Login Register
Volume 38 Issue 3
Mar.  2023
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Article Navigation >  STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English)  > 2023  >  38(3): 13-23
Chuntao Zhang, Hai Li, Wei Yu. Experimental Research on Post-Fire Mechanical Properties of Domestic Q355 Steel After Cooling from High Temperature[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2023, 38(3): 13-23. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS22110104
Citation: Chuntao Zhang, Hai Li, Wei Yu. Experimental Research on Post-Fire Mechanical Properties of Domestic Q355 Steel After Cooling from High Temperature[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2023, 38(3): 13-23. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS22110104
shu

Experimental Research on Post-Fire Mechanical Properties of Domestic Q355 Steel After Cooling from High Temperature

doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS22110104

  • 1. College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Southwest University of Science and Technology, Mianyan 621010, China;

  • 2. Shock and Vibration of Engineering Materials and Structures Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Mianyang 621010, China;

  • 3. College of Civil and Architecture Engineering, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541004, China;

  • 4. Guangxi Key Laboratory of New Energy and Building Energy Saving, Guilin 541004, China

  • Received Date: 2022-11-01
    Available Online: 2023-05-24
  • Publish Date: 2023-03-25
    Abstract
  • As a new type of steel, Q355 has been widely used in the field of construction due to its excellent mechanical properties. However, it has the fatal disadvantage of poor fire resistance, which is dangerous to steel structure buildings. Through the safety appraisal and bearing capacity evaluation of steel structure buildings after fire, the waste caused by demolition and reconstruction can be effectively avoided, and corresponding measures can be taken to repair or replace the components, which can greatly save economic costs. Therefore, it is necessary to study the residual mechanical properties of Q355 steel after fire. In order to simulate the situation of Q355 steel after fire and fire extinguishing, the conditions of 200 to 900℃, natural cooling and water cooling were set to simulate the fire, and the mechanical properties of Q355 steel after high temperature were tested. With the help of high temperature furnace, universal testing machine and electronic extensometer, the stress-strain curve and mechanical properties parameters (yield strength, tensile strength, ratio of yield strength to ultimate tensile strength, elastic modulus and elongation, etc) of Q355 steel after high temperature cooling were obtained. The influence of temperature and cooling method on the stress-strain curve and mechanical parameters was analyzed. The mechanical properties of Q355 steel and Q235, Q460 and Q690 steel after high temperature were compared and analyzed. The mathematical model of mechanical properties of Q355 steel under different cooling methods was fitted by ORIGIN data processing software. It was found that there were significant differences in the different apparent characteristics, failure modes and mechanical properties of Q355 steel for different temperatures and cooling methods. The surface carbonization degree of Q355 steel gradually deepened with the increase of temperature. When the exposure temperature exceeds 600℃, the carbonization phenomenon become more obvious, and even when immersed in water for cooling, the carbonization skin peeled off. When the temperature does not exceed 600℃, the apparent morphology change characteristics were small and the deformation degree of the tensile specimen was light, which was similar to the appearance and deformation of the specimen without high temperature. In addition, 600℃ was also the critical temperature for the change of residual mechanical properties of Q355 steel. When the temperature was lower than 600℃, the effect of temperatures and cooling methods