Huaishuan Sun, Baozhu Cao, Zhihua Chen, Jiadi Liu. Study on Seismic Performance of Cold-Formed Steel-Straw Bale Structure System[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2023, 38(9): 9-18. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS23040402
Citation: Huaishuan Sun, Baozhu Cao, Zhihua Chen, Jiadi Liu. Study on Seismic Performance of Cold-Formed Steel-Straw Bale Structure System[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2023, 38(9): 9-18. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS23040402

Study on Seismic Performance of Cold-Formed Steel-Straw Bale Structure System

doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS23040402
  • Received Date: 2023-04-04
    Available Online: 2023-10-20
  • The cold-formed steel(CFS) structure system has the characteristics of lightweight components, fully assembled construction(without the need for large machinery at construction site), fast and simple connection, safety and reliability, and is suitable for the construction of low and multi-story buildings in rural areas. Straw building is a highly energy-efficient building type, which can create a natural and comfortable indoor environment for residents, and has a good effect of energy saving and emission reduction. When the building is abandoned, the straw can also be biodegraded. Straw is rich in reserves and has the ability to sequester carbon, which has gradually become a green building material that has attracted attention. In the traditional CFS structure system, the platform inter-story connection is complicated, with weak connection strength and stiffness, and is prone to failure. The ledger-framed inter-story connection is prone to local buckling, as the studs bear the additional bending moment transmitted by the floor joists. The enclosure materials such as mineral wool, expanded polystyrene, extruded polystyrene are difficult to be widely used in rural buildings due to high energy consumption and high cost in the production. This paper proposed a platform-balloon type CFS-straw bale structure system, which combined CFS with straw bale and improved the platform CFS structure. This system meets the needs of green buildings and low energy consumption, and has unique advantages and large development space in rural areas. In order to investigate the seismic performance of the structure system subjected to earthquake, the finite element models of platform CFS structure, platform-balloon CFS structure, and platform-balloon CFS-straw bale structure were established respectively based on the actual project, and the natural frequencies of the three were obtained. The nonlinear time-history analysis of ground motion was carried out, and the seismic responses of the three subjected to different levels of earthquake were compared, including acceleration response, displacement response, and base shear-top displacement curve. It can be seen from the construction process of the actual project that compared with the platform CFS structure, the platform-balloon CFS structure has fewer components, simple joint configuration, convenient installation and good integrity, which is suitable for application in rural areas. The first three natural frequencies of platform-balloon CFS structure are higher than those of the platform CFS structure. Under the most unfavorable ground motion, the peak base shear force, peak roof displacement, and peak inter-story displacement of platform-balloon CFS structure are smaller than those of platform CFS structure, and the maximum inter-story drift of the structure meets the limit requirements of JGJ 227—2011 "Technical Specification for Low-rise Cold-fromed Thin-walled Steel Buildings" and GB 50011—2010 "Code for Seismic Design of Buildings". Those results indicate that the structural stiffness and seismic performance of the platform-balloon CFS structure are better than those of the platform CFS structure. Considering the influence of the straw wall, the peak base shear and peak roof displacement of the platform-balloon CFS structure are reduced by 12.5% and 30% respectively, indicating that the viscoelastic mechanical properties of straw wall can reduce the seismic response of CFS structure.
  • [1]
    曹宝珠,赵月明,段文峰,等.新型轻钢-秸秆草砖节能住宅在东北农村地区应用的可行性分析[J].新型建筑材料,2010,37(7):34-36.
    [2]
    Sun H S,Cao B Z,Chen Z H.Experimental study on mechanical properties of straw bale[C]//Tenth International Conference on Advances in Steel Structures (ICASS’2020).Chengdu:2022:148-160.
    [3]
    Chen Z H,Sun H S,Cao B Z.Experimental study on seismic behavior of cold-formed steel shear walls with reinforced plastered straw-bale sheathing[J/OL].Thin-Walled Structures,2021,169[2022-10-08].https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2021.108303.
    [4]
    Sun H S,Cao B Z,Chen Z H,et al.Shear behaviour of reinforced straw-bale plaster sheathed cold-formed steel-framed shear walls[J].Biosystems Engineering,2022,221:54-68.
    [5]
    Shamim I,DaBreo J,Rogers C A.Dynamic testing of single- and double-story steel-sheathed cold-formed steel-framed shear walls[J].Journal of Structural Engineering,2013,139(5):807-817.
    [6]
    Chu Y P,He X R,Yao Y,et al.Experimental research on the shear performance of the two-story composite cold-formed thin-walled steel wall[J].KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering,2020,24:537-550.
    [7]
    Wang X X,Ye J H.Cyclic testing of two-and three-story CFS shear-walls with reinforced end studs[J].Journal of Constructional Steel Research,2016,121:13- 28.
    [8]
    王秀丽,褚云鹏,姚勇,等.超薄壁冷弯型钢C型墙架柱-楼层梁连接抗震性能试验研究[J].土木工程学报,2015,48(7):50-59.
    [9]
    Ayhan D,Schafer B W.Cold-formed steel ledger-framed construction floor-to-wall connection behavior and strength[J].Journal of Constructional Steel Research,2019,156:215-226.
    [10]
    石宇,韩宇,肖文,等.壁挂式冷弯型钢结构双层组合墙体抗震性能试验研究[J].建筑结构学报,2021,42(2):71-81.
    [11]
    姚欣梅,周绪红,石宇,等.六层足尺冷弯薄壁型钢-钢板剪力墙结构抗震性能振动台试验研究[J/OL].建筑结构学报,2022,43[2022-07-12

