Login Register
Volume 40 Issue 2
Feb.  2025
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Article Navigation >  STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English)  > 2025  >  40(2): 46-55
Quanwei Liu, Lele Sun, Shoujie Ye, Peijun Wang. Numerical Analysis on Mechanical Properties of Bolted Beam-SHS Column Joints Strengthened by H-Steel[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2025, 40(2): 46-55. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS23111501
Citation: Quanwei Liu, Lele Sun, Shoujie Ye, Peijun Wang. Numerical Analysis on Mechanical Properties of Bolted Beam-SHS Column Joints Strengthened by H-Steel[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2025, 40(2): 46-55. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS23111501
shu

Numerical Analysis on Mechanical Properties of Bolted Beam-SHS Column Joints Strengthened by H-Steel

doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS23111501

  • 1. Qingdao Metro Group Co., Ltd., Qingdao 266000, China;

  • 2. Yantai Research Institute, Harbin Engineering University, Yantai 264003, China;

  • 3. School of Civil Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan 250061, China

  • Received Date: 2023-11-15
    Available Online: 2025-03-24
    Abstract
  • T-head Square-neck One-side Bolt (TSOB) is a novel fastener, which can be used for the connection of Square Hollow Steel (SHS) members, with its simple construction, easy installation, no additional aids, can adapt to the rough installation manners in construction site, and has a large application potential. However, the current research on the performance of TSOBs bolted connections is mostly for model tests, the parameters of the research is single, lack of sufficient data support. In this paper, a three-dimensional nonlinear Finite Element (FE) model of TSOBs bolted beam-column joint was established by the ABAQUS FE analysis software, and the structural performance was further evaluated. The results of FE analysis were used to reveal the key structural response mechanism of this type of connections, and the effects of parameters such as the installation gap between the strengthening component and the Steel Hollow Section (SHS) column, the cross-section of the strengthening component, and the splicing position of the connection on the joints structural performance were investigated. The results showed that the three-dimensional FE model of TSOBs bolted beam-column joints established in this paper could accurately predict the failure mode of the joint under monotonous loading, the stress state of the components and the yielding sequence, obtaining the rotation-moment curve with high agreement with the experimental results, which was highly accurate and reliable, and provided a reliable way to analyze the working mechanism, parametric research and structural performance assessment. The load transfer path of the H-steel component in the SHS column was clear and simple, the material properties were fully utilized, and the working efficiency of the H-steel component was high, which was an ideal section for strengthening components. It was recommended that the installation clearance between the strengthening component and the SHS column should not exceed 2.0 mm. The load transfer path of cross-section component in planar joints was the same as that of the H-steel component, which should be designed separately in space joints according to the H-steel component in two directions and could not transfer the load between adjacent walls of the SHS column. The novel component formed by external welding of the short SHS in the middle section of the H-steel component could reduce the visual dislocation of the SHS columns without affecting the mechanical properties of the joints, and improve the hoisting efficiency of on-site lifting equipment and the installation efficiency of joints. In the strengthened joints, the splice of the SHS columns should be preferentially designed at the beam flanges.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References(13)
  • [1]
    孙乐乐. T形方颈单边螺栓连接钢梁-方钢管柱节点力学性能与设计方法研究[D].济南:山东大学, 2023.
    [2]
    班慧勇,孔思宇,谢崇峰,等.新型高强度螺栓单边连接应变松弛及抗剪性能研究[J].工业建筑, 2019, 49(7):146-150

