Genshu Tong. Condition for Relieving Unbalanced Force in Chevron Braces[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2023, 38(12): 54-57. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS23060620
Citation: Genshu Tong. Condition for Relieving Unbalanced Force in Chevron Braces[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2023, 38(12): 54-57. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS23060620

Condition for Relieving Unbalanced Force in Chevron Braces

doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS23060620
  • Received Date: 2023-03-06
    Available Online: 2024-01-27
  • The static behavior of chevron brace when its beam is designed by a smaller unbalanced force is reviewed and it is revealed that the post-buckling behavior is fully dependent on the capacity of beam carrying unbalanced force. Lateral force-drift angle curves of dual systems composed of frame and chevron brace with their lateral capacity ratios of 1∶1 and 1∶3 are introduced, the capacity of the beam in chevron brace can carry 1.0 and 0.3 times the codified unbalanced force, respectively, totally 4 series of examples. Because the drift angles at brace buckling, tension yielding and frame lateral mechanism increase in order, brace buckling occurs first and then its capacity deteriorates, but the capacity of the frame develops and compensates the decrease of the compressive brace force, the total lateral capacity of the system after brace buckling depends on both the frame/brace capacity ratio and the capacity of the beam in chevron brace carrying unbalance force in chevron brace. Under the demand of assuring the total deteriorating percentage less than 20%, a relation between the frame/brace capacity ratio and the unbalance force ratio ratio is proposed.
  • [1]
    中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.建筑抗震设计规范:GB 50011-2010[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2010.
    [2]
    童根树.钢结构与钢-混凝土组合结构设计方法[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2022.
    [3]
    The American Society of Civil Engineers. Minimum design loads and associated criteria for buildings and other structures:ASCE 7-16[S]. Reston:Virginia, 2016.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]Jin Zhang, Lyulei Yang, Minfeng Gong, Yibin Sun. A Stratified and Classified Performance-Based Seismic Design Method and Its Application in Steel Concentrically Braced Frame Systems[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2024, 39(12): 1-11. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS24110501
    [2]Genshu Tong. Strength Reduction Factor of Framed Columns Supporting Leaning Columns[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2024, 39(4): 49-51. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS23032720
    [3]Yunlong Xu, Faxing Ding, Fei Lyu, Zhicheng Pan, Liang Luo, Guoan Yin, Ming Chen, Zhiwu Yu. Analysis on Seismic Performance of ConcreteFilled Steel Tubular Columns-Composite Beam Frame Structural System Under MultiDimensional Earthquake[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2023, 38(12): 27-38. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS23080501
    [5]Genshu Tong. Why Requiring Frame Capable of Resisting at Least 25% of Prescribed Seismic Forces in Dual Systems[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2023, 38(11): 43-45. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS23022720
    [6]TONG Genshu. Distortional Buckling of Framed Beams: Stiffener or Fly Bracing?[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2022, 37(12): 45-47. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS22101206
    [7]Genshu Tong. Hazard of Weak Panel Zone in Frame Design[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2022, 37(8): 47-49. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS22082001
  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-040510152025
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 23.6 %FULLTEXT: 23.6 %META: 71.2 %META: 71.2 %PDF: 5.2 %PDF: 5.2 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 33.5 %其他: 33.5 %上海: 0.9 %上海: 0.9 %北京: 2.8 %北京: 2.8 %合肥: 0.5 %合肥: 0.5 %宣城: 0.5 %宣城: 0.5 %常州: 0.5 %常州: 0.5 %常德: 0.9 %常德: 0.9 %平顶山: 0.5 %平顶山: 0.5 %广州: 0.9 %广州: 0.9 %张家口: 7.1 %张家口: 7.1 %昆明: 0.9 %昆明: 0.9 %晋城: 0.9 %晋城: 0.9 %江门: 0.9 %江门: 0.9 %济南: 0.9 %济南: 0.9 %海口: 0.5 %海口: 0.5 %漯河: 2.4 %漯河: 2.4 %石家庄: 0.5 %石家庄: 0.5 %芒廷维尤: 13.2 %芒廷维尤: 13.2 %芝加哥: 0.5 %芝加哥: 0.5 %茂名: 0.5 %茂名: 0.5 %衢州: 0.5 %衢州: 0.5 %西宁: 27.8 %西宁: 27.8 %运城: 1.4 %运城: 1.4 %郑州: 0.5 %郑州: 0.5 %重庆: 0.5 %重庆: 0.5 %其他上海北京合肥宣城常州常德平顶山广州张家口昆明晋城江门济南海口漯河石家庄芒廷维尤芝加哥茂名衢州西宁运城郑州重庆

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (150) PDF downloads(10) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return