    ].https://doi.org/10.14006/j.jzjgxb.2022.0013.
    [12]
    Peterman K D,Stehman M J J,Madsen R L,et al.Experimental seismic response of a full-scale cold-formed steel-framed building.Ⅰ:system-level response[J/OL].Journal of Structural Engineering,2016,142(12)[2022-10-08].http://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001577.
    [13]
    Shahnewaz M,Dickof C,Tannert T.Seismic behavior of balloon frame CLT shear walls with different ledgers[J/OL].Journal of Structural Engineering,2021,147(9)[2022-10-08].http://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0003106.
    [14]
    Chen Z Y,Popovski M.Mechanics-based analytical models for balloon-type cross-laminated timber (CLT) shear walls under lateral loads[J/OL].Engineering Structures,2020,208[2022-10-08].https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109916.
    [15]
    中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.低层冷弯薄壁型钢房屋建筑技术规程:JGJ 227—2011[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2011.
    [16]
    中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.建筑抗震设计规范:GB 50011—2010[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2016.
    [17]
    Hsiaw J S.Seismic load-resisting capacity of plastered straw bale walls[D].Berkeley:University of California,2009.
    [18]
    Kose M M,Karslioglu O.Effect of infills on high-rise buildings:a case study[J].Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings,2009,18:907-920.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]Ke Zou, Wei Bao, Songyan Li, Xutao Xue, Fangping Xiao, Jiaopeng Fang. Research on Seismic Performance of Semi-Rigid Steel Frames with Corrugated Steel Plate Shear Walls[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2025, 40(2): 10-20. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS24092004
    [2]Jinzhi Wu, Yang Li, Mingliang Liu, Guojun Sun, Yijun Hou, Chunjuan Zhou. Seismic Performance and Strong Earthquake Collapse Analysis of Long-Span Space Suspended-Dome Spoke-Type Truss Structures[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2024, 39(12): 61-73. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS23110303
    [3]Zengmei Qiu Zixuan Ye Guochang Li Runze Liu, . Finite Element Analysis on the Concrete-Filled Square Steel Tubular Pure Bending Members Encased with CFRP Profile Under Cyclic Loading[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2024, 39(7): 29-37. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS23102102
    [4]Yanxia Zhang, Tianhao Shi, Binglong Wu, Zhengqi Lin. Comparisons of Seismic Performance of Fully-Bolted Column Joints of Steel Tubular Columns with Built-in Cross-Shaped Core Barrels and Built-in Octagonal Core Tube[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2024, 39(12): 38-48. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS24011101
    [5]Liang Hu, Ziming Yang, Xu Zhan, Ju Chen. Numerical Analysis on Seismic Behavior of Steel Tubular Column-Shear Wall Transformation Nodes[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2024, 39(9): 24-33. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS23072702
    [6]Biao Li, Fei Lyu, Hao Sun, Faxing Ding, Yongqiang Cai, Chaocheng Zhang. Comparative Study on Seismic Performance of Several Types of Square Section Piers at the Same Cost[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2024, 39(1): 53-67. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS23063003
    [7]Faxing Ding, Luyu She, Linli Duan, Jianxiong Lei. Finite Element Analysis of Seismic Performance of Concrete-Filled Square Steel Tubular Column to Composite Beam Joint with Stiffening Ring Under High Axial Pressure[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2024, 39(1): 29-40. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS23072801
    [8]Huaishuan Sun, Baozhu Cao, Zhihua Chen, Jiadi Liu. Study on Seismic Performance of Cold-Formed Steel-Straw Bale Structure System[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2023, 38(9): 9-18. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS23040402
    [9]Chao Xu, Jiafu Li, Faxing Ding, Zhihai Shang, Sifeng Yan, Lijuan Xin, Yunlong Xu. Seismic Performance of Enhanced Restrained CFST Frame-Core Tube Structure[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2023, 38(12): 39-47. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS23081101
    [10]Xu Liu, Guochang Li, Xiao Li. Research on Lateral Impact Resistance of Concrete-Filled Circular Steel Tubular Columns Stiffened with Encased with I-Section CFRP Profile[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2023, 38(7): 12-21. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS23030801
    [11]Yifan Liu, Peng Wang, Yonghui Wang, Shilun Shi, Chunxiu Han, Junyuan Peng. Study on Mechanical Properties of Glued Laminated Wood-Concrete Simply Supported Composite Beams[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2023, 38(7): 1-11. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS23011002
    [12]Yunlong Xu, Faxing Ding, Fei Lyu, Zhicheng Pan, Liang Luo, Guoan Yin, Ming Chen, Zhiwu Yu. Analysis on Seismic Performance of ConcreteFilled Steel Tubular Columns-Composite Beam Frame Structural System Under MultiDimensional Earthquake[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2023, 38(12): 27-38. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS23080501
    [13]Faxing Ding, Yunlong Xu, Liping Wang, Fei Lyu, Linli Duan, Zhiwu Yu. State of Art and Future Insights of the Seismic Performance of Steel-Concrete Composite Structures[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2023, 38(12): 1-26. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS23062902
    [14]Qingqing Xiong, Jiahui Qian, Zhihua Chen. Research Progress on Mechanical Properties of Concrete-Filled Steel Tube Members Under Corrosive Environment[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2022, 37(7): 1-19. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgs22041501
    [15]Zhicheng, Tan Lin, Chen Yi Wu. Seismic Performance of Steel Frame-Coupled Steel Plate Shear Wall Structures with Different Coupling Ratio[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2021, 36(7): 9-17. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS20051501
    [16]Junming Jiang, Hongliang Liu, Qiaosheng Chen. Finite Element Analysis of Transfer-Bracket Joints of Concrete-Filled Steel Tubular Columns[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2021, 36(12): 23-31. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS21021802
    [17]Le Gao, Tengfei Li, Jiangran Guo, Mingzhou Su, Yan Sui, Peipei Jiao. Remote Collaborative Test on Seismic Behavior of High Strength Steel Composite Eccentrically Braced Frames[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2020, 35(12): 8-15. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS20120501
    [18]Dan Gan, Tao Liu, Yushan Yao, Xuhong Zhou. Study on Plastic Design Method of Staggered Truss Structure with Two-Side Connecting Steel Plates[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2020, 35(11): 1-24. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgSE20042101
    [19]Qi Zheng, Yingchang Xiang, Xuanding Wang, Jiepeng Liu, Xuhong Zhou. Pushover Analysis on the Seismic Performance of RC Column-Staggered Truss Structure[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2020, 35(11): 25-39. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgSE20042102
    [20]Zihan Jia, Xiantie Wang, Chuandong Xie, Jiaping Zhang, Yiwei Gu. Finite Element Analysis of Seismic Behavior of Self-Centering Concrete-Filled Square Steel Tubular Column-Steel Beam Joint with Slotted Energy Dissipation Plate[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2020, 35(12): 1-7. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS20091601
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(3)

