Yingying Zhang, Ziang Zhao, Junhao Xu, Bin Yang, Longjie Cui, Qingsong Lin, Jun Xu. Research on Carbon Emission Accounting and Emission Reduction Strategy of the Whole Life Cycle of Architectural Membrane Structure[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2024, 39(9): 43-51. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS24011501
Citation: Yingying Zhang, Ziang Zhao, Junhao Xu, Bin Yang, Longjie Cui, Qingsong Lin, Jun Xu. Research on Carbon Emission Accounting and Emission Reduction Strategy of the Whole Life Cycle of Architectural Membrane Structure[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2024, 39(9): 43-51. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS24011501

Research on Carbon Emission Accounting and Emission Reduction Strategy of the Whole Life Cycle of Architectural Membrane Structure

doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS24011501
  • Received Date: 2024-01-15
    Available Online: 2024-09-19
  • Membrane structure has the advantages of green environmental protection and sustainable development, and is an important research direction for China to achieve energy conservation and emission reduction in the field of buildings. There are no studies on carbon trace tracking, carbon emission accounting, and carbon emission factor statistics of building membrane structures at home and abroad. Based on the above background, this study aims to propose a calculation strategy for the carbon emissions of the whole life cycle of building membrane structures and analyze the key factors affecting emissions. By adopting a comprehensive carbon emission assessment method, combined with Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and carbon source tracking calculation, the whole life cycle of a typical building membrane structure was studied in detail, and carbon emission calculation models at different stages were established to calculate the carbon emissions at each stage. The results show that the carbon emissions generated in the production stage of the membrane structure project are 8 621.61 kgCO2e, accounting for 79.75%, which is the main source of carbon emissions in the whole life cycle of the structure, followed by the construction stage, accounting for 16.53%, and the transportation stage and service dismantling stage accounted for a small proportion; It is suggested that the membrane structure should further optimize the production process in the production stage, adopt energy-saving technology and equipment, and renewable energy to reduce carbon emissions in the production process of materials. This study provides an important data reference for the carbon accounting of membrane structures, and provides important support for the high-quality and sustainable development of membrane structures.
  • [1]
    张其林.膜结构在我国的应用回顾和未来发展[J].建筑结构, 2019, 49(19):55-64.
    [2]
    薛素铎.中国空间结构的近期发展与工程实践(英文)[J].钢结构(中英文), 2020, 35(7):1-16.
    [3]
    张毅刚.从国外近年来的应用与研究看膜结构的发展[J].钢结构, 2013, 28(11):1-9.
    [4]
    武岳,杨庆山,沈世钊.膜结构分析理论研究现状与展望[J].工程力学, 2014, 31(2):1-14.
    [5]
    张营营,张其林,徐俊豪,等.现代织物类膜材料力学性能研究进展[J].钢结构(中英文), 2024,39(2):1-19.
    [6]
    中国工程建设标准化协会.膜结构技术规程:CECS 158:2015[S].北京:中国计划出版社, 2015.
    [7]
    郭宇翔,胡建辉,陈务军.极地极昼和低温环境下新型充气膜结构建筑热性能研究[C]//第二十三届全国现代结构工程学术研讨会论文集. 2023:52-55.
    [8]
    王宁睿,张福,吴明儿.气肋式膜结构及其应用[J].钢结构(中英文), 2024,39(2):20-29.
    [9]
    中国建筑科学研究院.建筑碳排放计算标准:GB/T 51366-2019[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2019.
    [10]
    李庆伟,岳清瑞,金红伟,等.双碳背景下钢结构碳排放研究进展[J].建筑结构, 2023, 53(17):1-7

    ,36.
    [11]
    李庆伟,陈振明,岳清瑞,等.钢结构制造全过程碳排放与碳减排研究[J].建筑结构, 2023, 53(17):8-13.
    [12]
    乔兰,邓乃夫,李庆文,等.公路工程建设阶段全生命周期碳排放智能估算方法[J].工程科学学报, 2023, 45(12):2173-2186.
