doi: 10.13206/j.gjg201306001
  • Publish Date: 2013-06-20
  • Relative Articles

    [1]Jiansen Feng, Zexuan Sun, Yun Zou, Chengquan Wang. Finite Element Analysis of Axial Compression Behavior of Steel Tubular-Corrugated Steel Plate Confined Concrete Composite Column[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2023, 38(8): 14-21. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS23041202
    [2]ZHAO Qiu, CAI Wei, CHEN Peng, YU Ao, LIN Yongxin. Study on Refined Numerical Simulation Method of Mechanical Behavior of Prefabricated Bailey Beam[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2023, 38(2): 23-31. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS22111601
    [3]Xu Chen, Libin Zhang, Zongxue Chen, Wentao Qiao, Lijun Meng. Finite Element Study on Mechanical Properties of Groove Plate Unit in Assembled Cable Supported Steel-Concrete Composite Floor[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2022, 37(4): 33-39. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS21121902
    [4]Qiang Xu, Haowen Liu, Wentao Qiao, Chao Wang. Finite Element Analysis on Seismic Behavior of A New Prefabricated Corrugated Steel Plate and Polyurethane Composite Shear Wall[J]. STEEL CONSTRUCTION(Chinese & English), 2021, 36(12): 1-8. doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS21051102
  • Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Amount of accessChart context menuAbstract Views, HTML Views, PDF Downloads StatisticsAbstract ViewsHTML ViewsPDF Downloads2024-052024-062024-072024-082024-092024-102024-112024-122025-012025-022025-032025-0402.557.51012.5
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Class DistributionFULLTEXT: 12.7 %FULLTEXT: 12.7 %META: 87.3 %META: 87.3 %FULLTEXTMETA
    Created with Highcharts 5.0.7Chart context menuAccess Area Distribution其他: 11.8 %其他: 11.8 %其他: 0.8 %其他: 0.8 %Central District: 0.4 %Central District: 0.4 %China: 0.4 %China: 0.4 %上海: 1.2 %上海: 1.2 %东莞: 1.6 %东莞: 1.6 %丽水: 0.4 %丽水: 0.4 %兰州: 0.8 %兰州: 0.8 %北京: 9.8 %北京: 9.8 %十堰: 0.4 %十堰: 0.4 %南京: 0.8 %南京: 0.8 %南宁: 0.4 %南宁: 0.4 %南昌: 1.2 %南昌: 1.2 %南通: 0.4 %南通: 0.4 %台州: 1.6 %台州: 1.6 %和田: 0.4 %和田: 0.4 %哈尔滨: 1.2 %哈尔滨: 1.2 %天津: 0.4 %天津: 0.4 %安阳: 0.4 %安阳: 0.4 %常州: 0.4 %常州: 0.4 %张家口: 2.9 %张家口: 2.9 %徐州: 0.4 %徐州: 0.4 %恩施: 0.8 %恩施: 0.8 %成都: 0.8 %成都: 0.8 %扬州: 1.2 %扬州: 1.2 %景德镇: 0.4 %景德镇: 0.4 %杭州: 0.4 %杭州: 0.4 %柳州: 0.4 %柳州: 0.4 %格兰特县: 0.4 %格兰特县: 0.4 %武汉: 2.9 %武汉: 2.9 %海北: 0.4 %海北: 0.4 %温州: 0.4 %温州: 0.4 %湖州: 1.2 %湖州: 1.2 %漯河: 2.9 %漯河: 2.9 %石家庄: 0.4 %石家庄: 0.4 %芒廷维尤: 9.8 %芒廷维尤: 9.8 %芝加哥: 0.8 %芝加哥: 0.8 %苏州: 0.4 %苏州: 0.4 %西宁: 32.7 %西宁: 32.7 %西安: 0.4 %西安: 0.4 %贝格卡门: 0.4 %贝格卡门: 0.4 %邯郸: 0.4 %邯郸: 0.4 %郑州: 0.4 %郑州: 0.4 %重庆: 1.6 %重庆: 1.6 %金华: 0.4 %金华: 0.4 %长沙: 1.6 %长沙: 1.6 %其他其他Central DistrictChina上海东莞丽水兰州北京十堰南京南宁南昌南通台州和田哈尔滨天津安阳常州张家口徐州恩施成都扬州景德镇杭州柳州格兰特县武汉海北温州湖州漯河石家庄芒廷维尤芝加哥苏州西宁西安贝格卡门邯郸郑州重庆金华长沙

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (251) PDF downloads(63) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return