Shuai Xu, Yan Li. Influence Analysis of Axial Compression Ratio on the Performance of Core-Grouted Assembled Thin-Walled Steel Tube-Reinforced Concrete Composite Shear Wall[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2021, 36(12): 9-14. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS21040602
Citation: Shuai Xu, Yan Li. Influence Analysis of Axial Compression Ratio on the Performance of Core-Grouted Assembled Thin-Walled Steel Tube-Reinforced Concrete Composite Shear Wall[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2021, 36(12): 9-14. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS21040602

Influence Analysis of Axial Compression Ratio on the Performance of Core-Grouted Assembled Thin-Walled Steel Tube-Reinforced Concrete Composite Shear Wall

doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS21040602
  • Received Date: 2021-04-06
    Available Online: 2022-03-12
  • As a new type of shear wall system, core-grouted assembled thin-walled steel tube-reinforced concrete composite shear wall avoids the difficulty of core pulling of assembly shear wall. Besides, the amount of steel is not increased much, which means it has a good economy while improving the production efficiency. In order to study the influence of axial compression ratio on the performance of thin-walled steel tube reinforced concrete shear wall, the shear wall specimens with the height are 2 600 mm and the section size is 1 100 mm×200 mm are simulated by numerical simulation. The whole specimens are modeled, and it is assumed that the upper and lower ends of the wall are fixed with the loading beam and foundation beam. The load process is applied to the top of the model with vertical uniform load, and the horizontal displacement at the top of the specimen is gradually loaded from 1.3 mm to 26.0 mm. The whole process from elastic force stage to failure is simulated effectively. The difference between failure modes and hysteresis performance of thin-walled steel tube-reinforced concrete composite shear wall in the range of axial compression ratio 0.3-0.5 is compared.
    Through the numerical analysis of different models, it is found that the final failure modes of 5 specimens belong to the bending failure of large deflection members under the action of compression bending. Under the reciprocating load, the model near the bottom has a large horizontal deformation, which eventually results in failure due to loss of bearing capacity. According to the stress cloud diagram of the simulated specimens, the thin-walled steel tube at both ends of the test piece yields first, and then the concrete outside the thin-walled steel tube near the bottom begins to reach its tension strength, so the concrete outside the thin-walled steel tube gradually fails. The concrete inside is restrained by thin-walled steel tube, so the specimen can continue to bear the load. Thin-walled concrete-filled steel tube can bear repeated load. During the simulation process, there is no shear slip between thin-walled steel tube and concrete, to maintain a stable state, which makes the specimen have good plastic deformation ability while being subjected to vertical uniform load. The model hysteresis curves are full shuttle shapes, without obvious pinch up. With the increase of axial compression ratio, the envelope area of the hysteresis curve of thin-walled steel tube core filled concrete shear wall is larger, the shuttle curve presented is more fat, the energy dissipated is more, and the ultimate bearing capacity is improved to some extent. From the skeleton curve, when the axial compression ratio exceeds 0.35, with the increase of axial compression ratio, the ductility coefficient decreases. According to the cumulative energy consumption coefficient of each model, the energy consumption capacity of thin-walled concrete-filled steel tubular shear wall will be improved with the increase of axial compression ratio. Under the condition of axial compression ratio of 0.3-0.5, the ductility coefficient of thin-walled steel tube core filled concrete shear wall is more than 3.0, which shows that the structure has good deformation and ductility performance, which can meet the requirements of seismic design.
  • [1]
    中华人民共和国国家统计局.中华人民共和国2019年国民经济和社会发展统计公报[EB/OL].[2020-02-28

