Yaohua Wu. Performance Comparison of Structural Steels in Chinese and American Standards[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2020, 35(9): 26-43. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS20052508
Citation: Jinxun Zhang, Shudong Gao, Zeqiang Wang, Zhonglu Wang, Yi Zhang, Lei Zhang, Zhi Ji. Construction Design and Installation Technology of Fixed Length Cable for Large Span Saddle Shaped Single Layer Orthogonal Cable Net Structure[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2020, 35(10): 22-28. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS20032702

Construction Design and Installation Technology of Fixed Length Cable for Large Span Saddle Shaped Single Layer Orthogonal Cable Net Structure

doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS20032702
  • Received Date: 2020-05-20
  • The large-span saddle shaped single-layer orthogonal cable net structure of national speed skating oval is the largest span and scale cable net structure in similar projects in the world. The specification and internal force of the cable are large. The load cable and stable cable are designed with double cables, which makes it difficult to lift and tension the cable. In addition, in the process of cable lifting and tensioning, the ring truss support has only vertical restraint, horizontal sliding, and ring truss support It is difficult to design and control the passive tension of the outer ring of truss curtain wall cable. How to solve the lifting and tension construction of large-span saddle shaped single-layer orthogonal cable net structure under the variable boundary conditions is the key to the construction of national speed skating Pavilion, which is directly related to whether the project can be completed on time.
    In view of this situation, this paper systematically studies the cable fixed length design, installation error elimination, cable mesh weaving method, construction process simulation analysis, lifting tension construction and other aspects. It puts forward the concepts of fixed length cable installation, appropriate relaxation of synchronization requirements in the initial stage of cable network lifting, and the application of equal displacement synchronous tension forming in cable network tension stage The complete set of construction design and installation technology of large span saddle shaped single-layer orthogonal cable net structure, including calculation method, adjustable sleeve installation error elimination method, bearing pre deflection value design, construction simulation analysis, ground netting, phased, step-by-step, equal displacement integral lifting and tension forming technology. This technology solves the technical problem that the cable net structure is particularly sensitive to the construction error, successfully guides the construction of the cable net project of the national speed skating Pavilion, and ensures the smooth progress of the national speed skating hall project.
  • 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.索结构技术规程:JGJ 257-2012[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2012.
    许贤.张拉整体结构的形态理论与控制方法研究[D].杭州:浙江大学,2009.
    田广宇.车辐式张拉结构设计理论与施工控制关键技术研究[D].北京:清华大学,2012.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]Yongjiu Shi, Xianglin Yu, Huiyong Ban. Research and Progress on Application of High Performance Steel[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2024, 39(10): 97-104. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS24071720
    [2]Xianshun Li, Kai Zhang. Comparative Study on Fireproofing Design of Steel Structures in Petrochemical Industry Between Chinese and American Standards[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2024, 39(6): 42-47. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS23041001
    [3]ZHAO Yu-ran, ZHENG Teng-teng, ZHAO Cai-qi, YUAN Liang-jian. Comparative Study on Structural Performance of Box-Type Hollow Roof and Traditional Roof[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2022, 37(10): 24-31. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS22052901
    [4]Dan Guo, Wenxing He. Comparison of End Plate Connection Design Between AISC DG4 and GB Codes[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2021, 36(4): 32-49. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS20071302
    [5]Chang Chai, Yingchun Liu. Some Issus on Application for New National Standard GB/T 1591-2018 High Strength Low Alloy Structural Steel[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2020, 35(6): 50-54. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgSE20051201
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(6)

    1. 王勇骏. 浅析中美钢结构规范设计. 建设科技. 2024(08): 82-84 .
    2. 王兴宇,王彬楠,杨燕,黄青隆. 基于某中心支撑钢框架的中美标准对比研究. 施工技术(中英文). 2024(14): 118-124 .
    3. 汤伟,王开松. 叉车式AGV链轮轴有限元分析与结构优化. 装备制造技术. 2024(09): 47-50 .
    4. 李岩杰,臧振东,吕耀强,刘志卫. 冷却模式对Grade50热轧带钢组织及性能的影响. 河北冶金. 2023(03): 17-20+69 .
    5. 李思坤. 浅析桥梁用耐候结构钢Q355NH研制. 冶金与材料. 2022(01): 57-58 .
    6. 王飞,张龙. 辅助促进剂对建筑结构钢锌锰系磷化膜耐蚀性的影响. 电镀与精饰. 2022(08): 13-18 .

