Yiling Chen, Jinliang Jiang, Jingzhong Tong. Research on Lateral Stiffness of Embedded Wall Board Steel Frame Structure[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2023, 38(11): 1-9. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS22110501
Citation: Yiling Chen, Jinliang Jiang, Jingzhong Tong. Research on Lateral Stiffness of Embedded Wall Board Steel Frame Structure[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2023, 38(11): 1-9. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS22110501

Research on Lateral Stiffness of Embedded Wall Board Steel Frame Structure

doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS22110501
  • Received Date: 2022-11-05
    Available Online: 2023-11-27
  • Publish Date: 2023-11-25
  • Steel structure buildings have the characteristics of factory production, good seismic performance, recyclability, environmental protection and other characteristics. They are widely used in prefabricated buildings. In prefabricated steel structure buildings, embedded wallboards are often used as filling walls for steel frame structures. However, in the existing structural design theory, the period reduction factor is generally used to consider the influence of embedded wallboards on the lateral stiffness of steel frame structures. Sometimes, this causes a large difference between the simulated lateral stiffness of the frame and the actual stiffness, which is not conducive to refined engineering design. It is necessary to further study the influence of embedded wallboards on the lateral stiffness of steel frames. Therefore, in this context, in order to further study the changes of the lateral stiffness of steel frames caused by different influencing factors in the discrete connection between embedded wallboard and steel frame, ABAQUS finite element software was used to establish a structural model of steel frame with embedded autoclaved lightweight concrete(ALC) wallboard. The influence of the number of connection nodes and the stiffness ratio of the wallboard to the embedded wallboard steel frame structure(referred to as EWSF structure) was considered when connecting the ALC wallboard to the frame beam, the frame column, and the frame beam column together.
    The results show that the lateral stiffness of EWSF structure is greatly improved compared with the steel frame structure without wallboard. According to different connection conditions, the improvement degree can reach 4 to 6 times. The results of multi parameter analysis show that the change of connection conditions has a greater impact on the overall lateral stiffness of EWSF structure. With the increase of the number of connection nodes, the initial lateral stiffness of EWSF structure when the ALC wallboard is connected to the frame beam increases more significantly than when it is connected to the frame column. Compared with the case when the ALC wallboard and the frame beam column are connected separately, the effect of the joint connection of the ALC wallboard and the frame beam column on improving the lateral stiffness of EWSF structure is more significant. When the structure has fewer connection nodes, the change of beam column connection has little effect on the lateral stiffness of EWSF structure. The lateral stiffness of EWSF structure increases with the decrease of the stiffness ratio of the embedded wallboard to the steel frame. Based on the model analysis and theoretical derivation of the influence of factors such as the number of connection nodes and the stiffness ratio on the initial lateral stiffness of the structure, the influence coefficient β of the initial lateral stiffness of the structure when the embedded wallboard is fully rigid connected to the steel frame and the influence coefficient α of the initial lateral stiffness of the structure when the embedded wallboard is discrete connected are introduced respectively. And the formula for calculating the initial lateral stiffness of the structure is proposed. The calculation result is consistent with the finite element analysis result, which can provide a certain reference for engineering design.
  • [1]
    胡精武,徐锋,杜东升,等.整体钢框架内嵌加气混凝土填充墙板足尺模型振动台试验研究[J].建筑结构学报,2018,39(6):141-148.
    [2]
    侯和涛,周健,臧海涛,等.复合墙板与钢框架的连接节点抗震试验研究[J].工程力学,2014,31(10):85-91

    ,115.
    [3]
    王波,王静峰,李响,等.填充ALC墙板钢管混凝土框架抗震试验与数值模拟[J].土木工程学报,2014,47(增刊2):56-61.
    [4]
    王小平,朱晓章,程雅蒙.轻钢框架-加气混凝土砌块组合墙体抗侧试验研究与分析[J].武汉理工大学学报,2016,38(6):66-72.
    [5]
    Liu Y S,Li G Q.Behavior of steel frames with and without AAC infilled walls subjected to static and cyclic horizontal loads[C]//Proceedings of the 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering.2004.
    [6]
    Asadzadeh S A,Mohammadi M,ATTARI N K A,et al.An experimental study on finding prequalified connectors between the wall and steel frame infilled with autoclave-cured aerated concrete blocks[J].Journal of Earthquake Engineering,2022,26(8):4085-4104.
    [7]
    殷占忠,刘军,杨博,等.带PEC柱钢板剪力墙抗侧刚度的分析[J].哈尔滨工程大学学报,2022,43(3):392-398.
    [8]
    Mohammadi M,Nikfar F.Strength and stiffness of masonry-infilled frames with central openings based on experimental results[J].Journal of Structural Engineering,2013,139(6):974-984.
    [9]
    龚超,贾明明,刘信,等.钢框架-嵌挂结合型密肋复合墙板整体性能研究[J].工程力学,2020,37(增刊1):121-129.
    [10]
    常鹏,张凯,李强军.开洞对密肋复合墙体抗侧刚度的影响[J].华中科技大学学报(自然科学版),2015,43(11):127-132.
