Volume 35 Issue 6
Aug.  2020
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Chao Gong, Hao Kang, Zhaoxin Hou, Yuyin Wang, Weiqiao Liang, Guowei Zhang. Theoretical Analysis and Experimental Study on Bending Behavior of Steel-Concrete Composite Flat Beams[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2020, 35(6): 41-49. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS20051201
Citation: Chao Gong, Hao Kang, Zhaoxin Hou, Yuyin Wang, Weiqiao Liang, Guowei Zhang. Theoretical Analysis and Experimental Study on Bending Behavior of Steel-Concrete Composite Flat Beams[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2020, 35(6): 41-49. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS20051201

Theoretical Analysis and Experimental Study on Bending Behavior of Steel-Concrete Composite Flat Beams

doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS20051201
  • Received Date: 2020-03-20
  • The steel-concrete composite slim floor has the advantages of small height of the floor structure, good fire resistance, good appearance of the lower surface, easy pipeline laying, and smaller beam height in the economic span, and has been widely used in foreign countries (especially the United Kingdom and Northern Europe). The steel-concrete composite slim floor commonly used in the actual project is SP prestressed hollow slab and deep deck steel plate composite floor. When used in residential buildings, there are the following deficiencies:1) The lower flange of the steel beam is exposed, requiring anti-corrosion and fire protection. 2) The uneven bottom flange of composite slim beam with deep deck needs to be suspended, which increases cost and structural height. 3) SP prestressed hollow slab and deep rib profiled steel plate both are one-way slabs, which results in a large floor thickness, and it is difficult to further reduce the height of the floor, which restricts the application of the steel-concrete composite slim floor in practical projects. To this end, this paper presents the concept of prefabricated concrete hollow slab and composite slim beam with concrete hollow slab. The prefabricated concrete hollow floor is composed of prefabricated concrete hollow slab and cast-in-place concrete, which can achieve two-way force transmission. Because this new type of composite slim beam with concrete hollow slab is different from the traditional SP prestressed hollow slab and deep rib profiled steel plate. In order to study the cooperative working performance and design method of the new composite slim beam with concrete hollow slab, theoretical analysis and experimental study of the bending performance of the new steel-concrete composite slim beam with concrete hollow slab were carried out.
    In this paper, two specimens of composite slim beam with concrete hollow slabs were designed and manufactured. The main changing parameters were the opening pattern of steel beam webs and the settings of shear keys. The steel beams are welded unequal flange steel beams, and the floor slabs are prefabricated concrete hollow slab. The steel grade is Q345B, the floor concrete is C35, and the steel bar is HRB400. The calculated length of the test piece is 3 800 mm, and the geometric length is 4 000 mm. Through experiments, the bearing capacity, ductility, deformation performance, crack development, stress and strain development of the new steel-concrete composite flat beam were studied. On the basis of experimental research, a simplified assumption for the calculation of the ultimate bending capacity of prefabricated concrete hollow slab is proposed, and the calculation formula of the ultimate bending capacity of the prefabricated concrete hollow slab is derived based on the failure strength theory.
    The following conclusions were obtained through theoretical analysis and experimental research:1) The composite slim beam with concrete hollow slab has excellent bearing capacity and ductility. When the deflection span ratio of the specimen reaches 1/32, the bearing capacity of the specimen has not decreased significantly, and the specimen exhibits the characteristics of ductile failure. 2) When the bottom flange of the steel beam and the tensile steel bar yield, the test piece reaches the yield bearing capacity; when the steel beam full-section yields, the tensile and compression steel bar yields, and the concrete in the compression zone collapses, the test piece reaches the ultimate bearing capacity. Before the peak load, the strain distribution of the concrete and steel beam sections is approximately linear, and the flat section assumption can be used. 3) The calculation formula of the bending capacity of the composite slim beam with concrete hollow slab based on the failure strength theory is in good agreement with the test results and is safe.
  • loading
  • Silva S D, Thambiratnam D P. Vibration characteristics of concrete-steel composite floor structures[J]. ACI Structural Journal, 2011, 108(6):1-9.
    Sayhood E K, Mohammed S H. Non-linear behavior of composite slim floor beams with partial interaction[J]. European Journal of Scientific Research, 2011, 56(3):311-325.
    Nádaský P. Steel-concrete composite beams for slim floors-specific design features in scope of steel frames design[J]. Procedia Engineering, 2012, 40:274-279.
    Tsavdaridis K D, Mello C D, Huo B Y. Experimental and computational study of the vertical shear behavior of partially encased perforated steel beams[J]. Engineering Structures, 2013, 56:805-822.
    Bailey C G. The behavior of asymmetric slim floor steel beams in fire[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 1999, 50:235-257.
    Ellobody E. Composite slim floor stainless steel beam construction exposed to different fires[J]. Engineering Structures, 2012, 36:1-13.
    Ellobody E. Nonlinear behavior of unprotected composite slim floor steel beams exposed to different fire conditions[J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 2011, 49:762-771.
    Ma Z C, Makelainen P. Structural behavior of composite slim floor frames in fire conditions[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2006, 62:1282-1289.
    Silva S S D, Thambiratnam D. Vibration characteristics of concrete-steel composite floor structures[J]. ACI Structural Journal, 2011, 108(6):1-9.
    Hegger J, Roggendorf T, Kerkeni N. Shear capacity of prestressed hollow core slabs in slim floor constructions[J]. Engineering Structures, 2009, 31:551-559.
    高彦良,张素梅. 三种楼盖体系的技术经济比较[C]//中国钢结构协会钢-混凝土组合结构分会第十次年会论文集. 2005.
    郭兰慧,王玉银, Kuhlmann U. 帽型组合扁梁力学性能分析[J]. 土木工程学报, 2010, 43(3):8-14.
    石永久,杨璐,王元清,等. 简支深肋组合扁梁抗弯刚度[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2010, 40(6):1550-1555.
    魏京鹏. 深肋组合扁梁楼盖受力性能的分析[D]. 沈阳:沈阳建筑大学, 2011.
    王元清,杨璐,石永久,等. 框架深肋组合扁梁弹性刚度分析[J]. 沈阳建筑大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 29(1):1-6.
    中华人民共和国建设部. 普通混凝土力学性能试验方法标准:GB/T 50081-2002[S]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 2002.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (229) PDF downloads(45) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return