    ,161.
    [3]
    徐婷,王伟,陈以一.国外单边螺栓研究现状[J].钢结构, 2015, 30(8):27-33.
    [4]
    Wang P, Sun L, Zhang B, et al. Experimental studies on T-stub to hollow section column connection bolted by T-head square-neck one-side bolts under tension[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2021, 178, 106493.
    [5]
    Wang P, Sun L, Xia C, et al. Cyclic behavior of T-stub connection to hollow section steel column using TSOBs[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2021, 185, 106874.
    [6]
    Sun L, Liang Z, Wang Q, et al. Seismic response on T-head square-neck one-side bolted endplate connection of beam to square tubular column[J]. Engineering Structures, 2021, 246, 113077.
    [7]
    Sun L, Liang Z,Wu L, et al. Experimental and theoretical modeling for predicting bending moment capacity of T-head square-neck one-side bolted endplate to tube column connection[J]. Journal of Building Engineering, 2021, 43, 103104.
    [8]
    Sun L, Liang Z, Cai M, et al. Experimental investigation on monotonic bending behaviour of TSOBs bolted beam to hollow square section column connection with inner stiffener[J]. Journal of Building Engineering, 2022, 46, 103765.
    [9]
    Sun L, Liang Z, Cai M, et al. Seismic behaviour of TSOBs bolted I-beam to hollow section square column connection with inner stiffener[J]. Journal of Building Engineering, 2022, 51, 104260.
    [10]
    ABAQUS-Inc. ABAQUS/CAE user's guide, version 2016[EB/OL].[2022-08-30].http://130.149.89.49:2080/v2016/books/usi/default.htm.
    [11]
    王一焕.锚固单向螺栓力学性能及其在抗弯框架中的应用研究[D].广州:华南理工大学, 2020.
    [12]
    European Committee for Standardization.Eurocode 3:design of steel structures-part 1-1:general rules and rules for buildings:BS EN 1993-1-1[S]. Brussels:European Committee for Standardization,2004.
    [13]
    中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.钢结构设计标准:GB 50017-2017[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 2018.
    • Relative Articles

  • Relative Articles

    [1]Yunlong Xu, Faxing Ding, Fei Lyu, Zhicheng Pan, Liang Luo, Guoan Yin, Ming Chen, Zhiwu Yu. Analysis on Seismic Performance of ConcreteFilled Steel Tubular Columns-Composite Beam Frame Structural System Under MultiDimensional Earthquake[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2023, 38(12): 27-38. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS23080501
    [2]Faxing Ding, Yunlong Xu, Liping Wang, Fei Lyu, Linli Duan, Zhiwu Yu. State of Art and Future Insights of the Seismic Performance of Steel-Concrete Composite Structures[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2023, 38(12): 1-26. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS23062902
    [3]Zhenfeng Huang, Sumei Zhang, Lanhui Guo, Jie Chen. Performance of Dovetail Profiled Steel Concrete Sandwich Composite Members Subjected to Axial Compression[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2021, 36(4): 11-19. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS21010601
    [4]Faxing Ding, Zhicheng Pan, Liang Luo, Ping Xiang, Zhiwu Yu. Ultimate Seismic Resistance and Strong Column Construction Measure of Steel-Concrete Composite Frame Structures Under Horizontal Earthquake[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2021, 36(2): 26-37. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS20090301
    [5]Dong Liu, Yongjiu Shi, Xianglin Yu, Chengliang Tu. Parametric Analyses on Lateral Performance About Modular Composite Shear Wall with Double Steel Plates and Infill Concrete[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2020, 35(12): 43-49. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS20120701
    [6]Weiyi Zhao, Lin Wang, Quanquan Guo, Zepeng Gao. RESEARCH ADVANCES OF IMPACT RESISTANCE OF STEEL-CONCRETE COMPOSITE STRUCTURES[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2020, 35(3): 26-36. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgSE19121501
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(4)

    1. 李正良，唐正奇，杨靖波，俞登科，冯衡，郭莹. 输电塔半刚性连接钢管构件轴压稳定性能研究. 工程力学. 2025(01): 174-188 .
    2. 俞登科，杨靖波，李正良，唐正奇，吴海兵. 考虑节点半刚性的输电塔钢管构件稳定承载力分析. 钢结构(中英文). 2022(05): 36-43 . 本站查看
    3. 杨文刚，王宏飞，李鹏. 特高压单柱拉线塔的静力稳定性分析. 科学技术与工程. 2022(23): 10123-10129 .
    4. 李超，王孟鸿，曹笑楠，张硕. 网架组合杆件屈曲后性能研究. 钢结构(中英文). 2019(10): 10-15 . 本站查看