    Other cited types(3)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-04050100150200250300
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 18.0 %FULLTEXT: 18.0 %META: 78.8 %META: 78.8 %PDF: 3.2 %PDF: 3.2 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 29.3 %其他: 29.3 %其他: 1.2 %其他: 1.2 %Baden: 0.1 %Baden: 0.1 %Blairmore: 0.0 %Blairmore: 0.0 %Cambodia: 0.1 %Cambodia: 0.1 %Central District: 0.3 %Central District: 0.3 %China: 0.8 %China: 0.8 %Crawford: 0.0 %Crawford: 0.0 %Hanoi: 0.1 %Hanoi: 0.1 %Indianapolis: 0.1 %Indianapolis: 0.1 %Irving: 0.1 %Irving: 0.1 %Italy: 0.1 %Italy: 0.1 %Japan: 0.0 %Japan: 0.0 %Kennedy Town: 0.1 %Kennedy Town: 0.1 %Murfreesboro: 0.1 %Murfreesboro: 0.1 %Norway: 0.0 %Norway: 0.0 %Osaka: 0.1 %Osaka: 0.1 %Overland Park: 0.1 %Overland Park: 0.1 %Pasig: 0.1 %Pasig: 0.1 %Rochester: 0.1 %Rochester: 0.1 %Saitama: 0.0 %Saitama: 0.0 %Seychelles: 0.0 %Seychelles: 0.0 %Singapore: 0.0 %Singapore: 0.0 %United States: 0.1 %United States: 0.1 %Westbury: 0.1 %Westbury: 0.1 %[]: 0.5 %[]: 0.5 %上海: 2.1 %上海: 2.1 %东莞: 0.6 %东莞: 0.6 %中山: 0.0 %中山: 0.0 %临汾: 0.0 %临汾: 0.0 %乐山: 0.0 %乐山: 0.0 %伊斯兰堡: 0.1 %伊斯兰堡: 0.1 %佛山: 0.1 %佛山: 0.1 %保定: 0.0 %保定: 0.0 %信阳: 0.0 %信阳: 0.0 %克拉科夫: 0.1 %克拉科夫: 0.1 %六安: 0.1 %六安: 0.1 %兰州: 0.0 %兰州: 0.0 %凉山: 0.0 %凉山: 0.0 %加利福尼亚州: 0.2 %加利福尼亚州: 0.2 %包头: 0.0 %包头: 0.0 %北京: 3.1 %北京: 3.1 %匹兹堡: 0.1 %匹兹堡: 0.1 %十堰: 0.6 %十堰: 0.6 %华瑞兹城: 0.0 %华瑞兹城: 0.0 %南京: 1.5 %南京: 1.5 %南京市江宁区: 0.0 %南京市江宁区: 0.0 %南圣弗朗西斯科: 0.1 %南圣弗朗西斯科: 0.1 %南宁: 0.0 %南宁: 0.0 %南昌: 0.2 %南昌: 0.2 %南通: 0.4 %南通: 0.4 %南阳: 0.0 %南阳: 0.0 %卡尔加里: 0.1 %卡尔加里: 0.1 %卡拉奇: 0.1 %卡拉奇: 0.1 %卢瓦尔: 0.1 %卢瓦尔: 0.1 %厦门: 0.2 %厦门: 0.2 %台北: 0.0 %台北: 0.0 %台州: 0.0 %台州: 0.0 %合肥: 0.1 %合肥: 0.1 %吉隆坡: 0.0 %吉隆坡: 0.0 %呼和浩特: 0.1 %呼和浩特: 0.1 %咸阳: 0.0 %咸阳: 0.0 %哈尔滨: 0.2 %哈尔滨: 0.2 %唐山: 0.0 %唐山: 0.0 %嘉兴: 0.8 %嘉兴: 0.8 %堪萨斯城: 0.0 %堪萨斯城: 