    1. 郑凯锋,张宇,衡俊霖,冯霄暘,王亚伟. 国内外耐候钢腐蚀疲劳试验技术发展. 哈尔滨工业大学学报. 2021(03): 1-10 .
    2. 陈剑波,陈丽华. Q345A-V含钒建筑耐候钢的铸造工艺优化. 热加工工艺. 2020(15): 39-42 .
    3. 翟晓亮,袁远. 我国耐候钢桥发展及展望. 钢结构(中英文). 2019(11): 69-74+80 . 本站查看

    Other cited types(1)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-0405101520
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 19.3 %FULLTEXT: 19.3 %META: 75.3 %META: 75.3 %PDF: 5.4 %PDF: 5.4 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 25.9 %其他: 25.9 %东莞: 0.6 %东莞: 0.6 %六安: 0.6 %六安: 0.6 %北京: 7.2 %北京: 7.2 %十堰: 0.6 %十堰: 0.6 %南京: 3.0 %南京: 3.0 %嘉兴: 0.6 %嘉兴: 0.6 %天津: 0.6 %天津: 0.6 %常州: 0.6 %常州: 0.6 %常德: 0.6 %常德: 0.6 %广州: 1.2 %广州: 1.2 %廊坊: 0.6 %廊坊: 0.6 %张家口: 11.4 %张家口: 11.4 %扬州: 0.6 %扬州: 0.6 %昆明: 0.6 %昆明: 0.6 %济南: 1.2 %济南: 1.2 %温州: 0.6 %温州: 0.6 %湖州: 0.6 %湖州: 0.6 %漯河: 3.0 %漯河: 3.0 %石家庄: 0.6 %石家庄: 0.6 %芒廷维尤: 20.5 %芒廷维尤: 20.5 %芝加哥: 0.6 %芝加哥: 0.6 %西宁: 13.9 %西宁: 13.9 %达州: 0.6 %达州: 0.6 %运城: 1.2 %运城: 1.2 %长沙: 2.4 %长沙: 2.4 %其他东莞六安北京十堰南京嘉兴天津常州常德广州廊坊张家口扬州昆明济南温州湖州漯河石家庄芒廷维尤芝加哥西宁达州运城长沙

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (304) PDF downloads(10) Cited by(4)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return