Volume 40 Issue 8
Aug.  2025
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Wang Gang, Wan Fenli, Luo Feng, Zhao Caiqi. Health Assessment and Reinforcement Design of a Steel Horse-Riding Statue Structure[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2025, 40(8): 1-11. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS24120202
Citation: Wang Gang, Wan Fenli, Luo Feng, Zhao Caiqi. Health Assessment and Reinforcement Design of a Steel Horse-Riding Statue Structure[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2025, 40(8): 1-11. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS24120202

Health Assessment and Reinforcement Design of a Steel Horse-Riding Statue Structure

doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS24120202
  • Received Date: 2024-12-02
    Available Online: 2025-10-27
  • Publish Date: 2025-08-22
  • The bronze horse statue in Quanzhou Zhengchenggong Park was officially completed and opened to the public in 2004 and has been in existence for over 20 years. Due to the lack of regular inspection and maintenance of the statue's structure during long-term use, there have been multiple instances of damage and water leaks on the surface of the bronze statue, resulting in severe corrosion of the main steel structure and the secondary support system behind the copper plate. Therefore, a comprehensive inspection of the statue's interior is required. The structure was inspected using instruments such as ultrasonic thickness gauges and vernier calipers. The wall thickness of the steel pipe was reduced by about 2 mm due to corrosion, and the measured wall thickness of the ball joint was an average of 1-2 mm less than the original design wall thickness. The damaged thickness of the steel plate was 1 mm. Based on the construction drawings and actual measurement results, an overall structural evaluation model was established. The calculation results showed that the stress of the steel plate on the horse's back far exceeded the design value for steels, and the stress ratio of most members in the body and cloak was much greater than 1.0. The displacement ratio under the X-direction wind load was much greater than 1/150, indicating that the strength and stiffness of the main structure had exceeded the limit. A joint finite element analysis model was established in ABAQUS using the measured thickness, and the results showed that the stress in the body joint and the left hind leg joint had exceeded the strength design value for steels. Two semi-circular section reinforcement members were used to reinforce the original corroded steel pipe. The finite element simulation results showed that the reinforcement members and the circular steel pipe could work together to improve the compressive and bending bearing performance of the component. The steel plate was reinforced by welded plates, and finite element analysis confirmed that the stress distribution of the reinforced plate was generally consistent with that of the original steel plate; thus, the plate coukd work together with the original steel plate. Circular stiffeners were added between adjacent members and ball joints, and finite element analysis proved that the stiffeners effectively participate in load transfer, thereby reinforcing and strengthening the joints. Based on the reinforcement measures taken, establish a reinforced overall analysis model in MIDAS/Gen, and then apply the load combination conditions from the current specifications to complete the overall structural reinforcement analysis. The results indicated that the overall structural strength and stiffness indicators after implementing reinforcement measures met the requirements of the current relevant specifications. A numerical wind tunnel model was established using RWIND to obtain the wind pressure distribution of the structure under wind loads in the X and Y directions. The wind pressure was then applied to the structural analysis model for wind stability analysis. The results showed that the critical load coefficients in the X and Y directions were 10.7 and 25.9, respectively, both significantly higher than the limit of 4.2 in the Technical Specification for Space Frame Structures(JGJ 7‒2010) .
  • loading
  • [1]
    宫志群,丁北斗,马占国,等. 钢板加固螺栓球节点力学性能试验研究[J]. 建筑结构,2024,54(3):15- 20.
    [2]
    杨文,石永久,王元清,等. 螺栓端板连接节点加固后承载性能有限元分析[J]. 工程抗震与加固改造,2006,28(1):90- 99.
    [3]
    刘世龙,张令,杨港,等. 基于ABAQUS的预应力碳纤维板加固RC圆柱在施工阶段的摩擦预应力损失研究[J]. 土木工程,2024,13(6):901- 911.
    [4]
    赵更歧,何昱炘,王庆辉,等. 粘钢加固门式刚架柱锚固措施的受力性能研究[J]. 工程抗震与加固改造,2020,42(4):25- 30,165.
    [5]
    徐京,聂祺,苏韧,等. 钢板铰与钢板带和套管集成加固网架结构方法研究[J]. 工程抗震与加固改造,2024,46(2):157- 163.
    [6]
    中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 建筑抗震设计标准:GB/T 50011—2010[S]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2024.
    [7]
    中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 建筑结构荷载规范:GB 50009—2012[S]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2012.
    [8]
    中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 钢结构设计标准:GB 50017—2017[S]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2018.
    [9]
    中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 既有建筑鉴定与加固通用规范:GB 55021—2021[S]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2021.
    [10]
    中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 建筑结构检测技术标准:GB/T 50344—2019[S]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2019.
    [11]
    孟文清,严珮珮,崔邯龙,等. 间断焊接包管加固圆钢管构件轴压极限承载力研究[J]. 建筑钢结构进展,2024,26(6):84- 93.
    [12]
    臧倩,刘红波,李砚波,等. 球外肋板加固焊接空心球节点的轴拉力学性能[J]. 空间结构,2022(1):71- 78
    [13]
    中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 建筑工程风洞试验方法标准:JGJ/T 338—2014[S]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2014.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (71) PDF downloads(9) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return