Yaohua Wu. Performance Comparison of Structural Steels in Chinese and American Standards[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2020, 35(9): 26-43. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS20052508
Citation: Xiang Ye, Lu Li, Hongwei Li, Zhonghua Liu, Shilin Guan. Integrated Design of Steel Structure and Metal Roof of Special-shaped Large-span Exhibition Hall in Shaoxing Exhibition Center[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2021, 36(12): 32-43. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS21012802

Integrated Design of Steel Structure and Metal Roof of Special-shaped Large-span Exhibition Hall in Shaoxing Exhibition Center

doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS21012802
  • Received Date: 2021-01-28
    Available Online: 2022-03-12
  • The Exhibition Hall 1 of the Phase I Area B Project of Shaoxing International Convention and Exhibition Center has a rhythmic staggered roof with a non-column span of 72 meters.The design and construction of the steel structure and metal roof system are difficult,and the construction period of the Exhibition Hall 1 is extremely tight which is required to be constructed and put into use in the same year.To solve the problems,the project makes full use of the characteristics of EPC mode.The design and construction subjects participate in the design scheme consultation,in which the priority payment requirements,site construction efficiency and inter-professional cohesion are regarded as the key points of design management.The design schemes of the main body and metal roof are finally implemented after study and comparation,and good results are obtained:
    1) In view of the large-span special-shaped architectural form,a long-span steel structure scheme suitable for the rhymic staggeredplatformroof is innovatively put forward through the comparison of two form-finding schemes,one of which is the form-finding of roof substructure,and the other one is form-finding of main steel structure.The giant truss is arranged at the staggered platform to improve the overall stiffness and structural efficiency of the roof,through which the organic combination of roof modeling and reliable structure is realized.The analysis and verification show that the structural scheme has strong bearing capacity and excellent seismic performance.The structure greatly reduces the difficulty of design and construction of metal roofs,which is economical,reliable,and beautiful.It lays a good foundation for ensuring the construction period of the project,and can provide a useful reference for the selection of similar (rectangular tooth shaped roof) structure schemes.
    2) In view of the slope finding scheme of the main steel structure,in order to further improve the construction efficiency of the roof system,a comparison of the three schemes of reverse installation of metal roof floor,forward installation of overhead floor and forward installation of direct laying floor is conducted,a metal roof system with "separated load-bearing structure of long-span bottom plate and purlin system" is innovatively proposed.The high-wave steel bearing plate leap over the steel structure divisions with a span of 4.5 meters,and is directly laid on the completion surface of the steel structure,which changes the operation mode of the traditional metal roof system.The supporting components of roof bottom plate are integrated into the main steel structure to reduce the aerial working process of roof system.The operation efficiency and construction safety of the metal roof system are greatly improved.The roof bottom plate is separated from the purlin system,and the weight of the structural layer is directly transferred to the main steel structure from the roof bottom plate,so as to improve the utilization rate of the main steel structure.The purlin system bears small force and saves steel,which only supports the roof plate.In addition to the roof purlin,no other parts penetrate the TPO waterproof layer to form a real "two waterproofs" and improve the waterproof effect of metal roof.
    The project eventually takes 112 days to complete the construction of steel structure and metal roof system,which is nearly 4 months shorter than that of similar projects.At present,the project,which reflects the great advantages of the EPC mode,has successfully passed the acceptance of the main body and roof engineering,and has achieved the scheduled delivery and trial operation.The project reflects the great advantages of the EPC model.
  • [1]
    中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.建筑抗震设计规范:GB 50011-2010[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2016.
    [2]
    中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.建筑结构荷载规范:GB 50009-2012[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2012.
    [3]
    中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.钢结构设计标准:GB 50017-2017[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2018.
    [4]
    中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.空间网络结构技术规程:JGJ 7-2010[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2010.
