The cold-formed steel(CFS) structure system has the characteristics of lightweight components, fully assembled construction(without the need for large machinery at construction site), fast and simple connection, safety and reliability, and is suitable for the construction of low and multi-story buildings in rural areas. Straw building is a highly energy-efficient building type, which can create a natural and comfortable indoor environment for residents, and has a good effect of energy saving and emission reduction. When the building is abandoned, the straw can also be biodegraded. Straw is rich in reserves and has the ability to sequester carbon, which has gradually become a green building material that has attracted attention. In the traditional CFS structure system, the platform inter-story connection is complicated, with weak connection strength and stiffness, and is prone to failure. The ledger-framed inter-story connection is prone to local buckling, as the studs bear the additional bending moment transmitted by the floor joists. The enclosure materials such as mineral wool, expanded polystyrene, extruded polystyrene are difficult to be widely used in rural buildings due to high energy consumption and high cost in the production. This paper proposed a platform-balloon type CFS-straw bale structure system, which combined CFS with straw bale and improved the platform CFS structure. This system meets the needs of green buildings and low energy consumption, and has unique advantages and large development space in rural areas. In order to investigate the seismic performance of the structure system subjected to earthquake, the finite element models of platform CFS structure, platform-balloon CFS structure, and platform-balloon CFS-straw bale structure were established respectively based on the actual project, and the natural frequencies of the three were obtained. The nonlinear time-history analysis of ground motion was carried out, and the seismic responses of the three subjected to different levels of earthquake were compared, including acceleration response, displacement response, and base shear-top displacement curve. It can be seen from the construction process of the actual project that compared with the platform CFS structure, the platform-balloon CFS structure has fewer components, simple joint configuration, convenient installation and good integrity, which is suitable for application in rural areas. The first three natural frequencies of platform-balloon CFS structure are higher than those of the platform CFS structure. Under the most unfavorable ground motion, the peak base shear force, peak roof displacement, and peak inter-story displacement of platform-balloon CFS structure are smaller than those of platform CFS structure, and the maximum inter-story drift of the structure meets the limit requirements of JGJ 227—2011 "Technical Specification for Low-rise Cold-fromed Thin-walled Steel Buildings" and GB 50011—2010 "Code for Seismic Design of Buildings". Those results indicate that the structural stiffness and seismic performance of the platform-balloon CFS structure are better than those of the platform CFS structure. Considering the influence of the straw wall, the peak base shear and peak roof displacement of the platform-balloon CFS structure are reduced by 12.5% and 30% respectively, indicating that the viscoelastic mechanical properties of straw wall can reduce the seismic response of CFS structure.
Sun H S,Cao B Z,Chen Z H.Experimental study on mechanical properties of straw bale[C]//Tenth International Conference on Advances in Steel Structures (ICASS’2020).Chengdu:2022:148-160.
[3]
Chen Z H,Sun H S,Cao B Z.Experimental study on seismic behavior of cold-formed steel shear walls with reinforced plastered straw-bale sheathing[J/OL].Thin-Walled Structures,2021,169[2022-10-08].https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2021.108303.
[4]
Sun H S,Cao B Z,Chen Z H,et al.Shear behaviour of reinforced straw-bale plaster sheathed cold-formed steel-framed shear walls[J].Biosystems Engineering,2022,221:54-68.
[5]
Shamim I,DaBreo J,Rogers C A.Dynamic testing of single- and double-story steel-sheathed cold-formed steel-framed shear walls[J].Journal of Structural Engineering,2013,139(5):807-817.
[6]
Chu Y P,He X R,Yao Y,et al.Experimental research on the shear performance of the two-story composite cold-formed thin-walled steel wall[J].KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering,2020,24:537-550.
[7]
Wang X X,Ye J H.Cyclic testing of two-and three-story CFS shear-walls with reinforced end studs[J].Journal of Constructional Steel Research,2016,121:13- 28.
Ayhan D,Schafer B W.Cold-formed steel ledger-framed construction floor-to-wall connection behavior and strength[J].Journal of Constructional Steel Research,2019,156:215-226.
Peterman K D,Stehman M J J,Madsen R L,et al.Experimental seismic response of a full-scale cold-formed steel-framed building.Ⅰ:system-level response[J/OL].Journal of Structural Engineering,2016,142(12)[2022-10-08].http://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001577.
[13]
Shahnewaz M,Dickof C,Tannert T.Seismic behavior of balloon frame CLT shear walls with different ledgers[J/OL].Journal of Structural Engineering,2021,147(9)[2022-10-08].http://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0003106.
[14]
Chen Z Y,Popovski M.Mechanics-based analytical models for balloon-type cross-laminated timber (CLT) shear walls under lateral loads[J/OL].Engineering Structures,2020,208[2022-10-08].https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109916.