4 %圣地亚哥: 0.8 %圣地亚哥: 0.8 %坦佩: 0.2 %坦佩: 0.2 %墨尔本: 0.1 %墨尔本: 0.1 %夏尔迦: 0.1 %夏尔迦: 0.1 %夏洛特: 0.1 %夏洛特: 0.1 %多哈: 0.1 %多哈: 0.1 %大同: 0.0 %大同: 0.0 %大连: 0.1 %大连: 0.1 %天津: 1.7 %天津: 1.7 %太原: 0.1 %太原: 0.1 %奥兰多: 0.1 %奥兰多: 0.1 %威海: 0.0 %威海: 0.0 %宁波: 0.1 %宁波: 0.1 %安卡拉: 0.1 %安卡拉: 0.1 %安阳: 0.1 %安阳: 0.1 %宣城: 0.2 %宣城: 0.2 %密尔沃基: 0.1 %密尔沃基: 0.1 %密蘇里城: 0.5 %密蘇里城: 0.5 %尖竹汶府: 0.0 %尖竹汶府: 0.0 %巴拉瑞特: 0.0 %巴拉瑞特: 0.0 %巴格达: 0.1 %巴格达: 0.1 %巴淡岛: 0.1 %巴淡岛: 0.1 %巴罗达: 0.1 %巴罗达: 0.1 %巴黎: 0.1 %巴黎: 0.1 %布兰普顿: 0.1 %布兰普顿: 0.1 %布宜诺斯艾利斯: 0.1 %布宜诺斯艾利斯: 0.1 %布鲁克林区: 0.1 %布鲁克林区: 0.1 %常州: 0.2 %常州: 0.2 %常德: 0.0 %常德: 0.0 %平顶山: 0.0 %平顶山: 0.0 %广州: 1.1 %广州: 1.1 %庆尚北道: 0.2 %庆尚北道: 0.2 %延安: 0.0 %延安: 0.0 %开封: 0.0 %开封: 0.0 %开罗: 0.1 %开罗: 0.1 %张家口: 0.4 %张家口: 0.4 %徐州: 0.1 %徐州: 0.1 %德州: 0.3 %德州: 0.3 %德罕: 0.0 %德罕: 0.0 %德黑兰: 0.1 %德黑兰: 0.1 %悉尼: 0.3 %悉尼: 0.3 %惠州: 0.0 %惠州: 0.0 %意法半: 0.1 %意法半: 0.1 %成都: 0.4 %成都: 0.4 %托莱多: 0.1 %托莱多: 0.1 %扬州: 1.4 %扬州: 1.4 %拉斯维加斯: 0.1 %拉斯维加斯: 0.1 %拉普拉普: 0.0 %拉普拉普: 0.0 %拉瓦勒: 0.1 %拉瓦勒: 0.1 %斯普林菲尔德: 0.1 %斯普林菲尔德: 0.1 %新乡: 0.0 %新乡: 0.0 %新加坡: 0.1 %新加坡: 0.1 %无锡: 0.2 %无锡: 0.2 %旧金山: 0.2 %旧金山: 0.2 %昆明: 0.4 %昆明: 0.4 %晋城: 0.1 %晋城: 0.1 %曼谷: 0.2 %曼谷: 0.2 %杭州: 1.2 %杭州: 1.2 %柬埔寨: 0.0 %柬埔寨: 0.0 %格兰特县: 0.2 %格兰特县: 0.2 %格里利: 0.1 %格里利: 0.1 %桂林: 0.0 %桂林: 0.0 %梅州: 0.0 %梅州: 0.0 %梧州: 0.1 %梧州: 0.1 %森尼韦尔: 0.1 %森尼韦尔: 0.1 %武汉: 0.3 %武汉: 0.3 %汕头: 0.1 %汕头: 0.1 %沃思堡: 0.1 %沃思堡: 0.1 %沈阳: 0.1 %沈阳: 0.1 %河内: 0.1 %河内: 0.1 %泉州: 0.1 %泉州: 0.1 %法兰克福: 0.1 %法兰克福: 0.1 %法拉盛: 0.1 %法拉盛: 0.1 %泰州: 0.1 %泰州: 0.1 %洛杉矶: 0.0 %洛杉矶: 0.0 %济南: 0.4 %济南: 