    [5]
    徐国军,华孙炬,沈利江,等.苏州国际博览中心金属屋面系统设计[J].建筑钢结构进展,2006(2):1-7.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]Yongjiu Shi, Xianglin Yu, Huiyong Ban. Research and Progress on Application of High Performance Steel[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2024, 39(10): 97-104. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS24071720
    [2]Xianshun Li, Kai Zhang. Comparative Study on Fireproofing Design of Steel Structures in Petrochemical Industry Between Chinese and American Standards[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2024, 39(6): 42-47. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS23041001
    [3]ZHAO Yu-ran, ZHENG Teng-teng, ZHAO Cai-qi, YUAN Liang-jian. Comparative Study on Structural Performance of Box-Type Hollow Roof and Traditional Roof[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2022, 37(10): 24-31. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS22052901
    [4]Dan Guo, Wenxing He. Comparison of End Plate Connection Design Between AISC DG4 and GB Codes[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2021, 36(4): 32-49. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS20071302
    [5]Chang Chai, Yingchun Liu. Some Issus on Application for New National Standard GB/T 1591-2018 High Strength Low Alloy Structural Steel[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2020, 35(6): 50-54. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgSE20051201
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(6)

    1. 王勇骏. 浅析中美钢结构规范设计. 建设科技. 2024(08): 82-84 .
    2. 王兴宇,王彬楠,杨燕,黄青隆. 基于某中心支撑钢框架的中美标准对比研究. 施工技术(中英文). 2024(14): 118-124 .
    3. 汤伟,王开松. 叉车式AGV链轮轴有限元分析与结构优化. 装备制造技术. 2024(09): 47-50 .
    4. 李岩杰,臧振东,吕耀强,刘志卫. 冷却模式对Grade50热轧带钢组织及性能的影响. 河北冶金. 2023(03): 17-20+69 .
    5. 李思坤. 浅析桥梁用耐候结构钢Q355NH研制. 冶金与材料. 2022(01): 57-58 .
