Analysis of Seismic and Wind-Induced Vibration Responses of a Super-Long Irregular Terminal Structure Under Multi-Point Excitations
-
摘要: 某机场T3航站楼由中央大厅和两侧长廊组成,结构总平面轮廓尺寸为411 m×416 m,由下部混凝土高层结构和顶部大跨钢结构屋盖构成。根据建筑平面布置,在两侧长廊设置结构缝,结构缝与大厅长边延长线重合,从而将整体建筑分为3个结构区。中间区域长度和宽度分别为411、200 m,属于超长和体型复杂的超限结构,应充分考虑地震行波效应和复杂多变的风载分布,对结构进行多点激励的地震和风振响应分析。结构的前3阶振型为两个方向水平振动和竖向振动,振型分布较为规则,主要对X向、Y向和Z向的地震作用较为敏感。在进行后续多点激励的行波效应分析时,行波方向主要为X向和Y向,每组波行进时同时向结构施加X向、Y向和Z向3条地震波,主方向、次方向和竖向地震波的峰值按照1∶0.85∶0.65的比例施加。结构柱行波效应影响系数大于1.0的总占比为37%,屋盖钢结构行波效应影响系数大于1.0的总占比为5%。由于钢结构屋盖的整体刚度较好,且屋盖重力荷载全部传递至结构柱,导致结构柱对地震动更为敏感。多点激励的基底总反力远小于一致激励,二者比值的均值为0.45。这是由于考虑行波效应时,各杆件振动步调不一致,基底剪力叠加时有部分相互抵消。结构行波效应影响系数取值如下:角柱取1.6,边柱取1.5,其余柱取1.4;屋盖钢结构支座附近构件取1.4,其余构件取1.2。经过风洞数值分析,得到了不同风向角(0°、45°、90°、135°及180°)风荷载作用下建筑物表面的风压系数。结果显示,屋盖由于体型复杂,同时存在风压力和风吸力的作用,风压分布极不规律。因此在对屋盖钢结构进行风振分析时,应充分考虑各个风向角作用下的时程风压作用。基于此,根据风洞数值分析结果提取屋盖各点的时程风压,并将其转化为时程节点荷载施加至结构分析模型,结果表明:屋盖钢结构在风压时程荷载作用下竖向位移最大,后续进行风振系数计算以竖向位移为控制工况;屋盖钢结构在不同风向角时程风压作用下的风振系数为1.38~1.55,风振系数的设计建议值为1.5。Abstract: The T3 terminal building of an airport consists of a central hall and two side corridors, with a total structural outline dimension of 411 m × 416 m. It is composed of a lower concrete high-rise structure and a top long-span steel structure roof. According to the architectural layout, structural joints are set up on both sides of the corridor, which coincide with the extension line of the long side of the hall, thus dividing the overall building into three structural zones. Given its dimensions (411 m in length and 200 m in width), the middle area is a highly complex and ultra-long irregular structure. The seismic wave effect and complex and variable wind load distribution should be fully considered, and the seismic and wind-induced response analysis of the structure should be carried out with multi-point excitation.The first three modes of vibration of the structure are horizontal and vertical vibrations in two directions, exhibiting a relatively regular mode shape distribution. These modes are mainly sensitive to seismic effects in the X, Y, and Z directions. When analyzing the traveling wave effects of subsequent multi-point excitations, the main directions of the traveling waves are X and Y, and three seismic waves in the X, Y, and Z directions are simultaneously applied to the structure during each wave propagation. The peak values of the main, secondary, and vertical seismic waves are applied in a ratio of 1∶0.85∶0.65. The total proportion of structural columns with a wave effect coefficient greater than 1.0 is 37%, while that of the roof steel structures is 5%. Due to the good overall stiffness of the steel roof, all gravity loads are transmitted to the structural columns. As a result, the structural columns are more sensitive to seismic motion. The total base reaction force under multi-point excitation is significantly smaller than that under uniform excitation, with a mean ratio of 0.45 between the two. This occurs because, when the traveling wave effect is considered, the vibration phases of individual structural members are inconsistent, leading to partial mutual cancellation during the superposition of base shear forces. The influence coefficients for the structural traveling wave effect are as follows: 1.6 for corner columns, 1.5 for edge columns, and 1.4 for all other columns. The components near the support of the roof steel structure are taken as 1.4, and the rest of the components are taken as 1.2.A numerical wind tunnel analysis was conducted to obtain the wind pressure coefficients on the building surface at various wind direction angles of 0°, 45°, 90°, 135°, and 180°. The results showed a highly irregular wind pressure distribution, resulting from the roof's complex shape and the combination of wind pressure and suction. Therefore, when conducting wind-induced vibration analysis on the roof steel structure, the time-history wind pressure effects at various wind direction angles should be fully considered. Based on the results of wind tunnel numerical analysis, the time-history wind pressure at each point on the roof was extracted and converted into time-history nodal loads applied to the structural analysis model. The analysis showed that the steel roof structure exhibited the maximum vertical displacement under the action of wind pressure time-history loads.Subsequent calculations for the wind vibration coefficient were performed using vertical displacement as the control parameter. The calculated coefficients for the roof steel structure under time-history wind pressure at various wind angles ranged from 1.38 to 1.55. Based on these results, a value of 1.5 is proposed for design purposes.
-
[1] 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 钢结构设计标准:GB 50017—2017[S]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2018. [2] 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 建筑抗震设计标准:GB/T 50011—2010[S]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2024. [3] 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 建筑结构荷载规范:GB 50009—2012[S]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2012. [4] 王洪臣,卢骥,尹龙星,等. 西安城市展示中心长悬挑,大跨度钢结构设计[J]. 建筑结构,2024,54(11):84- 92. [5] 汪之松,刘兴龙,武彦君,等. 考虑SSI效应的输电塔-线体系风振响应简化分析[J]. 西南交通大学学报,2019,54(2):319- 327. [6] 王钢,赵才其,颜鹏. 异型空间桁架+单层网壳复合结构分析与设计[J]. 建筑结构,2022,52(增刊1):597- 602. [7] 谢俊乔,刘宜丰,夏循,等. 成都天府国际机场指廊钢结构设计[J]. 建筑结构,2020,50(19):43- 50. [8] 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 建筑工程风洞试验方法标准:JGJ/T 338—2014[S]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2015. -
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 69
- HTML全文浏览量: 15
- PDF下载量: 7
- 被引次数: 0



登录
注册
下载: