Research on Fatigue Crack Propagation Characteristics of Welding Seam Inclusions in Steel Bridge Decks
-
摘要: 正交异性钢桥面板成为大跨度桥面板的主要结构形式之后,由于钢桥面板焊缝较多,焊缝内部或表面很容易产生初始裂纹及夹杂、气孔等焊接缺陷,导致在役钢桥面板焊缝处疲劳开裂现象较为普遍。现有研究多将焊接缺陷简化为平面半椭圆形状,而忽略了焊接缺陷的物理属性,导致焊接缺陷对疲劳裂纹的影响机理不明确。为了研究焊接缺陷对钢桥面板疲劳裂纹扩展行为的影响,结合线弹性断裂力学和FRANC3D-ABAQUS交互模拟技术,开展了钢桥面板焊接夹杂处疲劳裂纹扩展数值模拟。基于ABAQUS建立了含裂纹和夹杂物的半U肋精细化有限元模型,并在焊趾处插入夹杂物,随后将含夹杂物的有限元模型导入到FRANC3D中,并在焊趾夹杂物附近插入一个初始疲劳裂纹,通过改变夹杂物的弹性模量来模拟软夹杂与硬夹杂效应。分析了钢桥面板U肋-顶板焊缝处疲劳裂纹与夹杂物之间的相互作用,揭示了焊接夹杂物对裂纹应力强度因子(SIF)、裂纹形态和扩展速率等关键参数的影响,模拟了裂纹穿过夹杂物过程中的动态扩展轨迹。分析结果表明:焊接夹杂物改变了疲劳裂纹的应力场,硬夹杂的应力集中点位于夹杂内部,而软夹杂的应力集中点位于裂纹近端点前侧,焊缝夹杂影响下焊趾处的疲劳裂纹为I-III型裂纹;夹杂物的弹性模量对疲劳裂纹扩展特性影响较大,软夹杂对裂尖SIF有短暂的抑制作用,但在裂纹全寿命周期中促进了裂纹的扩展速率,而硬夹杂的作用效果则完全相反,相对于无夹杂缺陷的焊缝而言,软夹杂使焊缝疲劳寿命减小7.8%,而硬夹杂使焊缝疲劳寿命增加10.1%;在裂纹扩展过程中的形态普遍趋于扁平化,但夹杂的存在显著影响其对称性,主要表现在软夹杂吸引裂纹近端点,导致局部集中扩展,而硬夹杂则产生排斥效应,使裂纹扩展方向发生偏离;硬夹杂对裂纹形状的影响更为显著,与远离夹杂的区域相比,接近硬夹杂的裂纹尖端部分平坦度增加了22%。在钢桥面板焊接过程中应严格控制夹杂物的分布和类型,在进行疲劳寿命预测时应考虑夹杂物对焊缝的影响。Abstract: Orthotropic steel bridge decks have become the predominant structural form for long-span bridges. However, the prevalence of welds in steel bridge decks leads to frequent instances of fatigue cracking at the weld joints due to the high occurrence of welding defects such as initial cracks, inclusions, and porosity on the inner or outer surfaces of the welds. Current research often simplifies welding defects as planar semi-elliptical shapes, overlooking their physical properties, which results in unclear understanding of how these defects affect the mechanism of fatigue crack propagation. To investigate the influence of welding defects on fatigue crack propagation behaviors in steel bridge decks, a numerical simulation was conducted. This study integrated linear elastic fracture mechanics and the FRANC3D-ABAQUS interactive simulation technique. A refined finite element model of a semi-U rib with cracks and inclusions was established using ABAQUS. Inclusions were inserted at the weld toe, and subsequently, this finite element model incorporating inclusions was imported into FRANC3D. An initial fatigue crack was introduced near the inclusion, and variations in the elastic modulus of the inclusion were employed to simulate the effects of soft and hard inclusions. The interaction between fatigue cracks and inclusions at the weld joints of U ribs and deck plates was analyzed. This analysis revealed the impact of welding inclusions on crucial parameters such as stress intensity factors (SIF), crack morphology, and propagation rate. The simulation accurately depicted the dynamic trajectory of crack propagation through inclusions. The results indicated that welding inclusions alter the stress field of fatigue cracks, with stress concentration points located internally within hard inclusions and near the crack tip in the presence of soft inclusions, resulting in I-III type cracks at the weld toe influenced by inclusion defects. The elastic modulus of inclusions was found to significantly influence the characteristics of fatigue crack propagation. Soft inclusions briefly inhibited the stress intensity factor at the crack tip but ultimately accelerated crack propagation rates throughout the crack’s lifecycle, resulting in a 7.8% reduction in fatigue life compared to welds without inclusions. Conversely, hard inclusions extended weld fatigue life by 10.1%. Crack morphology tended to flatten during propagation, influenced by the presence of inclusions and their impact on symmetry. Soft inclusions attracted crack propagation near the inclusion, causing localized concentrated expansion, while hard inclusions induced a deviation in crack propagation direction due to repulsion effects. The effect of hard inclusions on crack shape was particularly pronounced, with a 22% increase in flatness observed at the crack tip near the hard inclusion. Strict control over the distribution and type of inclusions during the welding process of steel bridge decks was recommended. Inclusion effects should be carefully considered when predicting fatigue life in welds.