0.4 %海口: 0.0 %海口: 0.0 %淄博: 0.0 %淄博: 0.0 %深圳: 0.2 %深圳: 0.2 %温哥华: 0.1 %温哥华: 0.1 %温州: 0.5 %温州: 0.5 %湖州: 0.1 %湖州: 0.1 %滨州: 0.0 %滨州: 0.0 %漯河: 3.7 %漯河: 3.7 %漳州: 0.0 %漳州: 0.0 %烟台: 0.0 %烟台: 0.0 %玉溪: 0.0 %玉溪: 0.0 %珀斯: 0.2 %珀斯: 0.2 %瑟普赖斯: 0.1 %瑟普赖斯: 0.1 %白银: 0.0 %白银: 0.0 %益阳: 0.0 %益阳: 0.0 %石家庄: 0.6 %石家庄: 0.6 %福州: 0.1 %福州: 0.1 %秦皇岛: 0.1 %秦皇岛: 0.1 %米兰: 0.0 %米兰: 0.0 %约翰内斯堡: 0.3 %约翰内斯堡: 0.3 %纳尔德韦克: 0.1 %纳尔德韦克: 0.1 %纽瓦克: 0.1 %纽瓦克: 0.1 %纽约: 0.1 %纽约: 0.1 %绍兴: 0.0 %绍兴: 0.0 %罗奥尔凯埃: 0.1 %罗奥尔凯埃: 0.1 %美国爱荷华得梅因: 0.0 %美国爱荷华得梅因: 0.0 %胡志明: 0.4 %胡志明: 0.4 %舟山: 0.0 %舟山: 0.0 %艾因: 0.0 %艾因: 0.0 %芒廷维尤: 12.4 %芒廷维尤: 12.4 %芝加哥: 2.2 %芝加哥: 2.2 %苏州: 0.3 %苏州: 0.3 %荆门: 0.0 %荆门: 0.0 %莫斯科: 0.9 %莫斯科: 0.9 %莱芜: 0.0 %莱芜: 0.0 %菏泽: 0.0 %菏泽: 0.0 %营口: 0.1 %营口: 0.1 %葵涌: 0.1 %葵涌: 0.1 %蒂尔堡: 0.0 %蒂尔堡: 0.0 %蒂米什瓦拉: 0.0 %蒂米什瓦拉: 0.0 %衡水: 0.1 %衡水: 0.1 %衡阳: 0.1 %衡阳: 0.1 %西宁: 4.4 %西宁: 4.4 %西安: 0.1 %西安: 0.1 %西雅图: 0.1 %西雅图: 0.1 %贵阳: 0.0 %贵阳: 0.0 %费利蒙: 0.2 %费利蒙: 0.2 %赫尔辛基: 0.1 %赫尔辛基: 0.1 %达州: 0.2 %达州: 0.2 %达拉斯: 0.1 %达拉斯: 0.1 %运城: 0.2 %运城: 0.2 %连云港: 0.2 %连云港: 0.2 %迪尔伯恩: 0.0 %迪尔伯恩: 0.0 %迪拜: 0.4 %迪拜: 0.4 %邯郸: 0.2 %邯郸: 0.2 %郑州: 0.7 %郑州: 0.7 %重庆: 0.6 %重庆: 0.6 %金华: 0.0 %金华: 0.0 %金奈: 0.2 %金奈: 0.2 %长春: 0.0 %长春: 0.0 %长沙: 0.6 %长沙: 0.6 %阳泉: 0.4 %阳泉: 0.4 %阿布扎比: 0.3 %阿布扎比: 0.3 %阿瓜斯卡达特斯: 0.1 %阿瓜斯卡达特斯: 0.1 %陵水: 0.0 %陵水: 0.0 %雅典: 0.1 %雅典: 0.1 %雅加达: 0.4 %雅加达: 0.4 %青岛: 0.6 %青岛: 0.6 %首尔: 0.0 %首尔: 0.0 %首尔特别: 0.2 %首尔特别: 0.2 %香港: 0.0 %香港: 0.0 %香港特别行政区: 0.1 %香港特别行政区: 0.1 %马尼拉: 0.4 %马尼拉: 0.4 %马德里: 0.2 %马德里: 0.2 %马格朗: 0.1 %马格朗: 0.1 %马湾: 0.1 %马湾: 0.1 %马科姆: 0.1 %马科姆: 0.1 %马鞍山: 0.0 %马鞍山: 0.0 %高雄: 0.0 %高雄: 0.0 %魁北克: 0.0 %魁北克: 0.0 %黑堡: 0.1 %黑堡: 0.1 %黑森州: 0.1 %黑森州: 0.1 %齐齐哈尔: 0.0 %齐齐哈尔: 0.0 %龙岩: 0.0 %龙岩: 0.0 %其他其他BadenBallwinBaltimoreBoiling SpringsBruderheimCarrboroCentral DistrictChinaEdinburgHalethorpeHamiltonIndianapolisJapanKao-sungKennedy TownMalvernMatawanMercer IslandNahantNormanReservedRochesterSan JoseSeattleSitkaSterlingSugar LandTaoyuan DistrictTiruchiTwinsburgUnited StatesValencia[]上海东京东莞中山丹佛丽水九龙亚兹德伊斯坦布尔伊萨卡休斯敦休斯顿伦敦伯灵顿佛山保定元朗新墟克雷塔罗六安兰州加利福尼亚州北京匹兹堡十堰华盛顿南京南京市江宁区南宁南昌南甘马粦省南通占碑卡尔加里卡拉奇卡纳塔克厦门台北合肥哈密哈尔滨唐山商丘喀什嘉兴圣保罗圣克拉拉圣地亚哥坦佩墨尔本夏尔迦夏洛特多哈大同大连天津太原奥兰多威海宁波安卡拉安阳宣城密尔沃基密蘇里城尖竹汶府巴拉瑞特巴格达巴淡岛巴罗达巴黎布兰普顿布宜诺斯艾利斯布鲁克林区常州常德平顶山广州庆尚北道延安开封开罗张家口徐州德州德罕德黑兰悉尼惠州意法半成都托莱多扬州拉斯维加斯拉普拉普拉瓦勒斯普林菲尔德新乡新加坡无锡旧金山昆明晋城曼谷杭州柬埔寨格兰特县格里利桂林梅州梧州森尼韦尔武汉汕头沃思堡沈阳河内泉州法兰克福法拉盛泰州洛杉矶济南海口淄博深圳温哥华温州湖州滨州漯河漳州烟台玉溪珀斯瑟普赖斯白银益阳石家庄福州秦皇岛米兰约翰内斯堡纳尔德韦克纽瓦克纽约绍兴罗奥尔凯埃美国爱荷华得梅因胡志明舟山艾因芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州荆门莫斯科莱芜菏泽营口葵涌蒂尔堡蒂米什瓦拉衡水衡阳西宁西安西雅图贵阳费利蒙赫尔辛基达州达拉斯运城连云港迪尔伯恩迪拜邯郸郑州重庆金华金奈长春长沙阳泉阿布扎比阿瓜斯卡达特斯陵水雅典雅加达青岛首尔首尔特别香港香港特别行政区马尼拉马德里马格朗马湾马科姆马鞍山高雄魁北克黑堡黑森州齐齐哈尔龙岩1/2

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索
    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (327) PDF downloads(24) Cited by(7)
    Proportional views
    Related

    Journal Online

    Author's Center

    Links

    版权所有 © 《工业建筑》杂志社有限公司

    京ICP备11033253号-1

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd     百度统计

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return