Yanxia Zhang, Tianhao Shi, Binglong Wu, Zhengqi Lin. Comparisons of Seismic Performance of Fully-Bolted Column Joints of Steel Tubular Columns with Built-in Cross-Shaped Core Barrels and Built-in Octagonal Core Tube[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2024, 39(12): 38-48. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS24011101
Citation: Yanxia Zhang, Tianhao Shi, Binglong Wu, Zhengqi Lin. Comparisons of Seismic Performance of Fully-Bolted Column Joints of Steel Tubular Columns with Built-in Cross-Shaped Core Barrels and Built-in Octagonal Core Tube[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2024, 39(12): 38-48. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS24011101

Comparisons of Seismic Performance of Fully-Bolted Column Joints of Steel Tubular Columns with Built-in Cross-Shaped Core Barrels and Built-in Octagonal Core Tube

doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS24011101
  • Received Date: 2024-01-11
    Available Online: 2025-01-25
  • There are some problems such as low construction efficiency, high labor cost and environmental pollution in the traditional full penetration welding joints of square steel tubular columns. In order to solve the above problems, the research group proposed the full-bolted connection joint of square steel tubular column with built-in octagonal core barrel. The joint connects the upper and lower columns by setting the core tube and high-strength bolts to realize the complete assembly on site. At present, a series of quasi-static, pseudo-dynamic and shaking table tests have been completed. The results showed that the joint form had the same mechanical properties as the welded joint, and could also realize the efficient assembly of the construction site. Furthermore, to enhance construction convenience and economy, as well as reduce the amount of steel and welding labor, a cross-shaped core barrel was suggested. The barrel was designed to have the same elastic bearing capacity as the octagonal core barrel. The finite element software ABAQUS was used to create a finite element analysis model for fully-bolted joints of square steel columns with built-in octagonal core barrels and built-in cross-shaped core barrels. The whole process of stress of the two connection joint members was analyzed, and the plastic development and final failure mode of the whole specimen and local members at the stress characteristic points were compared respectively. On this basis, the seismic performance of the two connection joints was further compared and analyzed, including hysteresis curve, skeleton curve, stiffness degradation, energy dissipation performance and residual deformation.
    The results of finite element analysis showed that the two types of joints damage under reciprocating loading were relatively similar, and both were plastic hinge section damage at the bottom of the column.The hysteresis curves of the forms of the two joints were full and there were no obvious pinching phenomenon. The equivalent viscous damping coefficients were between 0.25 and 0.28, and the seismic performance of the two was good. The elastic interlayer displacement angle ranged from 1/36 to 1/22, and the elastic-plastic interlayer displacement angle was 1/15, both of which met the requirements of Code for Seismic Design of Buildings(GB/T 50011—2010). Compared with the form of the joint with built-in octagonal core barrels, the yield bearing capacity of the form of the joint with built-in cross-shaped core barrels was reduced by 7.5%-16.3%, the peak bearing capacity was reduced by 7.8%, and the ductility performance was improved by about 66.7%. When the displacement angle was 1/100, 1/50 and 1/15, the stiffness of the joints with built-in cross-shaped core barrels was 0.94%, 2.05% and 8.43% higher,respectively. When the negative load was loaded to the displacement angle of 1/100,1/50 and 1/15, the stiffness of the joints with built-in cross-shaped core barrels was 0.91%, 1.85% and 8.51% higher, respectively. After loading, the residual deformation of the joints with built-in cross-shaped core barrels was 4.9% lower than that of the the joints built-in octagonal core barrels. The above research results showed that the joints with built-in octagonal core barrels had higher bearing capacity and energy dissipation capacity, and their hysteresis curves were fuller ; the stiffness degradation of the joints with built-in cross-shaped core barrels was gentle, the residual deformation after the earthquake was small, and the ductility performance was better. Both joint forms have good application prospects.
  • [1]
    梁炜宇. 焊接对多高层钢结构承载力影响的研究[D].杭州:浙江工业大学,2007.
    [2]
    顾正维. 钢结构半刚性连接的非线性分析[D].杭州:浙江大学,2003.
    [3]
    Kato B, Mukai A. Bolted tension flanges joining square hollow section members[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 1985, 5(3): 163-177.
    [4]
    Willibald S, Packer J A, Puthli R S. Experimental study of bolted HSS flange-plate connections in axial tension[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2002, 128(3): 328-336.
    [5]
