Chunyi Cai, Menghong Wang, Hao Yu. Wind-Induced Vibration Response Analysis of Large-Span Double-Tube Reticulated Shell Structure[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2024, 39(9): 15-23. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS23090802
Citation: Chunyi Cai, Menghong Wang, Hao Yu. Wind-Induced Vibration Response Analysis of Large-Span Double-Tube Reticulated Shell Structure[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2024, 39(9): 15-23. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS23090802

Wind-Induced Vibration Response Analysis of Large-Span Double-Tube Reticulated Shell Structure

doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS23090802
  • Received Date: 2023-09-08
    Available Online: 2024-09-19
  • In this paper, the wind-resistant performance and wind-damaging wind speed of a large-span double-cylinder mesh shell structure of a dry coal shed in Henan Province are investigated by means of large-vortex simulation and structural response calculation. As a flexible system, the large-span space structure is sensitive to the wind load, and it is easily affected by the unsteady strong wind and vibration, which leads to the damage or even collapse of the structure. Therefore, it is necessary to analyze the wind vibration response of the large-span space structure by simulating the generation of unsteady pulsating wind to provide a basis for the study of structural wind-resistant measures. Firstly, the structure is modeled by ANSYS ICEM CFD and SAP 2000 software based on the actual engineering parameters of the dry coal shed, and the unstructured mesh is used for mesh delineation, while the inlet surface is divided into 9 regions to ensure the simulation accuracy. MATLAB software combined with harmonic superposition method and Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) simulation to get the non-stationary pulsating wind, superimposed with the time-varying mean wind will get the non-stationary strong wind in the inlet surface area. Secondly, FLUENT is used to simulate the wind pressure distribution of the structure at five different wind angles under the mean wind pressure and to obtain the wind pressure values on the building surface, so as to determine the most unfavorable wind angle that will cause damage to the structure. The deformation of the structure is analyzed by nonlinear static elastic-plastic analysis (Pushover method) in SAP 2000 and the wind pressure distribution is combined to determine the critical areas of the structure. Finally, the LES vortex simulation method is used to simulate the unsteady strong wind acting on the structure under the most unfavorable wind angle, and the node wind load times are further calculated by obtaining the wind pressure times in the key nodes in the key area. The wind vibration response and other data are analyzed to determine the damage of the structure, and the ultimate wind load capacity is studied to obtain the ultimate wind speed that will damage the structure. Comparison of the simulation results with the actual damage of the structure reveals that the damage is the same, and the model simulation in this paper is considered to be reliable. After the simulation results, it is determined that the 90° angle is the most unfavorable wind angle for the large-span double-cylinder mesh shell structure, and the central region of the structure is the most unfavorable location, and it is determined that the horizontal displacement in the y-direction of the structure is the key to the damage of the structure through the analysis of the displacement time course. The structure reaches the ultimate wind load bearing capacity under the condition of 80 m/s instantaneous wind speed.
  • [1]
    Thordal M S, Bennetsen J C. Review for practical application of CFD for the determination of wind load on high-rise buildings[J].Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2019,186:155-168.Blocken B. 50 years of computational wind engineering:past,present and future[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and IndustrialAerodynamics, 2014, 129:69-102.
    [3]
    周晅毅,祖公博,顾明. TTU标准模型表面风压大涡模拟及风洞试验的对比研究[J].工程力学,2016,33(2):104-110.
    [4]
    孙海,陈伟,陈隽.强风环境非平稳风速模型及应用[J].防灾减灾工程学报,2006(1):52-57.
    [5]
    Davenport A G. The relationship of wind structure to wind loading[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics,1983,13(1/2/3):3-27.
    [6]
    潘永兵.小波非平稳风速模型及实测验证[D].重庆:重庆交通大学,2017.
    [7]
    Priestley M B. Power spectral analysis of non-stationary random processes[J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 1967, 6(1):86-97.
    [8]
    李锦华,李春祥,申建红.非平稳脉动风速的数值模拟[J].振动与冲击,2009,28(1):18-23

    ,192.
    [9]
    Deodatis G, Shinozuka M. Auto-regressive model for non-stationary stochastic process[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 1988,114(11):1995-2012.
    [10]
    Deodatis G. Non-stationary stochastic vector processes:seismicground motion applications[J]. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 1996, 11(3):149-168.
    [11]
    王世方.复杂空间网架结构数值风洞分析研究[D].北京:北京建筑大学,2022.
    [12]
    白泽升.非平稳强风激励下大跨网架结构风振响应分析[D].北京:北京建筑大学,2022.
    [13]
    李超. STADS软件与FLUENT风压计算软件接口的设计与开发[D].北京:北京建筑大学,2020.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]Qun Chen, Yan Wang, Qi An. Study on Single Side High Strength Bolt Connection Performance of Steel Pipe Bundle Composite Shear Wall Endplate Joints[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2023, 38(8): 22-33. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS23031901
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(3)

    1. 杨旭,罗永峰,刘俊,栗云松,张玉建. 既有网格结构损伤检测与模拟方法研究进展. 建筑钢结构进展. 2021(02): 1-13+21 .
    2. 张颖,戚世蕾,方有亮. 基于支持向量机的钢框架结构损伤定位试验研究. 科学技术与工程. 2018(07): 25-30 .
    3. 郭刚,李军,尹素杰,李海迎. 基于损伤本构模型的钢梁局部屈曲临界状态分析. 钢结构. 2016(12): 13-17 .

    Other cited types(5)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-040510152025
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 14.0 %FULLTEXT: 14.0 %META: 70.2 %META: 70.2 %PDF: 15.7 %PDF: 15.7 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 26.4 %其他: 26.4 %上海: 2.5 %上海: 2.5 %佛山: 2.5 %佛山: 2.5 %兰州: 0.8 %兰州: 0.8 %北京: 4.1 %北京: 4.1 %台州: 0.8 %台州: 0.8 %嘉兴: 0.8 %嘉兴: 0.8 %天津: 0.8 %天津: 0.8 %太原: 0.8 %太原: 0.8 %常州: 0.8 %常州: 0.8 %常德: 0.8 %常德: 0.8 %张家口: 11.6 %张家口: 11.6 %扬州: 1.7 %扬州: 1.7 %晋城: 0.8 %晋城: 0.8 %杭州: 2.5 %杭州: 2.5 %格兰特县: 0.8 %格兰特县: 0.8 %武汉: 0.8 %武汉: 0.8 %沈阳: 0.8 %沈阳: 0.8 %济南: 2.5 %济南: 2.5 %滨州: 1.7 %滨州: 1.7 %漯河: 0.8 %漯河: 0.8 %芒廷维尤: 20.7 %芒廷维尤: 20.7 %芝加哥: 1.7 %芝加哥: 1.7 %西宁: 5.0 %西宁: 5.0 %西安: 1.7 %西安: 1.7 %运城: 1.7 %运城: 1.7 %遵义: 0.8 %遵义: 0.8 %郑州: 0.8 %郑州: 0.8 %重庆: 0.8 %重庆: 0.8 %长沙: 1.7 %长沙: 1.7 %其他上海佛山兰州北京台州嘉兴天津太原常州常德张家口扬州晋城杭州格兰特县武汉沈阳济南滨州漯河芒廷维尤芝加哥西宁西安运城遵义郑州重庆长沙

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (121) PDF downloads(12) Cited by(8)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return