    [13]
    王琳,杨木言,高钰强.黄土隧道施工阶段碳排放计算与分析[J].环境工程, 2023, 41(10):99-107

    ,172.
    [14]
    于晓涵,李秀领,马锐,等.基于LCA理论的装配式高延性再生微粉混凝土结构碳排放研究[J/OL].材料导报,2023[2023-12-12] http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/50.

    1078.TB.20231211.1002.008.html.
    [15]
    贾兆琪,杨璐,及炜煜,等.基于生命周期评价的钢结构碳排放计算模型研究[J].工业建筑, 2023, 53(增刊1):301-308,319.
    [16]
    曹西,缪昌铅,潘海涛.基于碳排放模型的装配式混凝土与现浇建筑碳排放比较分析与研究[J].建筑结构,2021,51(增刊2):1233-1237.
    [17]
    赵彦革,孙倩,韦婉,等.建筑结构设计对碳排放的影响研究[J].建筑结构, 2023, 53(17):19-23.
    [18]
    齐亚楠,邓万军.基于LCA的高速公路施工期碳排放量化边界界定[J].中国公路, 2023(5):88-92.
    [19]
    赵晨曦.涤纶增强FEVE建筑用膜结构材料的研发及力学性能研究[D].上海:东华大学, 2018.
    [20]
    陈超,薄艾,刘亚运,等.建筑碳排放量计算方法发展历程[J].工程质量,2023,41(5):60-65.
    [21]
    朱聪聪.玻璃纤维-PTFE建筑膜结构材料的工艺优化及性能研究[D].上海:东华大学, 2013.
    [22]
    刘涛,王楠,许熙博,等.纤维增强复合材料废弃物在土木工程的回收再利用现状[J].再生资源与循环经济, 2023, 16(8):26-33.
    [23]
    Shuaib N A, Mativenga P T, Kazie J, et al. Resource efficiencyand composite waste in UK supply chain[J]. Procedia CIRP,2015, 29:662-667.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]Zhenming Chen, Ka Bian, Fei Gao, Junbo Chen, Meng Xiao. Anti-Slip Experimental Research on Aluminum-Based Metalized Faying Surfaces of Q690 High Strength Steel with Different Bolt Hole Types[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2024, 39(5): 8-16. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS24050102
    [2]Zhaoxin Hou, Chao Gong, Zihao Liang, Gang Wang, Zhidong Yao. Experimental Investigation on the Effects of Temperature on the Bearing Capacity of High Strength Bolt Connections[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2021, 36(1): 50-59. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS20081803
    [3]Zhaoxin Hou, Chao Gong, Yanxia Zhang, Zihao Liang, Weiqiao Liang, Wujun Fang. New Development of High Strength Bolt Connections in Steel Structures[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2021, 36(1): 1-12. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS20081901
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(1)

    1. 刘仲洋,汤青松,董新元,翁维素,赵佳兴,张晋梅. 冷弯方钢管柱-H型钢梁外伸端板单向螺栓连接节点性能试验研究. 建筑结构. 2021(02): 57-63 .