-
Key words:
- steel bridge deck /
- fatigue crack /
- welding defect /
- inclusion /
- stress intensity factor
-
[1] 邓扬,刘涛磊,曹宝雅,等.钢桥面顶板-U肋焊缝表贴增强板材疲劳加固方法研究[J].中国公路学报, 2022, 35(2):201-211. [2] 王春生,翟慕赛,唐友明,等.钢桥面板疲劳裂纹耦合扩展机理的数值断裂力学模拟[J].中国公路学报, 2017, 30(3):82-95. [3] 张清华,劳武略,崔闯,等.钢结构桥梁疲劳2020年度研究进展[J].土木与环境工程学报(中英文), 2021, 43(12):79-90. [4] 张允士,李法雄,熊锋,等.正交异性钢桥面板疲劳裂纹成因分析及控制[J].公路交通科技, 2013, 30(8):75-80. [5] Yao Y, Ji B, Fu Z, et al. Optimization of stop-hole parameters for cracks at diaphragm-to-rib weld in steel bridges[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2019, 162, 105747. [6] 张清华,金正凯,刘益铭,等.钢桥面板纵肋与顶板焊接细节疲劳裂纹扩展三维模拟方法[J].中国公路学报, 2018, 31(1):57-66. [7] Wang D, Xiang C, Ma Y, et al. Experimental study on the root-deck fatigue crack on orthotropic steel decks[J]. Materials&Design, 2021, 203, 109601. [8] 卜一之,金正凯,黄云,等.钢桥面板纵肋顶板焊缝疲劳裂纹扩展的关键影响因素[J].中国公路学报, 2019, 32(9):61-70. [9] Liu Y, Chen F, Wang D, et al. Fatigue crack growth behavior of rib-to-deck double-sided welded joints of orthotropic steel decks[J]. Advances in Structural Engineering, 2021, 24(3):556-569. [10] Wang B, De Backer H, Chen A. An XFEM based uncertainty study on crack growth in welded joints with defects[J]. Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics, 2016, 86:125-142. [11] 鲁乃唯,崔健,王鸿浩,等.钢桥面板焊缝多疲劳裂纹交互融合特性研究[J/OL].工程力学, 2023[2023-08-10].http://doi.org/10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2023.01.0066. [12] 鲁乃唯,王鸿浩,陈方怀,等.钢桥面顶板焊缝处共线双裂纹耦合扩展特性分析[J].湖南大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 49(11):180-187. [13] 鲁乃唯,戴歆文,王鸿浩,等.钢桥面板焊缝多疲劳裂纹耦合扩展试验研究[J].中国公路学报, 2024, 37(5):267-277. [14] Liu J, Liu M, Ma S, et al. Study on in-plane double-crack propagation in the rib-to-deck welded toe of steel-bridge[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2023, 203, 107838. [15] 王本劲, De Backer H,陈艾荣.正交异性钢桥面板裂纹扩展的均质化方法[J].中国公路学报,2017, 30(3):113-120. [16] 黄云,张清华,郭亚文,等.钢桥面板纵肋与横隔板焊接细节表面缺陷及疲劳效应研究[J].工程力学, 2019, 36(3):203-213. [17] International Institute of Welding (IIW). Recommendations for fatigue design of welded joints and components:IIW-1823-07[R]. Paris:IIW, 2008. [18] 中国国家标准化管理委员会.在用含缺陷压力容器安全评定:GB/T 19624-2019[S].北京:中国标准出版社, 2019. [19] Wang Y, Zhang L, Ren Y, et al. Effect of compression temperature on deformation of CaO-CaS-Al2O3-MgO inclusions in pipeline steel[J]. Journal of Materials Research and Technology, 2021, 11:1220-1231. [20] Jiang X, Sun K, Qiang X, et al. XFEM-based fatigue crack propagation analysis on key welded connections of orthotropic steel bridge deck[J]. International Journal of Steel Structures, 2023, 23(2):404-416. [21] British Standards Institution (BSI). Guide on methods for assessing the acceptability of flaws in metallic structures:BS 7910[S]. London:BSI,2013. [22] Jian H, Wang Y, Yang X, et al. Microstructure and fatigue crack growth behavior in welding joint of Al-Mg alloy[J]. Eng. Fail. Anal., 2021, 120, 105034. -

计量
- 文章访问数: 25
- HTML全文浏览量: 9
- PDF下载量: 0
- 被引次数: 0