Song Yuan, Lin Shao, Liangpu Li, Peng Zou. Study on the Selection of High-Energy Protective Steel Box Shed Against Post Earthquake Collapse[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2021, 36(7): 43-49. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS20111203
Citation: Song Yuan, Lin Shao, Liangpu Li, Peng Zou. Study on the Selection of High-Energy Protective Steel Box Shed Against Post Earthquake Collapse[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2021, 36(7): 43-49. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS20111203

Study on the Selection of High-Energy Protective Steel Box Shed Against Post Earthquake Collapse

doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS20111203
  • Received Date: 2020-11-12
    Available Online: 2021-09-16
  • The terrain and geological conditions in Western China are extremely complex, with high mountains and steep slopes and frequent earthquakes. From the Wenchuan earthquake in 2008, Lushan earthquake in 2013, Jiuzhaigou earthquake in 2017 and other strong earthquakes in mountainous areas, the secondary geological disasters such as high-level collapse are the most destructive, difficult and far-reaching ones. In order to solve the damage of secondary disasters such as high-level collapse after the earthquake to mountain roads and meet the needs of lifeline roads, taking "quick emergency response, small installation risk, low foundation requirements, strong adaptability and strong impact resistance" as the breakthrough point, the paper put forward three concepts of "avoid, slow, resist", "avoid, slow, delay", "avoid, delay, consume" of steel box shed tunnel.
    Based on the display algorithm of ANSYS/LS-DYNA, the whole process of steel box shed under rockfall impact load was simulated. According to the dynamic response indexes such as the maximum impact force of rockfall, the energy absorption capacity of each part of shed and the equivalent stress of steel box structure, the rockfall impact resistance performance of three types of steel box shed was analyzed, and the stress mechanism of steel box shed was mastered. The ultimate bearing capacity of steel box shed with three kinds of protection concept was studied.
    The results showed that:the structure of three types of steel box shed was reasonable, and the protection energy level could reach 1 000 kJ, which was higher than that of traditional steel shed or reinforced concrete shed; the modified rubber bearing was a compressible hyperelastic material with good self recovery, which could be reused for many times. It could store energy through its large circumferential deformation, prolonged the impact time and reduced the drop. The protection effect of the flexible net protection system was the best, the structure economy and seismic performance were the best, and the ultimate impact energy level could reach 2 000 kJ. The research results provided the basis for the design and optimization of the material and structure of the buffer device of the steel box shed tunnel and the subsequent 1:1 prototype experiment.
  • [1]
    赵晓彦, 黄金河, 周一文,等. 坡面锚索与坡脚抗滑桩联合加固边坡设计方法[J]. 西南交通大学学报, 2017, 52(3):489-495.
    [2]
    程素珍, 许尚杰, 耿灵生. 除险加固后的土石坝坡面生态护坡研究[J]. 水资源与水工程学报, 2009, 20(4):124-126.
    [3]
    周晓军, 毛露露, 姜波,等. 山岭隧道洞口边坡加固中锚杆(索)最优锚固角分析[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2016(6):123-128,136.
    [4]
    赵雅娜, 齐欣, 余志祥,等. 主被动混合式柔性防护网联合作用效果初步分析[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报, 2016, 27(1):111-116.
    [5]
    日本道路協會. 落石對策便覽[S]. 东京:丸善出版株式会,2000.
    [6]
    Kinoshita N. Development of long-span pocket-type rock-net[C]// Proceedings of annual meeting of ministry of land, infrastructure, transport and tourism. Shikoku:Shikoku Regional Development Bureau, 2009:1-4.
    [7]
    汪敏, 石少卿, 刘盈丰,等. 防落石柔性棚洞的耗能性能分析及优化设计[J]. 振动与冲击, 2018, 37(1):216-222.
    [8]
    何思明, 沈均, 吴永. 滚石冲击荷载下棚洞结构动力响应[J]. 岩土力学, 2011, 32(3):781-788.
    [9]
    王永东, 周天跃, 柴伦磊,等. 基于能量分析的落石对棚洞垫层冲击力学研究[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2018, 14(增刊1):148-153.
    [10]
    欧阳朝军, 何思明, 刘泉,等. 新型钢结构棚洞滚石冲击动力学计算研究[J]. 四川大学学报(工程科学版), 2011, 43(增刊2):105-110.
    [11]
    张群利, 王全才, 吴清,等. 不同结构类型棚洞的抗冲击性能研究[J]. 振动与冲击, 2015(3):72-76.
    [12]
    袁松, 郑国强, 张生,等. 汶川地震后10年公路明(棚)洞病害及处治工程的启示[J]. 隧道建设(中英文), 2019(8):1372

