直接分析法在连续倒塌中的应用

丁智霞; 刘耀鹏; 杜左雷; 陈绍礼

doi:10.13206/j.gjgSE20010801

直接分析法在连续倒塌中的应用

doi: 10.13206/j.gjgSE20010801

香港理工大学土木与环境学系, 中国香港 999077

基金项目:

香港特别行政区政府创新及科技基金（ITS/059/16FP）。

详细信息

作者简介:
丁智霞,女,1993年出生,博士研究生。

通讯作者:
刘耀鹏,yaopeng.liu@connect.polyu.hk

计量
- 文章访问数: 263
- HTML全文浏览量: 33
- PDF下载量: 37
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2019-09-02

THE APPLICATION OF DIRECT ANALYSIS METHOD IN PROGRESSIVE COLLAPSE

Department of Civil and Environment Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong 999077, China

摘要

摘要: 结构连续性倒塌分析中的核心问题主要有材料非线性、初始缺陷、动力效应和悬链线效应。结构的抗连续性倒塌性能设计验算主要采用构件拆除法，将关键竖向承载力构件拆除后检验结构的响应。结构整体分析可采用线性静力分析、非线性静力分析和非线性动力分析三种方法。采用基于非线性静力分析的直接分析法，在分析中直接考虑对结构响应有影响的因素，如材料非线性、初始几何缺陷、残余应力、节点连接刚度等，以整个结构体系为对象进行抗连续性倒塌分析。基于NIDA软件，通过一个算例体现了GSA和UFC规范中的构件拆除法的设计过程，并与传统的线性静力分析结果作比较。
- 连续倒塌 /
- 直接分析法 /
- 非线性静力分析 /
- 初始缺陷
Abstract: The key issues in progressive collapse analysis include material nonlinearity, initial imperfections, dynamic effects and catenary effects. The structural stability analysis for progressive collapse resistance is mainly based on the alternative path method, and the response of the structure is checked after the removal of key vertical members. The global structural analysis can be performed by three methods, i. e. linear static analysis, nonlinear static analysis and nonlinear dynamic analysis. In this paper, the direct analysis method based on nonlinear static analysis is adopted to to consider the key factors affecting the structural behaviors, such as material nonlinearity, initial geometric imperfection, residual stress, joint stiffness, etc. Using software NIDA, this paper presents the analysis and design process of the alternative path method specified in the specification GSA and UFC via a worked example. The conventional linear analysis method is also used for comparison purpose.
- progressive collapse /
- direct analysis method /
- nonlinear static analysis /
- initial imperfection

HTML全文

参考文献(49)

U. S. General Service Administration. Alternate path analysis and design guidelines for progressive collapse resistance[S]. Washington, D. C.:GSA, 2013.

U. S. General Service Administration. Alternate path analysis and design guidelines for progressive collapse resistance[S]. Washington D. C.:GSA, 2013.

Department of Defense. Unified Facilities Criteria:Design of Structures to Resist Progressive Collapse[S]. Washington, D. C.:DoD, 2010.

Department of Defense. Unified facilities criteria:design of structures to resist progressive collapse[S]. Washington D. C.:DoD, 2010.

U. S. General Service Administration. Progressive collapse analysis and design guidelines for new federal office buildings and major modernization projects[S]. Washington D. C.:GSA, 2003.

U. S. General Service Administration. Progressive collapse analysis and design guidelines for new federal office buildings and major modernization projects[S]. Washington, D. C.:GSA, 2003.

American Concrete Institute. Building code requirements for structural concrete and commentary[S]. MI:Farmington Hills, 2008.

American Society of Civil Engineers. Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures[S]. New York:ASCE, 2005.

Office of the Deputy Prime Minister. The Building Regulations 2000:Approved Document A[R]. UK:Department of the Enviroment, Transport and the Regions, 2010.

British Standard Institute. Structural use of concrete, part 1:code of practice for design and construction:BS8110[S]. London:BSI, 1997.

European Committee for Standardization. Eurocode 1:actions on structures. part 1-7:general actions-accidental actions:EN 1991-1-7:2006[S]. Brussels:ECS, 2006.