on the mechanical properties of Q355 steel was negligible. However, when the temperature was higher than 600℃, temperatures and cooling methods exerted a distinct influence on the mechanical properties of Q355 steel. After air cooling, the yield strength, tensile strength, and elastic modulus of Q355 steel decreased with the increase in temperature, but the ultimate elongation increased with the increase in temperature. After water cooling, the yield strength and tensile strength of Q355 steel increased with the increase in temperature, while the elastic modulus and ultimate elongation decreased with the increase in temperature. Furthermore, the predictive equations were proposed to determine the post-fire material properties of Q355 steel for cooling in air and cooling in water.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References(19)
  • [1]
    李国强, 王卫永. 钢结构抗火安全研究现状与发展趋势[J]. 土木工程学报,2017,50(12):1-8.
    [2]
    Zhang C T, Liu Y F, Huang C L. Fatigue performance of Q345 structural steel after natural cooling from elevated temperatures[J/OL]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2021, 184(2021- 07-02)[2021-09-02]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2021.106811.
    [3]
    Zhang C T, Wang R H, Song G B. Post-fire mechanical properties of Q460 and Q690 high-strength steels after fire-fighting foam cooling[J/OL]. Thin-Walled Structures, 2020, 156(2020-08-02)[2020-11-03]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2020.106983.
    [4]
    Outinen J, Kesti J, Makelainen P. Fire design model for structural steel S355 based upon transient state tensile test results[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 1997, 42(3):161-170.
    [5]
    Makelainen P, Outinen J, Kesti J. Fire design model for structural steel S420M based upon transient-state tensile test results[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 1998, 48(1):47-57.
    [6]
    Amin H, Niall S T, Asghar H K, et al. Mechanical properties of very high strength steel at elevated temperatures[J]. Fire Safety Journal, 2014, 64:27-35.
    [7]
    Qiang X H, Bijlaard F S K, Kolstein H. Post-fire mechanical properties of high strength structural steels S460 and S690[J]. Engineering Structures, 2012, 35:1-10.
    [8]
    Qiang X H, Jiang X, Bijlaard F S K, et al. Mechanical properties and design recommendations of very high strength steel S960 in fire[J]. Engineering Structures, 2016, 112:60-70.
    [9]
    丁发兴,余志武,温海林. 高温后Q235钢材力学性能试验研究[J]. 建筑材料学报,2006, 9(2):245-249.
    [10]
    张有桔, 朱跃, 赵升等. 高温后不同冷却条件下钢材力学性能试验研究[J]. 结构工程师, 2009, 25(5):104-109.
    [11]
    陈建锋, 曹平周. 高温后结构钢力学性能试验[J]. 解放军理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2010, 11(3):328-333.
    [12]
    Wang W Y, Liu T Z, Liu J P. Experimental study on post-fire mechanical properties of high strength Q460 steel[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2015, 114:100-109.
    [13]
    Lu J, Liu H B, Chen Z H, et al. Experimental investigation of the residual mechanical properties of cast steels after exposure to elevated temperature[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2017, 143:259-271.
    [14]
    Li G Q, Lyu H B, Zhang C. Post-fire mechanical properties of high strength Q690 structural steel[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2017, 132:108-116.
    [15]
    李国强, 黄雷, 张超. 国产Q550高强钢高温力学性能试验研究[J]. 同济大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 46(2):170-176.
    [16]
    Zhang C T, Wang R H, Zhu L. Mechanical properties of Q345 structural steel after artificial cooling from elevated temperatures[J/OL]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2021, 176(2020-11-09)[2021-01-13]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2020.106432.
    [17]
    强旭红, 武念铎, 姜旭,等. 超高强钢S960火灾后力学性能试验研究[J]. 同济 大学 学报(自然 科学 版), 2016, 44(7):1076-1083.
    [18]
    中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局. 金属材料拉伸试验第 1部分室温试验方法:GB/T 228. 1-2010[S]. 北京:中国标准出版社,2010.
    [19]
    中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局. 金属材料高温拉伸试验方法:GB/T 4338-2006[S]. 北京:中国标准 出版 社,2006.
    • Relative Articles

