Wei Chen, Kwok-Fai Chung. Fatigue Performance Study on Q690 High Strength Steels and Their Welded Sections[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2024, 39(5): 27-33. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS24050104
Citation: Wei Chen, Kwok-Fai Chung. Fatigue Performance Study on Q690 High Strength Steels and Their Welded Sections[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2024, 39(5): 27-33. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS24050104

Fatigue Performance Study on Q690 High Strength Steels and Their Welded Sections

doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS24050104
  • Received Date: 2024-05-01
    Available Online: 2024-06-22
  • Publish Date: 2024-05-22
  • High strength steel with nominal yield strength, fy, no smaller than 460 MPa has been progressively applied in buildings and bridges due to its good material properties. Compared with normal strength steel, high strength steels have higher yield strength which may reduce the size and dimension of members. In addition, the thinner steel plates may help avoid welding problems associated with thick steel plates as reducing the amount of welding work and improving the welding quality. Fatigue damage is one of the most critical service problems of steel bridge structures. There is no special design standard for fatigue performance of high strength steels in the current design code. This paper presents an experimental investigation on fatigue performance of Q690 high strength steels and their welded sections to determine the fatigue strength, so as to promoto the application of Q690 high strength steel in practical engineering. The monotonic tensile tests were carried out on Q690 high strength steels and their welded sections to examine the material properties. The welded section was etched before test to distinguish the position of base metal, heat affected zone and welded metal during testing, and determined the position of necking was heat affected zone. The various applied loadings of fatigue tests were determined according to the mechanical properties examined in the tensile test, and a series of high-cycle-low-strain cyclic tests on smooth cylindrical coupons had been conducted to determine the S-N curves for Q690 high strength steels and their welded sections. The fatigue limit of Q690 welded sections is 420 MPa, and that of base plate is 668. 8 MPa. It means that the fatigue performance of Q690 welded sections is worse than that of Q690 base plate, while the fatigue resistance of both the Q690 base plate and their welded sections are significantly larger than those given in Eurocode (base plate: 118 MPa, welded section: 82.5 MPa). The hardness test was conducted on the Q690 welded section to determine its hardness distribution along the longitudinal direction. It is found that the weld metal exhibits the larger hardness value as 328 HV, while the softening was identified in the heat affected zone with a hardness of 240 HV, which indicated that the hardness distribution of Q690 welded section is uneven and the difference is significant. Based on the results of etching tests and SEM observations on the fracture surfaces under fatigue loadings, it is found that the crack initiated at the fusion zone rather than the heat affected zone. What’s more, non-metallic inclusions have been identified in the fracture surfaces of Q690 welded sections, it means that the initial imperfections may be a critical parameter affecting the fatigue performance of Q690 welded sections.
  • [1]
    Schubnell J, Discher D, Farajian M. Determination of the static, dynamic and cyclic properties of the heat affected zone for different steel grades[J]. Materials Testing, 2019,61(7):635-642.
    [2]
    de Jesus A M, Matos R, Fontoura B F, et al. A comparison of the fatigue behavior between Q355 and S690 steel grades[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2012, 79:140-150.
    [3]
    BSI. Metallic materials-tensile testing part 1:method of test at room temperature:BS EN ISO 6892-1:2016[S]. London:British Standards Institution, 2016.
    [4]
    European Committee for Standardization. Eurocode 3:design of steel structures, part 1-1:general rules and rules for buildings:EN 1993-1-1[S]. Brussels:CEN, 2005.
    [5]
    European Committee for Standardization. Eurocode 3:design of steel structures, part 1-12:additional rules for the extension of EN 1993 up to steel grades S700:EN 1993-1-12[S]. Brussels:CEN, 2007.
    [6]
    American Society for Testing and Materials. Standard test method for strain-controlled fatigue testing:ASTM E606/E606M-12[S]. West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, USA:ASTM International, 2012.
    [7]
    European Committee for Standardization. Eurocode 3:design of steel structures, part 1-9:fatigue:EN 1993-1-9[S]. Brussels:CEN, 2005.
    [8]
    Coffin Jr L F. A study of the effects of cyclic thermal stresses on a ductile metal[J]. Transactions of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 1954, 76(6):931-949.
    [9]
    Manson S S. Behavior of materials under conditions of thermal stress[M]. Washington, USA:National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, 1953.