    [11]
    孙国华,何若全,顾强,等.半刚接钢框架内填RC墙结构侧移刚度分析[J].沈阳建筑大学学报(自然科学版),2011,27(4):613-620.
    [12]
    金晓飞,孟永杰,杨晓杰,等.内嵌围护墙板对钢框架抗侧力性能的影响效应[J].哈尔滨工业大学学报,2013,45(4):21-27.
    [13]
    孟永杰.多层内嵌围护墙板钢框架抗侧力性能研究[D].哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学,2012.
    [14]
    宋慧慧,王静峰,丁兆东,等.内嵌预制SVMFC夹芯复合墙板钢框架结构数值分析[J].合肥工业大学学报(自然科学版),2020,43(11):1538-1543.
    [15]
    颜雪洲.轻质高性能混凝土力学性能试验研究及新型复合墙体性能分析[D].北京:北京交通大学,2006.
    [16]
    中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.蒸压加气混凝土制品应用技术标准:JGJ/T 17-2020[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2020.
    [17]
    雷晴.ALC板填充墙RC框架结构数值模拟[J].山西建筑,2021,47(11):43-44.
    [18]
    童岳生,钱国芳,梁兴文,等.砖填充墙钢筋混凝土框架的刚度及其应用[J].西安冶金建筑学院学报,1985,44(4):21-35.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]Zhenghao Qian, Weiyong Wang. Research on Mechanical Properties of Circular Tubed Steel-Reinforced Concrete Stub Columns with High-Strength Steel Under Axial Compression[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2025, 40(2): 29-36. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS24091402
    [2]Ke Zou, Wei Bao, Songyan Li, Xutao Xue, Fangping Xiao, Jiaopeng Fang. Research on Seismic Performance of Semi-Rigid Steel Frames with Corrugated Steel Plate Shear Walls[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2025, 40(2): 10-20. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS24092004
    [3]Faxing Ding, Luyu She, Linli Duan, Jianxiong Lei. Finite Element Analysis of Seismic Performance of Concrete-Filled Square Steel Tubular Column to Composite Beam Joint with Stiffening Ring Under High Axial Pressure[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2024, 39(1): 29-40. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS23072801
    [4]Zuowei Qin, Hui Li, Dong Han, Haiqiang Jiang. Structure Optimization and Performance Analysis of Box-Type Support Joint of L-Shaped Partially Coated Steel-Concrete Composite Column[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2024, 39(6): 7-13. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS22082301
    [5]Yan Gao Guochang Li Xiao Li, . Finite Element Analysis of Pure Bending Properties of Square Steel Tube-Wood-Concrete Members[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2024, 39(7): 38-46. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS23110202
    [6]Jianghui He, Caiqi Zhao, Gang Wang, Tengteng Zheng. Experimental Study on Shear Performance of New Type of Aluminum Alloy Flower-Gusset Joint[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2023, 38(4): 29-34. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS22063003
    [7]XING Zunsheng, YE Dongchen, ZHANG Zhihao, JIA Shangrui. Performance Analysis of Complex Cast Steel Joint in the Steel Roof of Hangzhou West Railway Station[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2023, 38(2): 1-7. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS22120101
    [8]Zhenhai Shi, Minglan Han, Yan Wang, Kuan Pang, Xu Wang. Analysis of Mechanical Properties of Joints and Frames with Cantilevered Beams Based on Joint Simplification Theory[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2023, 38(3): 24-33. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS22120501
    [9]YANG Guosong, ZOU Huanmiao, CUI Qiang. Key Technology of Cross Steel Truss Construction of Supercomputer Cloud Roof[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2022, 37(12): 37-44. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS22032301
    [10]Shan Wang, Yi Zhang, Long Hao. Research on Global Stability Design Method of Steel-Concrete Composite Beams of Negative Moment Region[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2022, 37(2): 30-36. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS21012701
    [11]ZHONG Chang-jun, SHEN Rui-li, WANG Hui. Finite Element Analysis of Cable Saddle’s Mechanical Performance Considering the Influence of Cast Steel Material Inhomogeneity[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2022, 37(11): 31-38. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS20092001