    Other cited types(6)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-04050100150200250300
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 21.9 %FULLTEXT: 21.9 %META: 74.4 %META: 74.4 %PDF: 3.7 %PDF: 3.7 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 30.0 %其他: 30.0 %其他: 2.5 %其他: 2.5 %Baden: 0.2 %Baden: 0.2 %Ballwin: 0.1 %Ballwin: 0.1 %Baltimore: 0.1 %Baltimore: 0.1 %Boiling Springs: 0.1 %Boiling Springs: 0.1 %Bruderheim: 0.1 %Bruderheim: 0.1 %Carrboro: 0.1 %Carrboro: 0.1 %Central District: 1.2 %Central District: 1.2 %China: 0.6 %China: 0.6 %Edinburg: 0.0 %Edinburg: 0.0 %Halethorpe: 0.1 %Halethorpe: 0.1 %Hamilton: 0.1 %Hamilton: 0.1 %Indianapolis: 0.3 %Indianapolis: 0.3 %Japan: 0.1 %Japan: 0.1 %Kao-sung: 0.1 %Kao-sung: 0.1 %Kennedy Town: 0.1 %Kennedy Town: 0.1 %Malvern: 0.2 %Malvern: 0.2 %Matawan: 0.0 %Matawan: 0.0 %Mercer Island: 0.1 %Mercer Island: 0.1 %Nahant: 0.1 %Nahant: 0.1 %Norman: 0.2 %Norman: 0.2 %Reserved: 0.0 %Reserved: 0.0 %Rochester: 0.1 %Rochester: 0.1 %San Jose: 0.1 %San Jose: 0.1 %Seattle: 0.3 %Seattle: 0.3 %Sitka: 0.1 %Sitka: 0.1 %Sterling: 0.1 %Sterling: 0.1 %Sugar Land: 0.0 %Sugar Land: 0.0 %Taoyuan District: 0.0 %Taoyuan District: 0.0 %Tiruchi: 0.1 %Tiruchi: 0.1 %Twinsburg: 0.1 %Twinsburg: 0.1 %United States: 0.1 %United States: 0.1 %Valencia: 0.1 %Valencia: 0.1 %[]: 0.3 %[]: 0.3 %上海: 3.0 %上海: 3.0 %东京: 0.1 %东京: 0.1 %东莞: 0.3 %东莞: 0.3 %中山: 0.2 %中山: 0.2 %丹佛: 0.1 %丹佛: 0.1 %丽水: 0.0 %丽水: 0.0 %九龙: 0.0 %九龙: 0.0 %亚兹德: 0.1 %亚兹德: 0.1 %伊斯坦布尔: 0.1 %伊斯坦布尔: 0.1 %伊萨卡: 0.1 %伊萨卡: 0.1 %休斯敦: 0.2 %休斯敦: 0.2 %休斯顿: 0.5 %休斯顿: 0.5 %伦敦: 0.1 %伦敦: 0.1 %伯灵顿: 0.1 %伯灵顿: 