Volume 38 Issue 4
Apr.  2023
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Ruohuan He, Gang Wang, Caiqi Zhao, Shuo Yang, Zhijie Zhang. Study on Compressive Properties of Three Types of Aluminum Alloy Honeycomb Panels[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2023, 38(4): 20-28. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS22082601
Citation: Ruohuan He, Gang Wang, Caiqi Zhao, Shuo Yang, Zhijie Zhang. Study on Compressive Properties of Three Types of Aluminum Alloy Honeycomb Panels[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2023, 38(4): 20-28. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS22082601

Study on Compressive Properties of Three Types of Aluminum Alloy Honeycomb Panels

doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS22082601
  • Received Date: 2022-08-26
    Available Online: 2023-06-10
  • Inspired by the fact that the front wing of Unicorn contains both a column and an air bag wall structure,the traditional aluminum alloy honeycomb panel is improved in this paper.A column structure is set at the end of the honeycomb wall of the aluminum alloy honeycomb panel core panel,that is,a wall end column beetle panel.Because about 10% of the columella in the front wing of Unicorn Fairy distributed in the middle of the honeycomb wall,the columella in the middle of the honeycomb wall was added for joint research.Three kinds of plates are taken as the research object to carry out test and finite element analysis.In order to fully simulate the performance of the integrated molded honeycomb panel and consider that the 3D printing technology cannot print aluminum alloy materials,the resin is used as the material in the experiment,and the 3D printing technology is used to make the integrated honeycomb panel specimen for testing to verify the accuracy of the computer simulation.In the experiment,three different configurations of honeycomb panels,namely,traditional honeycomb panel,wall center pillar beetle panel and wall end pillar beetle panel,were made with resin materials through 3D printing technology,and side pressure tests were carried out on them.It can be seen from the experimental data that the ultimate lateral compression bearing capacity of the wall end post beetle board is increased from 27.9 kN to 34.7 kN compared with the traditional honeycomb board;compared with the traditional honeycomb panel,the lateral compression ultimate bearing capacity of the wall pillar beetle panel is increased from 27.9 kN to 31.9 kN.It can be seen that the lateral pressure performance of wall end post beetle board is better than that of honeycomb board and wall center post beetle board.Secondly,the finite element model was established to compare with the experimental data for verification.Due to the influence of the holes left by the 3D printing process,the failure form of the test piece was slightly different from the stress distribution of the finite element model,but the low stress area in the center of the upper and lower edges of the plate was the same as the experiment.It can be seen from the comparison between the finite element simulation value and the experimental value that the average error between the simulation results and the experimental results is only 3.366%,which verifies the validity of the finite element model.Thirdly,three kinds of honeycomb panel finite element models based on aluminum alloy material properties were established,and the side pressure finite element analysis was carried out.The results show that compared with the traditional honeycomb panel,the yield bearing capacity and ultimate bearing capacity of the wall end post beetle panel are improved by 2.6% and 4.7% respectively.Finally,the four factors that affect the lateral compression performance of the beetle board,namely,the ratio of the column radius r to the side length L of the hexagonal honeycomb core α,the thickness of the beetle board core layer h1,the thickness of the upper and lower panels h2,and the thickness of the beetle board core layer honeycomb wall d,were compared and analyzed.Among them,the diameter length ratio increased from 0.312 5 to 0.5,the yield bearing capacity and the ultimate bearing capacity increased by 5.3% and 6% respectively;the wall thickness of the core layer of the beetle board increased from 1mm to 1.4mm,and the yield bearing capacity and ultimate bearing capacity increased by 3.3% and 6.5% respectively;the thickness of the core layer of the beetle board increased from 6 mm to 12 mm,and the yield bearing capacity and ultimate bearing capacity increased by 2.2% and 5.1% respectively;the thickness of the surface layer of the beetle board increased from 1 mm to 2.5 mm,and the yield bearing capacity and ultimate bearing capacity increased by 244% and 236% respectively.It is concluded that the thickness of the beetle board panel has a significant impact on the side pressure performance.
  • loading
  • [1]
    刘艳辉,童国权,王辉等. GH99高温合金蜂窝板的制备及力学性能[J]. 机械工程材料,2013,37(2):82-85.
    [2]
    Gibson L,Ashby M. 多孔固体结构与性能[M]. 刘培 生,译. 北京:清华大学出版社,2003.
    [3]
    马金朵,陈潇涵,司莹 莹,等. 铝蜂 窝夹 芯板 研究 现状 与展 望[J]. 木工机床,2019(4):11-14.
    [4]
    刘金龙. 铝蜂窝复合材料客车底板性能研究及应用[D]. 广州:华南理工大学,2012.
    [5]
    管仁国,娄花芬,黄晖,等. 铝合金材料发展现状、趋势及展望[J]. 中国工程科学,2020,22(5):68-75.
    [6]
    Chen J X. Fundamental study on biomimetics composites[D]. Kyoto:Kyoto Institute of Technology, 2001.
    [7]
    Chen J X, Ni Q Q. Three dimensional compose structures in the fore-wing of beetle[J]. Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica, 2003, 20(6):61-66.
    [8]
    陈锦祥, 岩本正治, 倪庆清, 等. 甲虫上翅の 断面构造と そ の 最适性[J]. 复合材料, 2000, 49(4):407-412.
    [9]
    Chen J X, Ni Q Q, Xu Y, et al. Lightweight composite structures in the forewings of beetles[J]. Composite Structures, 2007, 79(3):331-337.
    [10]
    Chen J X, Dai G, Xu Y, et al. Optimal composite structures in the forewings of beetles[J]. Composite Structures, 2007, 81(3):432-437.
    [11]
    徐梦烨. 甲虫板的抗弯性能及其增强机理[D]. 南京:东南大学,2019.
    [12]
    Gu C L, Liu J, Chen J X, et al. Technological parameters and design of bionic integrated honeycomb plates[J]. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 2014(11):134-143.
    [13]
    Chen J X, Gu C L, Guo S J, et al. Integrated honeycomb technology motivated by the structure of beetle forewings[J]. Materials Science and Engineering C, 2012, 32(7):1813-1817.
    [14]
    陈锦祥, 何成林, 顾承龙,等. 带封边一体化蜂窝板的成型工艺:201310302313. 8[P]. 2013-10-09.
    [15]
    Chen J X, Zhang X M, Okabe Y, et al. Beetle elytron plate and the synergistic mechanism of trabecular-honeycomb core structure[J]. Science China Technological Sciences, 2019, 62(1):91-97.
    [16]
    Chen J X, Ni Q Q, Endo Y, et al. Distribution of trabeculae and elytral surface structures of the horned beetle, allomyrina dichotoma (linn) (coleoptera:scarabaeidae)[J]. Entomologia Sinica, 2002(9):55-61.
    [17]
    余心笛. 壁中柱甲虫板抗压及耗能性能研究[D]. 南京:东南大学,2020.
    [18]
    中国国家标准化管理委 员会. 夹芯 结构 侧压 性能 试验 方法:GB/T 1454-2005[S]. 北京:中国标准出版社,2005.
    [19]
    张晓明. 甲虫板 抗压 性能 及其 增强 机理[D]. 南京:东南 大学,2018.
    [20]
    拓万永. 甲虫前翅及仿生一体化蜂窝板的力学性能研究[D]. 南京:东南大学,2017.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (94) PDF downloads(14) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return