    ].http://www.stats.gov.cn/.
    [2]
    薛伟辰,胡翔. 预制混凝土剪力墙结构体系研究进展[J].建筑结构学报,2019,40(2):44-55.
    [3]
    张锡治,李义龙,安海玉.预制装配式混凝土剪力墙结构的研究与展望[J].建筑科学,2014,30(1):26-32.
    [4]
    李爱群,王维,贾洪,潘志宏,吴晓莉等. 预制钢筋混凝土剪力墙结构抗震性能研究进展(II):结构性能研究[J]. 防灾减灾工程学报, 2013, 33(6):736-742.
    [5]
    钱稼茹,江枣,纪晓东. 高轴压比钢管混凝土剪力墙抗震性能试验研究[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2010, 31(1):40-48.
    [6]
    赵作周,贺小岗,杨光,等. 高轴压比下钢管高强混凝土组合剪力墙抗震性能试验研究[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2016, 37(9):108-116.
    [7]
    方小丹,韦宏,刘庆辉. 钢管高强混凝土剪力墙抗震性能试验研究[J]. 建筑结构学报,2015,36(9):54-61.
    [8]
    Kurama Y C, Sritharan S, Fleischman R B, et al. Seismic-resistant precast concrete structures:state of the art[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 2018, 144(4):03118001-03118018.DOI: 10.1061/CASCELST.1943-541X.0001972.
    [9]
    Kang S M, Kim O J, Park H G. Cyclic loading test for emulative precast concrete walls with partially reduced rebar section[J]. Engineering Structures, 2013, 56:1645-1657.
    [10]
    孟凡林. 基于多用途薄壁钢管的装配式混凝土剪力墙及其建造方法[P].专利:108678218B[P].2018-10-19.
    [11]
    徐帅,孟凡林,宋敏,等.薄壁钢管灌芯混凝土剪力墙抗震性能分析[J].吉林建筑大学学报,2020,37(5):6-12.
    [12]
    中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 组合结构设计规范:JGJ 138-2016[S]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 2016.
    [13]
    祁佳睿,王铁成,苏幼坡,等.不同轴压比下钢管混凝土剪力墙结构受力性能试验[J].地震工程与工程振动,2015,35(3):217-223.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]Ke Zou, Wei Bao, Songyan Li, Xutao Xue, Fangping Xiao, Jiaopeng Fang. Research on Seismic Performance of Semi-Rigid Steel Frames with Corrugated Steel Plate Shear Walls[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2025, 40(2): 10-20. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS24092004
    [2]Liang Hu, Ziming Yang, Xu Zhan, Ju Chen. Numerical Analysis on Seismic Behavior of Steel Tubular Column-Shear Wall Transformation Nodes[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2024, 39(9): 24-33. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS23072702
    [3]Changbin Liao, Faxing Ding, Yicen Liu, En Wang, Liping Wang, Liangliang Zhang, Yinan Deng. Research on Interface Sliding Behavior and Seismic Performance of Stirrup-Confined Concrete Filled Circular Steel Tubular Columns Under High Axial Compression Ratio[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2024, 39(1): 41-52. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS23083101
    [4]Libo Wang, Ganping Shu, Jin Zhang, Hengli Fu, Zhanpeng Chen. Research on Seismic Performance Evaluation Indexes of Box-Section Steel Members Based on Strains[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2024, 39(12): 20-28. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS24112803
    [5]Qun Chen, Yan Wang, Qi An. Study on Single Side High Strength Bolt Connection Performance of Steel Pipe Bundle Composite Shear Wall Endplate Joints[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2023, 38(8): 22-33. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS23031901
    [6]Yegang You, Jian Li, Teng Wang, Lipeng Huang, Gang Gao. Review on the Axial Compression Performance of Double-Steel-Plate Composite Shear Wall[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2022, 37(8): 1-8. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS21122004
    [7]Jing Li, Wucai Lu. Finite Element Simulation and Parametric Analysis of Composite Shear Walls with Steel Plates and Infill Concrete Under Axial Compression[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2021, 36(9): 10-18. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS20062202
    [8]Weijia Xu, Xiaomei Ning, Ruoqiang Feng, Penghui Xu. Research on Lateral Performance of New Type Cold-Formed Steel Framed Shear Walls with Steel Sheathing and Gypsum Board[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2021, 36(2): 38-46. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS20050201
    [9]Borui Wu, Jiping Hao, Weifeng Tian, Weihui Zhong. Research on Hysteretic Behaviour of Coupled Steel Plate Shear Wall Structures Based on Coupling Ratio[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2020, 35(12): 36-42. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS20091501
    [10]Xuhong Zhou. Research Progress on Cold-Formed Steel Structural Framing[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2020, 35(1): 1-19. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgSE20010804
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(0)

    Other cited types(1)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-0405101520
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 17.9 %FULLTEXT: 17.9 %META: 80.0 %META: 80.0 %PDF: 2.1 %PDF: 2.1 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 11.3 %其他: 11.3 %Bosnia and Herzegowina: 0.5 %Bosnia and Herzegowina: 0.5 %China: 3.8 %China: 3.8 %上海: 1.0 %上海: 1.0 %六安: 0.8 %六安: 0.8 %北京: 2.6 %北京: 2.6 %十堰: 0.8 %十堰: 0.8 %南京: 0.5 %南京: 0.5 %南通: 0.5 %南通: 0.5 %天津: 0.8 %天津: 0.8 %安庆: 0.5 %安庆: 0.5 %常州: 1.0 %常州: 1.0 %常德: 0.3 %常德: 0.3 %张家口: 3.6 %张家口: 3.6 %昆明: 0.5 %昆明: 0.5 %杭州: 1.8 %杭州: 1.8 %武汉: 1.0 %武汉: 1.0 %泉州: 0.5 %泉州: 0.5 %济南: 0.3 %济南: 0.3 %深圳: 0.5 %深圳: 0.5 %温州: 0.3 %温州: 0.3 %漯河: 2.8 %漯河: 2.8 %石家庄: 0.3 %石家庄: 0.3 %芒廷维尤: 8.5 %芒廷维尤: 8.5 %芜湖: 0.3 %芜湖: 0.3 %芝加哥: 0.5 %芝加哥: 0.5 %西宁: 49.7 %西宁: 49.7 %西安: 0.3 %西安: 0.3 %贵阳: 0.3 %贵阳: 0.3 %运城: 1.5 %运城: 1.5 %郑州: 0.5 %郑州: 0.5 %重庆: 0.3 %重庆: 0.3 %长春: 1.3 %长春: 1.3 %长沙: 0.5 %长沙: 0.5 %阳泉: 0.5 %阳泉: 0.5 %其他Bosnia and HerzegowinaChina上海六安北京十堰南京南通天津安庆常州常德张家口昆明杭州武汉泉州济南深圳温州漯河石家庄芒廷维尤芜湖芝加哥西宁西安贵阳运城郑州重庆长春长沙阳泉

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (310) PDF downloads(8) Cited by(1)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return