Fracture Prediction and Analysis of Q690D High Strength Steel Based on Cyclic Void Growth Model

Jianzhou Ge; Xuewei Huang; Jun Zhao; Wei Zhao; Chenchen Wei

doi:10.13206/j.gjgS20061103

Volume 36 Issue 7

Sep. 2021

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English) > 2021 > 36(7): 18-28

Jianzhou Ge, Xuewei Huang, Jun Zhao, Wei Zhao, Chenchen Wei. Fracture Prediction and Analysis of Q690D High Strength Steel Based on Cyclic Void Growth Model[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2021, 36(7): 18-28. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS20061103

Citation:

Jianzhou Ge, Xuewei Huang, Jun Zhao, Wei Zhao, Chenchen Wei. Fracture Prediction and Analysis of Q690D High Strength Steel Based on Cyclic Void Growth Model[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2021, 36(7): 18-28. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS20061103

Citation:

PDF( 11149 KB)

Fracture Prediction and Analysis of Q690D High Strength Steel Based on Cyclic Void Growth Model

doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS20061103

School of Mechanics and Engineering Science, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China

Received Date: 2020-06-11
Available Online: 2021-09-16

Abstract

Abstract

High strength steel has been gradually applied in practical steel structures. The ultra-low cycle fatigue fracture analysis of steel is the basis to evaluate the fracture failure of high strength steel structures under strong earthquake. The traditional fracture mechanics method assumes that the crack already exists, and there is a high strain constraint at the initial crack tip, so it is mainly suitable for the study of brittle fracture problems with extremely limited plastic deformation, but it is not suitable for the ductile fracture problems with no macroscopic initial defects and significant plastic deformation under ultra-low cyclic loading. The ultra-low cycle fatigue fracture model based on void growth mechanism has been gradually applied in the ductile fracture analysis of steel.
In order to study whether the cyclic void growth model (CVGM) is suitable for predicting the fracture failure of domestic Q690D high strength structural steel, 17 rod specimens and 3 dog-bone weakened plate specimens (DB) were designed and processed. The MTS axial servo fatigue test system was used to carry out the fracture test of round bar specimens under monotonic loading and ultra-low cycle loading. The stress-strain relationship, basic mechanical parameters and load-displacement curve of Q690D steel were obtained. The influence of loading system on the bearing capacity and deformation capacity of specimens was analyzed.
The experimental results show that:1) Q690D steel has no obvious yield platform, and there are obvious notch strengthening effect and cyclic softening phenomenon. Due to the damage of material during cyclic loading, the fracture displacement of cyclic loading is less than that of monotonic loading. 2) By analyzing the fracture morphology of the specimen, it is found that the cracks all start at the center of the minimum section of the specimen. The micro morphology of the specimen fracture is observed by scanning electron microscope. The fracture presents the ductile fracture characteristics of dimple, which conforms to the mechanism of void growth fracture mechanics. At the same time, the characteristic length of Q690D steel is about 0. 3 mm by scanning electron microscope.
The finite element model of Q690D high strength steel was established by using ABAQUS software. Based on the test results of Q690D rod specimen and combined with finite element analysis, the parameters of CVGM and DSPS of Q690D high strength steel were calibrated. Under monotonic loading, CVGM and DSPS degenerate into the void growth model (VGM) and the stress modified critical strain model (SMCS). Finally, with the help of user subroutine USDFLD in ABAQUS software, the CVGM model is programmed with Fortran language. In the process of numerical calculation, when the material element meets the requirements of failure criteria, the element failure is determined, the stress of the element is released, and then the finite element calculation is continued according to the new state until the specimen failure. The cyclic void growth model of steel is used to predict the fracture failure of dog-bone weakened plate specimen under different loading systems. The crack initiation position, load-displacement curve and fracture displacement of the specimen are in good agreement with the experimental results, and the prediction errors of ultimate load and fracture displacement are within 2% and 12% respectively.
- Q690D steel,
- micro fracture mechanics model,
- fracture prediction,
- ultra-low cycle fatigue,
- finite element analysis

FullText(HTML)

References(21)

