Volume 38 Issue 6
Jun.  2023
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Rui Sun, Yiyi Chen, Yukun Yang, Xiaomeng Xie, Yuexi He. Experimental Study on Lateral Performance of Partially Encased Composite Shear Walls[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2023, 38(6): 1-11. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS22110301
Citation: Rui Sun, Yiyi Chen, Yukun Yang, Xiaomeng Xie, Yuexi He. Experimental Study on Lateral Performance of Partially Encased Composite Shear Walls[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2023, 38(6): 1-11. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS22110301

Experimental Study on Lateral Performance of Partially Encased Composite Shear Walls

doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS22110301
  • Received Date: 2022-11-03
    Available Online: 2023-07-01
  • With the application and promotion of prefabricated structures in China, the application value of PEC members in engineering has been greatly improved due to its characteristics of convenient mass production and rapid assembly. Some companies begin to try to apply PEC members in actual projects, and proposed a novel shear wall-PEC shear wall. Three full-scale PEC shear wall specimens were designed based on engineering application, and tested under low-cycle pseudo-static horizontal loading.The test phenomenon and failure process of PEC shear wall were observed, and the failure mode and deformation characteristics under the reciprocating load were studied by analyzing the stress and strain conditions of key parts. The hysteretic curve, skeleton curve, energy dissipation capacity, ductility, bearing capacity, stiffness and other mechanical properties of PEC shear wall under the low cyclic loading were analyzed to evaluate its lateral resistance properties. The influence of the flange crimping construction on the failure characteristics, deformation and lateral resistance were compared to verify its validity. And the influence of the axial compression ratio on the lateral performance of PEC walls with crimping construction was analyzed. The test results show that: 1)all PEC shear wall specimens failed after yielding due to bending, and the steel flange yielded before reaching the maximum bearing capacity. The concrete collapse at the bottom of specimen SW1 caused local buckling of the steel flange, while the bottom steel flange of specimen SW2 and SW3 did not buckled, and finally the base anchoring failure occurred. 2)Specimen SW1 hysteresis curve of SW1 is full, which has strong ability of plastic energy dissipation; hysteresis curves of specimen SW2 and specimen SW3 have a certain degree of pinch phenomenon. The ductility indexes are greater than 3.4, which has good deformation ability. The deterioration of wall resistance is much limited, and stiffness degrades is at a slower rate during later loading stages. All of the specimens keep stable bearing capacity within 1/30 inter-story drift.3) The crimping construction efficiently confines the concrete at the bottom corner of the PEC shear wall, postpones the collapse of the concrete, and makes the PEC shear walls have better bearing capacity. 4)Under high axial compression ratio, the specimen will compressively yield earlier, while the initial stiffness of the PEC shear wall will increase somewhat, meanwhile, its ductility and energy dissipation capacity will be reduced. 5) The deformation capacity of PEC shear wall is closer to that of steel plate shear wall than that of concrete shear wall. The deformation limit for seismic design of PEC shear wall can be appropriately enlarged.
  • loading
  • [1]
    European Committee for Standardization(ECS).Eurocode 4:design of composite steel and concrete structures,part 1-1:general rules and rules for buildings:EN 1994-1-1[S].Brussels:ECS,2004.
    [2]
    Canadian Standards Association.Design of steel structures:CSA S16-09[S].Mississauga:Canadian Standards Association,2009.
    [3]
    Fattah A B,Fattah B A,Hunaiti Y M.Design considerations of partially encased composite columns[J].Structures & Buildings,1994,104(1):75-82.
    [4]
    Brent S,P,Robert G D.Behaviour of partially encased composite columns made with high performance concrete[R].Edmonton:University of Alberta,2006.
    [5]
    杨婧.半组合结构压弯构件的滞回性能研究[D].上海:同济大学,2008.
    [6]
    方有珍,陆佳,马吉,等.薄壁钢板组合PEC 柱(强轴)滞回性能试验研究[J].土木工程学报,2012,45(4):48-55.
    [7]
    方有珍,马吉,陆承铎,等.新型卷边钢板组合截面 PEC 柱(强轴)滞回性能试验研究[J].工程力学,2013,30(3):181-190.
    [8]
    何雅雯.非塑性铰截面钢构件与PEC 压弯构件的力学模型及试验研究[D].上海:同济大学,2017.
    [9]
    刘杰.部分外包钢-混凝土组合柱截面特征参数对其力学性能的影响分析[D].上海:同济大学,2018.
    [10]
    张其林,黄亚男,吴杰,等.装配式部分外包组合短肢剪力墙抗震性能试验研究[J].施工技术,2019,48(2):100-106

    ,125.
    [11]
    周雨楠,黄亚男,徐国军,等.PEC短肢剪力墙轴压比影响及承载力计算方法[J].佳木斯大学学报(自然科学版),2018,36(6):843-848,875.
    [12]
    周雨楠,黄亚男,张其林,等.短肢PEC组合剪力墙的数值模型及公式拟合[J].建筑钢结构进展,2020,22(1):92-100.
    [13]
    中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局.金属材料拉伸试验第1部分:室温试验方法:GB/T 228.1—2010[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2010.
    [14]
    中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.普通混凝土力学性能试验方法标准:GB/T 50081—2002[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2003.
    [15]
    Federal Emergency Management Agency(FEMA).Interin testing protocls for deterining the seismic performance characteristics of structural and nonstructural components[R].Washington D C:FEMA,2007.
    [16]
    Park R.Ductility evaluation from laboratory and analytical testing[C]//Proceedings of Ninth World Conference on Earthquake Engineering.Tokyo-Kyoto:1988.
    [17]
    中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.建筑抗震试验规程:JGJ 101—2015[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2015.
    [18]
    宁燕琪.考虑竖向荷载作用的带缝钢板剪力墙试验研究与理论分析[D].上海:同济大学 ,2011.
    [19]
    中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.建筑抗震设计规范:GB 50011—2010[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2010.
    [20]
    中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.钢板剪力墙技术规程:JGJ/T 380—2015[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2015.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (192) PDF downloads(16) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return