Genshu Tong. Evolution of Notional Load Approach[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2023, 38(7): 42-44. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS23041022
Citation: Genshu Tong. Evolution of Notional Load Approach[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2023, 38(7): 42-44. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS23041022

Evolution of Notional Load Approach

doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS23041022
  • Received Date: 2023-04-10
  • A brief review is given for the notional load approach, and clauses in the codes GB 50017, Eurocode 3 and AISC 360 are introduced. A new understanding is proposed for the total story number in the current code formulae, which is reinterpreted as the story number above the story at which the notional load exerts. Such a new explanation avoids the logical defect of the traditional notional load approach. A new equation is proposed for the notional load computation.
  • [1]
    中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.钢结构设计标准:GB 50017—2017[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2018.
    [2]
    Bridge R Q,Clarke M J,Leon R T,et al.Effective length and notional load approach for assessing frame stability:implications for american steel design[M].Chicago:Task Committee on Effective Length,ASCE,1997.
    [3]
    童根树.钢结构的平面内稳定[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2015.
    [4]
    European Committee for Standardization(ECS).Eurocode 3:design of steel structures-part 1-1:general rules and rules for buildings:EC 3-1-1[S].Brussels:ECS,2005.
    [5]
    American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC).Specification for structural steel buildings:ANSI/AISC 360-16[S].Brussels:AISC,2016.
    [6]
    童根树.钢结构与钢-混凝土组合结构设计方法[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2022.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]Genshu Tong. A Modification of Column Strength Reduction Factors[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2023, 38(10): 59-61. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS23022020
  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-040510152025
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 16.3 %FULLTEXT: 16.3 %META: 77.3 %META: 77.3 %PDF: 6.4 %PDF: 6.4 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 39.7 %其他: 39.7 %上海: 1.4 %上海: 1.4 %临沂: 0.7 %临沂: 0.7 %丽水: 0.7 %丽水: 0.7 %兰州: 0.7 %兰州: 0.7 %北京: 2.1 %北京: 2.1 %南京: 0.7 %南京: 0.7 %南宁: 0.7 %南宁: 0.7 %合肥: 0.7 %合肥: 0.7 %吉林: 0.7 %吉林: 0.7 %天津: 0.7 %天津: 0.7 %常州: 1.4 %常州: 1.4 %广州: 2.1 %广州: 2.1 %张家口: 7.1 %张家口: 7.1 %无锡: 0.7 %无锡: 0.7 %晋城: 0.7 %晋城: 0.7 %杭州: 1.4 %杭州: 1.4 %济南: 0.7 %济南: 0.7 %淄博: 0.7 %淄博: 0.7 %温州: 0.7 %温州: 0.7 %漯河: 1.4 %漯河: 1.4 %福州: 1.4 %福州: 1.4 %芒廷维尤: 25.5 %芒廷维尤: 25.5 %芝加哥: 0.7 %芝加哥: 0.7 %西宁: 1.4 %西宁: 1.4 %西雅图: 2.1 %西雅图: 2.1 %运城: 1.4 %运城: 1.4 %遵义: 0.7 %遵义: 0.7 %长春: 0.7 %长春: 0.7 %其他上海临沂丽水兰州北京南京南宁合肥吉林天津常州广州张家口无锡晋城杭州济南淄博温州漯河福州芒廷维尤芝加哥西宁西雅图运城遵义长春

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (181) PDF downloads(27) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return