Volume 36 Issue 10
Jan.  2022
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Yuzhu Wang, Chang Shu, Peng Wang, Xingguang Zhou, Chunsheng Wang. Numerical Simulation of Distortion-Induced Fatigue Effect in Steel Plate Girder Bridges[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2021, 36(10): 7-15. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS21091001
Citation: Yuzhu Wang, Chang Shu, Peng Wang, Xingguang Zhou, Chunsheng Wang. Numerical Simulation of Distortion-Induced Fatigue Effect in Steel Plate Girder Bridges[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2021, 36(10): 7-15. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS21091001

Numerical Simulation of Distortion-Induced Fatigue Effect in Steel Plate Girder Bridges

doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS21091001
  • Received Date: 2021-09-10
    Available Online: 2022-01-11
  • For two type of distortion-induced fatigue details at web gaps(vertical stiffener web gap and horizontal gusset plate web gap) in the steel plate girder bridges, finite element models of the straight, skewed and curved three-span continuous steel plate girder bridges were built. The out-of-plane distortion and fatigue stress of the web gap fatigue details of steel plate girder bridges with different spans, oblique angles and horizontal curve radius are investigated by numerical simulation. Parametric analysis of fatigue effect in skewed and curved bridges is carried out. The simulation results show that when under the vehicle loads, the relative out-of-plane deformation and fatigue stresses will occur at the web gap details. The relative out-of-plane distortion and the peak fatigue stress of the vertical stiffener web gap details in the straight bridge are 0.079 mm and 105.6 MPa; the relative out-of-plane distortion and the peak fatigue stress of the horizontal gusset plate web gap details in the straight bridge are 0.006 mm and 10.9 MPa. The distortion-induced fatigue effects of two types of web gap details in the skewed bridge and the curved bridge are significantly greater than that of the straight bridge, and the out-of-plane distortions are larger than that of the straight bridge. The peak fatigue stress of vertical stiffener web gap in the skewed bridge and the curved bridge are 2.4 times and 1.7 times as much as that in the straight bridge; the peak fatigue stress of horizontal gusset plate web gap in the skewed bridge and the curved bridge are 2 times and 2.9 times as much as that in the straight bridge. The relative out-of-plane deformation of the fatigue details has a strong correlation with the stress level at the fatigue details, and small relative out-of-plane deformation can cause high fatigue stress. In skewed bridges, only 0.15 mm relative out-of-plane distortion at the horizontal gusset plate web gap details can cause 250 MPa vertical bending tensile stress. Parametric analysis results show that the fatigue stress at details in skewed bridge increases with the increase of oblique angle, while the stress at fatigue details in curved bridge increases with the decrease of horizontal curve radius. In the straight bridge with a span arrangement of(45+70+45) m, the maximum tensile stresses at the vertical stiffener web gap details and the horizontal gusset plate web gap details are 105.6 MPa and 10.9 MPa. The maximum tensile stresses at the corresponding details in the skewed bridge and curved bridge with the same span are 250.5 MPa and 21.8 MPa, 176.5 MPa and 31.9 MPa, respectively, which are significantly greater than the maximum tensile stress at the corresponding details in the straight bridge with the same span.
  • loading
  • [1]
    Connor R J, Fisher J W. Identifying effective and ineffective retrofits for distortion fatigue cracking in steel bridges using field instrumentation[J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2006, 11(6):745-752.
    [2]
    AASHTO AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications[M]. Washington, D. C.:AASHTO, 2012.
    [3]
    《中国公路学报》编辑部. 中国桥梁工程学术研究综述·2014[J]. 中国公路学报, 2014, 27(5):1-96.
    [4]
    Fisher J W, Jin J, Wagner D C, et al. Distortion-induced fatigue cracking in steel bridges:NCHRP Rep. 335[R]. Washington, D. C.:Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, 1990.
    [5]
    Zhao Y, Roddis W M K. Finite element study of distortion-induced fatigue in welded steel bridges[J]. Transportation Research Record, 2003,1854:57-65.
    [6]
    Roddis W M K, Zhao Y. Finite-element analysis of steel bridge distortion-induced fatigue[J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2003, 6(8):259-266.
    [7]
    Jajich D, Schultz A E. Measurement and analysis of distortion-induced fatigue in multigirder steel bridges[J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2003, 6(8):84-91.
    [8]
    黄侨, 李莹, 高秀云. 焊接钢桥疲劳成因及对策研究[J]. 北京交通大学学报, 2006, 30(5):50-54.
    [9]
    Yuan Z, Roddis W M K. Fatigue behavior and retrofit investigation of distortion-induced web gap cracking[J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2007, 12(6):737-745.
    [10]
    Wang C S, Wang Y Z, Cui B, et al. Numerical simulation of distortion-induced fatigue crack growth using extended finite element method[J]. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 2019(3):1-17.
    [11]
    Catinlioni C A, Fisher J W, Yen B T. Evaluation of fatigue cracking at cross diaphragms of a multigirder steel bridge[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 1984, 9(1):95-110.
    [12]
    Stallings J M, Cousins T E, Stafford T E, et al. Effects of removing diaphragms from steel girder bridge[J]. Transportation Research Board, 1995, 15(2):183-188.
    [13]
    Hassel H L, Bennett C R, Matamoros A B, et al. Parametric analysis of cross-frame layout on distortion-induced fatigue in skewed steel bridges[J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2013, 18(7):601-611.
    [14]
    Mahmoud H N, Miller P A. Distortion-induced fatigue crack growth[J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2016, 21(2). DOI:10. 1061/(ASCE) BE. 1943-5592. 0000793.
    [15]
    Li H, Schultz A E. Analysis of girder differential deflection and web gap stress for rapid assessment of distortional fatigue in multigirder steel bridges:Final Rep. No. MN/RC-2005-38[R]. St. Paul, Minnesota:Minnesota Department of Transportation, 2005.
    [16]
    Shifferaw Y, Fanous F S. Field testing and finite element analysis of steel bridge retrofits for distortion-induced fatigue[J]. Engineering Structures, 2013, 49:385-395.
    [17]
    王春生, 成锋. 钢桥腹板间隙面外变形疲劳应力分析[J]. 建筑科学与工程学报, 2010, 27(1):65-72.
    [18]
    Berglund E M, Schultz A E. Girder differential deflection and distortion-induced fatigue in skewed steel bridges[J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2006, 11(2):169-177.
    [19]
    王春生, 成锋. 弯桥腹板间隙面外变形疲劳应力分析[C]//中国钢结构稳定与疲劳分会第12届学术交流会暨教学研讨会论文集. 北京:2010:478-483.
    [20]
    Kyung K S, Jeon J C, Lee H H, et al. Fatigue crack and its retrofitting method in a curved Ⅰ girder bridge[J]. International Journal of Steel Structures, 2012, 12(4):563-578.
    [21]
    中华人民共和国交通运输部. 公路钢结构桥梁设计规范:JTG D64-2015[S]. 北京:人民交通出版社, 2015.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (269) PDF downloads(9) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return