    [10]
    Morrow J D. Cyclic plastic strain energy and fatigue of metals[J]. ASTM Special Technical Publication, 1965, 378:45-87.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]Zhenghao Qian, Weiyong Wang. Research on Mechanical Properties of Circular Tubed Steel-Reinforced Concrete Stub Columns with High-Strength Steel Under Axial Compression[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2025, 40(2): 29-36. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS24091402
    [2]Shuxin Liu, Yongqian Zhang, Yuan Liu, Hongpeng Sun. Status and Prospect of Boiler Steel Structure Technology Development[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2024, 39(11): 56-62. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS24101036
    [3]Hao Jin, Mengfei Zhu, Kwok-Fai Chung, Yanhua Wang, Hailong Liu. Mechanical Properties of Thick Plates After Welding of Q690 High Strength Steel[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2024, 39(5): 17-26. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS24050103
    [4]Mengfei Zhu, Ho-Cheung Ho, Hao Jin, Kwok-Fai Chung. Experimental Investigation into the Axial Compression of Welded Stocky Columns of Q690 and Q960 High Strength Steel[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2024, 39(5): 49-56. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS24050107
    [5]Bin Li, Xiao Liu, Kwok-Fai Chung. Tensile Properties of Q690-QT High Strength Steel Welded Sections with Different Heat Input Energy During Welding[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2024, 39(5): 34-40. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS24050105
    [6]Jianyu Yao, Ruiting Deng, Baofeng Zheng, Ganping Shu. Study on Mechanical Properties of Weld Joints of Stainless Steel and Carbon Steel[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2023, 38(10): 25-31. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS23102401
    [7]Hua Zhang, Qinghua Zhang, Shenyou Song, Liming Li, Jiashun Ruan. Review on the Development Status of Orthotropic Steel Deck's Manufacturing Techniques[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2022, 37(4): 1-13. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgs21121901
    [8]WANG Wei-yong, WANG Zi-qi, TAN Xing-kui, PANG Shi-yun, HUANG Dan, HUANG Yong-dong. Load Bearing Capacity and Economic Analysis of Cold-Formed Stiffened High-Strength Steel Beams[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2022, 37(10): 32-42. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS22033101
    [9]Liu Zhiguo, Li Junping, Che Ping, Zhang Haifeng. Discussion on the Detailed Design of the Composite Beam Bridge Structure in China[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2021, 36(11): 28-33. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS20062702
    [10]Kening Hu, Houdeng Zhang, Fan Wu, Zhixing Zhou. Research on the Fatigue Performance of Rib-to-Deck Welded Joints of Wujiagang Yangtze River Bridge[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2021, 36(10): 34-41. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgs20092801
    [11]Fei Yin, Lu Yang, Gang Shi, Xiaolin Li. OVERVIEW OF RESEARCH PROGRESS FOR SEISMIC BEHAVIOR OF HIGH STRENGTH STEEL STRUCTURES[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2020, 35(3): 1-25. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgSE20010805
    [12]Le Gao, Tengfei Li, Jiangran Guo, Mingzhou Su, Yan Sui, Peipei Jiao. Remote Collaborative Test on Seismic Behavior of High Strength Steel Composite Eccentrically Braced Frames[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2020, 35(12): 8-15. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS20120501
  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-040102030405060
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 11.1 %FULLTEXT: 11.1 %META: 86.4 %META: 86.4 %PDF: 2.5 %PDF: 2.5 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 25.0 %其他: 25.0 %其他: 0.2 %其他: 0.2 %Central District: 2.5 %Central District: 2.5 %Kennedy Town: 0.2 %Kennedy Town: 0.2 %上海: 1.2 %上海: 1.2 %中山: 0.2 %中山: 0.2 %保定: 0.2 %保定: 0.2 %北京: 4.2 %北京: 4.2 %十堰: 1.2 %十堰: 1.2 %南京: 1.0 %南京: 1.0 %南昌: 0.5 %南昌: 0.5 %南通: 0.7 %南通: 0.7 %厦门: 0.5 %厦门: 0.5 %哈尔滨: 0.2 %哈尔滨: 0.2 %嘉兴: 0.5 %嘉兴: 0.5 %天津: 3.7 %天津: 3.7 %太原: 1.0 %太原: 1.0 %宜昌: 0.2 %宜昌: 0.2 %宣城: 0.5 %宣城: 0.5 %常州: 1.0 %常州: 1.0 %常德: 0.2 %常德: 0.2 %广州: 2.2 %广州: 2.2 %庆阳: 0.2 %庆阳: 0.2 %廊坊: 0.2 %廊坊: 0.2 %张家口: 5.4 %张家口: 5.4 %悉尼: 0.5 %悉尼: 0.5 %扬州: 2.7 %扬州: 2.7 %晋城: 0.2 %晋城: 0.2 %杭州: 1.2 %杭州: 1.2 %武汉: 1.5 %武汉: 1.5 %池州: 0.2 %池州: 0.2 %济南: 0.2 %济南: 0.2 %温州: 1.0 %温州: 1.0 %漯河: 12.4 %漯河: 12.4 %石家庄: 0.7 %石家庄: 0.7 %福州: 1.5 %福州: 1.5 %芒廷维尤: 16.1 %芒廷维尤: 16.1 %芜湖: 0.2 %芜湖: 0.2 %芝加哥: 0.7 %芝加哥: 0.7 %蚌埠: 0.2 %蚌埠: 0.2 %衡阳: 0.5 %衡阳: 0.5 %西宁: 1.2 %西宁: 1.2 %西雅图: 0.7 %西雅图: 0.7 %贵阳: 0.2 %贵阳: 0.2 %运城: 0.5 %运城: 0.5 %邯郸: 1.0 %邯郸: 1.0 %郑州: 0.2 %郑州: 0.2 %长春: 0.2 %长春: 0.2 %长沙: 2.2 %长沙: 2.2 %其他其他Central DistrictKennedy Town上海中山保定北京十堰南京南昌南通厦门哈尔滨嘉兴天津太原宜昌宣城常州常德广州庆阳廊坊张家口悉尼扬州晋城杭州武汉池州济南温州漯河石家庄福州芒廷维尤芜湖芝加哥蚌埠衡阳西宁西雅图贵阳运城邯郸郑州长春长沙

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (346) PDF downloads(11) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return