  • Relative Articles

    [1]Sicheng Li, Ran He, Zhangqi Hu, Hao Peng, Shenyun Liu. Experimental Research on Special-Shaped Concrete-Filled Steel Tubular Columns Under Axial Compression[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2025, 40(2): 21-28. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS24091301
    [2]Xuhong Zhou, Dan Gan, Zheng Zhou, Yongjian Liu, Zexiang Li, Hongpeng Li. Developments of Concrete-Filled Steel Tube Structures Stiffened by Diagonal Ribs[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2024, 39(1): 1-28. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS23071102
    [3]Jun Zou, Bing Shao, Zunsheng Xing, Qixiao Yu, Jiahui Cui, Huajiao Xu. Research on Seismic Performance of a Steel Frame Structure with Flat Steel Tubular Column and X-Type Brace[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2024, 39(6): 14-21. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS23071902
    [4]Yingying Zhang, Qilin Zhang, Junhao Xu, Lingyu Sheng. Advances in Research on Material Mechanical Properties of Modern Architectural Coated Fabrics[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2024, 39(2): 1-19. doi: 10.3724/j.gjgS23080101
    [5]Zeyu Zhang, Lijing Zeng, Hongxu Li, Luzhen Jiang, Yuedong Wang, Zhaoxin Hou, Weinan Li. Experimental Investigation on Mechanical Properties of Fire-Resistant Steel Q235FRB at Elevated Temperature[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2024, 39(10): 111-118. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS24051601
    [6]Jianyu Yao, Ruiting Deng, Baofeng Zheng, Ganping Shu. Study on Mechanical Properties of Weld Joints of Stainless Steel and Carbon Steel[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2023, 38(10): 25-31. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS23102401
    [7]ZHAO Yu-ran, ZHENG Teng-teng, ZHAO Cai-qi, YUAN Liang-jian. Comparative Study on Structural Performance of Box-Type Hollow Roof and Traditional Roof[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2022, 37(10): 24-31. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS22052901
    [8]Dong Fuyuan, Meng Zhaojing, Zhang Mingxu. Orthoronal Experimental Study on the Effect of Heat Treatment on the Properties of G20Cr2Ni4A Steel[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2021, 36(11): 22-27. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS20032601
    [9]Jingjing Du, Zhongmin Yang, Xin Wang, Yanguang Cao, Zhaodong Li, Wanhua Yu. Effect of Microalloying Elements on Microstructure and Properties of 690 MPa Fire-Resistance Steel[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2021, 36(3): 12-21. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS20070804
    [10]Meng Xia, Hui Chen, Jie Wang, Lin Peng, Junwei He, Jun Xing, Jingcheng Yan. The Influence of Rolling Temperature on Mechanical Properties of Weathering Resistant Hot-Rolled H-Section Steel[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2021, 36(3): 46-51. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS20031202
    [11]Zhaoxin Hou, Chao Gong, Zihao Liang, Gang Wang, Zhidong Yao. Experimental Investigation on the Effects of Temperature on the Bearing Capacity of High Strength Bolt Connections[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2021, 36(1): 50-59. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS20081803
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(2)

    1. 李兴亮，谢超，李成杰，林旭嘉. 某中承式钢拱桥加工制作研究. 科技创新与应用. 2024(05): 121-124 .
    2. 李星. 对称外倾式拱桥拱肋预拱度设置与施工方法研究. 广州建筑. 2023(03): 41-44 .