0.1 %佛山: 0.0 %佛山: 0.0 %保定: 0.1 %保定: 0.1 %元朗新墟: 0.1 %元朗新墟: 0.1 %克雷塔罗: 0.1 %克雷塔罗: 0.1 %六安: 0.1 %六安: 0.1 %兰州: 0.1 %兰州: 0.1 %加利福尼亚州: 0.7 %加利福尼亚州: 0.7 %北京: 3.3 %北京: 3.3 %匹兹堡: 0.1 %匹兹堡: 0.1 %十堰: 0.2 %十堰: 0.2 %华盛顿: 0.0 %华盛顿: 0.0 %南京: 0.9 %南京: 0.9 %南京市江宁区: 0.1 %南京市江宁区: 0.1 %南宁: 0.0 %南宁: 0.0 %南昌: 0.1 %南昌: 0.1 %南甘马粦省: 0.1 %南甘马粦省: 0.1 %南通: 0.3 %南通: 0.3 %占碑: 0.1 %占碑: 0.1 %卡尔加里: 0.1 %卡尔加里: 0.1 %卡拉奇: 0.2 %卡拉奇: 0.2 %卡纳塔克: 0.1 %卡纳塔克: 0.1 %厦门: 0.2 %厦门: 0.2 %台北: 0.1 %台北: 0.1 %合肥: 0.2 %合肥: 0.2 %哈密: 0.1 %哈密: 0.1 %哈尔滨: 0.1 %哈尔滨: 0.1 %唐山: 0.0 %唐山: 0.0 %商丘: 0.1 %商丘: 0.1 %喀什: 0.0 %喀什: 0.0 %嘉兴: 0.3 %嘉兴: 0.3 %圣保罗: 0.1 %圣保罗: 0.1 %圣克拉拉: 0.4 %圣克拉拉: 0.4 %圣地亚哥: 0.8 %圣地亚哥: 0.8 %坦佩: 0.2 %坦佩: 0.2 %墨尔本: 0.1 %墨尔本: 0.1 %夏尔迦: 0.1 %夏尔迦: 0.1 %夏洛特: 0.1 %夏洛特: 0.1 %多哈: 0.1 %多哈: 0.1 %大同: 0.0 %大同: 0.0 %大连: 0.1 %大连: 0.1 %天津: 1.7 %天津: 1.7 %太原: 0.1 %太原: 0.1 %奥兰多: 0.1 %奥兰多: 0.1 %威海: 0.0 %威海: 0.0 %宁波: 0.1 %宁波: 0.1 %安卡拉: 0.1 %安卡拉: 0.1 %安阳: 0.1 %安阳: 0.1 %宣城: 0.2 %宣城: 0.2 %密尔沃基: 0.1 %密尔沃基: 0.1 %密蘇里城: 0.5 %密蘇里城: 0.5 %尖竹汶府: 0.0 %尖竹汶府: 0.0 %巴拉瑞特: 0.0 %巴拉瑞特: 0.0 %巴格达: 0.1 %巴格达: 0.1 %巴淡岛: 0.1 %巴淡岛: 0.1 %巴罗达: 0.1 %巴罗达: 0.1 %巴黎: 0.1 %巴黎: 0.1 %布兰普顿: 0.1 %布兰普顿: 0.1 %布宜诺斯艾利斯: 0.1 %布宜诺斯艾利斯: 0.1 %布鲁克林区: 0.1 %布鲁克林区: 0.1 %常州: 0.2 %常州: 0.2 %常德: 0.0 %常德: 0.0 %平顶山: 0.0 %平顶山: 0.0 %广州: 1.1 %广州: 1.1 %庆尚北道: 0.2 %庆尚北道: 0.2 %延安: 0.0 %延安: 0.0 %开封: 0.0 %开封: 0.0 %开罗: 0.1 %开罗: 0.1 %张家口: 0.4 %张家口: 0.4 %徐州: 0.1 %徐州: 0.1 %德州: 0.3 %德州: 0.3 %德罕: 0.0 %德罕: 0.0 %德黑兰: 0.1 %德黑兰: 0.1 %悉尼: 0.3 %悉尼: 0.3 %惠州: 0.0 %惠州: 0.0 %意法半: 0.1 %意法半: 0.1 %成都: 0.4 %成都: 0.4 %托莱多: 0.1 %托莱多: 0.1 %扬州: 1.4 %扬州: 1.4 %拉斯维加斯: 0.1 %拉斯维加斯: 0.1 %拉普拉普: 0.0 %拉普拉普: 0.0 %拉瓦勒: 0.1 %拉瓦勒: 0.1 %斯普林菲尔德: 