    6. 王飞,张龙. 辅助促进剂对建筑结构钢锌锰系磷化膜耐蚀性的影响. 电镀与精饰. 2022(08): 13-18 .

    Other cited types(3)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-04050100150200250300
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 18.0 %FULLTEXT: 18.0 %META: 78.8 %META: 78.8 %PDF: 3.2 %PDF: 3.2 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 29.3 %其他: 29.3 %其他: 1.2 %其他: 1.2 %Baden: 0.1 %Baden: 0.1 %Blairmore: 0.0 %Blairmore: 0.0 %Cambodia: 0.1 %Cambodia: 0.1 %Central District: 0.3 %Central District: 0.3 %China: 0.8 %China: 0.8 %Crawford: 0.0 %Crawford: 0.0 %Hanoi: 0.1 %Hanoi: 0.1 %Indianapolis: 0.1 %Indianapolis: 0.1 %Irving: 0.1 %Irving: 0.1 %Italy: 0.1 %Italy: 0.1 %Japan: 0.0 %Japan: 0.0 %Kennedy Town: 0.1 %Kennedy Town: 0.1 %Murfreesboro: 0.1 %Murfreesboro: 0.1 %Norway: 0.0 %Norway: 0.0 %Osaka: 0.1 %Osaka: 0.1 %Overland Park: 0.1 %Overland Park: 0.1 %Pasig: 0.1 %Pasig: 0.1 %Rochester: 0.1 %Rochester: 0.1 %Saitama: 0.0 %Saitama: 0.0 %Seychelles: 0.0 %Seychelles: 0.0 %Singapore: 0.0 %Singapore: 0.0 %United States: 0.1 %United States: 0.1 %Westbury: 0.1 %Westbury: 0.1 %[]: 0.5 %[]: 0.5 %上海: 2.1 %上海: 2.1 %东莞: 0.6 %东莞: 0.6 %中山: 0.0 %中山: 0.0 %临汾: 0.0 %临汾: 0.0 %乐山: 0.0 %乐山: 0.0 %伊斯兰堡: 0.1 %伊斯兰堡: 0.1 %佛山: 0.1 %佛山: 0.1 %保定: 0.0 %保定: 0.0 %信阳: 0.0 %信阳: 0.0 %克拉科夫: 0.1 %克拉科夫: 0.1 %六安: 0.1 %六安: 0.1 %兰州: 0.0 %兰州: 0.0 %凉山: 0.0 %凉山: 0.0 %加利福尼亚州: 0.2 %加利福尼亚州: 0.2 %包头: 0.0 %包头: 0.0 %北京: 3.1 %北京: 3.1 %匹兹堡: 0.1 %匹兹堡: 0.1 %十堰: 0.6 %十堰: 0.6 %华瑞兹城: 0.0 %华瑞兹城: 0.0 %南京: 1.5 %南京: 1.5 %南京市江宁区: 0.0 %南京市江宁区: 0.0 %南圣弗朗西斯科: 0.1 %南圣弗朗西斯科: 0.1 %南宁: 0.0 %南宁: 0.0 %南昌: 0.2 %南昌: 0.2 %南通: 0.4 %南通: 0.4 %南阳: 0.0 %南阳: 0.0 %卡尔加里: 0.1 %卡尔加里: 0.1 %卡拉奇: 0.1 %卡拉奇: 0.1 %卢瓦尔: 0.1 %卢瓦尔: 0.1 %厦门: 0.2 %厦门: 0.2 %台北: 0.0 %台北: 0.0 %台州: 0.0 %台州: 0.0 %合肥: 0.1 %合肥: 0.1 %吉隆坡: 0.0 %吉隆坡: 0.0 %呼和浩特: 0.1 %呼和浩特: 0.1 %咸阳: 0.0 %咸阳: 0.0 %哈尔滨: 0.2 %哈尔滨: 0.2 %唐山: 