Zhenhua Tong, Genshu Tong. Interaction Relation Between the Limiting Ratios of Flange and Web in T-Section[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2023, 38(7): 36-41. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS23030802
Citation: Zhenhua Tong, Genshu Tong. Interaction Relation Between the Limiting Ratios of Flange and Web in T-Section[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2023, 38(7): 36-41. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS23030802

Interaction Relation Between the Limiting Ratios of Flange and Web in T-Section

doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS23030802
  • Received Date: 2023-03-08
  • Buckling of T-Sections under compression is studied analytically considering the interaction between flange and web. Formulas for the critical stress of the cross-section are presented. Extending the classification philosophy of steel plates to steel cross-sections, the paper obtained the interaction curves between the limiting values of the width-to-thickness ratios of flanges and webs for 4 classes(S1, S2, S3, S4) of the T-section. Based on the interaction curves, it is revealed that the classifications are composed of two regions: one is the traditional, in which flange and web are classified independently; the other is the extended region for which the width-to-thickness ratio of the web is relaxed and correspondingly the flange's width-to-thickness ratio is more stringent to reflect the weakening effect to the flange itself due to providing restraint to the web. For 4 classes of T-section, the limiting values are presented for possible references of codification.
  • [1]
    European Committee for Standardization (ECS).Eurocode 3:design of steel structures-part 1-1:general rules and rules for buildings:EC 3-1-1[S].Brussels:ECS,2005.
    [2]
    American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC).Seismic provisions for structural steel buildings:ANSI/AISC 341-16[S].Chicago:AISC,2016.
    [3]
    中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.钢结构设计标准:GB 50017—2017[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2018.
    [4]
    陈绍蕃.T形截面压杆的腹板局部屈曲[J].钢结构,2001,16(2):52-54.
    [5]
    叶其孝,沈永欢.实用数学手册[M].北京:科学出版社,2001.
    [6]
    童根树.钢结构的平面外稳定[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2013.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]Genshu Tong. Classifications of Cross-Sections Oriented to Seismic Design of Steel Buildings[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2025, 40(1): 74-78. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS24120420
    [3]Genshu Tong. The Limiting Width-to-Thickness Ratio for Web of H-Columns[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2023, 38(9): 53-55. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS23022120
    [4]GAO Lei, WANG Jing-wen, BAI Lin-yue, LIU Hu. Research on the Influence of Residual Stress on the Stability of BS700 High Strength Steel Welding Box Section Columns Fabricated By Channel Sections[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2022, 37(11): 24-30. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS22072601
    [5]Qiliang Miao, Zhensen Song, Zhongxiang ZHANG. Numerical Study on Cold-formed Steel Built-up Stiffened Cruciform Specimen Subjected to Axial Load[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2022, 37(3): 20-27. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS21103101
    [6]Xiaoli Xiong, Meng Ma, Kun Du. Measurement Method of Initial Geometric Deflections of T-Section Steel Struts[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2021, 36(9): 25-32. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS20032402
  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-04051015202530
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 12.5 %FULLTEXT: 12.5 %META: 81.6 %META: 81.6 %PDF: 5.9 %PDF: 5.9 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 21.5 %其他: 21.5 %其他: 0.3 %其他: 0.3 %上海: 0.6 %上海: 0.6 %乌海: 0.3 %乌海: 0.3 %兰州: 0.6 %兰州: 0.6 %勿加泗: 0.6 %勿加泗: 0.6 %北京: 3.7 %北京: 3.7 %南通: 0.3 %南通: 0.3 %南阳: 0.3 %南阳: 0.3 %台州: 2.2 %台州: 2.2 %合肥: 0.3 %合肥: 0.3 %哈尔滨: 0.3 %哈尔滨: 0.3 %唐山: 0.6 %唐山: 0.6 %嘉兴: 0.6 %嘉兴: 0.6 %天津: 1.9 %天津: 1.9 %娄底: 0.3 %娄底: 0.3 %宁波: 0.3 %宁波: 0.3 %安阳: 0.3 %安阳: 0.3 %宣城: 0.6 %宣城: 0.6 %常州: 0.3 %常州: 0.3 %常德: 0.6 %常德: 0.6 %广州: 1.6 %广州: 1.6 %廊坊: 0.6 %廊坊: 0.6 %张家口: 10.0 %张家口: 10.0 %成都: 2.2 %成都: 2.2 %扬州: 0.3 %扬州: 0.3 %抚顺: 0.3 %抚顺: 0.3 %昆明: 1.6 %昆明: 1.6 %晋城: 0.6 %晋城: 0.6 %杭州: 2.2 %杭州: 2.2 %武汉: 0.9 %武汉: 0.9 %沈阳: 0.9 %沈阳: 0.9 %深圳: 1.2 %深圳: 1.2 %温州: 0.9 %温州: 0.9 %湖州: 0.6 %湖州: 0.6 %漯河: 1.6 %漯河: 1.6 %玉林: 0.6 %玉林: 0.6 %福州: 0.3 %福州: 0.3 %绥化: 0.3 %绥化: 0.3 %芒廷维尤: 14.6 %芒廷维尤: 14.6 %芝加哥: 0.9 %芝加哥: 0.9 %衢州: 0.3 %衢州: 0.3 %西宁: 15.3 %西宁: 15.3 %西雅图: 0.6 %西雅图: 0.6 %运城: 1.2 %运城: 1.2 %邯郸: 0.3 %邯郸: 0.3 %郑州: 1.2 %郑州: 1.2 %重庆: 0.3 %重庆: 0.3 %镇江: 0.6 %镇江: 0.6 %长沙: 0.6 %长沙: 0.6 %青岛: 0.3 %青岛: 0.3 %其他其他上海乌海兰州勿加泗北京南通南阳台州合肥哈尔滨唐山嘉兴天津娄底宁波安阳宣城常州常德广州廊坊张家口成都扬州抚顺昆明晋城杭州武汉沈阳深圳温州湖州漯河玉林福州绥化芒廷维尤芝加哥衢州西宁西雅图运城邯郸郑州重庆镇江长沙青岛

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (261) PDF downloads(19) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return