0.1 %斯普林菲尔德: 0.1 %新乡: 0.0 %新乡: 0.0 %新加坡: 0.1 %新加坡: 0.1 %无锡: 0.2 %无锡: 0.2 %旧金山: 0.2 %旧金山: 0.2 %昆明: 0.4 %昆明: 0.4 %晋城: 0.1 %晋城: 0.1 %曼谷: 0.2 %曼谷: 0.2 %杭州: 1.2 %杭州: 1.2 %柬埔寨: 0.0 %柬埔寨: 0.0 %格兰特县: 0.2 %格兰特县: 0.2 %格里利: 0.1 %格里利: 0.1 %桂林: 0.0 %桂林: 0.0 %梅州: 0.0 %梅州: 0.0 %梧州: 0.1 %梧州: 0.1 %森尼韦尔: 0.1 %森尼韦尔: 0.1 %武汉: 0.3 %武汉: 0.3 %汕头: 0.1 %汕头: 0.1 %沃思堡: 0.1 %沃思堡: 0.1 %沈阳: 0.1 %沈阳: 0.1 %河内: 0.1 %河内: 0.1 %泉州: 0.1 %泉州: 0.1 %法兰克福: 0.1 %法兰克福: 0.1 %法拉盛: 0.1 %法拉盛: 0.1 %泰州: 0.1 %泰州: 0.1 %洛杉矶: 0.0 %洛杉矶: 0.0 %济南: 0.4 %济南: 0.4 %海口: 0.0 %海口: 0.0 %淄博: 0.0 %淄博: 0.0 %深圳: 0.2 %深圳: 0.2 %温哥华: 0.1 %温哥华: 0.1 %温州: 0.5 %温州: 0.5 %湖州: 0.1 %湖州: 0.1 %滨州: 0.0 %滨州: 0.0 %漯河: 3.7 %漯河: 3.7 %漳州: 0.0 %漳州: 0.0 %烟台: 0.0 %烟台: 0.0 %玉溪: 0.0 %玉溪: 0.0 %珀斯: 0.2 %珀斯: 0.2 %瑟普赖斯: 0.1 %瑟普赖斯: 0.1 %白银: 0.0 %白银: 0.0 %益阳: 0.0 %益阳: 0.0 %石家庄: 0.6 %石家庄: 0.6 %福州: 0.1 %福州: 0.1 %秦皇岛: 0.1 %秦皇岛: 0.1 %米兰: 0.0 %米兰: 0.0 %约翰内斯堡: 0.3 %约翰内斯堡: 0.3 %纳尔德韦克: 0.1 %纳尔德韦克: 0.1 %纽瓦克: 0.1 %纽瓦克: 0.1 %纽约: 0.1 %纽约: 0.1 %绍兴: 0.0 %绍兴: 0.0 %罗奥尔凯埃: 0.1 %罗奥尔凯埃: 0.1 %美国爱荷华得梅因: 0.0 %美国爱荷华得梅因: 0.0 %胡志明: 0.4 %胡志明: 0.4 %舟山: 0.0 %舟山: 0.0 %艾因: 0.0 %艾因: 0.0 %芒廷维尤: 12.4 %芒廷维尤: 12.4 %芝加哥: 2.2 %芝加哥: 2.2 %苏州: 0.3 %苏州: 0.3 %荆门: 0.0 %荆门: 0.0 %莫斯科: 0.9 %莫斯科: 0.9 %莱芜: 0.0 %莱芜: 0.0 %菏泽: 0.0 %菏泽: 0.0 %营口: 0.1 %营口: 0.1 %葵涌: 0.1 %葵涌: 0.1 %蒂尔堡: 0.0 %蒂尔堡: 0.0 %蒂米什瓦拉: 0.0 %蒂米什瓦拉: 0.0 %衡水: 0.1 %衡水: 0.1 %衡阳: 0.1 %衡阳: 0.1 %西宁: 4.4 %西宁: 4.4 %西安: 0.1 %西安: 0.1 %西雅图: 0.1 %西雅图: 0.1 %贵阳: 0.0 %贵阳: 0.0 %费利蒙: 0.2 %费利蒙: 0.2 %赫尔辛基: 0.1 %赫尔辛基: 0.1 %达州: 0.2 %达州: 0.2 %达拉斯: 0.1 %达拉斯: 0.1 %运城: 0.2 %运城: 0.2 %连云港: 0.2 %连云港: 0.2 %迪尔伯恩: 0.0 %迪尔伯恩: 0.0 %迪拜: 0.4 %迪拜: 0.4 %邯郸: 0.2 %邯郸: 0.2 %郑州: 0.7 %郑州: 0.7 %重庆: 