0.0 %唐山: 0.0 %嘉兴: 0.8 %嘉兴: 0.8 %堪萨斯城: 0.0 %堪萨斯城: 0.0 %墨尔本: 0.0 %墨尔本: 0.0 %夏尔迦: 0.2 %夏尔迦: 0.2 %夏洛特: 0.1 %夏洛特: 0.1 %多伦多: 0.1 %多伦多: 0.1 %大同: 0.0 %大同: 0.0 %大庆: 0.1 %大庆: 0.1 %大连: 0.1 %大连: 0.1 %大阪: 0.1 %大阪: 0.1 %天水: 0.0 %天水: 0.0 %天津: 1.8 %天津: 1.8 %太原: 0.0 %太原: 0.0 %孟买: 0.1 %孟买: 0.1 %宁波: 0.1 %宁波: 0.1 %安山: 0.1 %安山: 0.1 %安康: 0.0 %安康: 0.0 %安曼: 0.4 %安曼: 0.4 %安阳: 0.1 %安阳: 0.1 %宜宾: 0.0 %宜宾: 0.0 %宣城: 0.3 %宣城: 0.3 %密蘇里城: 0.3 %密蘇里城: 0.3 %屏东: 0.0 %屏东: 0.0 %巴黎: 0.1 %巴黎: 0.1 %布兰普顿: 0.1 %布兰普顿: 0.1 %常州: 0.4 %常州: 0.4 %常德: 0.0 %常德: 0.0 %平顶山: 0.0 %平顶山: 0.0 %广州: 0.8 %广州: 0.8 %庆和: 0.1 %庆和: 0.1 %庆阳: 0.0 %庆阳: 0.0 %廊坊: 0.0 %廊坊: 0.0 %延安: 0.0 %延安: 0.0 %张家口: 0.7 %张家口: 0.7 %徐州: 0.3 %徐州: 0.3 %德里: 0.1 %德里: 0.1 %德黑兰: 0.0 %德黑兰: 0.0 %惠州: 0.0 %惠州: 0.0 %意法半: 0.0 %意法半: 0.0 %成都: 0.4 %成都: 0.4 %扬州: 1.4 %扬州: 1.4 %拉合尔: 0.2 %拉合尔: 0.2 %揭阳: 0.0 %揭阳: 0.0 %新加坡: 0.1 %新加坡: 0.1 %新德里: 0.1 %新德里: 0.1 %无锡: 0.1 %无锡: 0.1 %旧金山: 0.0 %旧金山: 0.0 %昆明: 0.2 %昆明: 0.2 %晋中: 0.0 %晋中: 0.0 %晋城: 0.1 %晋城: 0.1 %普若佛: 0.1 %普若佛: 0.1 %曼谷: 0.4 %曼谷: 0.4 %朝阳: 0.0 %朝阳: 0.0 %本溪: 0.0 %本溪: 0.0 %来宾: 0.1 %来宾: 0.1 %杭州: 1.6 %杭州: 1.6 %柏林: 0.0 %柏林: 0.0 %柳州: 0.0 %柳州: 0.0 %格兰特县: 0.2 %格兰特县: 0.2 %桂林: 0.0 %桂林: 0.0 %森尼韦尔: 0.1 %森尼韦尔: 0.1 %檀香山: 0.0 %檀香山: 0.0 %武汉: 0.6 %武汉: 0.6 %氹仔: 0.0 %氹仔: 0.0 %汉中: 0.0 %汉中: 0.0 %汕头: 0.1 %汕头: 0.1 %江门: 0.2 %江门: 0.2 %沈阳: 0.1 %沈阳: 0.1 %沧州: 0.0 %沧州: 0.0 %河内: 0.2 %河内: 0.2 %泉州: 0.1 %泉州: 0.1 %法兰克福: 0.1 %法兰克福: 0.1 %泰安: 0.0 %泰安: 0.0 %泰州: 0.1 %泰州: 0.1 %洛杉矶: 0.0 %洛杉矶: 0.0 %洛阳: 0.1 %洛阳: 0.1 %济南: 0.6 %济南: 0.6 %深圳: 0.5 %深圳: 0.5 %温州: 1.0 %温州: 1.0 %温莎: 0.1 %温莎: 0.1 %湖州: 0.1 %湖州: 0.1 %湘潭: 0.0 %湘潭: 0.0 %湛江: 0.0 %湛江: 0.0 %滁州: 0.0 %滁州: 0.0 %漯河: 5.5 %漯河: 5.5 %潍坊: 0.1 %潍坊: 0.1 %烟台: 0.1 %烟台: 0.1 %珠海: 0.1 %珠海: 0.1 %甘南: 0.0 %甘南: 0.0 %盐城: 0.0 %盐城: 0.0 %石家庄: 0.5 %石家庄: 0.5 %福州: 0.1 %福州: 0.1 %约翰内斯堡: 0.2 %约翰内斯堡: 0.2 %纽约: 0.1 %纽约: 0.1 %绍兴: 0.1 %绍兴: 0.1 %美国加利福尼亚洛杉矶: 0.0 %美国加利福尼亚洛杉矶: 0.0 %聊城: 0.0 %聊城: 