Q690高强钢在单调荷载下的延性断裂判据研究

李梦飞; 何浩祥; 钟国辉

doi:10.13206/j.gjgS24050108

Q690高强钢在单调荷载下的延性断裂判据研究

doi: 10.13206/j.gjgS24050108

李梦飞^1,2,
何浩祥^1,2,
钟国辉^1,2, ,

1. 香港理工大学国家钢结构工程技术研究中心香港分中心, 香港 999077;
2. 香港理工大学土木与环境工程学院, 香港 999077

详细信息

作者简介:
李梦飞,博士研究生。

通讯作者:
钟国辉,博士,教授,主要从事钢结构和钢-混凝土组合结构研究,kwok-fai.chung@polyu.edu.hk。

计量
- 文章访问数: 104
- HTML全文浏览量: 29
- PDF下载量: 8
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2024-05-01
- 网络出版日期: 2024-06-22
- 刊出日期: 2024-05-22

Ductile Fracture Behaviour of Q690 High Strength Steel Under Monotonic Tensile Actions

Mengfei Li^1,2,
Ho-Cheng Ho^1,2,
Kwok-Fai Chung^{1,2
, ,}

1. Chinese National Engineering Research Centre for Steel Construction (Hong Kong Branch), The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong 999077, China;
2. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong 999077, China

摘要

摘要: Q690高强钢由于其优越的强度和自重比在工程结构中受到越来越多的关注。螺栓连接是钢结构节点组成的重要形式,了解Q690钢的延性断裂行为对于研究Q690构件之间螺栓连接的破坏形式至关重要。为了解决这一问题,使用传统的延性断裂分析方法对Q690钢进行了全面的初步研究,包括校准空穴扩张模型(VGM)和应力修正临界应变(SMCS)模型。对标准拉伸试件和不同缺口半径的圆棒缺口试件进行单调拉伸试验,通过对试验数据的分析得到了Q690钢的真实应力-应变关系和在不同应力三轴度下的工程应力-应变曲线。随后对断口进行电镜扫描试验,区分了试验试件的破坏模式,并对断口表面韧窝形成的凸起和凹陷进行分析,计算出Q690钢的特征长度,用于确定后续有限元模型的网格尺寸。建立有限元模型对试验加载过程进行模拟,使用校准后的本构模型计算出的工程应力-应变曲线与试验结果吻合较好。通过提取不同试件延性断裂发生时断裂起始点的应力应变状态确定了空穴扩张模型(VGM)和应力修正临界应变(SMCS)模型的断裂参数,并用其对试验试件的断裂位移进行预测。结果表明,传统的VGM和SMCS模型不能准确预测Q690试件的断裂,预测误差达到了31%和39%。在此基础上,提出了一种改进的孔洞生长模型,充分考虑了应力三轴度对断裂时临界塑性应变的影响。数值分析表明,改进后的断裂模型对试验试件的断裂位移的预测值与实测值吻合较好,平均误差控制在5%以内。研究强调了了解Q690高强钢延性断裂行为的重要性,并提出了一种改进的延性断裂模型,以提高预测其延性断裂的准确性。
- 高强度钢材 /
- 延性断裂 /
- 电镜扫描 /
- 断裂预测
Abstract: The increasing utilization of high-strength Q690 steel in engineering structures is attributed to its superior strength-to-weight ratio. Understanding the ductile tensile fracture behavior of Q690 steel is crucial for investigating bolted connections between Q690 members. To address this, a comprehensive pilot study was conducted using conventional ductile fracture analysis methods, including the Void Growth Model (VGM) and the Stress Modified Critical Strain (SMCS) model. Through monotonic tensile tests on standard and notched coupons of varying radii, the true stress-strain relationship as well as the plastic fracture strains were directly measured for different triaxiality ratios of Q690 steel. Then the fracture surface of tested coupons was observed under SEM, and the failure mode was distinguished. After analyzing the valleys and plateaus formed by the dimples, and the characteristic length of Q690 steel was calculated, which was used as the mesh size of the subsequent numerical model. Advanced finite element models were then used to calibrate and validate the fracture parameters of VGM and SMCS model by examining the stress state at the fracture initiation point and predicting load-extension characteristics and elongations at fracture. The numerical results revealed that both the VGM and SMCS models failed to provide satisfactory predictions for elongations at fracture in the test coupons, and the prediction error of them reached 31% and 39% respectively. As a result, a modified void growth model was proposed, which considered the influence of stress triaxiality on the fracture strain. Notably, the numerical analysis showed a good agreement between predicted and measured values of elongations at fracture in the tested coupons, and the average prediction error was controlled with 5%. This study highlights the importance of understanding the ductile fracture behavior of Q690 steel and introduces a promising new fracture parameter for improved fracture analysis accuracy.
- high strength steel /
- ductile fracture /
- SEM /
- fracture prediction

HTML全文

参考文献(14)

[1]	Rice J R,Tracey D M. On the ductile enlargement of voids in triaxial stress fields[J]. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 1969, 17(3):201-217.
[2]	d'Escatha Y, Devaux J C. Numerical study of initiation, stable crack growth, and maximum load, with a ductile fracture criterion based on the growth of holes[M]//Landes J D, Begley J A, Clarke G A. Elastic-plastic fracture. West Conshohocken, PA:ASTM International:1979:229-248.
[3]	Kanvinde A M. Micromechanical simulation of earthquake-induced fracture in steel structures[D]. Stanford:Stanford University, 2004.
[4]	Hancock J W, Mackenzie A C, On the mechanisms of ductile failure in high-strength steels subjected to multi-axial stress-states[J]. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 1976, 24 (2/3):147-160.
[5]	Kanvinde A M, Deierlein G G. The void growth model and the stress modified critical strain model to predict ductile fracture in structural steels[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2006, 132 (12):1907-1918.
[6]	Kiran R, Khandelwal K. A triaxiality and Lode parameter dependent ductile fracture criterion[J]. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2014, 128:121-138.
[7]	Jia L, Kuwamura H. Ductile fracture simulation of structural steels under monotonic tension[J/OL]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2014, 140(5)[2024-04-23]. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000944.
[8]	Liao F, Wang M, Tu L, et al. Micromechanical fracture model parameter influencing factor study of structural steels and welding materials[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2019, 215:898-917.
[9]	Qu X, Qin C, Sun G, et al. Research on fracture of steel structure welded joint based on micro-mechanism[J]. Structures, 2022, 43:434-448.
[10]	Wang Y, Li G, Wang Y, et al. Ductile fracture of high strength steel under multi-axial loading[J/OL]. Engineering Structures, 2020, 210[2024-04-23]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110401.
[11]	The International Organization for Standardization. Metallic materials- tensile testing:part 1:method of test at room temperature:ISO 6892-1:2019[S]. Geneva:ISO, 2019.
[12]	Ho H C, Xiao M, Hu Y F, et al. Determination of a full range constitutive model for high strength S690 steels[J/OL]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research,2020, 174[2024-04-23]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2020.106275.
[13]	Hancock J W, Brown D K. On the role of strain and stress state in ductile failure[J]. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 1983, 31(1):1-24.
[14]	Johnson G R, Cook W H. Fracture characteristics of three metals subjected to various strains, strain rates, temperatures and pressures[J]. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 1985, 21(1):31-48.