Finite Element Analysis on Axial Compressive Performance of RHHCFST Short Columns with Longitudinal Stiffeners
-
摘要: 空心钢管混凝土是一种具有优良性能的组合构件,广泛应用于建筑、桥梁、隧道等工程结构中,矩形钢管混凝土柱与圆形相比,有施工方便、节点构造简单等优点,但研究表明相比于圆形空心钢管混凝土,矩形构件的组合强度较低,延性较差;配筋、加劲等措施,能够有效提升组合柱的强度与延性。PHC管桩是采用先张预应力离心成型工艺,经过蒸汽养护制成的一种空心圆形钢筋混凝土预制构件,内置纵筋能够提升管桩抗弯性能,螺旋箍筋能够改善结构的延性,其单桩承载力高,造价低,应用范围十分广泛。故提出将PHC管桩放入带肋钢管中,夹层混凝土后浇,制成一种新型组合构件——带肋配筋空心方钢管混凝土。已有研究表明,钢管壁厚及宽厚比对此类组合构件的轴压承载力影响最为显著。
为研究带肋配筋空心方钢管高强混凝土短柱的轴压性能,以加劲肋数量、钢管壁厚为变化参数对18个带肋配筋钢管混凝土构件进行了有限元模拟,与已有试验结果进行对比,荷载-位移曲线吻合良好。有限元分析结果表明,构件的受力过程可分为弹性阶段、弹塑性阶段、塑性强化阶段、下降阶段,加劲肋对构件轴压力学性能的影响在四个阶段均有所表现。加劲肋能够有效抑制钢管局部屈曲,使得钢管分担更多轴向荷载,充分发挥钢材的轴压性能。研究表明,相比于无肋构件,单肋构件的极限承载力有明显的提升,继续增加加劲肋数量,构件的极限承载力会继续提升,但提升幅度较小。无肋构件中的钢管分担内力会较早达到峰值,分担内力-位移曲线进入下降阶段,而带肋构件的钢管分担内力达到峰值较晚,分担内力-位移曲线无明显的下降段,表明带肋构件的钢管能够在加载后期承担更多的轴向荷载,从而提升构件的延性。相比于增大钢管壁厚,采用合理的加劲措施能够更有效地提升组合构件的承载力,且更加节约钢材。最后给出了带肋配筋空心方钢管混凝土短柱轴压承载力算式,计算结果误差均在5%以内且偏于保守。Abstract: Hollow concrete filled steel tube is a composite material with excellent performance, widely used in engineering structures such as buildings, bridges, and tunnels. Compared with circular concrete filled steel tube columns, rectangular concrete filled steel tube columns have advantages such as convenient construction and simple node structure. However, research has shown that compared with circular hollow concrete filled steel tube, rectangular members have lower composite strength and poorer ductility. Reinforcement and reinforcement measures can effectively enhance the strength and ductility of composite columns. PHC tubular pile is a hollow circular reinforced concrete prefabricated member made by pre tensioning and centrifugal molding technology and steam curing. The built-in longitudinal bars can improve the bending performance of the tubular pile, and the spiral hoop bars can improve the ductility of the structure. Its single pile bearing capacity is high, the cost is low, and its application range is very wide. This article proposes a new type of composite member-ribbed reinforced hollow square concrete filled steel tube-by placing PHC pile into ribbed steel tube and pouring sandwich concrete afterwards. Previous studies have shown that the wall thickness and width to thickness ratio of the steel tube have the most significant impact on the axial compressive bearing capacity of such composite members.
