Jiling Gao. Development and Practice of Processing and Manufacturing Technology for Complex Building Steel Structures[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2024, 39(11): 72-79. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS24101035
Citation: Chenyu Liang, Zhongyi Zhu, Kai Qin, Lin Zhang, Zhe Wang, Zhongfa Zhou. Seismic Design and Research of Roof Steel Structure of Beijing New Airport Terminal Building[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2020, 35(5): 19-26. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS255920181109

Seismic Design and Research of Roof Steel Structure of Beijing New Airport Terminal Building

doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS255920181109
  • Received Date: 2019-09-28
  • Publish Date: 2020-07-14
  • The roof steel structure of Beijing New Airport Terminal Building has large volume, complicated shape, large span, small number of supporting members and special-shaped columns, which is the key and difficult point of seismic design of the project. The roof on the north of the central hall has larger area and a large overhang, so the center of mass of the overall structure is biased to the north. However, because the roof elevation is higher on the north and lower on the south side, the height of the columns of the curtain wall and the C-shaped columns which Support the north roof is larger, so lateral stiffness is smaller, and the center of stiffness of the overall structure is biased to the south, which will cause the steel structure to twist. By adjusting the layout of the supporting structures, increasing the rigidity of the roof supporting structure on the north, and reducing the rigidity of the roof supporting structure on the south, it can effectively reduce the deviation between the center of mass and stiffness of the structure, improve the torsional stiffness of the structure, and reduce the torsional effect of the structure. The steel structure of the roof of the central hall is composed of six main structural units which are connected by a central lighting dome and six central radiation lighting belts. The structure of the lighting dome and lighting belts is a lighter and thinner truss structure, which is the weaker part of the overall structure by comparing with the six main grid structures. Once the structure of the lighting dome and the lighting belts fail, the overall structure becomes six independent structural units, and each structural unit bears its own regional load independently, which force state is quite different from the overall structure. By checking the bearing capacity of steel members under non-seismic and precautionary intensity seismic combinations for block models of the structure, it shows that even if the central daylighting dome and six daylighting zones fail, the main steel structure still has sufficient bearing capacity and will not collapse.
    The lateral stiffness of different kinds of the roof supporting members, such as the C-shaped columns, the steel supporting tubes, the supporting frames of the north curtain wall, independent steel pipe columns and the columns of other curtain walls, is quite different. In order to improve the safety of the whole structure under the action of earthquake, multi-line defense analysis is performed. Considering that the roof steel structure of the project is a large-span spatial structure, it is reasonable that the roof supporting members can bear the seismic force generated by their respective load mass. By analyzing of the proportion of the gravity load and seismic shear force of the roof supporting members, the seismic shear force of the roof supporting member bearing a less proportion of seismic shear force than its gravity load is adjusted according to its proportion of gravity load to improve the seismic resistance of multi-line defense of the whole structure.
    By seting up the dynamic elastoplastic time-history analysis model of the central hall structure, the elastoplastic time-history analysis of the whole structure is performed under rare earthquakes to discuss the plastic deformation and development degree of the roof supporting steel structures and the concrete structures. It shows that some members enter the elastoplastic working state with their strength and rigidity deteriorated, but the degree of degradation is not large, and the whole structure has sufficient capacity for redistribution of internal forces to maintain its overall stability and bear earthquake action and gravity loads.
  • 束伟农,朱忠义,祁跃,等.北京新机场航站楼结构设计研究[J].建筑结构,2016,46(17):1-7.
    束伟农,朱忠义,秦凯,等.北京新机场航站楼钢结构设计[J].建筑结构,2017,47(18):1-5.
    中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 高层民用建筑钢结构技术规程:JGJ 99-2015[S]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2016.
    中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 高层建筑混凝土结构技术规程:JGJ 3-2010[S]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2011.
    周忠发,杜志超,閤东东,等.天津中航大厦大底盘带高位转换双塔商务公寓动力弹塑性分析[C]//2015城市地下空间综合开发技术交流会论文集. 上海:2015.
    李华峰,甘明.动力弹塑性分析在大跨空间结构抗震设计中的应用[C]//第十三届空间结构学术会议论文集. 深圳:2010.
  • Relative Articles

    [2]Genshu Tong. How to Consider Dynamic Elastic-Plastic Stability Due to Earthquake[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2023, 38(3): 51-53. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS22102815
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(5)

    1. 盛长泉,耿琳,韩皓亮,张晓峰,马志远. 地面逆向拼装技术在幕墙支撑钢结构安装中的应用. 建筑技术开发. 2024(08): 9-11 .
    2. 程兴华. 机场航站楼扩建工程结构设计探析. 居舍. 2023(13): 109-112 .
    3. 杨广磊. 建筑钢结构抗震设计及优化策略. 四川水泥. 2022(02): 90-92 .
    4. 张艳. 耗能减震钢结构基于性能的抗震设计方法研究. 砖瓦. 2022(03): 91-93 .
    5. 夏心红,方辉,毛健宇,王四清,董冰. 长沙黄花国际机场T2航站楼出发大厅抗震性能分析. 建筑结构. 2022(22): 1-6+34 .

