Shixiang Zhang, Yande Lai, Qingxiang Li. Investigation on Failure Mechanism of the Standing Seam Metal Roof System[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2020, 35(5): 10-18. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS20022301
Citation: Shixiang Zhang, Yande Lai, Qingxiang Li. Investigation on Failure Mechanism of the Standing Seam Metal Roof System[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2020, 35(5): 10-18. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS20022301

Investigation on Failure Mechanism of the Standing Seam Metal Roof System

doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS20022301
  • Received Date: 2020-02-23
  • Publish Date: 2020-07-14
  • After the introduction of the standing seam metal roof system in China, the research on the force transmission principle and the mechanical performance has not been mature, which is not conducive to the popularization and application of such roofing systems. The problems involved in the upright lock-edge metal roofing system are comprehensive and complex, and require a lot of scientific research to solve them. Based on the above problems, this article targeted the relevant research on the crimping joint of the upright edge-sealing metal roof.
    First, the structure of the metal roof is introduced. The wind resistance principle of the roof slab is obtained through the preliminary analysis of the structure of the aluminum magnesium manganese upright metal roofing system:the top roof slab is first deformed upward, and the rising force is transmitted to the occlusion structure. The bearing, the bearing then transmits the load from the self-tapping screw to the purlin, and finally distributes it to the main structure. The order of force transmission is wind-absorbing load→roof panel→fixed support→self-tapping screw→purlin→main structure.
    Using non-linear finite element software midas FEA to simulate the whole process of the roof system under the wind load, the wind resistance performance of the vertical locking metal roof system was studied. Combined with the domestic research on the metal roofing system's resistance to wind damage, a uniform load of 2 kN/m2 and 5 kN/m2 is applied to the roof slab and vertical ribs, and the stress and stress of the roof slab under different loads are analyzed In the deformation situation, the Mises stress cloud maps at different nodes are obtained. Under the uniform load of 2 kN/m2, the local connection between the support and the metal hemming due to mutual extrusion and slip, the local stress is large, reaching 220 MPa. But at this time, the middle of the slab still stays at a relatively low stress level; under the uniform load of 5 kN/m2, the stress in the middle of the roof slab and the area near the support has reached the yield strength. Under the uniform load of 2 kN/m2, the maximum vertical deflection value of the mid-span position of the roof slab is about 48.18 mm, the deflection value is relatively large, and the opening at the support makes the deflection value of the two sides of the panel surface greater than that of the middle panel Its impact on the overall roofing system usage status. When the value of the uniformly distributed wind load applied to the roof panel is 5 kN/m2, the mid-span deflection is 220 mm. This is because the roof panel has detached from the support, causing the deflection to rapidly increase. At this time, the excessive deflection to normal use of the panel has an unrecoverable impact. By analyzing the deformation of the roof slab under load, it can be seen that the adjacent roof slabs are moved to the two sides by the curling straight ribs under the wind exposure, and the vertical locking part of the roof slab continuously rubs against the aluminum alloy support extrusion, with the continuous development of deformation, eventually detached from the support. Therefore, under the action of the wind suction force, the bite connection between the curling edge of the roof slab and the support is the first part to be damaged, and special attention should be paid to the need to take corresponding strengthening measures.
    Through the modal analysis of the structure, the first five orders of vibration mode and period are obtained. The time history analysis of the wind pressure on the roof slab was performed to obtain the relative displacement response of the lock joint corresponding to each measuring point. In order to improve the wind-resistance ability of the upright locking metal roofing system and prevent partial overturning, corresponding strengthening countermeasures are proposed according to different engineering conditions. After strengthening the treatment, the use safety of the upright lock-edge metal roofing system is improved, which can provide a reference for engineering design.
  • 刘军进,崔忠乾,李建辉.直立锁边金属屋面抗风揭性能研究现状及展望[J].建筑科学,2018,34(5):118-124.
    李路川. 大跨度场馆上金属屋面系统抗风性能研究[D]. 天津:天津大学, 2014.
    中华人民共和国建设部.铝合金结构设计规范:GB 50429-2007[S]. 北京:中国计划出版社,2007.
    张玉龙,赵中魁.实用轻金属材料手册[M].北京:化学工业出版社,2006.
    Serrette R, Peköz T. Bending strength of standing seam roof panels[J]. Thin-Walled Structures,1997,27(1):55-64.
    Habte F, Asghari M M,Gan A C, et al. Full-scale testing to evaluate the performance of standing seam metal roofs under simulated wind loading[J]. Engineering Structures,2015,105:231-248.
    陈玉. 直立锁边屋面系统抗风承载能力研究[D]. 北京:北京交通大学, 2015.
    罗勇峰,郑祥杰,郭小农,等.铝合金屋面系统抗风连接受力性能分析[J].重庆大学学报,2013(10):94-100.
    宋云浩,杨丽曼,王乾锁,等.金属屋面板风吸力下变形特性研究[J].建筑结构,2015,45(17):87-91.
    景晓昆,李元齐.直立锁缝屋面体系固定支座的有效静力风荷载[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版),2013,41(11):1630-1635,1760.
    陈辉.直立锁边金属屋面的抗风构造性能试验研究[J].钢结构,2018,33(8):20-23