    Willibald S, Packer J A, Puthli R S. Design recommendations for bolted rectangular HSS flange-plate connections in axial tension[J]. Engineering Journal-American Institute of Steel Construction, 2003, 40(1): 15-24.
    [6]
    孙鹏,王元清,石永久.方钢管法兰连接承载性能的有限元分析[J].中北大学学报(自然科学版),2009,30(5):430-435.
    [7]
    王元清,宗亮,石永久.钢管结构法兰连接节点抗弯承载性能的试验研究[J].湖南大学学报(自然科学版),2011,38(7):13-19.
    [8]
    Wang Y Q, Zong L, Shi Y J. Bending behavior and design model of bolted flange-plate connection[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2013, 84: 1-16.
    [9]
    杨松森,王燕,马强强.装配式外套筒-加强式外伸端板组件梁柱连接节点抗震性能试验研究[J].土木工程学报,2017,50(11):76-86.
    [10]
    Liu X C, Chen G P, Xu L, et al. Seismic performance of blind-bolted joints for square steel tube columns under bending-shear[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2021, 176, 106395.
    [11]
    Deng E F, Zong L, Ding Y, et al. Monotonic and cyclic response of bolted connections with welded cover plate for modular steel construction[J]. Engineering Structures, 2018, 167: 407-419.
    [12]
    Deng E F, Zong L, Ding Y, et al. Seismic behavior and design of cruciform bolted module-to-module connection with various reinforcing details[J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 2018, 133: 106-119.
    [13]
    Dai X M, Zong L, Ding Y, et al. Experimental study on seismic behavior of a novel plug-in self-lock joint for modular steel construction[J]. Engineering Structures, 2019, 181: 143-164.
    [14]
    Lacey A W, Chen W, Hao H, et al. New interlocking inter-module connection for modular steel buildings: experimental and numerical studies[J]. Engineering Structures, 2019, 198, 109465.
    [15]
    Sendanayake S V, Thambiratnam D P, Perera N, et al. Seismic mitigation of steel modular building structures through innovative inter-modular connections[J]. Heliyon, 2019, 5(11), e02751.
    [16]
    张艳霞,黄威振,郑明召,等.箱形柱内套筒式全螺栓拼接节点拟静力试验研究[J].工业建筑,2018,48(5):37-44.
    [17]
    张艳霞,武丙龙,张爱林,等. 箱形柱芯筒式双法兰连接平面框架抗震性能试验研究[J].建筑结构学报,2022,43(2):29-42.
    [18]
    Zhang A L, Chen X D, Zhang Y X, et al. Experimental and theoretical investigation of prefabricated separated core tube flange column connection joint[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2023, 201,107694.
    [19]
    张艳霞,王旭东,赵曦,等.箱形柱塞焊与单向螺栓芯筒式连接节点性能试验对比研究[J].工程力学,2021,38(10):103-118.
    [20]
    Zhang A L, Xie Z Q, Zhang Y X, et al. Shaking table test of a prefabricated steel frame structure with all-bolted connections[J]. Engineering Structures, 2021, 248,113273.
    [21]
    张艳霞,李宏伟,黄哲文,等.装配式钢结构自攻螺栓-芯筒法兰柱连接节点抗震性能有限元分析[J].北京建筑大学学报,2023,39(2):98-104.
    [22]
    张艳霞,程梦瑶,张爱林,等.箱形柱整体芯筒式全螺栓连接受力性能研究[J].建筑结构学报,2020,41(5):180-189.
    [23]
    Li G C, Shen M H, Ji D C, et al. Moment-rotation model of external cover plate joints between steel beams and concrete-filled square steel tubular columns with inner-I shaped CFRP profile[J]. Advanced Steel Construction, 2023,19(2):130-142.
    [24]
    D’Aniello M, Cassiano D, Landolfo R. Simplified criteria for finite element modelling of European preloadable bolts[J]. Steel and Composite Structures, 2017, 24(6): 643-658.
    [25]
    中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 混凝土结构设计标准:GB/T 50010—2010[S]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2024.
    [26]
    中华人民共和国建设部. 建筑抗震试验方法规程:GB 101—1996[S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 1997.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]Ke Zou, Wei Bao, Songyan Li, Xutao Xue, Fangping Xiao, Jiaopeng Fang. Research on Seismic Performance of Semi-Rigid Steel Frames with Corrugated Steel Plate Shear Walls[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2025, 40(2): 10-20. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS24092004
    [2]Liang Hu, Ziming Yang, Xu Zhan, Ju Chen. Numerical Analysis on Seismic Behavior of Steel Tubular Column-Shear Wall Transformation Nodes[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2024, 39(9): 24-33. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS23072702
    [3]Zuowei Qin, Hui Li, Dong Han, Haiqiang Jiang. Structure Optimization and Performance Analysis of Box-Type Support Joint of L-Shaped Partially Coated Steel-Concrete Composite Column[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2024, 39(6): 7-13. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS22082301
    [4]Yan Gao Guochang Li Xiao Li, . Finite Element Analysis of Pure Bending Properties of Square Steel Tube-Wood-Concrete Members[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2024, 39(7): 38-46. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS23110202
    [5]Jinzhi Wu, Yang Li, Mingliang Liu, Guojun Sun, Yijun Hou, Chunjuan Zhou. Seismic Performance and Strong Earthquake Collapse Analysis of Long-Span Space Suspended-Dome Spoke-Type Truss Structures[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2024, 39(12): 61-73. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS23110303
    [6]Faxing Ding, Luyu She, Linli Duan, Jianxiong Lei. Finite Element Analysis of Seismic Performance of Concrete-Filled Square Steel Tubular Column to Composite Beam Joint with Stiffening Ring Under High Axial Pressure[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2024, 39(1): 29-40. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS23072801
