Analysis of Mechanical Properties of Joints and Frames with Cantilevered Beams Based on Joint Simplification Theory

Zhenhai Shi; Minglan Han; Yan Wang; Kuan Pang; Xu Wang

doi:10.13206/j.gjgS22120501

Volume 38 Issue 3

Mar. 2023

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English) > 2023 > 38(3): 24-33

Zhenhai Shi, Minglan Han, Yan Wang, Kuan Pang, Xu Wang. Analysis of Mechanical Properties of Joints and Frames with Cantilevered Beams Based on Joint Simplification Theory[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2023, 38(3): 24-33. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS22120501

Citation:

Zhenhai Shi, Minglan Han, Yan Wang, Kuan Pang, Xu Wang. Analysis of Mechanical Properties of Joints and Frames with Cantilevered Beams Based on Joint Simplification Theory[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2023, 38(3): 24-33. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS22120501

Citation:

Zhenhai Shi, Minglan Han, Yan Wang, Kuan Pang, Xu Wang. Analysis of Mechanical Properties of Joints and Frames with Cantilevered Beams Based on Joint Simplification Theory[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2023, 38(3): 24-33. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS22120501

PDF( 1163 KB)

Analysis of Mechanical Properties of Joints and Frames with Cantilevered Beams Based on Joint Simplification Theory

doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS22120501

1. School of Civil Engineering, Qingdao University of Technology, Qingdao 266033, China;
2. School of Science, Qingdao University of Technology, Qingdao 266033, China

Received Date: 2022-12-05
Available Online: 2023-05-24
Publish Date: 2023-03-25

Abstract

Abstract

To improve the efficiency of finite element numerical calculation of steel frame solid structure, the simplified theoretical model of joint was used to simplify the assembled embedded joint with cantilever beam, the assembled reinforced embedded joint with cantilever beam, the traditional beam-column connection joint with cantilever beam and the embedded bolt-welded hybrid joint with cantilever beam. The static analysis and pseudo-static analysis of four joint simplified models, one-story one-bay frame simplified model and frame solid model were carried out by ABAQUS finite element software, respectively. The calculation results of joint simplified model and joint solid model were compared and analyzed, and the calculation results of frame simplified model and frame solid model were compared and analyzed. The analysis results showed that:1) the difference of joint stiffness, yield load and ultimate load calculated by the simplified model and the solid model of the joint under unidirectional static load was small. The hysteretic curve, skeleton curve and stiffness degradation curve of the two models under cyclic loading were basically the same. The joint simplified model could reflect the mechanical properties of the joint solid model largely. 2) Under the action of unidirectional static load, the difference between the yield load and ultimate load of the structure calculated by the frame simplified model and the frame solid model was small. Under the action of reciprocating cyclic load, the bearing capacity, frame stiffness, hysteretic performance and energy dissipation capacity of the frame structure calculated by the two frame models were the same basically, and the calculation results were in good agreement. 3) The joint simplified model and the frame simplified model were used to calculate four kinds of joints and frames with cantilever beam. The calculation results had certain accuracy. Compared with the joint and frame solid model, the analysis efficiency of the joint simplified model and the frame simplified model was improved by more than 95%, and the calculation cost was greatly reduced.
- joint simplification theory,
- joint with cantilever beam,
- finite element analysis,
- bearing capacity,
- hysteretic behavior

FullText(HTML)

References(18)

References

[1]	Miller D K. Lessons learned from the Northridge earthquake[J]. Engineering Structures, 1998,20(4/5/6):249-260.
[2]	Mahin S A. Lessons from damage to steel buildings during the Northridge earthquake[J]. Engineering Structures, 1998,20(4/5/6):261-270.
[3]	周炳章. 日本阪神地震的震害及教训[J]. 工程抗震,1996(1):39-42,45.
[4]	Kako M, Ikeda S. Volunteer experiences in community housing during the Great HanshinAwaji Earthquake, Japan[J]. Nursing and Health Sciences, 2009,11(4):357-359.
[5]	夏军武,徐博,张海威,等. 带填充墙的悬臂梁拼接钢框架抗震性能研究[J]. 建筑结构学报,2016,37(11):113-120.
[6]	Duan S J, Zhang Y Q. Analysis of semi-rigid joint frame with moment rotation and shearing-deformation relationships[J]. Advanced Materials Research, 2011,163-167:629-632.
[7]	Nethercot D A,Li T Q,Choo B S. Connection element method for the analysis of semi-rigid frames[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research,1995,32:143-171.
[8]	施刚,袁锋,霍达,等. 钢框架梁柱节点转角理论模型和测量计算方法[J]. 工程力学,2012,29(2):52-60.
[9]	李浩. 半刚性钢框架的抗震性能研究[D]. 西安:西安理工大学,2016.
[10]	韩明岚,王慧,王燕,等. 钢框架延性耗能节点简化模型研究[J]. 建筑科学与工程学报,2017,34(2):86-94.
[11]	夏磊,张鹏鹏,王文达. 半刚性连接钢管混凝土框架动力特性的非线性有限元分析[J]. 工程抗震与加固改造,2013,35(1):16-22.
[12]	洪敏,冯红卫,王凤,等. 基于多点位移控制的梁柱节点刚度对钢框架抗震性能的影响[J]. 地震工程学报, 2014, 36(2):243-248.
[13]	高蒙. 梁柱节点刚度对空间钢框架抗震性能的影响分析[D]. 呼和浩特:内蒙古工业大学,2018.
[14]	时建华. 带悬臂梁段嵌入式加强型节点力学性能研究[D]. 青岛:青岛理工大学,2022.
[15]	Faella C, Piluso V, Rizzano G. Structural steel semirigid connections[M]. Boca Raton:CRC Press,1999.
[16]	Jin J, El-Tawil S. Seismic performance of steel frames with reduced beam section connections[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2004, 61(4):453-471.
[17]	中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 钢结构设计标准:GB 50017-2017[S]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2018.
[18]	AISC. Seismic provisions for structural steel buildings:AISC/ANSI 341-10[S]. Chicago:American Institute of Steel Construction, 2010.