0.0 %胡志明: 0.2 %胡志明: 0.2 %舟山: 0.0 %舟山: 0.0 %艾伯塔: 0.0 %艾伯塔: 0.0 %艾因: 0.0 %艾因: 0.0 %芒廷维尤: 13.2 %芒廷维尤: 13.2 %芜湖: 0.0 %芜湖: 0.0 %芝冷西: 0.1 %芝冷西: 0.1 %芝加哥: 1.3 %芝加哥: 1.3 %苏州: 0.3 %苏州: 0.3 %茂名: 0.0 %茂名: 0.0 %荆门: 0.1 %荆门: 0.1 %莫斯科: 0.3 %莫斯科: 0.3 %菏泽: 0.0 %菏泽: 0.0 %营口: 0.0 %营口: 0.0 %萨默维尔: 0.1 %萨默维尔: 0.1 %葫芦岛: 0.0 %葫芦岛: 0.0 %蒙特利尔: 0.1 %蒙特利尔: 0.1 %蘭里: 0.1 %蘭里: 0.1 %衡水: 0.0 %衡水: 0.0 %衡阳: 0.0 %衡阳: 0.0 %西宁: 8.9 %西宁: 8.9 %西安: 0.2 %西安: 0.2 %西雅图: 0.0 %西雅图: 0.0 %贵阳: 0.0 %贵阳: 0.0 %辛辛那提: 0.1 %辛辛那提: 0.1 %运城: 0.2 %运城: 0.2 %连云港: 0.0 %连云港: 0.0 %迪拜: 0.0 %迪拜: 0.0 %邯郸: 0.4 %邯郸: 0.4 %郑州: 1.1 %郑州: 1.1 %都伯林: 0.1 %都伯林: 0.1 %鄂州: 0.0 %鄂州: 0.0 %重庆: 0.3 %重庆: 0.3 %金边: 0.1 %金边: 0.1 %铁岭: 0.1 %铁岭: 0.1 %银川: 0.0 %银川: 0.0 %镇江: 0.0 %镇江: 0.0 %长春: 0.0 %长春: 0.0 %长沙: 0.7 %长沙: 0.7 %长治: 0.0 %长治: 0.0 %阳泉: 0.2 %阳泉: 0.2 %阿姆斯特丹: 0.1 %阿姆斯特丹: 0.1 %阿布扎比: 0.1 %阿布扎比: 0.1 %雅加达: 0.4 %雅加达: 0.4 %雪兰莪: 0.0 %雪兰莪: 0.0 %青岛: 0.8 %青岛: 0.8 %香港: 0.0 %香港: 0.0 %香港特别行政区: 0.0 %香港特别行政区: 0.0 %马尼拉: 0.7 %马尼拉: 0.7 %马湾: 0.6 %马湾: 0.6 %马鞍山: 0.0 %马鞍山: 0.0 %麦迪逊: 0.0 %麦迪逊: 0.0 %其他其他BadenBlairmoreCambodiaCentral DistrictChinaCrawfordHanoiIndianapolisIrvingItalyJapanKennedy TownMurfreesboroNorwayOsakaOverland ParkPasigRochesterSaitamaSeychellesSingaporeUnited StatesWestbury[]上海东莞中山临汾乐山伊斯兰堡佛山保定信阳克拉科夫六安兰州凉山加利福尼亚州包头北京匹兹堡十堰华瑞兹城南京南京市江宁区南圣弗朗西斯科南宁南昌南通南阳卡尔加里卡拉奇卢瓦尔厦门台北台州合肥吉隆坡呼和浩特咸阳哈尔滨唐山嘉兴堪萨斯城墨尔本夏尔迦夏洛特多伦多大同大庆大连大阪天水天津太原孟买宁波安山安康安曼安阳宜宾宣城密蘇里城屏东巴黎布兰普顿常州常德平顶山广州庆和庆阳廊坊延安张家口徐州德里德黑兰惠州意法半成都扬州拉合尔揭阳新加坡新德里无锡旧金山昆明晋中晋城普若佛曼谷朝阳本溪来宾杭州柏林柳州格兰特县桂林森尼韦尔檀香山武汉氹仔汉中汕头江门沈阳沧州河内泉州法兰克福泰安泰州洛杉矶洛阳济南深圳温州温莎湖州湘潭湛江滁州漯河潍坊烟台珠海甘南盐城石家庄福州约翰内斯堡纽约绍兴美国加利福尼亚洛杉矶聊城胡志明舟山艾伯塔艾因芒廷维尤芜湖芝冷西芝加哥苏州茂名荆门莫斯科菏泽营口萨默维尔葫芦岛蒙特利尔蘭里衡水衡阳西宁西安西雅图贵阳辛辛那提运城连云港迪拜邯郸郑州都伯林鄂州重庆金边铁岭银川镇江长春长沙长治阳泉阿姆斯特丹阿布扎比雅加达雪兰莪青岛香港香港特别行政区马尼拉马湾马鞍山麦迪逊

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (386) PDF downloads(52) Cited by(9)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return