Jun Ma, Yan Wang. Research on Analysis Method of Mechanical Properties of Modular Steel Frame Based on Multi-Scale and Beam Elements[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2023, 38(8): 1-13. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS23021502
Citation: Jun Ma, Yan Wang. Research on Analysis Method of Mechanical Properties of Modular Steel Frame Based on Multi-Scale and Beam Elements[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2023, 38(8): 1-13. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS23021502

Research on Analysis Method of Mechanical Properties of Modular Steel Frame Based on Multi-Scale and Beam Elements

doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS23021502
  • Received Date: 2023-02-15
  • In order to explore the analysis method and applicability of prefabricated modular steel frame structures, the multi-scale finite element model is established in the ABAQUS finite element software to analyze static and dynamic characteristic. The static characteristic of beam element, solid element and multi-scale joint calculation models are compared and analyzed. The differences of beam element, solid element and multi-scale frame calculation model are compared from two aspects of internal force analysis and model analysis of modular structure. In addition, the multi-scale model is applied to the dynamic elastic-plastic time history analysis of the modular steel frame structure, and the dynamic response differences between the beam element and the multi-scale frame 6 to 12-story model are compared and analyzed. The results show that internal multi-point constraint method in ABAQUS can achieve the connection between beam element and solid element; the calculation accuracy of the multi-scale model is in good agreement with that of the solid element. Comparing the two models, the multi-scale calculation model can increase the calculation efficiency by about 40%; the dynamic modal analysis shows that the natural frequencies of the multi-scale model and the solid element are basically the same, which verifies the reliability of the multi-scale model calculation results; when the number of modular structure floors exceeds 10, the calculation accuracy of the beam element calculation model is greatly reduced, while the calculation accuracy of the multi-scale calculation model is stable.
  • [1]
    Lacey A W,Chen W,Hao H,et al.Effect of inter-module connection stiffness on structural response of a modular steel building subjected to wind and earthquake load[J].Engineering Structures,2020[2020-06-15].https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110628.
    [2]
    Annan C D,Youssef M A,El Naggar M H.Experimental evaluation of the seismic performance of modular steel-braced frames[J].Engineering Structures,2009,31(7):1435-1446.
    [3]
    陈志华,冯云鹏,刘佳迪,等.柱承重式钢模块建筑结构体系适用高度研究[J].建筑钢结构进展,2021,23(1):31-39.
    [4]
    梁晓婕.模块化装配式钢框架结构动力特性分析[D].青岛:青岛理工大学,2021.
    [5]
    陆新征,林旭川,叶列平.多尺度有限元建模方法及其应用[J].华中科技大学学报(城市科学版),2008(4):76-80.
    [6]
    石永久,王萌,王元清.基于多尺度模型的钢框架抗震性能分析[J].工程力学,2011,28(12):20-26.
    [7]
    王萌,石永久,王元清.强震下钢框架动力时程分析模型应用对比分析[J].土木工程学报,2012,45(增刊2):80-83.
    [8]
    刘亮,吴晓涵,吴宏磊.基于多尺度模型的钢管混凝土节点抗震性能分析[J].结构工程师,2015,31(3):75-81.
    [9]
    王开宇.基于多点约束的多尺度建模方法研究[D].哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学,2016.
    [10]
    马青萍,王辉明.装配整体式框架结构多尺度分析和力学性能研究[J].工程抗震与加固改造,2022,44(1):15-21

    ,143.
    [11]
    张莹,孙广俊,李鸿晶.混凝土结构多尺度建模界面连接方法[J].东南大学学报(自然科学版),2015,45(1):126-132.
    [12]
    刘明扬,王燕,郏书朔.新型模块化钢框架板式内套筒连接节点力学性能研究[J].钢结构,2018,33(1):1-5