European Committee for Standardization. Eurocode 1:Actions on structures. part 1-7:general actions-accidental actions:EN 1991-1-7:2006[S]. Brussels:ECS, 2006.

European Committee for Standardization. Eurocode 2:design of concrete structures. part 1:general rules and rules for buildings:EN 1992-1-1:2004[S]. Brussels:ECS, 2004.

中华人民共和国建设部. 工程结构可靠性设计统一标准:GB 50153-2008[S]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2008.

Ministry of Construction of the PRC. Unified standard for reliability design of engineering structures:GB 50153-2008[S]. Beijing:China Architecture & Building Press, 2008.

Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of People's Republic of China. Load code for the design of building structures:GB 50009-2012[S]. Beijing:China Architecture & Building Press, 2012.

中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 建筑结构荷载规范:GB 50009-2012[S]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2012.

中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 混凝土结构设计规范:GB 50010-2010[S]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2010.

Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of People's Republic of China. Code for Design of Concrete Structures:GB 50010-2010[S]. Beijing:China Architecture & Building Press, 2010.

Behrouz A, Farshad H R. Progressive collapse analysis of concentrically braced frames through EPCA algorithm[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2012, 70:127-136.

Farshad H R, Amirmohammad Y, Hamid R R. Effect of span length on progressive collapse behaviour of steel moment resisting frames[J]. Structures, 2015(3):81-89.

Farshad H R, Amirmohammad Y, Hamid R R. Effect of span length on progressive collapse behaviour of steel moment resisting frames[J]. Structures, 2015, 3:81-89.

Li H H, Cai X H, Zhang L, et al. Progressive collapse of steel moment-resisting frame subjected to loss of interior column:Experimental tests[J]. Engineering Structures, 2017, 150:203-220.

Li H H, Cai X H, Zhang L, et al. Progressive collapse of steel moment-resisting frame subjected to loss of interior column:experimental tests[J]. Engineering Structures, 2017, 150:203-220.

Song B I, Giriunas K A, Sezen H. Progressive collapse testing and analysis of a steel frame building[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2014, 94:76-83.

Ruth P, Marchand A K,Williamson B E. Static equivalency in progressive collapse alternate path analysis:reducing conservatism while retaining structural integrity[J]. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 2006, 20(4):349-364.

Ruth P, Marchand A K, Williamson B E. Static equivalency in progressive collapse alternate path analysis:reducing conservatism while retaining structural integrity[J]. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 2006, 20(4):349-364.

Fu F. Progressive collapse analysis of high-rise building with 3-d finite element modeling method[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2009, 65:1269-1278.

Fu F. Progressive collapse analysis of high-rise building with 3-D finite element modeling method[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2009, 65:1269-1278.

Fu Q N, Tan K H, Zhou X H, et al. Numerical simulations on three-dimensional composite structural systems against progressive collapse[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2017, 135:125-136.

Kapil K, Sherif E T. Pushdown resistance as a measure of robustness in progressive collapse analysis[J]. Engineering Structures, 2011, 33:2653-2661.

Wang W, Fang C, Qin X, et al. Performance of practical beam-to-SHS column connections against progressive collapse[J]. Engineering Structures, 2016, 106:332-347.

Wang W, Fang C, Qin X, et al. Performance of practical beamto-shs column connections against progressive collapse[J]. Engineering Structures, 2016, 106:332-347.

Lu X Z, Lin K Q, Li Y, et al. Experimental investigation of RC beam-slab substructures against progressive collapse subject to an edge-column-removal scenario[J]. Engineering Structures, 2017, 149:91-103.

Botez M, Bredean L, Ioani A M. Improving the accuracy of progressive collapse risk assessment:efficiency and contribution of supplementary progressive collapse resisting mechanisms[J]. Computers and Structures, 2016, 174:54-65.

NIDA Technology Co. Ltd. NIDA, User's manual. Nonlinear integrated design and analysis[EB/OL].[2019-05-05]. http://www.nidacse.com.