    ,78.
    汪明波. 两类常用金属屋面板抗风性能研究[D]. 广州:华南理工大学, 2017.
  • Relative Articles

    [1]Yijun Xie, Hua Xia, Zhengfeng Shen, Linlang Tong, Wei Li, Hongyu Pan. Numerical Research on Shape Coefficients of Wind Loads of Industrial Buildings with Overhanging Awnings[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2025, 40(1): 52-57. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS23090801
    [2]Quanwei Liu, Lele Sun, Shoujie Ye, Peijun Wang. Numerical Analysis on Mechanical Properties of Bolted Beam-SHS Column Joints Strengthened by H-Steel[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2025, 40(2): 46-55. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS23111501
    [3]Liang Hu, Ziming Yang, Xu Zhan, Ju Chen. Numerical Analysis on Seismic Behavior of Steel Tubular Column-Shear Wall Transformation Nodes[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2024, 39(9): 24-33. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS23072702
    [4]Shenghui Wu, Yongxuan Li, Jun Liu, Zhihua Fu, Chengjie Wu, Zichuan Xia, Yuchen Guan, Yurong Zhang. Key Construction Techniques for Steel Truss of Transfer Floor in Super High Rise Tower[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2024, 39(9): 52-59. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS23083001
    [5]Yutong Pang, Meigen Cao, Lulin Zhan, Zhanglong Chen. Wind Vibration Response and Wind Resistance of Suspension Towers with Large Height Difference in Mountainous Areas[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2023, 38(7): 22-28. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS22082202
    [6]ZHAO Qiu, CAI Wei, CHEN Peng, YU Ao, LIN Yongxin. Study on Refined Numerical Simulation Method of Mechanical Behavior of Prefabricated Bailey Beam[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2023, 38(2): 23-31. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS22111601
    [7]Qiliang Miao, Zhensen Song, Zhongxiang ZHANG. Numerical Study on Cold-formed Steel Built-up Stiffened Cruciform Specimen Subjected to Axial Load[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2022, 37(3): 20-27. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS21103101
    [8]Jun Wu. Simulated Analysis on Optimum Scheduling of Outrigger-Brace Connection for Super High-Rise Structure[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2022, 37(1): 46-52. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS21062901
    [9]Yande Lai, Shixiang Zhang, Qingxiang Li, Ruoqiang Feng. Numerical Simulation Investigation on Wind-Resistance Performance of the Metal Roof Aluminum Sheet[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2020, 35(9): 10-16. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS20071303
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(4)

    1. 卢磊. 直立锁边金属屋面与复杂钢网架施工研究. 建筑施工. 2024(01): 75-77 .
    2. 苟春龙. 铝镁锰直立锁边金属屋面关键技术研究. 居舍. 2024(15): 80-82 .
    3. 刘毛方,孟磊. 天长市全民健身中心体育馆金属屋面体系选型与设计. 安徽建筑. 2022(04): 15-16 .
    4. 胡瑞宇,王金森,王越. R130型抗强风金属屋面在核电厂房防台风加固工程中的应用. 工业建筑. 2021(12): 123-128 .

