Volume 39 Issue 8
Aug.  2024
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Mingliang Zhang, Hao Chen, Qiliang Wang. Study on Tensile Performance of Square Tubular Column-Column Joints of Modular Steel Structure with Bidirectional Bolt Connection[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2024, 39(8): 20-28. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS23062701
Citation: Mingliang Zhang, Hao Chen, Qiliang Wang. Study on Tensile Performance of Square Tubular Column-Column Joints of Modular Steel Structure with Bidirectional Bolt Connection[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2024, 39(8): 20-28. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS23062701

Study on Tensile Performance of Square Tubular Column-Column Joints of Modular Steel Structure with Bidirectional Bolt Connection

doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS23062701
  • Received Date: 2023-06-27
    Available Online: 2024-09-19
  • Modular steel structure building is a new type of prefabricated building, which has a high level of industrialization and has been vigorously developed in China. The expansion project of Jiaguang Middle School in Rongcheng County of Xiong’an New Area adopts modular steel structure laminated box system. In order to facilitate the connection and installation between the modules of the upper and lower unit rooms, a new type of unit room socket connection column-column joint is proposed. The joint realizes the connection between the upper and lower columns through bolts and sleeves. The vertical connection between the units should not be separated vertically under wind load and frequent earthquakes. Tensile tests were carried out on three full-scale joint specimens to analyze their failure modes, bolt shear distribution and tensile bearing capacity. The influence of grouting and the number of bolts on the bearing capacity of the joints was discussed. Based on the calculation method of the design value of the shear capacity of high-strength bolts in the existing literature, the design formula of the tensile strength of the new joint is proposed. A reliable numerical model was established, and the number of bolts and the diameter of bolts were analyzed. The parametric analysis results were compared with the formula calculation results.
    The results show that under the axial load, the shear failure of high-strength bolt group occurs in all specimens. At the same time, the inner sleeve hole wall buckling occurs in the non-slurry joint specimens, and the local crushing phenomenon of grouting material occurs in the grouting joint specimens, accompanied by the bond failure between steel and grouting material interface. In the early stage of test loading, the shearing force of high-strength bolt group is large at the end and small at the center. In the later stage of loading, the shear force difference of high-strength bolt group decreases gradually. When the ultimate bearing capacity is reached, the shearing force of high-strength bolt group tends to be evenly distributed. The new joint relies on the shear resistance of high-strength bolts to bear the axial tensile load. The average shear bearing capacity of a single bolt is 76.9% higher than the calculated value of GB 50017-2017 Steel Structure Design Standard; After the grouting material is injected into the joint, the grouting material and the high-strength bolt work together, and the tensile bearing capacity is 14.1% higher than that of the non-slurry joint. The number of bolts increased from 3 to 5, and the tensile bearing capacity of the joint increased by 80.9% due to the increase of friction force and the decrease of shearing force of single bolt. With the increase of bolt diameter, the bolt pre-tightening force in the elastic stage increases, the contact area between the screw and the hole wall in the plastic stage increases, and the tensile bearing capacity of the joint increases. The error between the finite element parametric analysis results and the theoretical calculation results is controlled within 10%. The proposed joint tensile strength design formula accurately predicts the tensile bearing capacity of the new joint under axial tension, which provides a theoretical reference for practical engineering applications.
  • loading
  • [1]
    陈志华,钟旭,余玉洁,等.多层模块钢结构住宅项目关键技术及实践[J].建筑技术,2018,49(4):372-376.
    [2]
    陈红磊,陈琛,李国强,等.模块化钢结构建筑模块间节点的研究综述[J].钢结构,2018,33(12):1-5

    ,27.
    [3]
    丁阳,邓恩峰,宗亮,等.模块化钢结构建筑连接节点研究进展[J].建筑结构学报,2019,40(3):33-40.
    [4]
    杨松森,王燕,马强强.装配式外套筒-加强式外伸端板组件梁柱连接节点抗震性能试验研究[J].土木工程学报, 2017, 50(11):76-86.
    [5]
    马吉,方有珍,陆承铎,等.薄钢管PEC柱-钢梁端板对拉螺栓连接滞回性能试验研究[J].工程力学,2013,30(6):107-115.
    [6]
    中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.建筑抗震设计标准:GB/T 50011-2010[S]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2024.
    [7]
    中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.钢结构设计标准:GB 50017-2017[S]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2018.
    [8]
    全国钢标准化技术委员会.钢及钢产品力学性能试验取样位置及试样制备:GB/T 2975-2018[S]. 北京:中国标准出版社,2018.
    [9]
    全国钢标准化技术委员会.金属材料 拉伸试验:第1部分:室温试验方法:GB/T 228 1-2021[S]. 北京:中国标准出版社,2021.
    [10]
    全国紧固件标准化技术委员会.紧固件机械性能有色金属制造的螺栓、螺钉、螺柱和螺母:GB/T 3098 1-2010[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2010.
    [11]
    中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.混凝土物理力学性能试验方法标准:GB/T 50081-2019[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2019.
    [12]
    杜运兴,欧阳卿.高强螺栓承压型连接抗剪承载力计算[J].湖南大学学报(自然科学版),2013,40(3):21-25.
    [13]
    Kwon G, Engelhardt M D, Dcingner R E. Behavior of post-installed shear connectors under static and fatigue loading[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2010, 66(4):532-541.
    [14]
    Liu X P, Bradford M A, Lee M. Behavior of high-strength friction-grip bolted shear connectors in sustainable composite beams[J/OL]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2015, 141(6).[2015-07-24]https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001090.
    [15]
    邢颖,刘雁斌,史才军,等.可恢复组合梁中高强螺栓连接件的抗剪性能研究[J].中国公路学报, 2023,36(6):132-142.
    [16]
    张耀春,郜京峰,姚淇誉,等.薄壁设肋方钢管混凝土柱穿心高强螺栓的抗剪性能[J].华南理工大学学报(自然科学版),2009,37(12):111-117.
    [17]
    刘中良, 陈俊, 霍静思. 装配式组合梁高强螺栓连接件抗剪性能试验研究[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2017, 47(10):65-70

    ,64.
    [18]
    陈俊, 汪威, 丁发兴,等. 钢-混凝土组合梁高强螺栓抗剪连接件受剪性能[J].铁道科学与工程学报, 2019, 16(10):2553-2561.
    [19]
    Lu Z H, Zhao Y G. Empirical stress-strain model for unconfined high-strength concrete under uniaxial compression[J]. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2010, 22(11):1181-1186.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (49) PDF downloads(3) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return