    Other cited types(2)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-04010203040
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 10.9 %FULLTEXT: 10.9 %META: 78.0 %META: 78.0 %PDF: 11.1 %PDF: 11.1 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 14.7 %其他: 14.7 %其他: 2.9 %其他: 2.9 %China: 2.1 %China: 2.1 %Japan: 0.1 %Japan: 0.1 %[]: 0.4 %[]: 0.4 %上海: 2.5 %上海: 2.5 %东莞: 0.6 %东莞: 0.6 %临汾: 0.1 %临汾: 0.1 %佛山: 0.6 %佛山: 0.6 %保定: 0.7 %保定: 0.7 %克孜勒苏: 0.1 %克孜勒苏: 0.1 %六安: 0.1 %六安: 0.1 %加利福尼亚州: 0.1 %加利福尼亚州: 0.1 %北京: 11.6 %北京: 11.6 %北海: 0.1 %北海: 0.1 %十堰: 0.3 %十堰: 0.3 %南京: 3.5 %南京: 3.5 %南充: 0.1 %南充: 0.1 %南昌: 0.1 %南昌: 0.1 %台州: 0.1 %台州: 0.1 %合肥: 0.3 %合肥: 0.3 %呼和浩特: 0.3 %呼和浩特: 0.3 %咸阳: 0.1 %咸阳: 0.1 %大同: 0.1 %大同: 0.1 %大连: 0.7 %大连: 0.7 %天水: 0.3 %天水: 0.3 %天津: 0.8 %天津: 0.8 %太原: 0.3 %太原: 0.3 %宁波: 0.6 %宁波: 0.6 %宣城: 0.1 %宣城: 0.1 %宿州: 0.3 %宿州: 0.3 %常州: 0.7 %常州: 0.7 %常德: 0.1 %常德: 0.1 %平顶山: 0.1 %平顶山: 0.1 %广州: 2.1 %广州: 2.1 %廊坊: 0.6 %廊坊: 0.6 %张家口: 0.6 %张家口: 0.6 %徐州: 0.4 %徐州: 0.4 %德阳: 0.1 %德阳: 0.1 %成都: 1.2 %成都: 1.2 %扬州: 0.7 %扬州: 0.7 %昆明: 1.1 %昆明: 1.1 %晋城: 0.6 %晋城: 0.6 %杭州: 0.6 %杭州: 0.6 %榆林: 0.1 %榆林: 0.1 %武汉: 1.1 %武汉: 1.1 %沈阳: 0.6 %沈阳: 0.6 %河源: 0.1 %河源: 0.1 %法兰克福: 0.8 %法兰克福: 0.8 %法尔肯施泰因: 1.1 %法尔肯施泰因: 1.1 %洛阳: 0.1 %洛阳: 0.1 %济南: 1.0 %济南: 1.0 %济宁: 0.1 %济宁: 0.1 %海口: 0.1 %海口: 0.1 %深圳: 1.1 %深圳: 1.1 %温州: 0.1 %温州: 0.1 %湛江: 0.3 %湛江: 0.3 %滨州: 0.3 %滨州: 0.3 %漯河: 0.4 %漯河: 0.4 %玉林: 0.1 %玉林: 0.1 %盐城: 0.1 %盐城: 0.1 %石家庄: 0.3 %石家庄: 0.3 %福州: 0.3 %福州: 0.3 %秦皇岛: 0.1 %秦皇岛: 0.1 %绍兴: 0.1 %绍兴: 0.1 %美国伊利诺斯芝加哥: 0.1 %美国伊利诺斯芝加哥: 0.1 %芒廷维尤: 10.4 %芒廷维尤: 10.4 %芝加哥: 0.1 %芝加哥: 0.1 %菏泽: 0.3 %菏泽: 0.3 %襄阳: 0.3 %襄阳: 0.3 %西宁: 19.5 %西宁: 19.5 %西安: 0.1 %西安: 0.1 %贵阳: 0.1 %贵阳: 0.1 %运城: 0.8 %运城: 0.8 %邯郸: 0.1 %邯郸: 0.1 %郑州: 0.7 %郑州: 0.7 %重庆: 1.1 %重庆: 1.1 %长沙: 1.7 %长沙: 1.7 %长治: 0.3 %长治: 0.3 %阜新: 0.1 %阜新: 0.1 %阳泉: 0.6 %阳泉: 0.6 %青岛: 0.7 %青岛: 0.7 %青岛市黄岛区: 0.1 %青岛市黄岛区: 0.1 %鞍山: 0.1 %鞍山: 0.1 %马湾: 0.4 %马湾: 0.4 %其他其他ChinaJapan[]上海东莞临汾佛山保定克孜勒苏六安加利福尼亚州北京北海十堰南京南充南昌台州合肥呼和浩特咸阳大同大连天水天津太原宁波宣城宿州常州常德平顶山广州廊坊张家口徐州德阳成都扬州昆明晋城杭州榆林武汉沈阳河源法兰克福法尔肯施泰因洛阳济南济宁海口深圳温州湛江滨州漯河玉林盐城石家庄福州秦皇岛绍兴美国伊利诺斯芝加哥芒廷维尤芝加哥菏泽襄阳西宁西安贵阳运城邯郸郑州重庆长沙长治阜新阳泉青岛青岛市黄岛区鞍山马湾

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (563) PDF downloads(80) Cited by(7)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return