0.0 %墨尔本: 0.0 %墨尔本: 0.0 %夏尔迦: 0.2 %夏尔迦: 0.2 %夏洛特: 0.1 %夏洛特: 0.1 %多伦多: 0.1 %多伦多: 0.1 %大同: 0.0 %大同: 0.0 %大庆: 0.1 %大庆: 0.1 %大连: 0.1 %大连: 0.1 %大阪: 0.1 %大阪: 0.1 %天水: 0.0 %天水: 0.0 %天津: 1.8 %天津: 1.8 %太原: 0.0 %太原: 0.0 %孟买: 0.1 %孟买: 0.1 %宁波: 0.1 %宁波: 0.1 %安山: 0.1 %安山: 0.1 %安康: 0.0 %安康: 0.0 %安曼: 0.4 %安曼: 0.4 %安阳: 0.1 %安阳: 0.1 %宜宾: 0.0 %宜宾: 0.0 %宣城: 0.3 %宣城: 0.3 %密蘇里城: 0.3 %密蘇里城: 0.3 %屏东: 0.0 %屏东: 0.0 %巴黎: 0.1 %巴黎: 0.1 %布兰普顿: 0.1 %布兰普顿: 0.1 %常州: 0.4 %常州: 0.4 %常德: 0.0 %常德: 0.0 %平顶山: 0.0 %平顶山: 0.0 %广州: 0.8 %广州: 0.8 %庆和: 0.1 %庆和: 0.1 %庆阳: 0.0 %庆阳: 0.0 %廊坊: 0.0 %廊坊: 0.0 %延安: 0.0 %延安: 0.0 %张家口: 0.7 %张家口: 0.7 %徐州: 0.3 %徐州: 0.3 %德里: 0.1 %德里: 0.1 %德黑兰: 0.0 %德黑兰: 0.0 %惠州: 0.0 %惠州: 0.0 %意法半: 0.0 %意法半: 0.0 %成都: 0.4 %成都: 0.4 %扬州: 1.4 %扬州: 1.4 %拉合尔: 0.2 %拉合尔: 0.2 %揭阳: 0.0 %揭阳: 0.0 %新加坡: 0.1 %新加坡: 0.1 %新德里: 0.1 %新德里: 0.1 %无锡: 0.1 %无锡: 0.1 %旧金山: 0.0 %旧金山: 0.0 %昆明: 0.2 %昆明: 0.2 %晋中: 0.0 %晋中: 0.0 %晋城: 0.1 %晋城: 0.1 %普若佛: 0.1 %普若佛: 0.1 %曼谷: 0.4 %曼谷: 0.4 %朝阳: 0.0 %朝阳: 0.0 %本溪: 0.0 %本溪: 0.0 %来宾: 0.1 %来宾: 0.1 %杭州: 1.6 %杭州: 1.6 %柏林: 0.0 %柏林: 0.0 %柳州: 0.0 %柳州: 0.0 %格兰特县: 0.2 %格兰特县: 0.2 %桂林: 0.0 %桂林: 0.0 %森尼韦尔: 0.1 %森尼韦尔: 0.1 %檀香山: 0.0 %檀香山: 0.0 %武汉: 0.6 %武汉: 0.6 %氹仔: 0.0 %氹仔: 0.0 %汉中: 0.0 %汉中: 0.0 %汕头: 0.1 %汕头: 0.1 %江门: 0.2 %江门: 0.2 %沈阳: 0.1 %沈阳: 0.1 %沧州: 0.0 %沧州: 0.0 %河内: 0.2 %河内: 0.2 %泉州: 0.1 %泉州: 0.1 %法兰克福: 0.1 %法兰克福: 0.1 %泰安: 0.0 %泰安: 0.0 %泰州: 0.1 %泰州: 0.1 %洛杉矶: 0.0 %洛杉矶: 0.0 %洛阳: 0.1 %洛阳: 0.1 %济南: 0.6 %济南: 0.6 %深圳: 0.5 %深圳: 0.5 %温州: 1.0 %温州: 1.0 %温莎: 0.1 %温莎: 0.1 %湖州: 0.1 %湖州: 0.1 %湘潭: 0.0 %湘潭: 0.0 %湛江: 0.0 %湛江: 0.0 %滁州: 0.0 %滁州: 0.0 %漯河: 5.5 %漯河: 5.5 %潍坊: 0.1 %潍坊: 0.1 %烟台: 0.1 %烟台: 0.1 %珠海: 0.1 %珠海: 0.1 %甘南: 0.0 %甘南: 0.0 %盐城: 0.0 %盐城: 0.0 %石家庄: 0.5 %石家庄: 0.5 %福州: 0.1 %福州: 0.1 %约翰内斯堡: 0.2 %约翰内斯堡: 0.2 %纽约: 0.1 %纽约: 0.1 %绍兴: 0.1 %绍兴: 0.1 %美国加利福尼亚洛杉矶: 0.0 %美国加利福尼亚洛杉矶: 0.0 %聊城: 0.0 %聊城: 0.0 %胡志明: 0.2 %胡志明: 