To study the axial compression performance of reinforced hollow square steel tube high-strength concrete short columns with ribs, this paper conducted finite element simulations on 18 reinforced concrete filled steel tube members with ribs and steel tube wall thickness as variable parameters including the number of stiffeners and the thickness of steel tube. The results were compared with existing experimental results, and the load displacement curves were well fitted. The finite element analysis results indicate that the stress process of the member can be divided into elastic stage, elastic-plastic stage, plastic strengthening stage, and descending stage. The influence of stiffeners on the axial compressive mechanical properties of the member is manifested in all four stages. Stiffening ribs can effectively suppress local buckling of steel tubes, allowing them to share more axial loads and fully utilize the axial compression performance of the steel. Research has shown that compared to non stiffener members, the ultimate bearing capacity of single-stiffener members has significantly improved. Continuing to increase the number of stiffeners will further enhance the ultimate bearing capacity of the member, but the increase is relatively small. The steel tubes in members with stiffeners will share the internal force and reach the peak earlier, and the share internal force displacement curve will enter the descending stage, while the steel tubes in members without stiffeners will share the internal force and reach the peak later, and the share internal force displacement curve will not have a significant descending segment, indicating that the steel tubes in members with stiffeners can bear more axial loads in the later stage of loading, thereby improving the ductility of the members. Compared to increasing the wall thickness of steel tubes, adopting reasonable reinforcement measures can more effectively enhance the bearing capacity of composite members and save more steel. At the end of this article, a formula for the axial compressive bearing capacity of reinforced hollow square concrete filled steel tube short columns with ribs is provided, and the calculation results have errors within 5% and tend to be conservative. -
[1] 蔡绍怀,顾维平.钢管混凝土空心短柱的基本性能和强度计算[J].建筑科学, 1986, 2(4):23-31. [2] 蔡绍怀,顾维平.钢管混凝土空心长柱的性能和承载能力计算[J].建筑科学, 1987, 3(4):11-21. [3] Zhao Y G, Yan X F, Lin S Q. Compressive strength of axially loaded circular hollow centrifugal concrete-filled steel tubular short columns[J]. Engineering Structures, 2019,201(15):1-15. [4] 陈宗平,经承贵,徐金俊,等.方钢管螺旋筋复合约束混凝土柱轴压机理及承载力计算[J].土木工程学报, 2017, 50(5):47-56. [5] 经承贵,陈宗平,周山崴,等.方钢管螺旋筋复合约束混凝土轴压短柱破坏机理试验研究[J].建筑结构学报, 2018, 39(3):93-102. [6] Hasan H G, Ekmekyapar T, Shehab B A. Mechanical performances of stiffened and reinforced concrete-filled steel tubes under axial compression[J]. Marine Structures, 2019, 65:417-432. [7] 谭秋虹,陈宗平,经承贵.方钢管螺旋筋复合约束混凝土柱偏压性能试验及承载力计算[J].建筑结构学报, 2020, 41(4):102-109. [8] 黄经纬,许力,胡红松,等.内配螺旋箍筋方钢管超高强混凝土柱的偏压受力性能[J].华侨大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 42(2):158-164. [9] Clotilda P, Hanizah A H, Azmi I,et al. Experimental behaviour of concrete filled thin walled steel tubes with tab stiffeners[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2010,66(7):915-922. [10] 黄宏,张安哥,李毅,等.带肋方钢管混凝土轴压短柱试验研究及有限元分析[J].建筑结构学报, 2011, 32(2):75-82. [11] Yoshiaki G, Kosuke M, Ghosh P K. Nonlinear finite element analysis for cyclic behavior of thin-walled stiffened rectangular steel columns with in-filled concrete[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2012, 138(5):571-584. [12] 李斌,郭世壮,高春彦.带肋薄壁方钢管混凝土轴压短柱受力性能试验研究[J].建筑结构学报, 2017, 38(1):218-225. [13] 杨有福,郭宏鑫.加劲薄壁高强方钢管混凝土短柱的轴压性能[J].华南理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 49(8):43-52. [14] 李旭.配筋空心方钢管高强混凝土轴压短柱力学性能研究[D].沈阳:沈阳建筑大学,2021. [15] 刘威.钢管混凝土局部受压时的工作机理研究[D].福州:福州大学, 2005. [16] 陈鹏.圆钢管混凝土轴压短柱尺寸效应研究[D].哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学, 2018. [17] American Concrete Institute (ACI). Building code requirements for structural concrete and commentary:ACI 318-14[S]. Farmington Hills, Michigan, USA:ACI, 2014.
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 66
- HTML全文浏览量: 8
- PDF下载量: 2
- 被引次数: 0