    -1379.
    [13]
    黎良仆,袁松,谢凌志,等. 落石冲击荷载作用下EPE垫层棚洞缓冲作用研究[J]. 四川建筑科学研究,2016,42(3):46.
    [14]
    王静峰,赵鹏,袁松,等. 复合垫层钢棚洞抵抗落石冲击性能研究[J]. 土木工程学报,2018,51(增刊2):7-13.
    [15]
    Delhomme F, Mommessin M, Mougin J P, et al. Behavior of a structually dissipating rock-shed:experimental analysis and study of punching effects[J]. International Journal of Solids and Structures,2005,42(14):4204-4219.
    [16]
    汪敏,石少卿,阳友奎. 新型柔性棚洞在落石冲击作用下的试验研究[J]. 土木工程学报,2013,46(9):131-138.
    [17]
    彭向峰,李录贤. 超弹性材料本构关系的最新研究进展[J]. 力学学报,2020,52(5):1221-1232
    [18]
    赵世春,余志祥,韦韬,等. 被动柔性防护网受力机理试验研究与数值计算[J]. 土木工程学报,2013,46(5):122-128.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]Genshu Tong. Seismic Actions on Buildings with Short and Intermediate Periods[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2025, 40(2): 71-75. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS24050620
    [2]Guochang Li, Lirong Wei, Zengmei Qiu, Xu Liu. Seismic Fragility Analysis of High-Strength Concrete Filled Steel Tube Column-Aluminum Alloy Buckling Restrained Braces Structure System[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2024, 39(7): 1-9. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS22120201
    [3]Wenzhong Wu. Stochastic Response and Controlling to Earthquake Wave in Compound Periodic Steel Structure[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2023, 38(12): 48-53. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS23063004
    [4]Chuanchun Dai, Yang Ding. Seismic Damage Evaluation Indexes and Classification Criteria of Spatial Structures[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2023, 38(10): 1-9. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgs23080402
    [5]Faxing Ding, Zhicheng Pan, Liang Luo, Ping Xiang, Zhiwu Yu. Ultimate Seismic Resistance and Strong Column Construction Measure of Steel-Concrete Composite Frame Structures Under Horizontal Earthquake[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2021, 36(2): 26-37. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS20090301
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(5)

    1. 魏记承,黎良仆,赵大权. 公路明(棚)洞道路保通方案的选择与使用研究. 山西建筑. 2024(14): 145-148 .
    2. 黎良仆,魏记承,袁松,王希宝. 山区公路装配式钢棚洞的开发与应用研究. 公路交通技术. 2024(04): 51-58 .
    3. 袁松,黎良仆,廖沛源,王希宝. 公路明洞与棚洞的应用现状与发展趋势. 公路. 2024(10): 283-293 .
    4. 黎良仆,袁松,廖沛源,王希宝. 对《公路隧道设计细则》(JTG D70—2010)落石冲击力计算部分条文的修改意见. 现代隧道技术. 2023(03): 65-73 .
    5. 冉龙洲,袁松,王希宝,廖沛源. 关于矩形明(棚)洞土压力荷载模式的探讨. 隧道建设(中英文). 2023(10): 1723-1732 .

    Other cited types(0)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-040510152025
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 15.9 %FULLTEXT: 15.9 %META: 78.1 %META: 78.1 %PDF: 6.0 %PDF: 6.0 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 14.3 %其他: 14.3 %China: 2.4 %China: 2.4 %[]: 0.4 %[]: 0.4 %上海: 0.4 %上海: 0.4 %上饶: 0.4 %上饶: 0.4 %保定: 0.4 %保定: 0.4 %北京: 1.6 %北京: 1.6 %南京: 1.2 %南京: 1.2 %南通: 0.4 %南通: 0.4 %咸阳: 2.0 %咸阳: 2.0 %安阳: 0.8 %安阳: 0.8 %宿州: 0.8 %宿州: 0.8 %常州: 0.8 %常州: 0.8 %常德: 0.4 %常德: 0.4 %张家口: 8.4 %张家口: 8.4 %成都: 1.2 %成都: 1.2 %昆明: 0.8 %昆明: 0.8 %晋城: 1.2 %晋城: 1.2 %杭州: 0.4 %杭州: 0.4 %武汉: 1.2 %武汉: 1.2 %沈阳: 0.8 %沈阳: 0.8 %法兰克福: 1.2 %法兰克福: 1.2 %海口: 0.4 %海口: 0.4 %深圳: 0.4 %深圳: 0.4 %渭南: 0.8 %渭南: 0.8 %烟台: 0.4 %烟台: 0.4 %石家庄: 0.8 %石家庄: 0.8 %秦皇岛: 0.4 %秦皇岛: 0.4 %芒廷维尤: 8.0 %芒廷维尤: 8.0 %西宁: 39.4 %西宁: 39.4 %西安: 4.4 %西安: 4.4 %运城: 2.0 %运城: 2.0 %郑州: 0.4 %郑州: 0.4 %重庆: 0.8 %重庆: 0.8 %长沙: 0.4 %长沙: 0.4 %其他China[]上海上饶保定北京南京南通咸阳安阳宿州常州常德张家口成都昆明晋城杭州武汉沈阳法兰克福海口深圳渭南烟台石家庄秦皇岛芒廷维尤西宁西安运城郑州重庆长沙

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (195) PDF downloads(15) Cited by(5)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return