    ,10.
    [13]
    庄妍,王康宇.基于von Mises屈服准则的结构安定性研究[J].地下空间与工程学报,2016,12(增刊1):170-174,191.
    [14]
    中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.建筑结构荷载规范:GB 50009—2012[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2010.
    [15]
    中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.建筑抗震设计规范:GB 50011—2010[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2010.
    [16]
    中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.高层民用建筑钢结构技术规程:JGJ 99—2015[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2010.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]Mingliang Zhang, Hao Chen, Qiliang Wang. Study on Tensile Performance of Square Tubular Column-Column Joints of Modular Steel Structure with Bidirectional Bolt Connection[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2024, 39(8): 20-28. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS23062701
    [2]Xiaoxiao Xu, Yan Wang, Qi An. Seismic Performance and Stress Mechanism Analysis of Inner Sleeve Splicing Joints of Modular Steel Construction[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2024, 39(12): 49-60. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS23112803
    [3]Hongliang Xiu. Experimental Study of Steel-UHPC Sheet with Large Diameter Stud Interface Connection[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2023, 38(3): 34-42. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS23010201
    [4]Wenshuang Wu, Yan Wang. Research on Mechanical Properties of Inner Sleeve Connected Joint Between Modules of Fabricated Modular Steel Frame[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2023, 38(3): 1-12. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS23010301
    [5]Xu Chen, Libin Zhang, Zongxue Chen, Wentao Qiao, Lijun Meng. Finite Element Study on Mechanical Properties of Groove Plate Unit in Assembled Cable Supported Steel-Concrete Composite Floor[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2022, 37(4): 33-39. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS21121902
    [6]Dong Liu, Yongjiu Shi, Xianglin Yu, Chengliang Tu. Parametric Analyses on Lateral Performance About Modular Composite Shear Wall with Double Steel Plates and Infill Concrete[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2020, 35(12): 43-49. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS20120701
  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-04010203040
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 9.6 %FULLTEXT: 9.6 %META: 86.8 %META: 86.8 %PDF: 3.5 %PDF: 3.5 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 22.2 %其他: 22.2 %North Point: 0.6 %North Point: 0.6 %上海: 2.9 %上海: 2.9 %东莞: 0.9 %东莞: 0.9 %北京: 4.7 %北京: 4.7 %十堰: 0.6 %十堰: 0.6 %南京: 0.3 %南京: 0.3 %南通: 0.6 %南通: 0.6 %呼和浩特: 0.3 %呼和浩特: 0.3 %嘉兴: 1.8 %嘉兴: 1.8 %天津: 3.2 %天津: 3.2 %定西: 0.6 %定西: 0.6 %宣城: 0.3 %宣城: 0.3 %常州: 1.5 %常州: 1.5 %常德: 0.6 %常德: 0.6 %广州: 0.6 %广州: 0.6 %廊坊: 0.3 %廊坊: 0.3 %张家口: 5.6 %张家口: 5.6 %扬州: 2.9 %扬州: 2.9 %昆明: 0.6 %昆明: 0.6 %朝阳: 0.6 %朝阳: 0.6 %杭州: 1.5 %杭州: 1.5 %武汉: 1.2 %武汉: 1.2 %沈阳: 0.6 %沈阳: 0.6 %法兰克福: 1.8 %法兰克福: 1.8 %济南: 0.3 %济南: 0.3 %深圳: 0.6 %深圳: 0.6 %温州: 2.6 %温州: 2.6 %湛江: 0.6 %湛江: 0.6 %漯河: 10.5 %漯河: 10.5 %石家庄: 0.6 %石家庄: 0.6 %芒廷维尤: 6.7 %芒廷维尤: 6.7 %衡阳: 0.3 %衡阳: 0.3 %西宁: 17.3 %西宁: 17.3 %贵阳: 0.3 %贵阳: 0.3 %运城: 0.6 %运城: 0.6 %邯郸: 0.9 %邯郸: 0.9 %郑州: 0.6 %郑州: 0.6 %金华: 0.3 %金华: 0.3 %钦州: 0.3 %钦州: 0.3 %长沙: 1.2 %长沙: 1.2 %其他North Point上海东莞北京十堰南京南通呼和浩特嘉兴天津定西宣城常州常德广州廊坊张家口扬州昆明朝阳杭州武汉沈阳法兰克福济南深圳温州湛江漯河石家庄芒廷维尤衡阳西宁贵阳运城邯郸郑州金华钦州长沙

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (296) PDF downloads(12) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return