    Other cited types(2)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-040255075100
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 19.0 %FULLTEXT: 19.0 %META: 78.8 %META: 78.8 %PDF: 2.2 %PDF: 2.2 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 19.2 %其他: 19.2 %其他: 1.9 %其他: 1.9 %Arlington: 0.0 %Arlington: 0.0 %Austell: 0.0 %Austell: 0.0 %Bass Hill: 0.1 %Bass Hill: 0.1 %Bryansk: 0.1 %Bryansk: 0.1 %Canton: 0.2 %Canton: 0.2 %Carrboro: 0.0 %Carrboro: 0.0 %Central District: 0.2 %Central District: 0.2 %China: 1.2 %China: 1.2 %Clemmons: 0.0 %Clemmons: 0.0 %Doylestown: 0.0 %Doylestown: 0.0 %Indianapolis: 0.0 %Indianapolis: 0.0 %Kingsland: 0.0 %Kingsland: 0.0 %Koesan: 1.9 %Koesan: 1.9 %Lithonia: 0.3 %Lithonia: 0.3 %Malvern: 0.2 %Malvern: 0.2 %Norman: 0.2 %Norman: 0.2 %Poland: 0.3 %Poland: 0.3 %Reserved: 0.0 %Reserved: 0.0 %Rochester: 0.4 %Rochester: 0.4 %San Lorenzo: 0.0 %San Lorenzo: 0.0 %United States: 0.3 %United States: 0.3 %Valencia: 0.1 %Valencia: 0.1 %Wixom: 0.0 %Wixom: 0.0 %[]: 0.4 %[]: 0.4 %三门峡: 0.8 %三门峡: 0.8 %上海: 2.2 %上海: 2.2 %东京: 0.1 %东京: 0.1 %东莞: 0.4 %东莞: 0.4 %中山: 0.3 %中山: 0.3 %九江: 0.0 %九江: 0.0 %代顿: 0.0 %代顿: 0.0 %伊利诺伊州: 0.1 %伊利诺伊州: 0.1 %休斯敦: 0.2 %休斯敦: 0.2 %休斯顿: 0.0 %休斯顿: 0.0 %伦敦: 0.1 %伦敦: 0.1 %佛罗里达州: 0.0 %佛罗里达州: 0.0 %兰州: 0.0 %兰州: 0.0 %内江: 0.0 %内江: 0.0 %加利福尼亚州: 0.5 %加利福尼亚州: 0.5 %勿加泗: 0.1 %勿加泗: 0.1 %北京: 7.8 %北京: 7.8 %匹兹堡: 0.2 %匹兹堡: 0.2 %十堰: 0.0 %十堰: 0.0 %华沙: 0.0 %华沙: 0.0 %南京: 1.3 %南京: 1.3 %南宁: 0.2 %南宁: 0.2 %南昌: 0.0 %南昌: 0.0 %南通: 0.1 %南通: 0.1 %厦门: 0.3 %厦门: 0.3 %合肥: 0.1 %合肥: 0.1 %呼和浩特: 0.0 %呼和浩特: 0.0 %咸阳: 0.0 %咸阳: 0.0 %哈伦: 0.0 %哈伦: 0.0 %哈尔滨: 0.1 %哈尔滨: 0.1 %哥伦布: 0.0 %哥伦布: 0.0 %哥德堡: 0.4 %哥德堡: 0.4 %圣保罗: 0.1 %圣保罗: 0.1 %圣地亚哥: 0.1 %圣地亚哥: 0.1 %圣安东尼奥: 0.1 %圣安东尼奥: 0.1 %圣路易斯: 0.1 %圣路易斯: 0.1 %坦佩: 0.1 %坦佩: 0.1 %基秦拿: 0.1 %基秦拿: 0.1 %塔拉哈西: 0.0 %塔拉哈西: 0.0 %墨尔本: 0.1 %墨尔本: 0.1 %士嘉堡: 0.2 %士嘉堡: 0.2 %大同: 0.0 %大同: 0.0 %大庆: 0.1 %大庆: 0.1 %大连: 0.7 %大连: 0.7 %天津: 0.3 %天津: 0.3 %太原: 0.0 %太原: 0.0 %奥古斯塔: 0.0 %奥古斯塔: 0.0 %孝感: 0.4 %孝感: 0.4 %孟菲斯: 0.0 %孟菲斯: 0.0 %安康: 0.0 %安康: 0.0 %安條克: 0.1 %安條克: 0.1 %安特里姆和纽敦阿比区: 0.0 %安特里姆和纽敦阿比区: 0.0 %安阳: 0.0 %安阳: 0.0 %宣城: 0.4 %宣城: 0.4 %密蘇里城: 1.2 %密蘇里城: 1.2 %巴黎: 0.2 %巴黎: 0.2 %布劳利: 0.0 %布劳利: 0.0 %布雷登顿: 0.1 %布雷登顿: 0.1 %布鲁克林区: 0.1 %布鲁克林区: 0.1 %常州: 0.1 %常州: 0.1 %平顶山: 0.0 %平顶山: 0.0 %广州: 2.5 %广州: 2.5 %廊坊: 0.0 %廊坊: 0.0 %延安: 0.1 %延安: 0.1 %张家口: 0.2 %张家口: 0.2 %徐州: 0.2 %徐州: 0.2 %悉尼: 0.3 %悉尼: 0.3 %成都: 0.2 %成都: 0.2 %扬州: 0.2 %扬州: 0.2 %拉斯维加斯: 0.2 %拉斯维加斯: 0.2 %拉雷多: 0.0 %拉雷多: 0.0 %揭阳: 0.1 %揭阳: 0.1 %斯帕坦堡: 0.1 %斯帕坦堡: 0.1 %新加坡: 0.1 %新加坡: 0.1 %旧金山: 0.0 %旧金山: 0.0 %昆明: 0.4 %昆明: 0.4 %晋城: 0.2 %晋城: 0.2 %曼彻斯特: 0.0 %曼彻斯特: 0.0 %朗伯德: 0.0 %朗伯德: 0.0 %杭州: 0.5 %杭州: 0.5 %林肯: 0.1 %林肯: 0.1 %查塔努加: 0.1 %查塔努加: 0.1 %柳州: 0.1 %柳州: 0.1 %格兰特县: 0.3 %格兰特县: 0.3 %格林维尔: 0.1 %格林维尔: 0.1 %格里利: 0.1 %格里利: 0.1 %格雷特纳: 0.1 %格雷特纳: 0.1 %梅诺莫尼: 0.0 %梅诺莫尼: 0.0 %森尼韦尔: 0.1 %森尼韦尔: 0.1 %榆林: 0.1 %榆林: 0.1 %武威: 0.1 %武威: 0.1 %武汉: 1.2 %武汉: 1.2 %河源: 0.0 %河源: 0.0 %法兰克福: 0.1 %法兰克福: 0.1 %泽西: 0.0 %泽西: 0.0 %洛杉矶: 0.0 %洛杉矶: 0.0 %济南: 0.1 %济南: 0.1 %济宁: 0.3 %济宁: 0.3 %海口: 0.1 %海口: 0.1 %深圳: 1.5 %深圳: 1.5 %温州: 0.1 %温州: 0.1 %渭南: 0.0 %渭南: 0.0 %湖州: 0.0 %湖州: 0.0 %湘潭: 0.7 %湘潭: 0.7 %漯河: 0.8 %漯河: 0.8 %潍坊: 0.0 %潍坊: 0.0 %烟台: 0.2 %烟台: 0.2 %焦作: 0.0 %焦作: 0.0 %珠海: 0.2 %珠海: 0.2 %琼海: 0.0 %琼海: 0.0 %瑟普赖斯: 0.0 %瑟普赖斯: 0.0 %石家庄: 0.0 %石家庄: 0.0 %福州: 1.6 %福州: 1.6 %科泽科德县: 0.1 %科泽科德县: 0.1 %科隆: 0.1 %科隆: 0.1 %纽瓦克: 0.1 %纽瓦克: 0.1 %纽约: 0.5 %纽约: 0.5 %绍兴: 0.0 %绍兴: 0.0 %芒廷维尤: 15.6 %芒廷维尤: 15.6 %芝加哥: 3.4 %芝加哥: 3.4 %苏州: 0.0 %苏州: 0.0 %荆门: 0.1 %荆门: 0.1 %萨默维尔: 0.0 %萨默维尔: 0.0 %蚌埠: 0.1 %蚌埠: 0.1 %衢州: 0.2 %衢州: 0.2 %西宁: 10.4 %西宁: 10.4 %西安: 0.1 %西安: 0.1 %西雅图: 0.6 %西雅图: 0.6 %贝尔维尔: 0.1 %贝尔维尔: 0.1 %贵阳: 0.0 %贵阳: 0.0 %费利蒙: 0.0 %费利蒙: 0.0 %达特茅斯: 0.1 %达特茅斯: 0.1 %迈阿密: 0.0 %迈阿密: 0.0 %运城: 0.3 %运城: 0.3 %连云港: 0.1 %连云港: 0.1 %邯郸: 0.1 %邯郸: 0.1 %郑州: 2.0 %郑州: 2.0 %都伯林: 0.0 %都伯林: 0.0 %重庆: 0.6 %重庆: 0.6 %金华: 0.0 %金华: 0.0 %长沙: 0.3 %长沙: 0.3 %阜阳: 0.0 %阜阳: 0.0 %阳泉: 0.4 %阳泉: 0.4 %青岛: 0.8 %青岛: 0.8 %韦科: 0.0 %韦科: 0.0 %香港: 0.5 %香港: 0.5 %马尼拉: 0.1 %马尼拉: 0.1 %黄石: 0.0 %黄石: 0.0 %黑尔福德: 0.1 %黑尔福德: 0.1 %黑格斯敦: 0.0 %黑格斯敦: 0.0 %其他其他ArlingtonAustellBass HillBryanskCantonCarrboroCentral DistrictChinaClemmonsDoylestownIndianapolisKingslandKoesanLithoniaMalvernNormanPolandReservedRochesterSan LorenzoUnited StatesValenciaWixom[]三门峡上海东京东莞中山九江代顿伊利诺伊州休斯敦休斯顿伦敦佛罗里达州兰州内江加利福尼亚州勿加泗北京匹兹堡十堰华沙南京南宁南昌南通厦门合肥呼和浩特咸阳哈伦哈尔滨哥伦布哥德堡圣保罗圣地亚哥圣安东尼奥圣路易斯坦佩基秦拿塔拉哈西墨尔本士嘉堡大同大庆大连天津太原奥古斯塔孝感孟菲斯安康安條克安特里姆和纽敦阿比区安阳宣城密蘇里城巴黎布劳利布雷登顿布鲁克林区常州平顶山广州廊坊延安张家口徐州悉尼成都扬州拉斯维加斯拉雷多揭阳斯帕坦堡新加坡旧金山昆明晋城曼彻斯特朗伯德杭州林肯查塔努加柳州格兰特县格林维尔格里利格雷特纳梅诺莫尼森尼韦尔榆林武威武汉河源法兰克福泽西洛杉矶济南济宁海口深圳温州渭南湖州湘潭漯河潍坊烟台焦作珠海琼海瑟普赖斯石家庄福州科泽科德县科隆纽瓦克纽约绍兴芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州荆门萨默维尔蚌埠衢州西宁西安西雅图贝尔维尔贵阳费利蒙达特茅斯迈阿密运城连云港邯郸郑州都伯林重庆金华长沙阜阳阳泉青岛韦科香港马尼拉黄石黑尔福德黑格斯敦

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索
    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (42) PDF downloads(3) Cited by(6)
    Proportional views
    Related

    Journal Online

    Author's Center

    Links

    版权所有 © 《工业建筑》杂志社有限公司

    京ICP备11033253号-1

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd     百度统计

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return