0.6 %重庆: 0.6 %金华: 0.0 %金华: 0.0 %金奈: 0.2 %金奈: 0.2 %长春: 0.0 %长春: 0.0 %长沙: 0.6 %长沙: 0.6 %阳泉: 0.4 %阳泉: 0.4 %阿布扎比: 0.3 %阿布扎比: 0.3 %阿瓜斯卡达特斯: 0.1 %阿瓜斯卡达特斯: 0.1 %陵水: 0.0 %陵水: 0.0 %雅典: 0.1 %雅典: 0.1 %雅加达: 0.4 %雅加达: 0.4 %青岛: 0.6 %青岛: 0.6 %首尔: 0.0 %首尔: 0.0 %首尔特别: 0.2 %首尔特别: 0.2 %香港: 0.0 %香港: 0.0 %香港特别行政区: 0.1 %香港特别行政区: 0.1 %马尼拉: 0.4 %马尼拉: 0.4 %马德里: 0.2 %马德里: 0.2 %马格朗: 0.1 %马格朗: 0.1 %马湾: 0.1 %马湾: 0.1 %马科姆: 0.1 %马科姆: 0.1 %马鞍山: 0.0 %马鞍山: 0.0 %高雄: 0.0 %高雄: 0.0 %魁北克: 0.0 %魁北克: 0.0 %黑堡: 0.1 %黑堡: 0.1 %黑森州: 0.1 %黑森州: 0.1 %齐齐哈尔: 0.0 %齐齐哈尔: 0.0 %龙岩: 0.0 %龙岩: 0.0 %其他其他BadenBallwinBaltimoreBoiling SpringsBruderheimCarrboroCentral DistrictChinaEdinburgHalethorpeHamiltonIndianapolisJapanKao-sungKennedy TownMalvernMatawanMercer IslandNahantNormanReservedRochesterSan JoseSeattleSitkaSterlingSugar LandTaoyuan DistrictTiruchiTwinsburgUnited StatesValencia[]上海东京东莞中山丹佛丽水九龙亚兹德伊斯坦布尔伊萨卡休斯敦休斯顿伦敦伯灵顿佛山保定元朗新墟克雷塔罗六安兰州加利福尼亚州北京匹兹堡十堰华盛顿南京南京市江宁区南宁南昌南甘马粦省南通占碑卡尔加里卡拉奇卡纳塔克厦门台北合肥哈密哈尔滨唐山商丘喀什嘉兴圣保罗圣克拉拉圣地亚哥坦佩墨尔本夏尔迦夏洛特多哈大同大连天津太原奥兰多威海宁波安卡拉安阳宣城密尔沃基密蘇里城尖竹汶府巴拉瑞特巴格达巴淡岛巴罗达巴黎布兰普顿布宜诺斯艾利斯布鲁克林区常州常德平顶山广州庆尚北道延安开封开罗张家口徐州德州德罕德黑兰悉尼惠州意法半成都托莱多扬州拉斯维加斯拉普拉普拉瓦勒斯普林菲尔德新乡新加坡无锡旧金山昆明晋城曼谷杭州柬埔寨格兰特县格里利桂林梅州梧州森尼韦尔武汉汕头沃思堡沈阳河内泉州法兰克福法拉盛泰州洛杉矶济南海口淄博深圳温哥华温州湖州滨州漯河漳州烟台玉溪珀斯瑟普赖斯白银益阳石家庄福州秦皇岛米兰约翰内斯堡纳尔德韦克纽瓦克纽约绍兴罗奥尔凯埃美国爱荷华得梅因胡志明舟山艾因芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州荆门莫斯科莱芜菏泽营口葵涌蒂尔堡蒂米什瓦拉衡水衡阳西宁西安西雅图贵阳费利蒙赫尔辛基达州达拉斯运城连云港迪尔伯恩迪拜邯郸郑州重庆金华金奈长春长沙阳泉阿布扎比阿瓜斯卡达特斯陵水雅典雅加达青岛首尔首尔特别香港香港特别行政区马尼拉马德里马格朗马湾马科姆马鞍山高雄魁北克黑堡黑森州齐齐哈尔龙岩1/2

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (163) PDF downloads(5) Cited by(7)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return