Research and Analysis Simulation on the Installation Plans of an Irregular Steel Structure
-
摘要: 超高层、异形的钢结构或钢-混组合结构不仅在结构使用阶段受力非常复杂,而且施工过程中结构的变形和受力也特别复杂。该工程为具有特殊形体的钢框架-核心筒结构,存在较多的斜向桁架结构,其顶部与对侧的巨型桁架或核心筒通过水平构件强连接,形成“巨型结构”。在整体结构合龙前后,钢桁架主要构件受力形态差异很大。因此,考虑竖直构件及相应楼盖按常规顺序逐层施工,而斜向钢桁架需先行拼装就位,整体结构形成后再拆除临时支撑,并施加重力荷载。另外,因核心筒与桁架竖向刚度差异较大,两者之间的竖向变形差造成与核心筒相连的构件存在较大的内力。为此,在参考了超高层中伸臂桁架的处理方式后,设计采取“放”的手段,即,与核心筒相邻的构件采取后固接和后安装的做法,以减小竖向变形差的不利影响。为减小施工过程中产生的结构初始变形及内力,同时实现上述“放”的要求,根据受力需要,结合施工上的可行性和经济性,设计拟定了精确模拟和简化模拟两种施工拼装方案,并利用有限元程序SAP 2000进行计算和比较。精确模拟方案是指完全严格按照施工顺序,充分考虑构件拼装过程中的变形和应力,并累计到最终内力计算与变形控制中;简化模拟是指将大部分构件在计算模型中一次成型,将分析的重点聚焦在部分构件后安装及后固接对整体结构和相关构件的影响上。两种方案的差异主要在于,方案A考虑了在施工未完成前,新拼装的钢桁架有一段时间处于悬臂状态,而方案B未考虑这部分的影响。
以一榀典型钢桁架为例,具体分析对比两种方案的杆件内力和节点位移等计算结果。由于该工程施工方案的特殊性,设计时对计算模型及参数进行了特殊处理,以实现施工方案中的部分步骤的准确模拟。
结果表明,两种模拟方案最终状态的内力及变形无显著差异,变形形态与内力分布类同,多数构件最终状态下内力的变化幅度小于3%。根据分析结果,在保证计算精度的前提下,选择简化模拟方案,以提高分析效率。Abstract: The irregular steel structures or steel-concrete composite structures of super high-rise buildings are not only subjected to very complex forces during the structural use stage, but also have particularly complex deformation and stress during the construction process. This project is a steel frame-core tube structure of special architectural form, with many oblique truss structures, whose top is strongly connected with the giant truss or core tube on the opposite side through horizontal members to be a "Mega-structure". There are significant differences in the stress forms of the main components of the steel truss before and after the overall structure synthesis. Therefore, it is considered that the vertical components and corresponding floors should be constructed layer by layer in the conventional sequence, while the diagonal steel truss should be assembled in place first, and the temporary support should be removed after the overall structure is formed, with the gravity load being applied at the same time. Besides, as the vertical stiffness of the core tube and truss varies greatly, the vertical deformation difference between them causes a large internal force on the member connected with the core tube. Because of this, in order to reduce the effect of vertical deformation difference, "release" is adopted in the design, which means the components next to the core tube adopt a method of subsequent fixation and installation to reduce the adverse impact of vertical deformation difference. In order to reduce the initial deformation and internal force of the structure in the process of construction, as well as achieve the above "release" requirements, two construction assembly plans, precise simulation and simplified simulation, were designed and formulated with considering the force requirement and the feasibility and economy of construction, and finite element program SAP2000 was used for calculation and comparison. The precise simulation plan refers to strictly following the construction sequence, fully considering the deformation and stress during the component assembly process, and accumulating them into the final internal force calculation and deformation control. Simplified simulation refers to forming most components in a computation model at once, with a focus on the impact of post installation and post consolidation of some components on the overall structure and related components. The main difference between the two schemes is that Scheme A considers that the newly assembled steel truss will be in a cantilever state for a period of time before the construction is completed, while Scheme B does not consider the impact of this part.
Taking a typical steel truss as an example, this article specifically analyzes and compares the calculation results of the internal forces of the members and node displacements of the two schemes. Due to particularity of the construction plan for this project, the calculation model and parameters are specially processed to achieve accurate simulation of some steps in the construction plan.
The results show that there is no significant difference in the internal force and deformation of the final state between the two simulation schemes, and the deformation modality and internal force distribution are similar. The variance of internal force in the final state of most components is less than 3%. According to the analysis results, the simplified simulation is selected to improve the analysis efficiency on the premise of ensuring the accuracy of calculation. -
[1] 罗永峰,王春江,胨晓明.建筑钢结构施工力学原理[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2009. [2] 王化杰,范峰,支旭东,等.超高层结构施工竖向变形规律及预变形控制研究[J].工程力学,2013,30(2):298-312. [3] 郭彦林,刘学武.大型复杂钢结构施工力学问题及分析方法[J].工业建筑,2007,37(9):1-8. [4] 崔晓强,郭彦林,叶可明.大跨度钢结构施工过程的结构分析方法研究[J].工程力学,2006,23(5):83-87. [5] 杨璐,尚帆,王宪璋,等.人民日报社综合楼钢结构安装施工模拟与变形控制[J].北京工业大学学报,2014,40(9):1361-1370. [6] 周金良,李红现,梁建军,等.大型机场航站楼北连接体钢结构屋盖提升施工模拟分析[J].施工技术(中英文),2023,52(8):16-22. [7] 宋博翰.混凝土收缩徐变对超高层结构竖向位移的影响研究[J].中国水运(下半月),2023,23(5):136-137. [8] 苑会杰,马锦姝,王泽强,等.超高层结构竖向变形与伸臂桁架安装控制方法研究[J].建筑结构,2018,48(23):66-71. [9] 戴苗,李治,涂建,等.带伸臂桁架的超高层混合结构施工模拟分析[J].建筑结构,2021,51(增刊2):1759-1764. [10] 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.建筑结构荷载规范:GB 50009-2012 [S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2008. [11] 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.高层民用建筑钢结构技术规程:JGJ 99-2015 [S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2015.
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 355
- HTML全文浏览量: 48
- PDF下载量: 25
- 被引次数: 0