Volume 37 Issue 3
May  2022
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Lin Huang, Longgui Pu. Structural Analysis and Design of Guangzhou Show Theatre Roof[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2022, 37(3): 28-34. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS21052501
Citation: Lin Huang, Longgui Pu. Structural Analysis and Design of Guangzhou Show Theatre Roof[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2022, 37(3): 28-34. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS21052501

Structural Analysis and Design of Guangzhou Show Theatre Roof

doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS21052501
  • Received Date: 2021-05-25
    Available Online: 2022-05-27
  • Guangzhou Show Theatre is located in Huadu District of Guangzhou, which is a specific theme Theatre with a total building area of about 50 200 m2. The main structure adopted the frame core tube structure system, and the steel roof adopted single layer grid structure of free surface, with diameter of 105 m and height of 29.1 m. In order to meet the needs of the curtain, the steel roof structure was meshed into approximately 4 000 grids of triangle and quadrilateral with 3 m length of side.
    It will make the load-transfered path unclear and increase construction difficulty when all numbers were designed to main forced components. The primary-secondary and the primary grid scheme were analyzed comparatively in order to select the better structure scheme. Comparative analysis of different boundaries models were carried out in order to confirm the most efficient boundary conditions. The whole model and independent model were analyzed comparatively in order to defining the scale of influence between the steel roof and the concrete structure. The static analysis and dynamic analysis was carried out in order to ensure mode, period of vibration and deformation was in a reasonable range. Buckling analysis was used to calculate the critical force and back calculate the calculation length of the element, so as to accurately check the strength of the element.
    The following conclusions can be drawn from the result of analysis. 1) The primary-secondary grid structure scheme was adopted by comparative analysis, which not only had better mechanical performance, but also could reduce material consumption and construction difficulty. 2) The checking calculation results showed that maximum stress ratio of main member, secondary member and roof bracing member was respectively 0.78,0.85 and 0.72. 3) The overall stability of the structure was analyzed considering material nonlinearity and geometrical nonlinearity by ANSYS.The load-displacement curve showed that the structure was elastic under 1.8 times nominal load and the ultimate load was 4.6 time as the nominal load. Connections were specifically design in order to mechanical property of connections meet the calculation assumptions. 4) Hinged connection joint was set up between the roof members and the first, third and fifth concrete floor. 5) The structure static response analysis and dynamic response existed difference among the whole model and independent model, so the whole model was adopted to calculate the steel roof structure.
  • loading
  • [1]
    中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.空间网格结构技术规程:JGJ 7-2010[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 2011.
    [2]
    陈绍蕃.钢结构稳定设计指南[M].2版.北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 2010.
    [3]
    童根树.钢结构设计方法[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 2007.
    [4]
    王国周, 瞿覆谦.钢结构原理与设计[M].北京:清华大学出版社, 1998.
    [5]
    张丽, 徐国彬.国家大剧院超级椭球穹顶的稳定性分析[J].钢结构, 2003, 18(2):5-6

    , 15.
    [6]
    林健康, 杨文伟, 马朝.大跨度钢-混凝土混合结构协同工作性能分析[J].工业建筑, 2019, 49(2):155-161.
    [7]
    王树, 葛家琪, 张庆亮, 等.大剧院上下结构共同工作对钢屋盖抗震性能影响分析[J].建筑结构, 2008, 38(12):7-10.
    [8]
    丁洁民, 康晓菊.北京奥运会乒乓球馆钢屋盖与下部结构的协同工作[J].建筑结构, 2006(增刊1):227-230.
    [9]
    中国人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.钢结构设计标准:GB 50017-2017[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 2017.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (309) PDF downloads(50) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return