    Other cited types(6)

  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-040510152025
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 12.9 %FULLTEXT: 12.9 %META: 80.2 %META: 80.2 %PDF: 6.9 %PDF: 6.9 %FULLTEXTMETAPDF
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 11.4 %其他: 11.4 %其他: 0.2 %其他: 0.2 %China: 0.4 %China: 0.4 %上海: 1.4 %上海: 1.4 %临沂: 0.2 %临沂: 0.2 %佛山: 1.0 %佛山: 1.0 %六安: 0.2 %六安: 0.2 %兰州: 0.2 %兰州: 0.2 %北京: 8.8 %北京: 8.8 %十堰: 0.2 %十堰: 0.2 %南京: 0.4 %南京: 0.4 %南昌: 0.8 %南昌: 0.8 %南通: 0.4 %南通: 0.4 %合肥: 0.4 %合肥: 0.4 %嘉兴: 0.2 %嘉兴: 0.2 %天津: 1.6 %天津: 1.6 %宁波: 0.6 %宁波: 0.6 %宣城: 0.4 %宣城: 0.4 %常州: 0.4 %常州: 0.4 %常德: 0.2 %常德: 0.2 %广州: 1.6 %广州: 1.6 %张家口: 3.5 %张家口: 3.5 %惠州: 0.2 %惠州: 0.2 %成都: 0.4 %成都: 0.4 %扬州: 1.0 %扬州: 1.0 %无锡: 0.2 %无锡: 0.2 %昆明: 0.8 %昆明: 0.8 %晋城: 0.8 %晋城: 0.8 %朝阳: 0.2 %朝阳: 0.2 %杭州: 0.4 %杭州: 0.4 %武汉: 0.6 %武汉: 0.6 %沈阳: 0.4 %沈阳: 0.4 %泰州: 0.2 %泰州: 0.2 %洛杉矶: 0.6 %洛杉矶: 0.6 %济南: 0.6 %济南: 0.6 %深圳: 0.2 %深圳: 0.2 %温州: 0.4 %温州: 0.4 %滨州: 0.8 %滨州: 0.8 %漯河: 2.4 %漯河: 2.4 %濮阳: 0.4 %濮阳: 0.4 %珠海: 0.6 %珠海: 0.6 %盐城: 0.2 %盐城: 0.2 %石家庄: 0.2 %石家庄: 0.2 %芒廷维尤: 12.4 %芒廷维尤: 12.4 %芝加哥: 0.4 %芝加哥: 0.4 %葫芦岛: 0.2 %葫芦岛: 0.2 %西宁: 32.9 %西宁: 32.9 %贵阳: 0.2 %贵阳: 0.2 %运城: 1.2 %运城: 1.2 %郑州: 1.0 %郑州: 1.0 %重庆: 0.2 %重庆: 0.2 %长沙: 0.4 %长沙: 0.4 %阳泉: 1.2 %阳泉: 1.2 %青岛: 1.4 %青岛: 1.4 %香港特别行政区: 1.8 %香港特别行政区: 1.8 %其他其他China上海临沂佛山六安兰州北京十堰南京南昌南通合肥嘉兴天津宁波宣城常州常德广州张家口惠州成都扬州无锡昆明晋城朝阳杭州武汉沈阳泰州洛杉矶济南深圳温州滨州漯河濮阳珠海盐城石家庄芒廷维尤芝加哥葫芦岛西宁贵阳运城郑州重庆长沙阳泉青岛香港特别行政区

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (392) PDF downloads(34) Cited by(10)
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return