0.2 %舟山: 0.0 %舟山: 0.0 %艾伯塔: 0.0 %艾伯塔: 0.0 %艾因: 0.0 %艾因: 0.0 %芒廷维尤: 13.2 %芒廷维尤: 13.2 %芜湖: 0.0 %芜湖: 0.0 %芝冷西: 0.1 %芝冷西: 0.1 %芝加哥: 1.3 %芝加哥: 1.3 %苏州: 0.3 %苏州: 0.3 %茂名: 0.0 %茂名: 0.0 %荆门: 0.1 %荆门: 0.1 %莫斯科: 0.3 %莫斯科: 0.3 %菏泽: 0.0 %菏泽: 0.0 %营口: 0.0 %营口: 0.0 %萨默维尔: 0.1 %萨默维尔: 0.1 %葫芦岛: 0.0 %葫芦岛: 0.0 %蒙特利尔: 0.1 %蒙特利尔: 0.1 %蘭里: 0.1 %蘭里: 0.1 %衡水: 0.0 %衡水: 0.0 %衡阳: 0.0 %衡阳: 0.0 %西宁: 8.9 %西宁: 8.9 %西安: 0.2 %西安: 0.2 %西雅图: 0.0 %西雅图: 0.0 %贵阳: 0.0 %贵阳: 0.0 %辛辛那提: 0.1 %辛辛那提: 0.1 %运城: 0.2 %运城: 0.2 %连云港: 0.0 %连云港: 0.0 %迪拜: 0.0 %迪拜: 0.0 %邯郸: 0.4 %邯郸: 0.4 %郑州: 1.1 %郑州: 1.1 %都伯林: 0.1 %都伯林: 0.1 %鄂州: 0.0 %鄂州: 0.0 %重庆: 0.3 %重庆: 0.3 %金边: 0.1 %金边: 0.1 %铁岭: 0.1 %铁岭: 0.1 %银川: 0.0 %银川: 0.0 %镇江: 0.0 %镇江: 0.0 %长春: 0.0 %长春: 0.0 %长沙: 0.7 %长沙: 0.7 %长治: 0.0 %长治: 0.0 %阳泉: 0.2 %阳泉: 0.2 %阿姆斯特丹: 0.1 %阿姆斯特丹: 0.1 %阿布扎比: 0.1 %阿布扎比: 0.1 %雅加达: 0.4 %雅加达: 0.4 %雪兰莪: 0.0 %雪兰莪: 0.0 %青岛: 0.8 %青岛: 0.8 %香港: 0.0 %香港: 0.0 %香港特别行政区: 0.0 %香港特别行政区: 0.0 %马尼拉: 0.7 %马尼拉: 0.7 %马湾: 0.6 %马湾: 0.6 %马鞍山: 0.0 %马鞍山: 0.0 %麦迪逊: 0.0 %麦迪逊: 0.0 %其他其他BadenBlairmoreCambodiaCentral DistrictChinaCrawfordHanoiIndianapolisIrvingItalyJapanKennedy TownMurfreesboroNorwayOsakaOverland ParkPasigRochesterSaitamaSeychellesSingaporeUnited StatesWestbury[]上海东莞中山临汾乐山伊斯兰堡佛山保定信阳克拉科夫六安兰州凉山加利福尼亚州包头北京匹兹堡十堰华瑞兹城南京南京市江宁区南圣弗朗西斯科南宁南昌南通南阳卡尔加里卡拉奇卢瓦尔厦门台北台州合肥吉隆坡呼和浩特咸阳哈尔滨唐山嘉兴堪萨斯城墨尔本夏尔迦夏洛特多伦多大同大庆大连大阪天水天津太原孟买宁波安山安康安曼安阳宜宾宣城密蘇里城屏东巴黎布兰普顿常州常德平顶山广州庆和庆阳廊坊延安张家口徐州德里德黑兰惠州意法半成都扬州拉合尔揭阳新加坡新德里无锡旧金山昆明晋中晋城普若佛曼谷朝阳本溪来宾杭州柏林柳州格兰特县桂林森尼韦尔檀香山武汉氹仔汉中汕头江门沈阳沧州河内泉州法兰克福泰安泰州洛杉矶洛阳济南深圳温州温莎湖州湘潭湛江滁州漯河潍坊烟台珠海甘南盐城石家庄福州约翰内斯堡纽约绍兴美国加利福尼亚洛杉矶聊城胡志明舟山艾伯塔艾因芒廷维尤芜湖芝冷西芝加哥苏州茂名荆门莫斯科菏泽营口萨默维尔葫芦岛蒙特利尔蘭里衡水衡阳西宁西安西雅图贵阳辛辛那提运城连云港迪拜邯郸郑州都伯林鄂州重庆金边铁岭银川镇江长春长沙长治阳泉阿姆斯特丹阿布扎比雅加达雪兰莪青岛香港香港特别行政区马尼拉马湾马鞍山麦迪逊

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (525) PDF downloads(57) Cited by(9)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return