    Other cited types(1)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-040255075100
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 8.6 %FULLTEXT: 8.6 %META: 89.4 %META: 89.4 %PDF: 2.0 %PDF: 2.0 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 14.3 %其他: 14.3 %其他: 0.2 %其他: 0.2 %China: 0.1 %China: 0.1 %Falls Church: 0.1 %Falls Church: 0.1 %三门峡: 0.1 %三门峡: 0.1 %上海: 3.2 %上海: 3.2 %东莞: 2.4 %东莞: 2.4 %丽水: 0.1 %丽水: 0.1 %亚特兰大: 0.1 %亚特兰大: 0.1 %佛山: 0.4 %佛山: 0.4 %六安: 0.1 %六安: 0.1 %兰州: 0.2 %兰州: 0.2 %勿加泗: 0.2 %勿加泗: 0.2 %北京: 3.5 %北京: 3.5 %十堰: 1.0 %十堰: 1.0 %南京: 1.1 %南京: 1.1 %南通: 0.6 %南通: 0.6 %厦门: 0.4 %厦门: 0.4 %合肥: 0.1 %合肥: 0.1 %呼和浩特: 0.1 %呼和浩特: 0.1 %嘉兴: 1.2 %嘉兴: 1.2 %大连: 0.7 %大连: 0.7 %天津: 2.0 %天津: 2.0 %太原: 0.9 %太原: 0.9 %宁波: 0.2 %宁波: 0.2 %宜昌: 0.1 %宜昌: 0.1 %宜春: 0.1 %宜春: 0.1 %宣城: 1.0 %宣城: 1.0 %宿迁: 0.1 %宿迁: 0.1 %岳阳: 0.4 %岳阳: 0.4 %巴音郭楞: 0.1 %巴音郭楞: 0.1 %常州: 0.5 %常州: 0.5 %常德: 0.1 %常德: 0.1 %平顶山: 0.1 %平顶山: 0.1 %广州: 0.9 %广州: 0.9 %廊坊: 0.1 %廊坊: 0.1 %延安: 0.2 %延安: 0.2 %开封: 0.4 %开封: 0.4 %张家口: 3.1 %张家口: 3.1 %徐州: 0.1 %徐州: 0.1 %德阳: 0.1 %德阳: 0.1 %成都: 0.4 %成都: 0.4 %扬州: 3.2 %扬州: 3.2 %新乡: 0.1 %新乡: 0.1 %无锡: 0.1 %无锡: 0.1 %昆明: 1.9 %昆明: 1.9 %杭州: 1.9 %杭州: 1.9 %枣庄: 0.1 %枣庄: 0.1 %桂林: 0.1 %桂林: 0.1 %武汉: 0.5 %武汉: 0.5 %汉中: 0.4 %汉中: 0.4 %汕头: 0.4 %汕头: 0.4 %沈阳: 0.7 %沈阳: 0.7 %沧州: 0.1 %沧州: 0.1 %济南: 1.1 %济南: 1.1 %深圳: 0.4 %深圳: 0.4 %温州: 1.1 %温州: 1.1 %湖州: 0.2 %湖州: 0.2 %滁州: 0.2 %滁州: 0.2 %漯河: 8.6 %漯河: 8.6 %潍坊: 0.1 %潍坊: 0.1 %盐城: 0.1 %盐城: 0.1 %石家庄: 1.0 %石家庄: 1.0 %福州: 0.7 %福州: 0.7 %绵阳: 0.1 %绵阳: 0.1 %芒廷维尤: 5.6 %芒廷维尤: 5.6 %芜湖: 0.1 %芜湖: 0.1 %芝加哥: 1.2 %芝加哥: 1.2 %苏州: 0.5 %苏州: 0.5 %莫斯科: 0.4 %莫斯科: 0.4 %菏泽: 0.2 %菏泽: 0.2 %蚌埠: 0.1 %蚌埠: 0.1 %衡水: 0.9 %衡水: 0.9 %衡阳: 0.1 %衡阳: 0.1 %衢州: 0.4 %衢州: 0.4 %西宁: 12.6 %西宁: 12.6 %西安: 1.5 %西安: 1.5 %西雅图: 0.1 %西雅图: 0.1 %贵阳: 0.1 %贵阳: 0.1 %运城: 0.2 %运城: 0.2 %连云港: 0.1 %连云港: 0.1 %邯郸: 0.4 %邯郸: 0.4 %郑州: 6.5 %郑州: 6.5 %鄂州: 0.1 %鄂州: 0.1 %重庆: 0.4 %重庆: 0.4 %镇江: 0.5 %镇江: 0.5 %长沙: 1.9 %长沙: 1.9 %青岛: 0.4 %青岛: 0.4 %鞍山: 0.1 %鞍山: 0.1 %马鞍山: 0.1 %马鞍山: 0.1 %黄石: 0.1 %黄石: 0.1 %其他其他ChinaFalls Church三门峡上海东莞丽水亚特兰大佛山六安兰州勿加泗北京十堰南京南通厦门合肥呼和浩特嘉兴大连天津太原宁波宜昌宜春宣城宿迁岳阳巴音郭楞常州常德平顶山广州廊坊延安开封张家口徐州德阳成都扬州新乡无锡昆明杭州枣庄桂林武汉汉中汕头沈阳沧州济南深圳温州湖州滁州漯河潍坊盐城石家庄福州绵阳芒廷维尤芜湖芝加哥苏州莫斯科菏泽蚌埠衡水衡阳衢州西宁西安西雅图贵阳运城连云港邯郸郑州鄂州重庆镇江长沙青岛鞍山马鞍山黄石

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索
    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (717) PDF downloads(18) Cited by(3)
    Proportional views
    Related

    Journal Online

    Author's Center

    Links

    版权所有 © 《工业建筑》杂志社有限公司

    京ICP备11033253号-1

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co. Ltd     百度统计

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return