Volume 38 Issue 12
Dec.  2023
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Chao Xu, Jiafu Li, Faxing Ding, Zhihai Shang, Sifeng Yan, Lijuan Xin, Yunlong Xu. Seismic Performance of Enhanced Restrained CFST Frame-Core Tube Structure[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2023, 38(12): 39-47. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS23081101
Citation: Chao Xu, Jiafu Li, Faxing Ding, Zhihai Shang, Sifeng Yan, Lijuan Xin, Yunlong Xu. Seismic Performance of Enhanced Restrained CFST Frame-Core Tube Structure[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2023, 38(12): 39-47. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS23081101

Seismic Performance of Enhanced Restrained CFST Frame-Core Tube Structure

doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS23081101
  • Received Date: 2023-08-11
    Available Online: 2024-01-27
  • In order to fully utilize the load-bearing capacity and seismic resistance potential of the CFST frame-core tube structure and enhance the safety of important engineering structures under strong earthquakes, the enhanced constraint measures including stirrup-confining concrete at column end and “strengthening coupling beam and wall pier ” were used in the CFST frame-core tube structure system. The influence of these measures on displacement response, plastic energy dissipation, stiffness damage, second line of defense and failure mode were discussed. The analysis results showed that:
    1)The core tube as the first line of defense for the structure, when the plastic deformation of the structure is small, the measure of “coupling beam and wall pier strengthened” has a greater impact on structural deformation. However, the measure of column end stirrup-confined has a significant impact on the interlayer deformation of the bottom reinforcement area when in the stage of large plastic deformation.
    2)The measure of column end stirrup-confined has a significant impact on the seismic performance of the external frame as a second line of defense. It can enhance the loading-bearing capacity of CFST columns and ensure that the columns in external frame do not suffer serious damage during super strong earthquakes. In this case, more torque and shear force are borne by the external frame, coordinating with the core tube to resist seismic force, reducing the damage and plastic deformation of the core tube, effectively exerting the seismic performance of the second line of defense, and ultimately achieving the goal of not collapsing.
    3)The measure of column end stirrup-confined has changed the failure mode of “strong core tube and weak frame”, and improved the energy dissipation capacity of concrete-filled steel tube column, significantly improving the toughness of CFST columns and limiting the displacement of the core tube in large plastic deformation, further expanding the energy dissipation range of the wall pier. At the same time, this measure makes the plastic energy dissipation distribution of wall pier in core tube and CFST columns in external frame more reasonable, forming a reasonable double line of defense failure mode, slowing down the degradation of structural stiffness, improving the ductility and seismic toughness of the structure.
  • loading
  • [1]
    丁洁民,吴宏磊,赵昕.我国高度250 m以上超高层建筑结构现状与分析进展[J].建筑结构学报,2014,35(3):1-7.
    [2]
    方义庆,包联进,陈建兴.伸臂桁架对框架-核心筒-伸臂桁架结构侧向受力性能的影响[J].建筑结构学报,2016,37(11):130-137.
    [3]
    刘畅,黄用军,何远明.伸臂桁架工作性能研究和设计建议[J].建筑结构,2013,43(9):57-61.
    [4]
    徐培福,黄吉锋,肖从真,等.带加强层的框架-核心筒结构抗震设计中的几个问题[J].建筑结构学报, 1999, 20(4):2-10.
    [5]
    容柏生,李盛勇,陈洪涛,等.中国高层建筑中钢管混凝土柱的应用与展望[J].建筑结构, 2009, 39(9):33-38.
    [6]
    安东亚,周德源,李亚明.框架-核心筒结构双重抗震防线研究综述[J].结构工程师, 2015, 31(1):191-199.
    [7]
    任重翠,肖从真,徐培福.墙体受拉对框架-核心筒结构抗震性能的影响[J].建筑结构, 2019, 49(21):22-28.
    [8]
    陈才华,王翠坤,潘玉华,等.框架-核心筒结构框架剪力调整方法研究[J].建筑结构, 2021, 51(11):8-14.
    [9]
    刘凯,张崇厚,刘彦生,等.超高层建筑结构中腰桁架和伸臂桁架的应用问题[J].建筑结构, 2019, 49(6):12-16.
    [10]
    丁发兴,潘志成,罗靓,等.水平地震下钢-混凝土组合框架结构极限抗震与强柱构造[J].钢结构(中英文), 2021, 36(2):26-37.
    [11]
    Ding F X, Luo L, Wang L P, et al. Pseudo-static tests of terminal stirrup-confined concrete-filled rectangular steel tubular columns[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2018, 144:135-152.
    [12]
    丁发兴,刘怡岑,吕飞,等.拉筋接触方式对高轴压比钢管混凝土柱抗震性能影响试验研究[J].建筑结构学报, 2021, 42(9):62-72.
    [13]
    丁发兴,许云龙,王莉萍,等.拉筋对两层两跨钢-混凝土组合框架结构抗震性能的影响[J].工程力学, 2023, 40(4):58-70.
    [14]
    许云龙,丁发兴,吕飞,等.多维地震下钢管混凝土柱-组合梁框架结构体系抗震性能分析[J].钢结构(中英文), 2023,38(12):27-38.
    [15]
    Lubliner J, Oliver J, Oller S, et al. A plastic-damage model for concrete[J]. International Journal of Solids and Structures,1989, 25(3):229-326.
    [16]
    Lee J, Fenves G L. Plastic-damage model for cyclic loading of concrete structures[J]. Journal of Engineering Mechanics,1998, 124(8):892-900.
    [17]
    钱稼茹,程丽荣,周栋梁.普通箍筋约束混凝土柱的中心受压性能[J].清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2002, 42(10):1369-1373.
    [18]
    韩林海.钢管混凝土结构:理论与实践[M].北京:科学出版社,2004.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (140) PDF downloads(9) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return