    [12]Yong Guo, Wending Mou, Yong Chen, Cheng Chen, Yujia Mei. Approximating Formulas for Out-of-Plane Stiffness of Flange Plates in Inner-Outer Flanges[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2022, 37(7): 31-40. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgs21122001
    [13]Enfeng Deng, Liang Zong, Yang Ding. Research on Calculated Method of Initial Lateral Stiffness of Corrugated Steel Plate Shear Walls with Openings[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2022, 37(3): 1-9. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS21100101
    [14]Xiaoli Xiong, Meng Ma, Kun Du. Measurement Method of Initial Geometric Deflections of T-Section Steel Struts[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2021, 36(9): 25-32. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS20032402
    [15]Qiang Xu, Haowen Liu, Wentao Qiao, Chao Wang. Finite Element Analysis on Seismic Behavior of A New Prefabricated Corrugated Steel Plate and Polyurethane Composite Shear Wall[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2021, 36(12): 1-8. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS21051102
    [16]Tang Qiang, Liu Qiang, Wang Liankun, Yang Huixian, Guo Yu, Yan Ziqiang, Wang Jicong. Analysis of Mechanical Performance of Steel Frames Composed of Non-Compact Members[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2021, 36(11): 8-13. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS20092302
    [17]Jianzhou Ge, Xuewei Huang, Jun Zhao, Wei Zhao, Chenchen Wei. Fracture Prediction and Analysis of Q690D High Strength Steel Based on Cyclic Void Growth Model[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2021, 36(7): 18-28. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS20061103
    [18]Pang Lin, Sun Guohua, Dong Jiaying, Liao Qianwen. Analysis on the Hysteretic Behavior of Special Truss Moment Frame Connections[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2021, 36(11): 14-21. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS20081102
    [19]Zihan Jia, Xiantie Wang, Chuandong Xie, Jiaping Zhang, Yiwei Gu. Finite Element Analysis of Seismic Behavior of Self-Centering Concrete-Filled Square Steel Tubular Column-Steel Beam Joint with Slotted Energy Dissipation Plate[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2020, 35(12): 1-7. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS20091601
    [20]Dong Liu, Yongjiu Shi, Xianglin Yu, Chengliang Tu. Parametric Analyses on Lateral Performance About Modular Composite Shear Wall with Double Steel Plates and Infill Concrete[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2020, 35(12): 43-49. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS20120701
  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-0405101520
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 12.4 %FULLTEXT: 12.4 %META: 81.4 %META: 81.4 %PDF: 6.2 %PDF: 6.2 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 13.6 %其他: 13.6 %Central District: 0.5 %Central District: 0.5 %Morand: 0.2 %Morand: 0.2 %上海: 3.2 %上海: 3.2 %东莞: 0.2 %东莞: 0.2 %佛山: 0.2 %佛山: 0.2 %六安: 0.2 %六安: 0.2 %北京: 5.7 %北京: 5.7 %南京: 0.7 %南京: 0.7 %南昌: 0.5 %南昌: 0.5 %南阳: 0.2 %南阳: 0.2 %合肥: 0.2 %合肥: 0.2 %嘉兴: 0.5 %嘉兴: 0.5 %天津: 1.0 %天津: 1.0 %宁波: 0.7 %宁波: 0.7 %宣城: 0.5 %宣城: 0.5 %宿州: 0.5 %宿州: 0.5 %常州: 0.2 %常州: 0.2 %常德: 0.5 %常德: 0.5 %延安: 0.2 %延安: 0.2 %张家口: 4.2 %张家口: 4.2 %德阳: 0.2 %德阳: 0.2 %成都: 0.7 %成都: 0.7 %扬州: 0.7 %扬州: 0.7 %承德: 0.2 %承德: 0.2 %昆明: 2.5 %昆明: 2.5 %朝阳: 0.2 %朝阳: 0.2 %杭州: 0.7 %杭州: 0.7 %柏林: 0.2 %柏林: 0.2 %武汉: 1.2 %武汉: 1.2 %法兰克福: 1.5 %法兰克福: 1.5 %济宁: 1.0 %济宁: 1.0 %淮南: 0.2 %淮南: 0.2 %深圳: 0.5 %深圳: 0.5 %温州: 0.2 %温州: 0.2 %湖州: 0.2 %湖州: 0.2 %滨州: 1.0 %滨州: 1.0 %漯河: 1.7 %漯河: 1.7 %烟台: 0.2 %烟台: 0.2 %石家庄: 0.5 %石家庄: 0.5 %福州: 0.2 %福州: 0.2 %秦皇岛: 0.2 %秦皇岛: 0.2 %绍兴: 0.5 %绍兴: 0.5 %芒廷维尤: 24.0 %芒廷维尤: 24.0 %芜湖: 0.2 %芜湖: 0.2 %芝加哥: 1.2 %芝加哥: 1.2 %蚌埠: 0.2 %蚌埠: 0.2 %西宁: 16.6 %西宁: 16.6 %西安: 0.5 %西安: 0.5 %运城: 1.0 %运城: 1.0 %邯郸: 0.5 %邯郸: 0.5 %郑州: 1.7 %郑州: 1.7 %重庆: 0.2 %重庆: 0.2 %锦州: 0.2 %锦州: 0.2 %长春: 1.0 %长春: 1.0 %长沙: 1.5 %长沙: 1.5 %青岛: 0.2 %青岛: 0.2 %香港: 1.5 %香港: 1.5 %其他Central DistrictMorand上海东莞佛山六安北京南京南昌南阳合肥嘉兴天津宁波宣城宿州常州常德延安张家口德阳成都扬州承德昆明朝阳杭州柏林武汉法兰克福济宁淮南深圳温州湖州滨州漯河烟台石家庄福州秦皇岛绍兴芒廷维尤芜湖芝加哥蚌埠西宁西安运城邯郸郑州重庆锦州长春长沙青岛香港

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (328) PDF downloads(26) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return