    [7]Zhenhai Shi, Minglan Han, Yan Wang, Kuan Pang, Xu Wang. Analysis of Mechanical Properties of Joints and Frames with Cantilevered Beams Based on Joint Simplification Theory[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2023, 38(3): 24-33. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS22120501
    [8]XING Zunsheng, YE Dongchen, ZHANG Zhihao, JIA Shangrui. Performance Analysis of Complex Cast Steel Joint in the Steel Roof of Hangzhou West Railway Station[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2023, 38(2): 1-7. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS22120101
    [9]Chao Xu, Jiafu Li, Faxing Ding, Zhihai Shang, Sifeng Yan, Lijuan Xin, Yunlong Xu. Seismic Performance of Enhanced Restrained CFST Frame-Core Tube Structure[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2023, 38(12): 39-47. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS23081101
    [10]HAN Ming-lan, SHI Jian-hua, SHI Zhen-hai, WANG Yan. Analysis on Seismic Properties of Embedded and Reinforced Prefabricated Connection with Cantilever Beam[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2023, 38(1): 1-12. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS22110101
    [11]Zhaobing Ren. Nonlinear Performance Analysis of Steel Reinforced Concrete Beam Column Joints in Yinchuan Green Space Center[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2022, 37(9): 8-16. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS22022202
    [12]ZHONG Chang-jun, SHEN Rui-li, WANG Hui. Finite Element Analysis of Cable Saddle’s Mechanical Performance Considering the Influence of Cast Steel Material Inhomogeneity[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2022, 37(11): 31-38. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS20092001
    [13]Xiaojie Liang, Yan Wang, Guangxing Zhou. Simplified Calculation Model and Dynamic Characteristics Analysis of Modular Prefabricated Steel Frame Structure[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2022, 37(1): 9-20. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS21052002
    [14]Pang Lin, Sun Guohua, Dong Jiaying, Liao Qianwen. Analysis on the Hysteretic Behavior of Special Truss Moment Frame Connections[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2021, 36(11): 14-21. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS20081102
    [15]Tang Qiang, Liu Qiang, Wang Liankun, Yang Huixian, Guo Yu, Yan Ziqiang, Wang Jicong. Analysis of Mechanical Performance of Steel Frames Composed of Non-Compact Members[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2021, 36(11): 8-13. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS20092302
    [16]Yongjiu Shi, Xianglin Yu. Comparisons Between Chinese and American Standards on End-Plate Connection Design[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2021, 36(12): 44-72. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS21110202
    [17]Qiang Xu, Haowen Liu, Wentao Qiao, Chao Wang. Finite Element Analysis on Seismic Behavior of A New Prefabricated Corrugated Steel Plate and Polyurethane Composite Shear Wall[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2021, 36(12): 1-8. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS21051102
    [18]Dong Liu, Yongjiu Shi, Xianglin Yu, Chengliang Tu. Parametric Analyses on Lateral Performance About Modular Composite Shear Wall with Double Steel Plates and Infill Concrete[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2020, 35(12): 43-49. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS20120701
    [19]Qi Zheng, Yingchang Xiang, Xuanding Wang, Jiepeng Liu, Xuhong Zhou. Pushover Analysis on the Seismic Performance of RC Column-Staggered Truss Structure[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2020, 35(11): 25-39. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgSE20042102
    [20]Zihan Jia, Xiantie Wang, Chuandong Xie, Jiaping Zhang, Yiwei Gu. Finite Element Analysis of Seismic Behavior of Self-Centering Concrete-Filled Square Steel Tubular Column-Steel Beam Joint with Slotted Energy Dissipation Plate[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2020, 35(12): 1-7. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS20091601
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(1)

    1. 刘梦溪,刘群文,蔡景红,余嘉辉. MIDAS有限元仿真分析在双层螺旋曲面组合肋壳结构施工中的应用研究. 建筑施工. 2024(11): 1896-1899 .

    Other cited types(0)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-0405101520
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 24.7 %FULLTEXT: 24.7 %META: 69.4 %META: 69.4 %PDF: 5.9 %PDF: 5.9 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 75.3 %其他: 75.3 %丹东: 1.2 %丹东: 1.2 %北京: 2.4 %北京: 2.4 %喀什: 1.2 %喀什: 1.2 %张家口: 3.5 %张家口: 3.5 %成都: 1.2 %成都: 1.2 %石家庄: 1.2 %石家庄: 1.2 %芒廷维尤: 10.6 %芒廷维尤: 10.6 %芝加哥: 1.2 %芝加哥: 1.2 %萍乡: 2.4 %萍乡: 2.4 %其他丹东北京喀什张家口成都石家庄芒廷维尤芝加哥萍乡

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (59) PDF downloads(5) Cited by(1)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return