References

[1]	尹飞,杨璐,施刚,等. 高强度钢材钢结构抗震研究进展综述[J]. 钢结构(中英文), 2020, 35(3):1-25.
[2]	Tateishi K, Hanji T, Minami K. A prediction model for extremely low cycle fatigue strength of structural steel[J]. International Journal of Fatigue, 2007, 29(5):887-896. DOI:10. 1016/j. ijfatigue. 2006. 08. 001.
[3]	Kanvinde A M, Deierlein G G. Void growth model and the stress modified critical strain model to predict ductile fracture in structural steels[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2006, 132(12):1907-1918. DOI:10. 1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2006)132:12(1907).
[4]	Kanvinde A M, Deierlein G G. Cyclic void growth model to assess ductile fracture initiation in structural steels due to ultra low cycle fatigue[J]. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 2007(6). DOI:10. 1061/(ASCE) 0733-9399(2007) 133:6(701).
[5]	Hancock J W, Mackenzie A C. On the mechanics of ductile failure in high-strength steel subjected to multi-axial stress-states[J]. Journal of Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 1976, 24(3):147-169. DOI:10. 1016/0022-5096(76) 90024-7.
[6]	Kanvinde A M, Deierlein G G. Micromecha-nical simulation of earthquake-induced fracture in steel structures[R]. Stanford:Stanford University, 2004.
[7]	Bonora N. A nonlinear CDM model for ductile failure[J]. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 1997, 58(1/2):11-28. DOI:10. 1016/s0013-7944(97) 00074-x.
[8]	Gurson A L. Continuum theory of ductile rupture by void nucleation and growth:part I-yield criteria and flow rules for porous ductile media[J]. Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology, 1977, 99(1):2-15. DOI:10. 1115/1. 3443401.
[9]	Tvergaard V, Needleman A. Analysis of the cup-cone fracture in a round tensile bar[J]. Acta Metallurgica, 1984, 32(1):157-169. DOI:10. 1016/0001-6160(84) 90213-x.
[10]	邢佶慧,郭长岚,张沛,等. Q235B钢材的微观损伤模型韧性参数校正[J]. 建筑材料学报,2015, 18(2):228-236. DOI:10. 3969/j. issn. 1007-9629. 2015. 02. 008.
[11]	黄学伟,赵军. 不同断裂模型在钢结构断裂破坏预测中的比较[J]. 建筑科学与工程学报, 2018, 35(1):93-101. DOI:10. 3969/j. issn. 1673-2049. 2018. 01. 012.
[12]	廖芳芳. 钢材微观断裂判据研究及在节点延性断裂预测中的应用[D]. 上海:同济大学,2012.
[13]	Chi W M, Kanvinde A M, Asce A M. Prediction of ductile fracture in steel connections using SMCS criterion[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2006, 132(2):171-181. DOI:10. 1061/(ASCE) 0733-9445(2006) 132:2(171).
[14]	Kanvinde A M, Fell B V, Gomez I R, et al. Predicting fracture in structural fillet welds using traditional and micromechanical fracture models[J]. Engineering Structures, 2008, 30(11):3325-3335. DOI:10. 1016/j. engstruct. 2008. 05. 014.
[15]	刘希月,王元清,石永久. 基于微观机理的高强度钢材及其焊缝断裂预测模型研究[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2016, 37(6). DOI:10. 14006 /j. jzjgxb. 2016. 06. 028.
[16]	Rice J R, Tracey D M. On the ductile enlargement of voids in triaxial stress fields[J]. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 1969, 17(3):201-217. DOI:10. 1016/0022-5096(69) 90033-7.
[17]	D'escatha Y, Devaux J C. Numerical study of initiation, stable crack growth and maximum load, with a ductile fracture criterion based on the growth of holes[J]. Elastic Plastic Fracture, 1979:229-248. DOI:10. 1520/STP35833S.
[18]	Myers A T, Kanvinde A M, Deierlein G G, et al. Probabilistic formulation of the cyclic void growth model to predict ultralow cycle fatigue in structural steel[J]. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 2014, 140(6). DOI:10. 1061/(ASCE) EM. 1943-7889. 0000728.
[19]	Chaboche J L. Anisotropic creep damage in the frameuork of continum damage mechanics[J]. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 1984,79(3):309-319.
[20]	黄学伟,葛建舟,赵军,等. Q690D高强钢基于连续损伤模型的断裂破坏预测分析[J]. 工程力学, 2020, 37(2):230-240. DOI:10. 6052/j. issn. 1000-4750. 2019. 03. 0088.
[21]	茹继平, 杨娜, 杨庆山. 翼缘削弱型钢框架梁柱节点的性能研究综述[J]. 工程力学, 2004, 21(1):61-66. DOI:10. 3969/j. issn. 1000-4750. 2004. 01. 012.