Volume 36 Issue 9
Jan.  2022
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Zhichao Shang, Li Chen, Fan Chen, Tingyu Li, Yong Tian. Stress Analysis of Ultra-Wide Orthotropic Steel Box Girder with Large Width-Span Ratio and Single Inclined Pylon[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2021, 36(9): 19-24. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS21012602
Citation: Zhichao Shang, Li Chen, Fan Chen, Tingyu Li, Yong Tian. Stress Analysis of Ultra-Wide Orthotropic Steel Box Girder with Large Width-Span Ratio and Single Inclined Pylon[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2021, 36(9): 19-24. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS21012602

Stress Analysis of Ultra-Wide Orthotropic Steel Box Girder with Large Width-Span Ratio and Single Inclined Pylon

doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS21012602
  • Received Date: 2021-01-26
    Available Online: 2022-01-11
  • Geometrical asymmetry in cable-stayed bridges with single pylon leads to differences in stresses and deformation in comparison to conventional ones. Thin-walled orthotropic steel girder with big width/span ratio has more complicated loading and deformation performance, which cannot be calculated accurately using conventional approaches. Jialuhe bridge is such an example with even more complicated properties. The 120 m long main span consists of three segments:The first 100 m from the pylon is orthotropic steel girder, followed by 8 m transition segment, and the last 12 m reinforced concrete plate is a cantilever from the abutment on the opposite bank. The width of the steel girder is 54.8 m, not supported on the abutment directly, but connected to the cantilever through a transitional segment with 8×54.8 m side length instead. So there are three materials of different stiffness connected in a small space, leading to two seaming sections, which not only reduces the monolith of the structure, but also increases difficulties in construction controlling.
    The investigate shows:The transverse deformation of the steel girder is identical, with a maximal relative difference of-2.8 mm, so that no transverse camber is needed in construction phase. The maximal Mises stress due to gravity is 93.7 MPa, and that due to secondary deadload is about 1/4 of this value. This reveals a big safety reserve of the steel girder. When the height of the U-stiffeners varies between 260~320 mm, the variation of displacements of the bridge deck lies within 5%, variation of maximal stresses of the bridge deck within 8%. In this range the variation of the height of the U-stiffeners has less impact on displacement and stress of the deck. The internal cause is that the height of U-stiffener and the stiffness delivered by the transverse girder are supplementary each other, just demonstrating the salient plate property of this orthotropic girder. Height of U-stiffeners in this range should be chosen when designing.
  • loading
  • [1]
    王春生, 冯亚成. 正交异性钢桥面板的疲劳研究综述[J]. 钢结构, 2009, 24(9):9-12.
    [2]
    小西一郎. 钢桥第一分册[M]. 朱立冬, 等, 译. 北京:人民铁道出版社, 1980.
    [3]
    Wolchuk R. Empirical design rules for effective utilization of orthotropic decks[J]. Jourmal of Bridge Engineering, 2014, 19:152-158.
    [4]
    Walter R, Olesen J F. Analysis of an orthotropic deck stiffened with a cement based overlay[J]. Jourmal of Bridge Engineering, 2007(6):350-363.
    [5]
    孔祥福, 周绪红, 狄谨, 等. 钢箱梁斜拉桥正交异性桥面板的受力性能[J]. 长安大学学报, 2007, 27(3):52-56.
    [6]
    樊启武. 正交异性桥面系第二体系应力计算方法研究[D]. 成都:西南交通大学, 2005.
    [7]
    邢中凯. 钢箱梁正交异性桥面板受力特性及计算方法分析研究[D]. 上海:同济大学, 2003.
    [8]
    王勖成, 邵敏. 有限单元法基本原理和数值方法[M]. 北京:清华大学出版社, 1997.
    [9]
    宁立. 斜拉桥扁平钢箱梁混合有限元分析[J]. 中外公路, 2009(10):119-122.
    [10]
    兰枢灵. 薄壁钢箱梁计算方法研究[D]. 西安:长安大学, 2011.
    [11]
    苏庆田. 斜拉桥扁平钢箱梁的有限混合单元法分析[J]. 同济大学学报, 2005(6):473-478.
    [12]
    白海涛, 王端宜. 钢桥面铺装病害特点及设计要点分析[J]. 公路交通科技, 2007(1):123-128.
    [13]
    狄谨. 钢箱梁梯形加劲板受力性能与设计方法研究[D]. 西安:长安大学, 2009.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (240) PDF downloads(13) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return